Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Noncritical Surfaces in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in South Eastern Nigeria

Agbo Ejiofor C., Ejinaka Obiora. R., Obeta M. Uchejeso*, Lote-Nwaru Ifeoma E., Ibanga Imoh E, Dajok D. Godfrey

Department of Chemical Pathology, Federal School of Medical Laboratory Science, Jos-Nigeria

Abstract: Background: The presence of biofilm forming Pseudomonas species on noncritical surfaces in various hospital areas are the basis of Healthcare Associated Infections. Justification: The Healthcare associated infections are on the increase, affecting both care givers and patients with many showing resistant to many antibiotics and therefore calls for study for better understanding of the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from noncritical surfaces in the facility. Aim and objectives: The study was to assess the susceptibility of commonly prescribed antibiotics in the south eastern healthcare facility and to be able to educate the staff, students and patients. Methodology: The study used an experimental design carried out in 800 beds capacity Federal Medical Center, Umuahia, and South East Nigeria. These bacteria were isolated using the swab to collect samples for analysis. Samples were collected from different noncritical surfaces surrounding hospitalized patients and equipment in the tertiary healthcare facility. The 450 positive samples out of the 1314 samples collected were analyzed for bacterial isolation and identification using bacterial cultural and microscopic identification techniques, biochemical tests and the Microbact 24E assay. Result: Biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified through crystal violet assay while Antimicrobial susceptibility test was done using agar well diffusion method which was carried out on the isolated biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusion: The susceptibility showed that biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were resistant to Gentamicin and Augmentin, but sensitive to Vancomycin, Azithromycin and Meropenem. Pseudomonas aeruginosa has the highest potential to form biofilms and could be recognized as a major agent of nosocomial infections in healthcare facilities in South East. Its notable resistance to some major antibiotics used in those centres calls for an urgent need for caregivers to carry out susceptibility testing before antibiotic prescription.

Keywords: antimicrobial susceptibility, biofilm forming pseudomonas aeruginosa, hospital, South East-Nigeria

Received April 05, 2020; Revised May 07, 2020; Accepted May 14, 2020

Citation: Agbo Ejiofor C., Ejinaka Obiora. R., Obeta M. Uchejeso, Lote-Nwaru Ifeoma E., Ibanga Imoh E, Dajok D. Godfrey, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Noncritical Surfaces in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in South Eastern Nigeria. American Journal of Public Health Research, 8 (3). 87-92. January 2020. doi:10.12691/ajphr-8-3-2

1. Introduction

The potential for a contaminated environmental surfaces to contribute to transmission of healthcare- associated pathogens depends on a number of factors including the ability of the pathogen to remain viable on a variety of dry environmental surfaces, frequency with which the contaminated surfaces are regularly touched by patients and healthcare workers and whether or not such contaminations are sufficiently high to result in transmission to patients. Noncritical surfaces are at the center of such transmission cycle and thus serve as sources of contamination and spread of nosocomial pathogen because they are surfaces that are frequently exposed to sources of contaminations by both patients, their relatives and caregiver unlike critical surfaces that are usually handled by professionals that understand the principles of sterility and maintenance of hygiene when handling patients in preventing nosocomial infections. Transmission from healthcare worker`s hand or gloves has been documented in some studies [1]. There could be direct transmission from contaminated noncritical surfaces to patients [2] when noncritical surfaces are contaminated, patients can directly acquire pathogenic organisms from these surfaces directly because of the proximity of some of the noncritical surfaces to patients during healthcare delivery e.g. electronic thermometer and sphygmomanometer. Elimination of the environmental source of contamination reduces transmission of several pathogens that otherwise would have resulted in outbreak [3].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is known as a leading cause of nosocomial infections worldwide especially in hospital environments and Federal Medical Center, Umuahia may not be exempted. There is generally an increase resistance of biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa to most antibiotics [4]. Biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa shows multidrug resistance (MDR) pattern that are statistically significant in comparison to non-biofilm producers and a greater understanding of the nature, intercellular communications within the biofilm and their susceptibility or resistance shall help in development of new and more effective treatment pattern towards an improved patient management especially in healthcare associated infections [5]. Drug resistance and healthcare associated infections (HAIs) is now a global burden that needs world attention ranging from bacteria gotten from noncritical surfaces of hospital environment [6] to the ones gotten from food and environment. [7]

This study is aimed at assessing the susceptibility of commonly prescribed antibiotics in the healthcare facility, so as to be well informed, thus serving as a tool for massive education campaign to staff, students and patients.

