Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Evaluation of Photoreactivation and Dark Repair of Total and Fecal Coliforms and Enterococci in Wastewater Treated with Ultraviolet Light

J.J. Dragoni-Rosado*, G. Tavárez-Hernández, A. González-Mederos, A.E. Pérez-Matos

Department of Science and Technology, Inter American University of Puerto Rico, San Germán, Puerto Rico

Abstract: Wastewater treatment plants are essential in reducing the microbial load of water discharged into the ecosystems by UV light. However, it has been found that some pathogenic bacteria have developed mechanisms to reverse the damage caused to their DNA by UV light, with possible adverse effects on the environment and human health. Therefore, this research evaluated if fecal indicator bacteria that use photoreactivation or dark repair are present in the wastewater from a treatment plant in Puerto Rico. Samples of wastewater treated with UV light were collected and exposed to two treatments: fluorescent light (photoreactivation) and darkness (dark repair). The number of colonies of total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and enterococci was determined every hour of exposure. Results show that after exposure to fluorescent light, the number of colonies of total and fecal coliforms increased, being able to repair and reverse the damage caused to their DNA when exposed to visible light but not in darkness, possibly through the mechanism of photoreactivation. However, enterococci showed no increase in colonies when exposed to fluorescent light and kept in darkness. These results suggest reviewing the disinfection process considering photoreactivation and dark repair mechanisms. The new considerations can reduce pollution of watersheds when large amounts of treated wastewater are released into the environment.

Keywords: bacteria, sewage, disinfection, water, enterobacteria

Received June 12, 2022; Revised July 17, 2022; Accepted July 27, 2022

Citation: J.J. Dragoni-Rosado, G. Tavárez-Hernández, A. González-Mederos, A.E. Pérez-Matos, Evaluation of Photoreactivation and Dark Repair of Total and Fecal Coliforms and Enterococci in Wastewater Treated with Ultraviolet Light. American Journal of Water Resources, 10 (2). 54-58. January 2022. doi:10.12691/ajwr-10-2-3

1. Introduction

One of the current environmental problems is the poor control to prevent water bodies from becoming contaminated by several sources (e.g., wastewater). In Puerto Rico, wastewater must comply with effluent guidelines and quality levels established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [1]. The main objective is to ensure that human and industrial effluents are discharged safely into water bodies and do not represent a risk to human health or unacceptable environmental damage [2].

Treatment plants use conventional ultraviolet light (UV) to disinfect the effluents before discharge into the receiving waters [3]. UV disinfection works by damaging the microorganism's nucleic acid, preventing its replication [4]. This method does not leave residuals in the water after treatment, which is an advantage over chemical disinfection [5].

Nonetheless, bacteria can repair DNA damage caused by UV light, possibly reactivating their activity after the water leaves the treatment plant [3,6]. It has been reported that microorganisms can recover the biological damage caused by UV radiation by using photoreactivation [5]. Photoreactivation has been reported in microorganisms from wastewater treated with UV light and after exposure to sunlight when discharged to the basins [7]. This light-dependent DNA repair mechanism happens when the microorganism produces the photolyase enzyme. This enzyme is responsible for repairing DNA damage when the bacteria are exposed to light, as it effectively reverses the harmful effects in the genome caused by UV radiation [8,9]. As a result, this could reduce the effectiveness of the disinfection process, which is a risk to public health and the water body's health.

Bacteria may also use a dark repair mechanism to repair the damage induced to their DNA by the action of several enzymes without the need for specific light [10]. This mechanism uses various DNA repair processes that do not depend on the light; they require that the uvrA, uvrB, and uvrC genes initiate the repair of pyrimidine base dimers (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers) and photoproducts of 6-4, as well as other voluminous lesions [11]. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) has also been proposed as the pathway to repair UV-damaged DNA without exposure to radiation [12]. However, some research concludes that dark repair occurs less than photoreactivation [13].

Besides being necessary, wastewater technologies and processes must be adequate to protect aquatic ecosystems [14]. This work aimed to evaluate if photoreactivation and dark repair occur in total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and enterococci in wastewater treated with ultraviolet light in Puerto Rico. Therefore, UV-treated wastewater samples were exposed to fluorescent light or kept in darkness, and the growth of those organisms was monitored.

