Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Incisional Hernia in Pregnancy at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Southern Nigeria

Wichendu Promise*, Gbeneol Tombari

Consultant General Surgeon, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Choba, Port Harcourt

Abstract: Background: Aim: incisional hernias occur through a weakness at the site of abdominal wall closure after surgery and is a common condition encountered in day to day surgical practice. It lends itself to multiple and varied aetiological factors. Despite recent advances in the management of incisional hernias, the recurrence rate is still high. Incisional hernia is uncommon in pregnancy, however when it occurs serious and life-threatening complications may arise. Thus there is a need to revisit the possible aetiological factors that may give rise to incisional hernia in our locality so as to prevent them. To our knowledge no such study has ever been undertaking here. Materials and methods This is a five-year retrospective survey conducted at the antenatal clinic of the university of Port Harcourt Teaching hospital in southern Nigeria between January 2008 to December 2013. A total of one hundred and seven patients with incisional hernia were identified and some aetiological factors for incisional hernia in the patient were deciphered. Each patient’s abdomen was examined to confirm the presence of incisional hernia, and type of surgical incision used. All these were collated and analysed. Results: Obesity was the commonest risk factor 78 (72.9%), while wound sepsis accounted for 61 (57.0%) Nearly all patients had longitudinal incisions 105 (98.1%) while for some 11 (10.3%), there were no identifiable risk factors. Also, Caesarean section accounted for majority of the surgeries that led to incisional hernia in the study population 72(67.3%) followed by myomectomy. Emergency surgeries were complicated by incisional hernia than elective Conclusion: This study found that the commonest aetiological factors for incisional hernia in our locality but not limited to: Obesity, wound sepsis, emergency surgeries as well as longitudinal incisions. Interestingly these are all modifiable risk factors and are amenable to health education and sound surgical techniques.

Keywords: incisional, hernia, abdomen, pregnancy, aetiology, sepsis

Received January 01, 2021; Revised January 20, 2021; Accepted January 28, 2021

Citation: Wichendu Promise, Gbeneol Tombari, Incisional Hernia in Pregnancy at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Southern Nigeria. American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine, 9 (1). 13-16. January 2021. doi:10.12691/ajmsm-9-1-3

1. Introduction

An Incisional hernia exists when there is a protrusion of an intra-abdominal viscus, through an anterior abdominal wall fascial defect following an abdominal surgical incision. [1] in Europe the term “ventral hernia” is used synonymously with incisional hernia while in USA, ventral hernia is used to describe all abdominal wall hernia, other than groin hernias [2].

Incisional hernia is a common surgical condition encountered in day to day practice. The reported incidence of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy varies widely ranging from 3-22% and becomes doubled if the wound gets infected [3,4]. Usually 50% of incisional hernias are detected within 1 year of surgery, but they can occur several years after surgery, with a subsequent risk of 2% per year [5]. Consequently, incisional hernia repair is a common procedure with about 350,000 repairs performed annually in the United States [6].

Patient-specific risk factors for postoperative ventral hernia include advanced age, malnutrition, presence of ascites, corticosteroid use, diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, wound infection, wound dehiscence emergency surgery and obesity. [7,8,9,10,11] Other factors include use of vertical abdominal incisions, recurrent incisions and previous laparotomy, post abdominal wound dehiscence and a low preoperative haematocrit [12,13].

Patients with some connective tissue diseases (Marfan’s syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome) have increased incidence of incisional hernia [14,15].

Usually the diagnosis is clinical and ultrasound, CT scan and MRI are only required in situations where the diagnosis is not clear. Treatment strategy is dependent on whether it is elective or emergency presentation. Operative treatment is done for complicated cases while elective cases throws up a variety of therapeutic options.

A conservative approach, including manual reduction and use of an abdominal binders, trusses and corsets during the antenatal period and labour, has been applied with varying success [16,17,18,19] These nonsurgical management options are considered to be ineffective. Nevertheless, these may be the only options in a patient who is not a reasonable risk for surgery [20,21,22].

Surgery remains the only viable therapeutic option, and techniques of repair has progressed from simple herniorrhaphy to hernioplasty currently. Tension free mesh repairs are now considered the gold standard of surgical care. Surgical techniques continue to improve with the advent of Laparoscopic and robotic approaches in the management of this pathology. Mesh repair has decreased the high recurrence rate historically associated with primary suture repair to less than 25%. [23,24,25] However, mesh related problems such as wound complications, discomfort, pain and a potential loss of elasticity of the abdominal wall raise the question whether all patients should have mesh repair [26,27].

There is no consensus on the management of hernia in pregnant women because previous study samples are small and experience in hospitals is limited. Pregnancy after repair of a hernia with mesh is safe and there is no increased risk of relapse [28]. In the absence of emergency indications, conservative management is preferred. [29]. Interestingly simultaneous repair and caesarean delivery have been reported with those with elective indications even though this is still controversial [30,31,32].

This study was done to highlight the existence of a etiological factors in the causation of incisional hernia in pregnancy thus sensitizing us to these challenges with the hope of mitigating them.