2. Materials and Method

This study was conducted in Federal Medical Center, Umuahia in Abia State after obtaining management and ethical approvals from the institution. Samples were collected from noncritical surfaces like Sphygmomanometer cuff, Sink, Electronic thermometer, stethoscope, bed rail, hand gloves, delivery couch, ultra sound probe and toilet door handle. Samples were collected with sterile cotton swabs pre-moistened with sterile normal saline and rubbed (10cm radius) on the selected noncritical surfaces and inserted into bijou bottles containing same medium and transported to the laboratory within 30 minutes for immediate processing [8].

2-3 colonies of 20h growth of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa on Muller Hinton agar were suspended in 50 ml pre-warmed (37°C) Mueller Hinton broth. The suspension was incubated overnight at 37°C, diluted 1 in 250 in the same pre-warmed medium and incubated in water bath with agitation (50 rpm). The absorbance of the culture was monitored with a spectrophotometer (6405 Jenway, Barloworld Scientific Ltd. Dunmow, Essex CMB 3LB), using a wavelength 450 nm and 19 mm diameter spectrophotometer tubes until absorbance of 0.1 was reached [9].

Biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, identified through Crystal Violet Assay [10] were tested for their susceptibility to most commonly used antibiotics in the hospital by agar well diffusion method with slight modification. 2-3 colonies of the isolate were taken from a pure culture and transferred to a tube containing 5ml sterile brain heart infusion broth (BHIB) and mixed gently by shaking until a homogenous suspension was formed which was then diluted to 0.5 McFarlane standard (1.5x10⁸) [10].

Using a micropipette, 100µL of bacteria suspension in BHIB was evenly inoculated over the entire surface of Mueller Hinton agar plate and made uniformed with the aid of a sterile cotton swab stick. Five (5) holes of 8mm was punched aseptically with a sterile cork borer in each of the culture plates. One of the holes was punched at the center of the plate where 10µL of sterile TSB was added as a negative control.

100µL volume of antibiotics was added per well in the other holes and all the plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The clear zones of inhibition around the antibiotics were measured and result interpreted as sensitive, intermediate and resistant in line with the National committee on clinical laboratory standards [11] chart. The experiment was done in triplicate. The concentration of antibiotics used for the susceptibility tests is shown in Table 1. The minimum inhibitory concentration of commonly used antibiotics was evaluated by tube dilution method [12] with slight modifications.

The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of antibiotics was tested by determining their bactericidal activity through counting of the number of bacteria in the initial suspension using the surface plate method. After ascertaining the MIC, the number of bacteria was counted in each of the tubes of the broth that showed invisible turbidity after overnight incubation and was compared with the number of bacteria in the initial suspension. According to NCCLS [11], the lowest concentration of the antibiotics solution that allowed 0.1% of the original inoculum to survive was taken to be the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). The Minimum Biofilm Inhibitory Concentration (MBIC) of commonly used antibiotics in Federal Medical Center, Umuahia as shown in Table 1, against biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa, was determined according to Cernohorska and Votava [13], with slight modifications. The experiment was done on 96-wells polystyrene micro titer round bottomed plates.75µL of an overnight standard culture of 1.5x 10⁸cfu (i.e. 0.5 McFarlane standards) was added to wells of micro titer plates and the plates incubated for 24h at 37°C. These wells were washed three times with Phosphate buffer saline (PBS) under aseptic conditions to remove unattached bacteria and dried in an inverted position.