2. Methodology

2.1. Water Collection

Wastewater samples were collected in 500 mL sterile plastic bottles, on three different occasions, from a treatment plant on the west side of Puerto Rico. This secondary wastewater plant removes biodegradable organic matter and utilizes UV light as a disinfection method. After the disinfection, the samples were taken at the final stage before the effluent reached a municipal ravine that joins the Güanajibo River in Puerto Rico. All the samples were transported under refrigeration conditions to the laboratory.

2.2. Evaluation of Repair Mechanisms by Ultraviolet Radiation

The water samples were divided and transferred to seven 1,000 mL Erlenmeyer flasks (with 95% transparency). Three flasks with 1,000 mL of water sample were designated to evaluate the light exposure, and the other three flasks were covered with aluminum foil to simulate darkness conditions. The seventh Erlenmeyer flask was used as a control for the experiment. All the Erlenmeyer flasks were placed in a controlled environment incubator equipped with a fluorescent bulb (Ecosmart 19 watts) at a 4 cm distance from the flasks and a temperature of 26.5°C (Figure 1). The irradiation periods with fluorescent light were up to 300 minutes in total coliforms, and for fecal coliforms and enterococci were up to 240 minutes. An Erlenmeyer flask with 1,000 mL of sterilized sample was used for negative control.

Figure 1. Erlenmeyer flasks exposed to fluorescent light and darkness in a controlled environment

The concentration of total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and enterococci was determined for microbiological contamination. The EPA standard method 1603 for examining enterobacteria in water using the membrane filtration technique (0.45μm) was used [15]. 1 mL was filtered for total coliforms; 50 mL for fecal coliforms; and 100 mL for enterococci; every 60 minutes (starting at time 0) until reaching 300 minutes for total coliforms and 240 minutes for fecal coliforms and enterococci to evaluate repair mechanisms.

Figure 2. Total coliforms colonies in m-Endo agar after exposure to light (A) and kept in darkness (B)

Figure 3. Fecal coliforms colonies in m-FC agar after exposure to light (A) and kept in darkness (B)

Total coliforms were cultured in m-Endo agar and incubated at 35°C for 24 hours (Figure 2). Next, fecal coliforms were cultured in m-FC agar for 24 h of incubation at 44.5° C (Figure 3). Finally, enterococci were cultured in m-Enterococcus agar at 35°C for 48 h (Figure 4). After the incubation period, the number of bacterial colonies was determined, and the colony-forming units (CFU) per 100 ml sample were calculated. This experiment was carried out in triplicate with duplicates, and average values of CFU were obtained.

Figure 4. Enterococci colonies in m-Enterococcus agar after exposure to light (A) and kept in darkness (B)

The relation N⁄N₀ [10] was used to determine the relationship between the concentration of colonies of total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and enterococci present after being treated with ultraviolet light. Where N represents the number of colonies present after exposure to visible light or darkness, and N₀ represents the number of colonies before exposure to light or darkness. Also, colonies' concentration of each group of bacteria as a function of time under visible light and darkness conditions were determined.

Traditional aseptic transfer techniques and differential staining methods were used to determine the microscopic characteristics of the microorganisms evaluated. The colonies observed in the selective-differential culture media used for this analysis were transferred to inclined agar tubes to determine by staining the microscopic characteristics of the microorganisms. For this, a Gram stain was used, differentiating between two large groups of bacteria (Gram-positive and Gram-negative) based on their cell wall composition.

3. Results and Discussions

After UV treatment in the wastewater plant, the growth of some bacteria is not expected because of the DNA damage occasioned by UV light exposure. However, under the conditions of this experiment, total coliforms exposed to visible light grew despite being previously exposed to UV light. Furthermore, our results showed an increase in N⁄N0 when exposed to visible light for up to 5 hours (Figure 5). This increase reflects that there were colonies capable of repairing and reversing the damage caused to their DNA by the UV treatment when later exposed to visible light, demonstrating a possible mechanism of photoreactivation. Previous works have also reported the capability of this group of bacteria to resist and repair the harmfulness caused by UV rays [13,16,17,18,19]. However, none have been reported in Puerto Rico.

