Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Modeling of the Scattering Process and the Optical Photo-generation Rate of a Dye Sensitized Solar Cell: Influence of the TiO₂ Radius

E. H. O. Gueye, P. D. Tall, O. Sakho, C. B. Ndao, M. B. Gaye, N. M. Ndiaye, B. D. Ngom*, A.C. Beye

Groupe de physique du Solide et Sciences des Matériaux, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar (UCAD), B.P. 25114 Dakar-Fann Dakar (Sénégal)

Abstract: We report on a methodology for optical and electrical modeling of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). In order to take into account the scattering process, the optical model is based on the determination of the effective permittivity of the mixture and the scattering coefficient using Mie and Bruggeman theories, considering spherical particles. Then, from the radiative transfer equation, the optical generation rate of cell is deduced. From the presented model, the dependence effects of the nanoparticles size upon the extinction coefficient and the optical generation rate are evidenced. Thus, we noticed that the extinction coefficient decreases with the increase of the TiO₂ nanoparticles and vanishes when the wavelengths increases in the visible spectrum. A significant uniformity of the absorption for radius smaller than 10 nm is observed, however at a radius about 80 nm, we observe a non-uniformity. The simulated results based on this model are in good agreement with the experimental results.

Keywords: dye-sensitized solar cell, mie theory, scattering parameters

Citation: E. H. O. Gueye, P. D. Tall, O. Sakho, C. B. Ndao, M. B. Gaye, N. M. Ndiaye, B. D. Ngom, A.C. Beye, Modeling of the Scattering Process and the Optical Photo-generation Rate of a Dye Sensitized Solar Cell: Influence of the TiO₂ Radius. American Journal of Nanomaterials, 4 (3). 58-62. January 2016. doi:10.12691/ajn-4-3-2

1. Introduction

Dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are seen as an alternative to conventional solar cells and have been widely studied in recent years [1,2,3]. A DSSC is a mixture of nanostructured thin films, a sensitizer and an electrolyte containing the mediator sandwiched between two electrodes: a transparent conductive oxide as a transparent anode and a counter electrode as a cathode, such DSSC is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Structure of the Dye sensitized solar cell

The efficiency of the dye absorption is one of the paramount parameters that determine the cell performance. Accordingly, the peculiar composition of the photoactive layer, makes it very complicate to establish an optoelectronic model for the DSSCs. Indeed, it is composed of a mixture of three components (titanium dioxide (TiO₂), dye molecules and the electrolyte in which tri-iodide ions are immerged) which could raise homogeneity problems.

Nevertheless, various optical [7,8], electrical [9-18] and optoelectronic [19,20] models have been developed. But, one can notice that various phenomena such as molecular processes for the excitation of the dye, injection within the titanium dioxide and recombination of charges in the dye, cannot be simulated as it have been done for the conventional silicon solar cells [4]. In this paper, an optical model of dye-sensitized solar cell will be presented, putting a focus on the accurate description of the optics in the photoactive layer (by applying Bruggeman's theory, Mie's Theory and radiative transfer equations). The influence of the TiO₂ radius is also studied.

2. Computational Method

The model considered is depicted in Figure 2. Thus, our study is essentially limited to the photoactive layer sandwiched between the two electrodes. The photoactive layer is a mixture of Titanium dioxide (TiO₂), a dye (Z907), a mediator and an electrolyte. For the calculation of the effective permittivity, we use the same approach as that used in our previous paper [21].

Figure 2. Schematic of the cell

Firstly, we calculate the scattering cross sections and absorption through the Mie theory in the case of a mono-dispersed nanoparticle size. Our medium is composed of three compounds; we calculate the scattering cross sections for the nanostructured thin films (TiO₂ here) and electrolyte / mediator. The particle sizes of dyes are low [7], therefore they do not participate in the scattering process. Then macroscopic scattering and absorption coefficient s and k will be calculated for each compound, using the following equations.

[picture] | (1)

[picture] | (2)

Where i = electrolyte/mediator or TiO₂; j = TiO₂ or dye or electrolyte /mediator. The particle density of the electrolytic/ mediator will be given by the equation:

[picture] | (3)

The hypothesis we making here is to consider the TIO₂/Dye as one particle. Since the diffusion of the dyes particles is very low we consider that the particle (TiO₂/Dye) have the same dimensions as the simple TiO2 particle [7]. On the other hands since the TiO₂ particle doesn't absorb we consider also that the absorption of the particle (TiO₂/Dye is just coming from the simple dye particle Therefore we have:

[picture] | (4)

With P the porosity.