Volumes of 100µL of appropriate twofold dilutions of the respective antibiotics were transferred into the wells with established biofilms. The micro titer plates were incubated for 18h to 24h at 37oC. Following incubation, 40µl of 0.2% of INT (2-4-Iodophenyl-3-4-nitrophenyl-5-phenyl-2H-tetrazoliumchloride or Iodo Nitro Tetrazolium) was added in all the wells and incubated for further 30 min at 37°C and the MBIC determined, as the concentration which corresponds to the lowest concentration of the antibiotics that inhibited growth of biofilm cells of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa as indicated by the first clear well. The positive and Negative controls were vancomycin and Tryptone soy broth (TSB) respectively. The experiment was carried out in triplicate. The result was analyzed in percentages.

Table 1. Concentrations of Antibiotics used in the study.

3. Result

Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonized majority of the noncritical surfaces/equipment in the various wards when compared to other species of Pseudomonads identified. Sink, Toilet door handle, hand gloves, electronic thermometer and Stethoscope showed significant level of colonization ranging between 14.28% to 66.67%. Moderate colonizationwas observed on noncritical surfaces like bed sheet and bed rail at 9.09% colonization while delivery couch was not colonized by biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The distribution of biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa on noncritical surfaces located in the hospital wards is shown in Table 2.

The resistance profile of biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to some commonly used antibiotics in Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia at statistical significance, P value < 0.05 indicates that 73.43% and 65.05% of the isolates assayed, demonstrated resistance to Aminoglycosides (Gentamycin) and β-Lactamase (Augmentin) respectively, 45.78% and 42.16% were resistant to tetracycline and polypeptide (Colistin), 37.34% and 36.14% were resistant to Macrolides (Erythromycin) and Nitrofurantoin respectively, 25.30% and 21.68% demonstrated resistance to quinolone(Nalidixic acid) and fluoquinolone (Ciprofloxacin)respectively. The least resistant rates were demonstrated by 12.05%, 7.29% and 4.81% of the isolates to Macrolides (Azithromycin), Carbapenem (Meropenem) and Glycopeptides (Vancomycin) respectively. Significant correlation was found between the total percentages resistances to the antibiotics tested. Table 3 showed the resistance profile of biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.

Table 2. Distribution of biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa on noncritical surfaces in various wards

Table 3. Antibiotics Resistant Profile of Biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates

Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonized majority of the noncritical surfaces/equipment in the various wards when compared to other species of Pseudomonads identified. Sink, Toilet door handle, hand gloves, electronic thermometer and Stethoscope showed significant level of colonization ranging between 14.28% to 66.67%. Moderate colonizationwas observed on noncritical surfaces like bed sheet and bed rail at 9.09% colonization while delivery couch was not colonized by biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The distribution of biofilm Pseudomonas aeruginosa on noncritical surfaces located in the hospital wards is shown in Table 2.

Table 4. MIC, MBC and MBIC of commonly used antibiotics against biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Antibacterial activities of most commonly used antibiotics in Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia, shows Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Minimum bactericidal concentration (MIC) and Minimum Biofilm Inhibitory Concentration (MBIC) as in Table 4.

4. Discussion

Resistance of biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa to commonly use antibacterial agents, is becoming an increasing clinical problem and a recognized Public health threat [14]. In this study, the highest resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was observed with aminoglycosides (gentamicin) which was 43.88% (61/139). This resistance rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate is in contrast to studies done in India which was 63% [15] and Turkey which was 57.5% [16]. Higher resistance rates of 75% were also reported from Jordan [17], Bangladesh was 77.3% [18], Saudi Arabia was 85.3% [19] and Malaysia was 94.3% [20]. Bacterial resistance to gentamicin is mainly due to an enzymatic modification of the antibiotic as indicated by Poole [21].