2. Materials and Methods

This is a five-year retrospective survey conducted at the antenatal clinic of the university of Port Harcourt Teaching hospital in southern Nigeria between January 2008 to December 2013.

Prospective cases were identified at the antenatal clinics of the institution by the research team, consisting of a General surgeon, a plastic surgeon and 3 research assistants.

The University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital is a five hundred bed tertiary care health facility located in the south-southern part of Nigeria. It sees an average of two hundred thousand (200,000) patients annually with about two thousand (2,000) antenatal clinic attendance yearly.

Any antenatal clinic attendee with any circumscribed abdominal swelling around a previous surgical scar was referred to members of the team for further scrutiny and if confirmed to be an incisional hernia was enlisted into the study after obtaining due consent.

A research proforma was used to extract relevant data from the patient, and/ or the case records if the index surgery was done at the facility.

Data extracted include patient’s age, occupation, elective or emergency nature of the surgery and type of surgery, history suggestive of known risk factors like postoperative wound sepsis, dehiscence, wound re-suture and previous multiple laparotomies were sought and recorded. The abdomen was examined to confirm the presence of incisional hernia, and type of surgical incision used.

The patient ‘s height was measured and her prenatal weight ascertained. The data were analysed using SPSS version 22.

2.1. Inclusion Criteria

All antenatal clinic attendees with the above features

2.2. Exclusion Criteria

Patients whose index surgery was done outside our domain and are unable to provide reliable and sufficient information for us to make reasonable conclusions were excluded.

3. Results

A total of one hundred and seven patients who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study were recruited. Their ages range from 20 to 49 years, and more than half were within the (30 to 39) year age bracket Table 1. All the patients, understandably were in the reproductive age group (15-49 years).

Table 1. Age of Patients

Obesity was the commonest risk factor 78 (72.9%), while wound sepsis accounted for 61 (57.0%) Nearly all patients had longitudinal incisions 105 (98.1%) while for some 11 (10.3%), no aetiological factors were deciphered Table 2.

Table 2. Risk factors:

Caesarean section accounted for majority of the surgeries that led to incisional hernia in the study population 72 (67.3%) followed by myomectomy as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Type of surgery

Emergency surgeries 68 (63.3%) accounted for more of the previous surgeries done than elective Table 4.

Table 4. Elective /emergency surgery

4. Discussion

One hundred and seven patients with incisional hernias attending antenatal clinic at the institution were studied, as will be expected they were all within the reproductive age group and it has been reported that approximately every tenth patient undergoing incisional hernia repair is a woman of childbearing age. [33] This age group are the ones subjected to prolonged or repeated pregnancy and labour involving stretching and weakness of the abdominal musculature and the ones most likely to undergo surgeries. Thus incisional hernia is more prevalent in this group. [34]

The risk factors encountered in our study population include obesity, wound sepsis, vertical incisions, prolonged ileus, wound dehiscence, recurrent laparotomies, emergency surgeries, and in some cases no aetiological factors could be adduced. These findings have been replicated by other workers. [7,8,9,10,11]

Obesity was a risk factor for 78 (72.9%) of our patients, Ahmed Alenazi et al [35] reported 51.9% of their cases as obese. The slightly lower figure in their series may be due to the fact that he considered all anterior abdominal wall hernias not just incisional hernias. Other authors also found obesity a significant risk factor. [36,37] Obesity affects incisional hernia indirectly by increasing the risk of wound infection and obesity related comorbid diseases (diabetes, atherosclerosis, etc.) as well as making abdominal closure technically more difficult.

Wound sepsis as an important risk factor as was also found in our study where 61(57%) had it in their index surgery. This has been replicated in other studies with one study reporting a figure as high as 79.5% [12,34,37,38]. Wound infection predisposes to acute wound failure with postoperative separation of musculoaponeurotic layers and later incisional hernia if not promptly managed. All measures to prevent wound infection must be implemented even though these have not been helped by the constant mutations of the contaminating microbes and consequent development of antibiotic resistance. Wound dehiscence which usually follows wound sepsis was the risk factor in 19 (17.8%) cases as has been recorded by previous researchers. [12]

Vertical midline incision was recorded in 78 (72.9%) cases. This type of incision is a known risk factor in incisional hernia formation. Studies have shown that transverse incisions are associated with a reduced incidence of incisional hernia compared to midline vertical laparotomies, although the data are far from conclusive [5,10,13,37]. The least resistance to stress by intra-abdominal forces is offered by vertical incision, which transects the transversely oriented fascia fibers of the anterior abdominal wall, thus transverse incisions, like Pffanenstiel have lower incidence of incisional hernia.

Caesarean section accounted for 67 (62.6) of the surgeries that resulted in incisional hernias. This is the commonest surgery in women in the reproductive age group and accounted for the highest number of cases of incisional hernia [12]. This is followed by myomectomy another common surgery in women of this age group and General surgical operations then follow.