Then:

[picture] | (5)

[picture] | (6)

Afterwards the macroscopic coefficients K and S are used to calculate the collimated flux (Ic and Jc) and diffused flux (Id and Jd). Basically, the approximation of the radiative transfer equation are done using four flux [22] and the equations are given by (equations: 7-10). These different flux are illustrated in Figure 3. In fact, the variation of the flows in the medium with an infinitesimal value of the thickness dx can be established using the equilibrium between the scattering and the absorption energy in forward and backward.

[picture] | (7)

[picture] | (8)

[picture] | (9)

[picture] | (10)

Figure 3. Schema of the cell with different flux

The factor is the equivalent path length for the diffuse flux which ranges from 1 for collimated light to 2 for isotropic scattered light [23]. Thus, the analytical expression of the forward scattering ratio is obtained from C. Rozé et al. analysis [24].

The four flux Ic, Id, Jc and Jd included in the previous equations, (7), (8), (9) and (10) are determined by taking into account the following boundary conditions.

At the Glass/Mixed zone: x=a

[picture] | (11)

[picture] | (12)

where , , , the reflective coefficient of collimated beam, the reflective coefficient of radiation diffuse beam, the reflective coefficient of collimated beam at the back, the reflective coefficient of radiation diffuse beam at back side respectively.

and are the incident collimated flux and the incident diffuse flux at the interface x=a. can be determined by taking into account the interference effects at the glass/mixed zone and air/glass interfaces and is given as:

[picture] | (13)

In fact, is equal to zero and is the incoming light.

At the Mixed zone/Glass: x=0

By considering the reflection effects at the air/glass and the glass/mixed interfaces the following conditions can be established:

[picture] | (14)

[picture] | (15)

Where:

[picture] | (16)

[picture] | (17)

Where is determined using bruggeman theory.

Thus, the local optical absorption rate per unit volume [8] can be established using the expression below:

[picture] | (18)

Hence, the optical photons absorption rate is deduced from [25], and is expressed as:

[picture] | (19)

And Gdye is deduced by:

[picture] | (20)

Finally, the optical photo-generation rate of the DSSC is given by:

[picture] | (21)

where being the injection rate of electrons.

3. Results and Discussion

The analytical model presented above is validated with experimental data reported in the literature (Cf section D) [18]. After calculating the analytical new expressions presented in the previous section, a numeric based code program implemented by the commercial package Matlab software is established. Basically, numerical results are presented and discussed in this section. Thus, the macroscopic parameters such as the extinction coefficient, the four flux and the optical generation rate of the DSSC in term of various phenomenological parameters such as the wavelength of the incoming light, the TiO₂ nanoparticles radius, the depth of the photoactive layer are depicted.

3.1. The Extinction Coefficient of the Mixture Material within the Photoactive Layer

The Figure 4 shows the extinction coefficient of the TiO₂-dye (Z907) as a function of the wavelength for different TiO₂ nanoparticles radius ranging from 10 and 20 nm. All the obtained spectrums show the same trend, however, when the radius increases, the extinction coefficient decreases. The reason is that, when the radius increases, the absorption decreases because of the disappearance of the surface absorption effects [8].

In Figure 5 is depicted the effective extinction coefficient of the mixture {TiO₂+dye (Z907)+electrolyte+mediator} within the photoactive layer as function of the wavelength from 400-800 nm for different TiO₂ nanoparticles radius ranging from 10 and 20 nm. Compared to the results obtained in figure 4, the intensity of the extinction coefficient presented in figure 5 decreases when the size of TiO₂ nanoparticles increases. Three areas are identified: 400 nm to 450 nm, 450 nm to 600 nm and 600 nm to 800 nm. Except the wavelength region between 400 nm and 450 nm, where we observe a behavior similar to that of the mediator, the trend of the mixture is the same for the two other regions and completely different from the trend of the mediator. Such observed behavior on {TiO₂+dye (Z907)+electrolyte+mediator} mixture on the first region is due to the absorbance of the mediator which happens only between 400 nm and 450 nm.

