﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
    <journalTitle>American Journal of Rural Development</journalTitle>
    <eissn>2333-4770</eissn>
    <publicationDate>2017-04-26</publicationDate>
    <volume>5</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <startPage>65</startPage>
    <endPage>72</endPage>
    <doi>10.12691/ajrd-5-3-2</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>AJRD2017532</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Social Capital and Agricultural Technology Adoption among Ethiopian Farmers</title>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Nizam A. Husen</name>
        <email>abbamilki@gmail.com, n.husen@cgiar.org</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tim K. Loos</name>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Khalid H.A. Siddig</name>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa Ethiopia, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany</affiliationName>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="2">Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany and Khartoum University, the Sudan</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">Despite the recent efforts to increase agricultural productivity in Ethiopia, food insecurity remains a major challenge in the country. Improving smallholders´ productivity requires the adoption of suitable agricultural technologies and practices. Previous researches highlighted the importance of socio-economic factors; but widely overlooked the role of social capital in technology adoption and its potential to create collective actions, reduce transaction costs, relax supply side constraints, and disseminate information. Using socio-economic data of 398 farming households, the study assessed social capital as a determinant for soil and water conservation practices (SWC) such as terraces, bunds and agro-forestry as well as adopting productivity enhancing technologies (PET) such as fertilizers and improved high yielding seed varieties applying a probit model. The result showed that members of Iddir (informal funeral group) were more likely to adopt SWC (18.2%). For the case of PET, Iddir members were 12.8% less likely to adopt. Being members of Jarsumma (informal conflict resolution) increased the likelihood of SWC and PET adoption by 12.87% and 17.8%, respectively. Therefore, technology transfer should consider different types of social capital as an alternative policy option to the prevailing top down approaches in order to improve smallholder livelihoods.</abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajrd/5/3/2/ajrd-5-3-2.pdf</fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>social capital</keyword>
      <keyword>technology adoption</keyword>
      <keyword>Ethiopia</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>