Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Label_Title

Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

The Use of Brain Based Learning Elements in a Teaching Approach for Scientific Understanding of Biology Concepts

Nektarios Lagoudakis, Filippos Vlachos, Vasilia Christidou, Denis Vavougios, Marianthi Batsila

Abstract: The attempt of a functional conflation of the knowledge originated from neuroscientific research with the educational practices has been supported by many researchers in the fields of education and neuroscience. Brain-Based Learning (BBL) encompasses teaching techniques that leverage neuroscience in designing educational methodologies. Regarded as a holistic approach to education, its defining traits are rooted in pivotal insights and extensive research findings. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a teaching approach based on BBL elements in improving secondary students’ conceptual apprehension of common biology concepts. A quasi-experimental design with two comparable groups (treatment group and comparison group) of seventh grade students, using pretest and posttest, was implemented so as to examine the extent to which the BBL teaching technique was effective enough for the learners’ understanding of the biology concepts and their conceptual change. The results revealed that the students of the treatment group displayed a statistically significant better conceptual understanding about conceptions concerning Biology than the students of the comparison group. These results are discussed in the context of supporting the use of BBL elements in constructing more efficient teaching practices for Biology courses.

Keywords: brain based learning, instructional practice, conceptual understanding, biology teaching, biology concepts

Received June 07, 2024; Revised July 08, 2024; Accepted July 15, 2024

Citation: Nektarios Lagoudakis, Filippos Vlachos, Vasilia Christidou, Denis Vavougios, Marianthi Batsila, The Use of Brain Based Learning Elements in a Teaching Approach for Scientific Understanding of Biology Concepts. American Journal of Educational Research, 12 (7). 247-253. January 2024. doi:10.12691/education-12-7-5

1. Introduction

Over the last decades there has been a special interest in the study of human brain from neuroscientists and psychologists. The various findings, stemming from continuous research efforts, succeeded by means of new high-tech neuro-imaging technologies, have crucially contributed to the study of the brain changes which take place both at brain structure and function level during the learning process [1].

As a consequence, many researchers in the fields of education and neuroscience have claimed the attempt of a functional conflation of the knowledge originated from neuroscientific research with the educational practices [2,3,4]. The aforementioned idea has led to the creation of a new interdisciplinary field which aims to propose research based ways of the effective application of the contemporary knowledge about the physiology and function of the human brain to the education process.

However, some researchers have expressed skepticism about the successful cooperation between neuroscience and education, mainly because they consider that there is a tremendous difficulty for the two different disciplinary fields to be bridged in a practical level [5,6]. Difficulties that emerge from the cooperation between education and neuroscience have been attributed to factors such as: (i) the use of different scientific language and terminology that is typical for the two scientific fields, (ii) the inadequate communication between the neuroscientific researchers and the educational community, (iii) the philosophical and epistemological differences that by definition exist between scientific research and practical implementation [7,8].

Despite the various concerns that have been expressed, there is a vivid interest in seeking appropriate ways that could enable the effective and fruitful implementation of neuroscientific findings into the classroom. Some researchers and specialists have proceeded to the formulation of a core set of neuroscience concepts which could enrich and support teachers’ understanding about the learning process, enabling them to tap into pedagogical choices [3,4,9]. This could be feasible through: a) continuous research and trial in practical level under school conditions and b) the concurrent provision of support to the teachers with more practical proposals. This could provide them with sufficient background and clarification about neuroscientific findings, as well as with specific practices that could be implemented in the educational act [10,11].