The widely usage of gentamicin in this hospital setting may have also contributed to the high resistance rate seen in this study. The outcome of biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to gentamicin is also not in agreement with high resistance of 87.5% for trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole observed in Addis Ababa [22], 93.5% in Bangledesh [18] and 100% in Iran [23], which are entirely a different antimicrobial agent (trimethoprime-sulphamethodazole).

As indicated by McDonnell and Russell [24], reduced susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to any disinfectant can be associated with the ability of the bacterium to form biofilms. Growth within biofilms gives rise to extensive genetic diversity that, in turn, enhances the potential for resistance against disinfectants to underlying cell modulation of the microenvironment and genetic tolerance to disinfectants.

Contrary to the inhibition posed against planktonic cells by the antimicrobial agents, biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were less susceptible to these agents (antibiotics and disinfectants). Bacteria living as biofilm are often more difficult to eradicate compared to the planktonic mode of growth [25]. Contemporary testing of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) which measures only planktonic susceptibility may be the possible explanation for treatment failures and resistant development among bacterial biofilms. In the present study, the result of MBIC, MBC, MIC and MBEC as highlighted shows the interesting activity of disinfectants commonly used in Federal Medical Center, Umuahia as seen in Agbo et al. [6]

5. Conclusion

The study further indicated that Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from this health facility was less susceptible to commonly prescribed antibacterial drugs, an evidence of circulating drug resistant strain with biofilm phenotype in the hospital community enviroments. [26,27] Despite this observation, Vancomycin, Azithromycin and Meropenem showed very good activity, showing that these antibiotics seem to be a promising therapy for biofilm related Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections especially in emergency situation.

Regular antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance is essential. An effective national and state level area wise monitoring of the resistance patterns of antibiotics policy and draft guild lines should be produced to preserve the antibiotics for better patient managements.

Financial Support

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The entire Medical Laboratory Services staff of FMC Umuahia are acknowledged for cooperation during the study.

References

[1]   | Vernon, M.O., Mary, K., Hayden, M. D.,Williams, E. and Trick, M. D. (2006). Chlorhexidine gluconate to cleanse patients in a Medical Intensive Care Unit. Archives of International. Medical Journal. 166(3): 306-312.
[2]   | Livornese, L. L., Dias, S. and Samel, C., (1992). Hospital-acquired infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium transmitted by electronic thermometers. Annual International Medical Journal 117:1 12-124.
[3]   | Brooks, S., Khan. A. Stoica, D., Griffith, J„ Friedman, L., Mukherji, R., Hameed, R., Schup, N. (1998). Reduction in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridium difficile infections following change to tympanic thermometers. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 19: 333 336.
[4]   | Kamali, E., Jamali, A., Ardebili, A. Ezadi F. & Mohebbi A. (2020). Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance, biofilm forming potential, and the presence of biofilm-related genes among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Res Notes 13, 27 (2020).
[5]   | Gurung J, Khyriem AB, Banik A, Lyngdoh WV, Choudhury B, Bhattacharyya P. (2013). Association of biofilm production with multidrug resistance among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med; 17: 214-8.
[6]   | Agbo E.C, Achi O.K, Nwachukwu E, Obeta M. U, Obiora E. O, Maduka K. M, Oraekeyi, N.P. (2020). Time Kill Kinetics Study of Commonly Used Disinfectants against Biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia-Nigeria. AJBSR. 7(3). MS.ID.001155.
[7]   | Ejinaka O. R., Obeta M.U., Lote-Nwaru, I.E., Agbalaka P.I., Ajik H., Jwanse R.I. (2019). Assessment of Antibiotic Susceptibility pattern on Staphilococus aureus Isolated from Suya (Roasted meat) and Nunu (Milk) sold in Jos Metropolis. Nigerian Biomedical Science Journal 16(4) 14-18.
[8]   | Collins, C.H., Lyne, P. M., Grange J.M. and Falkinham J.O. (2007). Collins and Lyne’s Microbiological methods. 8lh edition. Arnold Publishers-A Member of Hodder headline group London. 455 pages.
[9]   | Macfarlane, S. and Dillon J.F. (2007). Microbial biofilms in the human gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102: 1187-1196.
[10]   | Stepanovic, S, Cirkoric, L., Mijac, V. and Svabic-vlaharic. M., (2007). Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp and Listeria monocytogene on plastic surfaces. Letters in Applied Microbiology), 6 (3): 199-250.
[11]   | NCCLS, (1997). Guidelines for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Assessment Report. 67: 73-78.
[12]   | Jenifer M. A. (2001). Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations. Journal of Antimicrobial chemotherapy 48: Supp 1. S1, 5-16.
[13]   | Cernohorska, L. and Votava, M. (2004). Antibiotic Synergy against biofilm-forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Folia Microbiology, 53(1): 57-60.
[14]   | Meenakumari, S.,Verma, S.H., Absar, A. and Chaudhary, A.(2011). Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an Indian cardiac hospital. Int. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3: 7117-7124.
[15]   | Rakgesh, M.R., Govind, L.N., Kalpesh, M., Rosy, P„ Kanu, P. and Vegad, M. M. (2012). Antibiotic resistance pattern in Pseudomonas aeruginosa species isolated at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Ahmadnbad. National Journal of Medical Research,2: 156-15.

