<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>American Journal of Educational Research</journalTitle>
<eissn>2327-6150</eissn>
<publicationDate>2013-11-14</publicationDate>
<volume>1</volume>
<issue>11</issue>
<startPage>528</startPage>
<endPage>533</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/education-1-11-12</doi>
<publisherRecordId>EDUCATION201311112</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">The Bologna Reform of Teacher Education in Ukraine and Hungary: A Comparative Analysis</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Borkach E.</name>
<email>barkatsj@gmail.com</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Vice-rektor, Ferenc Rákóczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian Institute, Berehove, Ukraine</affiliationName>

</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">The present article describes the main features of a two-stage model of teacher training in  and  during the years 2006-2013. This time was sufficient enough for the basic training of future teachers, and this model continues to work today. In , the reduction in undergraduate training to 3 years resulted in a decline in the quality of training; the two-stage model also resulted in significant reduction of students at teacher training. This led to criticism of experts and the shift to a new model of teacher training with the scheme 4 +&#160;1 and 5&#160;+&#160;1, the implementation of which was provided in 2013.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/1/11/12/education-1-11-12.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng">Bologna reformteacher educationmodel of teacher trainingcomparative analysis of the educational systemsHungaryUkraine</keywords>
</record>
</records>