The ΒBL consists an integrated educational and instructional context appropriate for the designation of effective student-centered didactical approaches which attempts the synthesis of a holistic simplified scientific knowledge about the human brain with the teaching practices [12,13]. It was originally founded on twelve principles which have been formed from various findings derived from the intensive biology and neuroscientific research about the structure and function of the brain [14,15]. This will lead to the enhancement of students' inherent cognitive abilities by optimizing the natural mechanisms of brain function. Moreover, BBL fosters a rich learning atmosphere conducive to natural learning processes. Simultaneously, it facilitates each student's engagement in the learning process according to their individual style [12,14,16]. The aforementioned principles are incorporated into three pedagogical and didactical axes that are used as a guidance for designing learning environments. The first axis refers to the relaxed alertness and is related to the need for balance in the learning environment in which students have a calm state of mind, a calm learning environment and do not feel threatened or challenged. The second one is called orchestrated immersion and concerns the need to have a learning environment that introduces students to multiple techniques, actions and ways of mastering it mainly through interaction, integration and communication. The third axis concerns active processing where, through practices and appropriate materials, students are given the opportunity to reflect so that their learning displays meaning and leads to constructive learning experiences [14].

The effect of various teaching approaches, that have been organized based on the principles of BBL on various academic features, has been the subject of active research during the last decade. According to literature, BBL displays many advantages and supports students’ retention of knowledge and school achievement [17,18,19]. It was also found that selected units in Biology, with learning activities based on the principles of BBL, augmented eleven to fourteen-year-old learners’ cognitive performance age [13,20,21]. Also, the positive effect on the adequate degree of conceptual understanding and conceptual change achievement was found in a small number of studies [22,23].

The difficulties confronted by the students in dealing with major concepts at learning physical sciences, consists of a crucial factor for their school performance [23]. Additionally, in their attempt to interpret various natural phenomena in their everyday lives or to give explanations about procedures using the appropriate conceptions that pertain to sciences, students result in creating various alternative conceptions [24,25,26,27,28,29].

In the field of biology, a large body of research has dealt with the detection and the record of students’ alternative conceptions about various biology phenomena and procedures and how these alternative conceptions affect students’ ability in the deeper understanding of the proper scientific concepts [30,31,32].

In particular, as far as the human digestive system, the procedures of organisms’ food intake, nourishment and the concept of energy are concerned, various alternative conceptions have been documented. Students at different school grades have expressed various alternative views regarding the structure and organization of the digestive system in relation to its constituent organs and how it works [33]. They struggle with comprehending that starch is finally broken down into glucose molecules which in their turn are absorbed and are transferred into the circulatory system [33]. Many students believe that digestion and absorption take place only in the stomach whereas the processes of foods’ chemical digestion comprise also a difficult point in their understanding of digestion generally [34]. Although they are aware of the fact that plants need water, air, sun for living, they hardly understand that these materials are used by plants in order to make their food, thus, resulting in the misunderstanding of autotrophic organism and photosynthesis concepts [35]. Many students believe that during photosynthesis, plants use both sun light and heat or only heat [36] or absorb organic material and food components from the soil for their living [37].

Students’ difficulties in accurate comprehension of various scientific concepts consists of a crucial factor for their school performance in the subject of biology. It is crucial for the instructional process to facilitate the brain in forming appropriate connections among the various pieces of information it receives, ultimately fostering meaningful learning.

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a teaching approach based on BBL elements in improving secondary students’ conceptual apprehension of common biology concepts. These concepts concern the procedures of organisms’ food intake and nourishment and the humans’ digestive system structure and function. It was assumed that students exposed to a BBL designed instruction would have a better learning outcome as far as their conceptual understanding is concerned compared to the students’ that were instructed with a conventional way of teaching.

2. Method

A quasi-experimental research method with two comparable groups (treatment group TG and comparison group CG) was employed so as to examine the extent to which the BBL teaching technique was effective enough for the learners’ understanding of the biology concepts and their conceptual change.

2.1. Participants

The participants, deriving from public schools, were 97 seventh grade students, 53 male and 44 female (age range 12-13 years, M = 12.47 years, SD = 0.30 years). The treatment group (TG) consisted of 48 students (M = 12.43 years, SD = 0.29 years) assigned to two intact classes and the other two intact classes consisting of 49 (M = 12.51 years, SD = 0.31 years) students served as the comparison group (CG). A statistical analysis using an independent samples t-test revealed no significant difference in the mean age between the two groups (t = 1.28, p > .05, 2-tailed).