[16]  
Gonlugur, U., Bakici, M.Z., Ozdemir, L., Akkurt, I., Icagasioglu, S. and Gultekin F. (2003). Retrospective analysis of antibiotic susceptibility patterns of respiratory isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Turkish University Hospital. Annual Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Therapy, 2: 5-8.

[17]   | Masaadeh, H. A. and Jaran, A. S. (2009). Incident of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in post-operative wound Infection. American Journal of Infectious Disease, 5: 1-6.
[18]   | Rashid, A., Chowdhury, A., Rahman, H.Z, Begum. S.A. and Muazzam, N. (2007). Infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and antibiotic resistance pattern of tire isolates from Dhaka Medical College Hospital. Bangladesh, Journal of Medical Microbiology; 1: 48-51.
[19]   | Salih, H. A., Abdulbary, M. and Abdul rid a, A.S. (2009). Susceptibility of Pseudomonasa eruginosa isolated from urine to some antibiotics. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 10: 33-36.
[20]   | Al-Kabsi, A. M. Mohammed, Y.B., Yusof, M.D. and Shamala, D. S. (2011). Antimicrobial resistance pattern of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from University of Malaya Medical Centre, Malasia. African Journal of Microbiology’ Research, 5(299): 5266-5272
[21]   | Poolo, K, (2005). Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy,56:20-51

[22]  
Tekie, K. (2008). Surgical wound infection in Tikur Anbessa hospital with special emphasis on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Unpublished MSc thesis in medical microbiology, Addis Ababa University, Medical Faculty, Ethiopia. Accessed on 31 Oct 2018 from: http://etd.aau.edu.et/dspace/bitstream/123456789/2621/1/KASSAYE%20TEKIE.pdf.

[23]   | Hagihi, M: Mandi H, Delshad, R., Nezhady, M and Golizade, S. (2010). Antibiotic resistance pattern of E. Cali, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burnt patients. Uremia Iran International Journal of Academic Research, 2: 377-380.
[24]   | McDonnell, G. and Russell, A. D. (1999). Antiseptics and Disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clinical Microbiology Review, 12: 147-179
[25]   | Donlan, R.M. (2002). Biofilms: Microbial life on surfaces. Journal of Emerging Infectious Disease, 8: 881-890.
[26]   | Aneela S. and Rakshanda, B. (2016). Biofilm Formation by Environmental Microbes Isolated from Hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan, American Science Research Journal for Engineering Technical and Science, 15(1): 240-251.
[27]   | Masood, G., and Zahra, A. (2014). Isolation, Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Pseudomonas Spp. Isolated from Hospital Environment in Tonekabon, North of Iran, Journal of Applied industrial/Environmental Microbiology, 2, (4): 97-101.