eng Science and Education Publishing American Journal of Educational Research 2327-6150 2013-11-21 1 10 413 418 10.12691/education-1-10-1 EDUCATION20131101 article Penny Verhoeven pverhoev@kennesaw.edu 1 Tatiana Rudchenko 1 Kennesaw State University, Georgia, USA Designing a hybrid course entails the challenge of choosing learning activities for each of the face-to-face and online environments--and sequencing and coordinating the activities across the two environments--to promote student attainment of the course's learning objectives. This paper presents a study comparing student performance in an undergraduate Principles of Microeconomics course taught by the same instructor under hybrid (n = 51) and face-to-face (n = 24) delivery. The percentage of hybrid students completing the course (71%) was not significantly different (chi-square = .61, p = .433) than that (79%) of the face-to-face students. A regression analysis controlling for student GPA indicated that, for students completing the course, the composite test score was, on average, an estimated 4.8 percentage points lower (p = .025, one-tailed) under hybrid delivery than under face-to-face delivery. Student GPA had a strong positive ceteris paribus impact (p = .000, one-tailed) on the composite test score. The finding of a lower level of student learning under hybrid relative to face-to-face delivery is attributed to inattentiveness to pedagogical principles in designing the hybrid course. The study serves as a caution to colleges and universities initiating or expanding their hybrid course offerings in the absence of faculty training or quality control checks. The paper closes with suggestions for further research. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/1/10/1/education-1-10-1.pdf hybrid courseblended courseface-to-face coursestudent learningpedagogy