<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>American Journal of Public Health Research</journalTitle>
<eissn>2327-6703</eissn>
<publicationDate>2018-03-22</publicationDate>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<startPage>44</startPage>
<endPage>50</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/ajphr-6-2-4</doi>
<publisherRecordId>AJPHR2018624</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">Determinants of Respirable Crystalline Silica Exposure among Sand-stone Workers</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Kanala Chanvirat</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Naesinee Chaiear</name>
<email>naesinee@kku.ac.th</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Thitiworn Choosong</name>
<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
</author>

</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Division of Occupational Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand</affiliationName>

<affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Songkla University, Thailand</affiliationName>
</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">Objective: Our aim was to determine the occupational exposure level for respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and respirable dust (RD) among sandstone workers. Materials and methods: This study was a descriptive analysis of the occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and respirable dust (RD), utilizing personal air sampling from the breathing zone. The samples were collected throughout the 8-h working day: 88 samples were collected from workers performing stone cutting in mines and at home (wetting system), as well as stone chiseling and stone carving (22 samples each). Twenty-two samples were collected of the RD using the Gravimetric method (NIOSH 600), while for occupational exposure, the level of RCS was measured using a NIOSH7601 spectrophotometer. Results: Sand-stone workers had a geometric mean occupational exposure to RD of GM 1.84 mg/m3. The highest respiratory dust (RD) concentration (2.83 mg/m3) was found among the stone carvers. Those cutting stone at the mines had the next highest GM (2.65 mg/m3), while the lowest occupational exposure was seen among those chiseling stone(GM 0.9 mg/m3). The occupational exposure to RCS had a geometric mean of 0.10 mg/m3. The highest exposure group was for those cutting stone in the mines (GM = 0.14 mg/m3) followed by those carving stone (GM = 0.10 mg/m3). The moderate exposure group was for those chiseling stone (GM 0.05 mg/m3 ) followed by those cutting stone at home (GM = 0.03 mg/m3). The low exposure group had a GM of 0.03 mg/m3 for RCS. We found the quartz silica concentrations of the sandstone used in this area high (≤90%) as was the percentage of quartz silica in the airborne particulates for stone carving (ܡ71.4% by volume). Conclusion: The stone cutting in mines group and the stone carving group reached occupational exposure limits to RCS which exceeded the 0.05 mg/m3 OSHA PEL. It is essential to prevent such high exposure through engineering controls, by adapting tools and implementing medical surveillance. All groups had a RCS occupational exposure which would warrant medical surveillance as each group exceeded the OSHA action level of 0.0025 mg/m3.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajphr/6/2/4/ajphr-6-2-4.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword><b> </b>silica</keyword>
<keyword>respirable crystalline silica</keyword>
<keyword>respirable dust</keyword>
<keyword>pneumoconiosis</keyword>
<keyword>sand stone</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