Figure 5. Comparison of N/No of TC exposed to visible light (photoreactivation) and darkness (dark repair)

On the other hand, total coliforms did not grow in darkness, so dark repair was not evident. In investigations where this mechanism has been studied in total coliforms, it has been found that dark repair occurs considerably lower than in photoreactivation [13]. However, over time a reduction in the number of colonies occurs, and when the final count is compared with the initial count, it is concluded that this mechanism is irrelevant. The results of this study are like other investigations, in which no significant differences are found in the growth of TC in darkness [6].

Fecal coliforms also grew by exposing them to visible light after being treated with UV light treatment (Figure 6), reversing the damage caused to their DNA, possibly by a photoreactivation mechanism. The results obtained can be compared with other investigations [10,13,20,21] that reported that fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli (fecal coliform) demonstrated the ability to carry out photoreactivation by exposure to visible light after being exposed to UV light. In addition, the DNA repair under light exposure has been explained by the presence of the enzyme photolyase in the bacterium E. coli [16].

Figure 6. Comparison of N/No of FC exposed to visible light (photoreactivation) and darkness (dark repair)

Figure 7. Comparison of N/No of EC exposed to visible light (photoreactivation) and darkness (dark repair)

Like total coliforms, fecal coliforms did not make the mechanism of dark repair evident. On exposure to darkness, the proportion of the number of colonies was statistically the same at all times evaluated. The results obtained in dark repair can be compared with other investigations [10,13,20], showing limited or no repair in this group of bacteria when kept in darkness.

When evaluating the effect of darkness on the growth of enterococci, some studies reported that they are capable of photoreactivation [13,22], but this was not the case in our investigation. The N/No ratio was similar from the beginning to the end of the exposure period. Our results for enterococci showed that they could not repair themselves in treatment with visible light or darkness (Figure 7). Nonetheless, this is consistent with other studies that report that enterococci do not carry out any repair mechanism [10,23].

4. Conclusions

Our research proved that the total and fecal coliforms in Puerto Rico wastewaters have photoreactivation mechanisms in light. On the contrary, the enterococci group did not show growth related to photoreactivation processes. Furthermore, when kept in darkness, none of the three groups of bacteria show growth, which could indicate the dark repair of damaged DNA. These results suggest reviewing UV disinfection processes in wastewater treatment plants to determine if the pathogenic microorganism is reactivating after water is released into the environment. This review is essential for Puerto Rico, where light and water temperatures may be suitable for those species' growth, reducing and avoiding pollution of watersheds when large amounts of treated wastewater are released into the environment.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by iCATCH: Innovative Curriculum for Agricultural Training and Career for Hispanics, grant no. 2016-3842225549 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Thanks to the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico, Biotechnology and Agrobiotechnology Research and Learning Center (CEIBA for its Spanish acronym) for the use of their research facilities.

