<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>American Journal of Educational Research</journalTitle>
<eissn>2327-6150</eissn>
<publicationDate>2015-01-28</publicationDate>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<startPage>116</startPage>
<endPage>120</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/education-3-2-2</doi>
<publisherRecordId>EDUCATION2015322</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">Exploration of Students' Misconceptions in Mechanics using the FCI</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Géraldine Poutot</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bernard Blandin</name>
<email>bblandin@cesi.fr</email>
<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
</author>

</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">LIEA, CESI, Assat, France</affiliationName>
<affiliationName affiliationId="2">LIEA, CESI, Montpellier, France</affiliationName>
</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">During 3 years, we have used the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) to assess the progress of our First-Year students in Engineering in mastering the concepts of Newtonian Physics and to compare the efficiency of two teaching methods, courses and drills versus Problem-Based Learning. If both methods lead to quite similar deceptive results, the detailed analysis of the response to each question of the test allowed us to identify our students' most common misconceptions. This paper presents this research and discusses our findings.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/3/2/2/education-3-2-2.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>newtonian physics</keyword>
<keyword>misconceptions in mechanics</keyword>
<keyword>testing</keyword>
<keyword>force concept inventory</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