2.2. Instrument and Data Collection

Students’ accurate conceptual comprehension of biology concepts and processes during the pretest and posttest phase was evaluated by a properly structured test consisting at its final form of a total of 12 items. There were nine items in multiple-choice format, while three were open-ended questions requiring brief student responses. Each multiple choice item consisted of one statement that was the correct answer and three distractor statements [38]. The distractors were based on students’ common alternative conceptions about biology concepts and procedures according to the results of previous studies concerning photosynthesis, food, energy, and human digestive system [33,34,36,37,39,40] [41,42,43,44,45] [46,47,48,49,50].

All questions were in accordance with the learning goals outlined in the National Greek Curriculum for Biology, tailored for first-grade middle school students. Additionally, the items evaluated for content validity by a panel of experts. A preliminary trial of the tool with a group of 22 students from the same grade in the preceding school year, indicated an internal consistency factor Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.695. Each correct multiple-choice answer was awarded one point, while open-ended questions could receive up to three points based on the thoroughness of the response. The total possible score for the assessment was 18 points. Τhe documentation of low score indicates few correct answers resulting thus in many alternative conceptions, while achieving a high score indicates quite the opposite.

2.3. Procedure

All treatment and comparison group students were delivered, as a pretest, the conceptual test that was implemented during a single class session prior to the teaching intervention phase. After changing the pretests question order, so as to diminish possible recollection effects, it was administered as a posttest to both groups (TG, CG) two months after the completion of the intervention period. The duration of the actual research was seven weeks (with one intervention every week, according to the biology program for first Junior High School graders). To this end, the biology chapter called ‘Intake of Substances and Digestion’ was taught in seven consequent 45 min. class meetings. According to the National Curriculum, we aimed for the instruction of the aforementioned chapter to conclude within the first semester for both approaches (the conventional method and the BBL one). Both the implementation of the BBL instructional approach to the treatment group and the conventional instructional approach to the comparison group were carried out by the same teacher.

2.3.1. Brain Based Learning Intervention Approach

The particular BBL sessions [12,13,14,16,23,51] were implemented in seven consecutive meetings. Each session comprised seven instructional stages (Table 1) progressing through three time periods (prime time 1 - downtime - prime time 2), with consideration given to students’ attentional abilities in accordance with the principles of the serial position effect (first/middle/last) as outlined by Sousa [16].

The period of optimum attention with a duration of approximately 19 minutes was named prime time 1. Initiating learning sessions with activities like brief experiments or displaying relevant cartoons and images related to the lesson's topic served as catalysts to spark curiosity and anticipation for the upcoming presentation of new material. Additionally, incorporating occasional light-hearted jokes and witty remarks, combined with the teacher's calm voice and friendly smile, fostered a positive and enjoyable environment, reducing stress throughout the learning process. Participants engaged in either completing a concise questionnaire or crafting a brief paragraph detailing their existing knowledge of the subject matter slated for instruction, facilitating the formation of fresh connections with the forthcoming learning content. The delivery of novel information incorporated suitable audiovisual aids, models, and interactive worksheets, along with simulations, aiming to stimulate both hemispheres of the brain evenly for comprehensive engagement.

Table 1. Instructional stages of BBL teaching approach

The period of reduced attention with a duration of approximately 14 minutes was named down time. This phase commenced with a short relaxation break, accompanied by soft classical music, allowing students to unwind, stretch and engage in tranquil conversation. Subsequently, they participated in diverse learning activities, including designing concept maps, discerning similarities and differences among various processes and concepts, and exploring the correlation between structure and function in biological entities, where applicable. The above tasks and practice techniques aimed at the organization, process and apprehension of the teaching information which had been presented at the first period contributing in parallel to a more effective encoding and storage [16]. The students’ participation in the whole class discussion gave them the opportunity to express their preexisting view about biological phenomena to receive various clarifications and finally to enter into a social process of changing their preexisting alternative conceptions with scientific accepted ones.

