<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.0//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query/static/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>Science and Education Publishing</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>American Journal of Educational Research</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2327-6150</Issn>
<Volume>4</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Improving PupilsĄŻ Conceptual Understanding by a Connected In-school and Out-of-school Science Program: A Multiple Case Study</ArticleTitle>
<FirstPage>115</FirstPage>
<LastPage>125</LastPage>
<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
<FirstName>C. H.</FirstName>
<LastName>Geveke</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Teacher Education and Center of Expertise Healthy Ageing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Zernikeplein 9, 9747 AS Groningen, The Netherlands</Affiliation>
</Author>
<Author>
<FirstName>H. W.</FirstName>
<LastName>Steenbeek</LastName>
</Author>
<Author>
<FirstName>J. M.</FirstName>
<LastName>Doornenbal</LastName>
</Author>
<Author>
<FirstName>P. C. L. van</FirstName>
<LastName>Geert</LastName>
</Author>

</AuthorList>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">EDUCATION20164118</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.12691/education-4-1-18</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<History>
<PubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
</PubDate>
<PubDate PubStatus="revised">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</PubDate>
<PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
</PubDate>
</History>
<Abstract>The number of out-of-school science programs, which refers to science education at outside school environments, is gradually increasing. Although out-of-school programs are generally considered to be important for the development of pupilsĄŻ science knowledge and skills, more evidence concerning the learning effect of these programs is needed. In the present study, we explored whether different degrees of implementation of a connected in-school and out-of-school science program affect pupilsĄŻ cognitive science skills in relation to teachersĄŻ/instructorsĄŻ support. We used a multiple case study design with four cases comprising three different degrees of program implementation: optimal, intermediary and marginal. The cases comprised pupils of upper grade elementary school classes, their teachers, and the instructors of the out-of-school activity. The effect of the program was measured by coding pupilsĄŻ performance with a scale based on skill theory, and by coding teacherĄŻs/instructorĄŻs support with the Openness Scale. The data was gathered from microgenetic measurements over time, corresponding with an in-depth analysis of the process of change in naturalistic conditions. We found the highest learning effect in the optimal program implementation, which indicates that it is favorable to implement the complete program, and train teachers/instructors to use open teaching focused on conceptual understanding.</Abstract>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