Figure 4. Extinction coefficient of photo-active layer (mixture TiO₂ + Z907) as a function of wavelength for different radii of the TiO2 particle

Figure 5. Extinction coefficient of photo-active layer (mixture TiO₂ + Z907+acétonitrile-I⁻/I₃⁻) as a function of wavelength for different radii of the TiO₂ particle

3.2. Scattering of Multiple Particles

The values of the 4 flux Ic, Jc, Id and Jd can be calculated as function of the depth of the cell, from the diffusion coefficients, the macroscopic absorption, the forward scattering ratio and the equivalent path length. Figure 6 shows the flux as function of the cell depth. One can see that for small radius, Ic decreases slightly and much part of flux reaches the edge of the cell. This is due to the small extinction and diffusion coefficient for small radius. The others flux are very small compared to the Ic flux for 10 nm. This phenomenon became different with radius ranging from 20 nm to 40 nm, where Ic rapidly decreases, while Id increases in the first half of the cell. Therefore the light reaching the edge of the cell is spread. Jd has also a large value like Id. This due to the small increase in the diffusion coefficient. For much larger radius (80 nm), Ic rapidly decreases, while Id increases right at the edge before rapidly decreasing too. Because of the high diffusion of the molecules with larger radius, only a small part of the flux touches the edge of the cell.

3.3. Determination of the Generation Rate

Figure 7a shows, the generation rate of the photoactive layer depending on the depth of the mixed. In this figure, we compare our model and that of Wenger et al. [19]. We can see that our results are in the same range of values than those calculated by Wenger et al. [19].

Figure 7b shows the generation rate of the photoactive layer as a function of depth and for different radius. It seems that for low radius the absorption is fairly homogeneous, as the scattering of light is low, as shown in Figure 6a, the intensity of the collimated light is almost constant. More the radius increases more scattering increases, which cause an increase of diffusion flux and a decrease of the collimated flux. Such behavior makes the major part of the intensity being absorbed at the edge of the cell, because of the process of scattering and extinction.

Figure 6. Collimated flux (Ic, Jc) and diffuse flux (Id, Jd), for different radii of TiO₂ (a − 10nm, b − 20nm, c − 40nm, d- 80nm) particle I₀=1000W m–2

Figure 7. Generation rate of photo active layer as a function of the cell depth (a: comparison between our model and Sophie Wenger results, b: for different radii of TiO₂)

4. Conclusion

Our model allows us to see the influence of the nanoparticle size of TiO₂ on the effective extinction coefficient of the mixture. The influence of the nanoparticle size of TiO₂ on the generation rate was demonstrated. This study allowed seeing that for the small radius, the generation rate is homogeneous. When radius increases, almost all the light is absorbed at the edge of the cell. Our results are in agreement with those in the literature. However, this model shows limitations: the porosity is fixed, the nanoparticles are not ideally spherical and same size, and the difference between the reflected coefficient diffused and collimated could be taken into account for better precision.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful for the funding by the UEOMA under the PAIS project.