The period of good attention with a duration of approximately 12 minutes was named prime time 2. During this phase, students engaged in quiz games and assessment tests, serving dual purposes: providing feedback to assess the extent of knowledge acquisition and understanding, and reinforcing the consolidation of newly acquired information through revision. Moreover, students were prompted to offer explanations for everyday situations and phenomena, or to solve problems using the newly gained knowledge via structured worksheets. These activities aimed to ensure students' contentment by validating new knowledge and fostering personal significance through a transfer of knowledge process applicable to daily situations and future instructional contexts [12,16] [52,53].

2.3.2. Convectional Instructional Approach

The first stage started with students’ oral examination. The teacher asked various questions about the concepts and procedures, which had been taught in the previous lesson, in order to evaluate the extent of the previous learning subject understanding. At each question students were given appropriate time in order to be facilitated with their reflection before answering. A comprehensive class discussion ensued, during which the teacher provided clarifications and explanations addressing students' inquiries and misunderstandings. The subsequent stage involved students' introduction to the new material through lectures augmented by audiovisual aids, theoretical elaborations, analytical commentary, examples, worksheets and concise discussions.

3. Results

The mean pretest scores of the comparison and treatment groups were compared with the use of an independent sample t-test (Table 2) so as to assess the equivalence of the groups conceptual understanding. The CG mean score (3.80) seemed to be similar to that of the TG (3.81) and the findings of the t-test revealed that there was not a statistical difference between them (t=1.05, p > .05, 2-tailed).

Table 2. Comparison of CG and TG students mean scores on the pretest

Upon the end of the instructive interventions both the comparison and the treatment groups seemed to have improved in the conceptual comprehension test during the posttest phase. As Table 3 indicates, the increasing shifts of the mean scores were 1.55 (from 3.80 to 5.35) and 5.09 (from 3.81 to 8.19) points for the CG and TG groups correspondingly in a maximum score of 18. The implementation of a t-test for dependent samples showed that the above increases were statistically significant for both the CG [t(48) = 4.96, p < .001] and the TG [t(47) = 10.59, p < .001] groups.

Table 3. Pretest and posttest mean scores of the comparison and treatment groups (maximum sore 18 points)

Nevertheless, the treatment group seemed to have achieved a better result in the conceptual comprehension posttest as its mean score was 2.84 points higher than the mean score of the comparison group. In order to check how effective the two approaches were, an independent t-test sample was applied so as to compare the posttests of the two groups mean scores (Table 4). The findings revealed a significantly statistical difference (t=4.74, p < .001, 2-tailed) between the TG mean score (M=8.19, SD=3.65) and the CG score (M=5.35, SD=2.00). This implied that the instructive BBL method allowed learners to have a statistically significant better conceptual understanding than the traditional method.

Table 4. Comparison of CG and TG students mean scores on the posttest

4. Discussion

This research aimed at investigating the extent to which a BBL instructive intervention on Junior High School learners had positive effects on the learning of biology concepts. Results revealed that students who received instruction utilizing BBL elements exhibited significantly enhanced conceptual understanding of topics related to the Biology unit "Intake of Substances and Digestion" compared to those subjected to conventional teaching methods. These findings corroborate prior research indicating that the adoption of a teaching approach based on BBL principles yielded superior outcomes in students' conceptual comprehension across various subjects, such as physics topics like force and motion [23] and electricity [22].

Although there was an improvement in conceptual comprehension to the students of both groups, the treatment group showed a significant better understanding a fact that might be owed to various reasons. The organization, the course and the variety of learning practices during the BBL teaching approach seemed to ensure the multifaceted student involvement with the learning material, enabling thus a more individualized approach to the learning process [12,14]. The allocation of the instruction phases in three attentional time zones, contributed to the learning process harmonization with the brain physiological rhythms. This could reinforce important factors that affect students’ performance and play a pivotal role in implicitly influencing the engagement of various brain regions by facilitating memory distribution and training neuronal circuits [9,14]. The ability of the BBL approach to allow learners time to relax results into a better delivery, processing and understanding of new knowledge [14]. More particularly, the intermediary time of the downtime phase helped learners feel less anxious, comfortable, relaxed, sentimentally and psychologically content in order to proceed with their learning.