References

[1]   | United States Environmental Protection Agency. Effluent Guidelines, 2022.
[2]   | Ehalt-Macedo, H., Lehner, B., Nicell, J., Grill, G., Li, J., Limtong, A. and Shakya, R., “Distribution and characteristics of wastewater treatment plants within the global river network,” Earth System Science Data, 14, pp.559-577, 2022.
[3]   | EL Shahawy, A., El-Shatoury, S., Bayomi, S. and El-Monayeri, D., “Wastewater Disinfection Using Artificial Ultraviolet Rays Technology.” In: Unconventional Water Resources and Agriculture in Egypt. Ed: Negm, A.M., Springer International Publishing, Egypt, 2018.
[4]   | Bonetta, S., Pignata, C., Gasparro, E., Richiardi, L., Bonetta S. and Carraro, E., “Impact of wastewater treatment plants on microbiological contamination for evaluating the risks of wastewater reuse,” Environmental Sciences Europe, 34 (20), pp. 1-13, 2022.
[5]   | International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15727: 2020 - Measurement of the output of a UV-C lamp (2020-01), Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
[6]   | Fitzhenry, K., Clifford, E., Rowan, N. and Val del Rio, A., “Bacterial inactivation, photoreactivation and dark repair post flow-through pulsed UV disinfection,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, 41, pp. 1-9, 2021.
[7]   | Bohrerova, Z. and Linden, K., “Standardizing photoreactivation: Comparison of DNA photorepair rate in Escherichia coli using four different fluorescent lamps,” Water Research, 41 (12), pp. 2832-2838, 2007.
[8]   | Kavakli, I.H., Ozturk, N. and Gul, S., “Chapter One - DNA repair by photolyases,” In: Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology. Ed: R. Donev, Academic Press, 2019, pp. 1-19.
[9]   | Pathak, J., Rajneesh, Singh, P., Häder, D. and Sinha, R., “UV-induced DNA damage and repair: A cyanobacterial perspective,” Plant Gene, 19, pp. 1-12, 2019.
[10]   | Locas, A., Demers, J., and Payment, P., “Evaluation of photoreactivation of Escherichia coli and enterococci after UV disinfection of municipal wastewater,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 54 (11), pp. 971-975, 2008.
[11]   | Selby, C., Linsey-Boltz, L., Yang, Y. and Sancar, A., “Mycobacteria excise DNA damage in 12- or 13-nucleotide-long oligomers by prokaryotic-type dual incisions and performs transcription-coupled repair,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 295 (50), pp. 17374-17380, 2020.
[12]   | Krasikova, Y., Rechkunova, N. and Lavrik, O., “Nucleotide excision repair: From molecular defects to neurological abnormalities,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22 (12), pp. 1-23, 2021.
[13]   | Salcedo, I., Andrade, J., Quiroga, J. and Nebot., E., “Photoreactivation and Dark Repair in UV-Treated Microorganisms: Effect of Temperature,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73 (5), pp. 1594-1600, 2007.
[14]   | Edokpayi, J., Odiyo, J. and Durowoju, O., “Impact of wastewater on surface water quality in developing countries: A case study of South Africa.” In: Water Quality. Ed: Tutu, H., Intech Open, 2017, 401-416.
[15]   | United States Environmental Protection Agency. Method 1603: Escherichia coli (E. coli) in Water by Membrane Filtration Using Modified membrane-Thermotolerant Escherichia coli Agar (Modified mTEC), 2014.
[16]   | Xu, L., and Zhu, G., “The roles of several residues of Escherichia coli DNA photolyase in the highly efficient photo-repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers,” Journal of Nucleic Acids, 2010, pp. 1-7, 2010.

[17]  
Lara, G., Navarro, M. and Altamiranda, J., “Estudio de fotoreactivación en cultivos microbiológicos obtenidos de carga microbiana de la superficie de fresas sometidas a diferentes dosis de luz ultravioleta de onda corta UV-C,” Revista Colombiana de Investigaciones Agroindustriales, 5(1), pp. 32-40, 2018.

[18]   | Shafaei, S., Bolton, J. R., and Gamal El Din, M., “Effect of environmental factors on photoreactivation of microorganisms under indoor conditions,” International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 10(5), pp. 560-563, 2016.
[19]   | Shafaei, S., Klamerth, N., Zhang, Y., McPhedran, K., Bolton, J. R., and Gamal El-Din, M., “Impact of environmental conditions on bacterial photoreactivation in wastewater effluents,” Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 19, 31-37, 2017.
[20]   | Zimmer, J., and Slawson, R., “Potential repair of Escherichia coli DNA following exposure to UV radiation from both medium and low-pressure UV sources used in drinking water treatment.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(7), pp. 3293-3299, 2002.
[21]   | Quek, P. and Hu, J., “Indicators for photoreactivation and dark repair studies following ultraviolet disinfection,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 35(6), pp. 533-541, 2008.
[22]   | Chen, P.Y., Chu, X. N., Liu, L., Hu, J.Y., “Effects of salinity and temperature on inactivation and repair potential of Enterococcus faecalis following medium- and low-pressure ultraviolet irradiation,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, 120, pp. 816-825, 2015.
[23]   | Wang, X.-F., Gong, X., Hu, X.-L., & Ren, B.-Z., “Photoreactivation of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis in the secondary effluent disinfected by UV-TiO2,” Huan Jing Ke Xue, 35(4), pp.1332-1336, 2014.