References

[1]   | O’Regan, B., Grätzel, M., “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO₂ films,” Nature, 353-737, 1991.
[2]   | Wang, Q., Ito, S., Gratzel, M., Fabregat-Santiago, F., Mora-Sero, I., Bisquert, J., Bessho, T., and Imai, H., “Characteristics of High Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells,” J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 25210-25221, 2006.
[3]   | Mathew, S., Yella, A., Gao, P., Humphry-Baker, R., Curchod, B.F.E., Tavernelli, I., Rothlisberger, U., Nazeeruddin M.K., and Grätzel, M., “Dye-sensitized solar cells with 13% efficiency achieved through the molecular engineering of porphyrin sensitizers,” Nature Chemistry 6, 242-247, 2014.
[4]   | Green, M. A., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W., and Dunlop, E. D., “Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 45),” Progress in photovoltaics: research and applications, 23(1), 1-9, 2015.
[5]   | Chiba, Y.; Islam, A.; Watanabe, Y.; Komiya, R.; Koide, N.; Han, L., J. Appl. Phys., Part 2, 45, L638-L640, 2006.
[6]   | Gao, F.; Wang, Y., Shi, D., Zhang, J., Wang, M. K., Jing, X. Y., Humphry-Baker, R., Wang, P., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Grätzel, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10720-10728 ,2008.
[7]   | Ferber, J., and Luther, J., “Computer simulations of light scattering and absorption in dye-sensitized solar cells.” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 54 (1998)
[8]   | Rothenberger, G., Comte, P., Gratzel, M., “A contribution to the optical design of dye_sensitized nanocrystalline solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 58, 321-336, 1999.
[9]   | Soedergren, S., Hagfeldt, A., Olsson, J., and Lindquist, S. E., “Theoretical models for the action spectrum and the current-voltage characteristics of microporous semiconductor films in photoelectrochemical cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 98(21), 5552-5556, 1994.
[10]   | Matthews, D., Infelta, P., and Grätzel, M, “Calculation of the photocurrent-potential characteristic for regenerative, sensitized semiconductor electrodes.” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 44(2), 119-155, 1996.
[11]   | Ferber, J., Stangl, R., and Luther, J., “An electrical model of the dye-sensitized solar cell,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 53(1), 29-54, 1998.
[12]   | Usami, A., “Theoretical study of application of multiple scattering of light to a dye-sensitized nanocrystalline photoelectrichemical cell,” Chemical Physics Letters, 277(1), 105-108, 1997.
[13]   | Usami, A., “Theoretical study of charge transportation in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO₂ electrodes,” Chemical physics letters, 292(1), 223-228, 1998.
[14]   | Ferber, J., Stangl, R., and Luther, J., “An electrical model of the dye-sensitized solar cell,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 53(1), 29-54, 1998.
[15]   | Stangl, R., Ferber, J., & Luther, J., “On the modeling of the dye-sensitized solar cell,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 54(1), 255-264, 1998.
[16]   | Usami, A., & Ozaki, H., “Computer simulations of charge transport in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline photovoltaic cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 105(20), 4577-4583, 2001.
[17]   | Bisquert, J., Cahen, D., Hodes, G., Rühle, S., & Zaban, A., “Physical chemical principles of photovoltaic conversion with nanoparticulate, mesoporous dye-sensitized solar cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 108(24), 8106-8118, 2004.
[18]   | Filipič, M., Berginc, M., Smole, F., & Topič, M., “Analysis of electron recombination in dye-sensitized solar cell,” Current Applied Physics, 12(1), 238-246, 2012.
[19]   | Wenger, S., Schmid, M., Rothenberger, G., Gentsch, A., Gratzel, M., and Schumacher, J. O., “Coupled Optical and Electronic Modeling of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells for Steady-State Parameter Extraction,” J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 10218–10229, 2011.
[20]   | Topič, M., Čampa, A., Filipič, M., Berginc, M., Krašovec, U. O., & Smole, F., “Optical and electrical modelling and characterization of dye-sensitized solar cells,” Current Applied Physics, 10(3), S425-S430, 2010.
[21]   | Gueye, E.H.O., Tall, P. D., Ndao, C. B., Dioum, A., Dione, A. N., & Beye, A. C. (2016). An Optical and Electrical Modeling of Dye Sensitized Solar Cell: Influence of the Thickness of the Photoactive Layer. American Journal of Modeling and Optimization, 4(1), 13-18.
[22]   | C. Rozé, T. Girasole, G. Gréhan, G.Gouesbet, B.Maheu. Four-flux models to solve the scattering transfer equation in terms of Lorenz-Mie parameters. Optics communications 194. (2001). 251-263.
[23]   | G. Kortum, Reflectance Spectroscopy, Springer, Berlin, 1969.
[24]   | B. Maheu, J. N. Letoulouzan and G. Gouesbet. Four-flux models to solve the scattering transfer equation in terms of Lorenz-Mie parameters. Applied Optics Vol. 23, No. 19 (1984).

[25]  
A. Dioum, S. Ndiaye, E. H. O. Gueye, M. B. Gaye, D. N. Faye, O. Sakho, M. Faye and A. C. Beye. 3-D Modeling of bilayer heterojunction organic solar cell based on Copper Phthalocyanine and Fullerene (CuPc/C60): evidence of total excitons dissociation at the donor-acceptor interface. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, Vol 19 (2013).