As Ausubel [54] has supported, the inner cognitive conceptual structures that are being possessed by an individual, consist of a crucial factor that contributes to the achievement of the connection with the learning material or in other words with meaningful learning. The amount and the kind of conceptual structures determines the extent of how the various information and facts can be retrievable and useful in learning [55]. Documentation of students’ prior knowledge, which was relative to the new learning subject, had been a permanent element in the structure of every BBL instructional session. It has been shown that this personal knowledge, stemmed from either daily experience or previous lessons, consists of one of the most important presuppositions of learning [56]. The recollection of previous knowledge and experiences enable students to make connections and associations with the new learning information. In addition, it determines to a great extent the understanding of the learning material, facilitating the integration of new knowledge to the students’ cognitive schemata, making it meaningful and important to them [57]. Hence, the new information has a personal relevance for the students leading to its individualization, which in parallel subserves to the construction of mnemonic processes that are more powerful contributing to memories formation [58].

All the above procedures took place into the framework of relaxed alertness and orchestrated immersion, characterized by students’ reflection and internalization upon the new learning material. This was accomplished by means of appropriate instructional activities as they had been designed according to the BBL teaching approach. The whole procedure had a significant effect on students’ better performance as it was demonstrated at the results of the conceptual understanding posttest.

As it was mentioned, students’ prior knowledge comprises the frame of the new knowledge construction. However, in other cases it might conflict with the new knowledge scientific conceptual framework, resulting thus in a process of learning as a product of conceptual change [59]. This implies that students’ attempts to assimilate the new scientific knowledge into their theoretical contexts might lead to the creation of misconceptions [29]. Moreover, students are able to possess both misconceptions and scientific acceptable concepts so that they might use them differently depending on the different problem and context that are facing each time [60]. This might be a reason why students, who attended the BBL instructional approach, failed to achieve a high score in the posttest despite the fact that they displayed a significant improvement in their conceptual understanding.

5. Conclusion

Students alternative concepts about processes and phenomena concerning Biology field consist of a crucial learning factor since they strongly affect students’ correct scientific conceptual understanding, showing in parallel a notable persistence even after the instructional intervention. The research reveals that it is possible to have better cognitive results when using a number of instructive methods and learning tasks, even in the traditional classroom. Nevertheless, it seems important that interventions are planned and implemented in a particular sequence so as to allow a balance in students’ disposition and ability to attend and concentrate. The BBL approach is an instructive method that may allow learners’ better conceptual understanding and expansion of their learning capacity. Further studies could investigate the effectiveness of the BBL teaching approach in other grades of the secondary education level including various biological concepts and processing concerning different biology topics.

Statement of Competing Interests

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the research ethics committee which conforms to the declaration of Helsinki. Participation in the study was based on informed consent. All tests were anonymously completed by the students and appropriate codes were used for the data processing.

