<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.0//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query/static/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>Science and Education Publishing</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>American Journal of Educational Research</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2327-6150</Issn>
<Volume>4</Volume>
<Issue>14</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Students' Use of Intuitive Reasoning to Decide on the Validity of Mathematical Statements</ArticleTitle>
<FirstPage>1025</FirstPage>
<LastPage>1029</LastPage>
<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
<FirstName>Chih-Hsien</FirstName>
<LastName>Huang</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ming Chi University of Technology</Affiliation>
</Author>

</AuthorList>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">EDUCATION20164147</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.12691/education-4-14-7</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<History>
<PubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
</PubDate>
<PubDate PubStatus="revised">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
</PubDate>
<PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</PubDate>
</History>
<Abstract>This study explored students' approaches to mathematical statements with unknown truth values. Task-based interviews utilizing the think-aloud method revealed students' reasoning processes in depth. The students in this study used three distinct types of intuitive reasoning to decide the truth value of mathematical statements. The results of this study indicate that in each intuitive response there seems to be an underlying logical schema, or a mental model intuitively accepted by the students, which interacts with the specific restrictions of the presented mathematical statement.</Abstract>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
