﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
    <journalTitle>American Journal of Public Health Research</journalTitle>
    <eissn>2327-6703</eissn>
    <publicationDate>2020-09-25</publicationDate>
    <volume>8</volume>
    <issue>6</issue>
    <startPage>184</startPage>
    <endPage>189</endPage>
    <doi>10.12691/ajphr-8-6-1</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>AJPHR2020861</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">An IRT-constructed Brief Physical Functioning Scale and Its Association with Health Status</title>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Peter D. Hart</name>
        <email>pdhart@outlook.com</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Health Promotion Research, Havre, MT 59501</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">Background: This study used item response theory (IRT) to create a brief PF scale (BPFS) and subsequently examined its relationship with several health characteristics. Methods: Data were used from N=1,716 adults 50+ years of age participating in a large health survey. A pool of 19 PF items were dichotomized to either 1 (any amount of difficulty) or 0 (no difficulty). A 2-parameter logistic (2PL) IRT model was used to evaluate item fit to the unidimensional PF construct. Criteria used to eliminate an item was 1) a small discrimination (slope) parameter, 2) a significant chi-square statistic for cell residuals, and 3) a large root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). The IRT model was continually re-fitted until all remaining items met criteria. SAS PROC IRT and R ltm were used for scale construction. Results: The IRT analysis resulted in 8 well-fitting items with large item discrimination (as &gt; 2.03), moderate item difficulty range (bs: -0.07 - 1.35), and adequate item fit (RMSEAs &lt; .036). After full adjustment, each additional BPFS point significantly (ps &lt; .05) increased stepwise the odds of reporting poor HRQOL (OR = 1.59), being depressed (OR = 1.46), having thoughts of suicide (OR = 1.35), not meeting PA guidelines (OR = 1.29), being BMI-obese (OR = 1.23), being WC-obese (OR = 1.13), experiencing poor sleep (OR = 1.29), and reporting sleepiness (OR = 1.16). Conclusion: Results from this study show that the IRT-constructed BPFS is an efficient and valid tool that can predict health status in older adults.</abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajphr/8/6/1/ajphr-8-6-1.pdf</fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>physical functioning</keyword>
      <keyword>Item response theory (IRT)</keyword>
      <keyword>psychometrics</keyword>
      <keyword>aging and health</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>