References

[1]   | Vlachos, Μ. F. (2018). Egefalos, mathisi kai eidiki agogi [Brain, learning & special education]. Gutenberg.
[2]   | Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Understanding the brain: birth of a new learning science. new insights on learning through cognitive and brain science.
[3]   | Tokuhama-Espinosa, Τ. (2011). Mind, Brain, and Education Science: A Comprehensive Guide to the New Brain-Based Teaching; W. W. Norton & Company: New York.
[4]   | Willis, J. (2007). Review of research: Brain-based teaching strategies for improving students' memory, learning, and test-taking success. Childhood Education, 83(5), 310-315.
[5]   | Bowers, J. S. (2016). The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience. Psychological review, 123(5), 600–612.
[6]   | Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4–16.
[7]   | Pickering, S.J., & Howard-Jones, P.A. (2007). Educators’ views on the role of neuroscience in education: Findings from a study of UK and international perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 109-113.
[8]   | Samuels, B. M. (2009). Can the differences between education and Neuroscience be overcome by mind, brain, and education? Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(1), 45–55.
[9]   | Dubinsky, J. M., Roehrig, G., & Varma, S. (2013). Infusing neuroscience into teacher professional development. Educational researcher, 42(6), 317–329.
[10]   | Howard-Jones, P. A., Varma, S., Ansari, D., Butterworth, B., De Smedt, B., Goswami, U., Laurillard, D., & Thomas, M. S. (2016). The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016). Psychological Review, 123(5), 620–627.
[11]   | Immordino-Yang, M. H., Fischer, K. W. (2010). Neuroscience bases of learning. In V.G. Aukrust (Ed.), Learning and Cognition in Education. Academic Press.
[12]   | Jensen, E. P. (2008). Brain-based learning: The new paradigm of teaching (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.
[13]   | Lagoudakis, N., Vlachos, F., Christidou, V., & Vavougios, D. (2022). The effectiveness of a teaching approach using brain-based learning elements on students’ performance in a biology course. Cogent Education, 9(1).
[14]   | Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1994). Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain. Addison-Wesley.
[15]   | Caine, R., Caine, G., McClintic, C., & Klimek, K. (2005). 12 brain/mind learning principles in action: The field book for making connections, teaching, and the human brain. Corwin Press.
[16]   | Sousa, D. A. (2017). How the brain learns: A classroom teacher’s guide (5th ed.). Corwin Press.
[17]   | Mekarina, M., & Ningsih, Y. P. (2017). The effects of brain based learning approach on motivation and students’ achievement in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 895.
[18]   | Thomas, B. M., & Swamy, S. S. (2014). Brain-based teaching approach-A new paradigm of teaching. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 3(2), 62-65. https://www.semanticscholar.org
[19]   | Uzezi, J. G., & Jonah, K. J. (2017). Effectiveness of brain-based learning strategy on students’ academic achievement, attitude, motivation and knowledge retention in electrochemistry. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 21(3), 1-13.

[20]  
Varghese, M. G., & Pandya, S. R. (2016). A study of the effectiveness of brain-based learning of students of secondary level on their academic achievement in biology, study habits and stress. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 103-122. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301816156

[21]   | Vyas, K., & Vashishtha, K. C. (2013). Effectiveness of teaching based on brain research with reference to academic achievement of secondary school students. International Journal of Students Research in Technology & Management, 1(4), 383-397. https://www.academia.edu/4625058

[22]  
Bawaneh, A., Nurulazam, A., Saleh, S., & Kanesan, A. G. (2012). The effect of a brain-based teaching method on conceptual change in students' understanding of electricity change agent for arab development and education reform. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 4(2), 79-96. https:// www.ijpce.org/ index.php/IJPCE/article/view/97.

[23]   | Saleh, S. (2012). The effectiveness of Brain-Based Teaching Approach in dealing with the problems of students’ conceptual understanding and learning motivation towards physics. Educational Studies, 38(1), 19-29.
[24]   | Arenson, M., & Coley, J. D. (2018). Anthropocentric by default? attribution of familiar and novel properties to living things. Cognitive Science, 42, 253-285.
[25]   | Coley, J. D., Arenson, M., Xu, Y., & Tanner, K. D. (2017). Intuitive biological thought: Developmental changes and effects of biology education in late adolescence. Cognitive Psychology, 92, 1–21.
[26]   | Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1994). Young children’s naive theory of biology. Cognition, 50(1-3), 171–188.
[27]   | Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2000). Domain-specific constraints on conceptual development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(3), 267 – 275.
[28]   | Maeyer, J.R., & Talanquer, V. (2010). The role of intuitive heuristics in students' thinking: Ranking chemical substances. Science Education, 94(6), 963-984.
[29]   | Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69.
[30]   | Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Open University Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED393679
[31]   | Duggan, D., & Matthews, P. (2002). The identification of students’ alternative conceptions in biology by the use of creative writing. Irish Educational Studies, 21(1), 79-96.
[32]   | Franke, G., Scharfenberg, F.-J., & Bogner, F.X. (2013). Investigation of students’ alternative conceptions of terms and processes of gene technology. Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Education.
[33]   | Carvalho, G. S., Silva, R., Lima, N., Coquet, E., & Clément, P. (2004). Portuguese primary school children's conceptions about digestion: identification of learning obstacles. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1111-1130.
[34]   | Teixeira, F. M. (2000). What happens to the food we eat? Children’s conceptions of the structure and function of the digestive system. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 507–520.
[35]   | Ozay, E., & Oztas, H. (2003). Secondary students’ interpretations of photosynthesis and plant nutrition. Journal of Biological Education, 37(2), 68–70.
[36]   | Marmaroti, P., & Galanopoulou, D. (2006). Pupils’ understanding of photosynthesis: A questionnaire for the simultaneous assessment of all aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 383-403.
[37]   | Stavy, R., Eisen, Y., & Yaakobi, D. (1987). How students aged 13‐15 understand photosynthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 9(1), 105-115.
[38]   | Tamir, P. (1971). An Alternative Approach to The Construction of Multiple Choice Test Items. Journal of Biological Education 5(6): 305–307.
[39]   | American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS; 2018, May 25). AAAS science assessment. https://www.aaas.org/programs/project-2061/assessment-resources
[40]   | Anderson, C.W., Sheldon, T.H., & DuBay, J. (1990). The effects of instruction on college nonmajors’ conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27(8): 761–776.
[41]   | Clément, P. (2003). Situated conceptions and obstacles: The example of digestion and excretion. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in a knowledge-based society (pp. 89–98). Kluwer Academic.
[42]   | Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. Routledge.
[43]   | Granklint Enochson, P.G., Redfors, A., Dempster, E. R., & Tibell, L.A.E. (2015). Ideas about the human body among secondary students in South Africa. African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19(2), 199-211.
[44]   | Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-211.

[45]  
Lee, Y.J., & Diong, C.H. (1999). Misconceptions in the biological concept of food: Results of a survey of high school students. In M. Waas (Ed.), Enhancing learning: challenge of integrating thinking and information technology into the curriculum. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Educational Research Association (pp. 825-832). Singapore: Education Research Association. http://hdl.handle.net/10497/14986

[46]   | Lin, C. Y., & Hu, R. (2003). Students’ understanding of energy flow and matter cycling in the context of the food chain, photosynthesis, and respiration. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1529-1544.
[47]   | Mann, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2010). Students’ conceptions about energy and the human body. Science Education International, 21(3), 144-159. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ904865.pdf
[48]   | Nunez, F., & Banet, E. (1997). Students' conceptual patterns of human nutrition. International Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 509-526.
[49]   | Simpson, M., & Arnold, B. (1982). The inappropriate use of subsumers in biology learning. European Journal of Science Education, 4(2), 173–182.
[50]   | Dry, H. A. (1998). Student misconceptions in science: The human digestive system. [Master's thesis, College at Brockport, State University of New York]. Brockport @ SUNY Open Repositories. https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses/1084
[51]   | Smith, A. (2003). Accelerated learning in practice. Brain-based method for accelerating motivation and Achievement. Network Educational Press.
[52]   | Hung, W. (2013). Problem-Based Learning: A learning environment for enhancing learning transfer. New directions for adult and continuing education, 2013(137), 27-38.
[53]   | Perkins, D., & Salomon, G. (1988). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 22-32. http://www.ascd.org
[54]   | Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer Science Business Media.
[55]   | Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small Group Discussion in Physics: Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099–1114.
[56]   | Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2010). Prior knowledge activation: How different concept mapping tasks lead to substantial differences in cognitive processes, learning outcomes, and perceived self-efficacy. Instructional Science, 38(4), 417–433.
[57]   | Rocha, E., Costa, B., Ferreira, I., & Fregni, F. (2018). Neural basis of learning / Bases neurais da aprendizagem. Rev Med (São Paulo), 97(1), 1-6.
[58]   | Tileston, D. W. (2011). The ten best teaching practices: How brain research, learning styles, and standards define teaching competencies (3nd ed.). Corwin.
[59]   | Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). Routledge.
[60]   | Palmer, D.H. (1999). Exploring the link between students’ scientific and nonscientific conceptions. Science Education, 83(6), 639–653.