Emergency surgery is known to increase the risk of incisional hernia formation as has been found in our study (see Table 4) and also reported by other workers. Work done by Pollock in 1989, revealed that only 1.2% of the patients operated on elective basis had incisional hernia compared to 23.9% of the patients operated on emergency basis. [10,39]

Increased intra abdominal pressure due either to ileus or adhesions does not enhance the healing of an abdominal scar, especially midline scar leading to increased incidence of incisional hernia.[37] This was also evident from our study.

In eleven patients (11, 10,3%) no risk factor could be elicited, and hernia occurrence in these situations may be attributable to poor surgical techniques like overuse of diathermy, rough tissue handling, use of absorbable suture material, non-adherence to Jenkins rule and Smead Jones mass closure technique. [5,40] Other factors that may account for this include presence of chronic cough, immunosuppression, hypoproteinaemia, and renal insufficiency. We did not include these risk factors in our study ab initio.

5. Conclusion

This study found that the commonest aetiological factors for incisional hernia in our locality include obesity, emergent surgeries, caesarean section operations, wound sepsis, longitudinal incisions.as well some occult factors. These are all modifiable risk factors, thus a reduction of the frequency of occurrence of incisional hernia and its complications in female patients can be achieved through a combination of health education and sound surgical techniques with good wound care. Other measures include a preference for transverse incision, and prophylactic use of mesh and antibiotics when indicated.

References

[1]   | Malangoni MA, Hernias RMJ. In: Townsend et al., editors. Townsend: Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 19th ed. New York: Saunders; 2012. pp. 1114-1140.
[2]   | Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN. The modern management of incisional hernia. BMJ. 2012; 344: 37-42.
[3]   | Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 70.
[4]   | Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN et al: Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 51-54.
[5]   | Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: A prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. BMJ. 1982; 284: 931-933.
[6]   | Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S et al: Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: Making the case for hernia research. Hernia 2012; 16: 179-183.
[7]   | Santora TA, Rosalyn JJ. Incisional hernia. Surg Clin North Am 1993; 73: 557
[8]   | Regnard JF, Hay JM, Rea S. Ventral incisional hernias: incidence, date of recurrence, localization, and risk factors. Ital J Surg Sci 1988; 3: 259
[9]   | Read RC, Yoder G. Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg 1989; 124:485
[10]   | Greenall MJ, Evans M, Pollack AV. Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part I: influence on healing. Br J Surg 1980; 67: 188.
[11]   | Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Juvonen T, et al. Factors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy. Am J Surg 1995; 170: 387.
[12]   | Adesunkanmi AR, Faleyimu B. Incidence and aetiological factors of incisional hernia in post-caesarean operations in a Nigerian hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 23: 258-60.
[13]   | Wall PD, Deucy EE, Glantz JC, Pressman EK. Vertical skin incisions and wound complications in the obese parturient. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102(5 Pt 1): 952-6.
[14]   | Girotto JA, Malaisrie SC, Bulkely G, Manson PN. Recurrent ventral herniation in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2000; 106: 1520-1526.
[15]   | Klinge U, Binnebosel M, Mertens PR. Are collagens the culprits in the development of incisional and inguinal hernia disease? Hernia. 2006; 10: 472-477.
[16]   | Dare FO, Makinde OO, Lawal OO. Gravid uterus in abdominal wall hernia of a Nigerian woman. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 32: 377-379.
[17]   | Boys CE. Strangulated hernia containing pregnant uterus at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1945; 50: 450-452.
[18]   | Banerjee N, Deka D, Sinha A, Prasrad R, Takkar D. Gravid uterus in an incisional hernia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2001; 27: 77-79. [PubMed]
[19]   | Nagpal M, Kaur S. Herniated pregnant uterus with bleeding from previous abdominal scar. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2003; 53: 283.
[20]   | Heniford BT. SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surgical Endoscopy. 2016; 30(8): 3161-3162
[21]   | Souza JM, Dumanian GA. Routine use of bioprosthetic mesh is not necessary: A retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of intraabdominal midweight polypropylene mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surgery. 2013; 153(3): 393-399.

[22]  
de Vries HS, Smeeing D, Lourens H, Kruyt PM, Mollen RMHG. Long-term clinical experience with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a ParietexTM composite mesh in severely obese and non-severe obese patients: A single center cohort study. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies. 2018; 11: 1-5.

[23]   | Millikan KW, Baptisa M, Amin B, et al. Intraperitoneal underlay ventral hernia repair utilizing bilayer ePTFE and polypropylene mesh. Am Surg 2003; 69: 258.
[24]   | McLanahan D, King LT, Weems C, et al. Retrorectus prosthetic mesh repair of midline abdominal hernia. Am J Surg 1997; 173: 445.
[25]   | den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW. (2008). Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. In: Tuinebreijer WE (ed) Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Wiley, Chichester, p CD006438.
[26]   | Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A, Giboni P, Niewiera M, Schumpelick V. Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernia using mesh implants. Hernia 2001; 5: 113-8.
[27]   | Kim WB, Kim J, Boo YJ, Park SH, Song TJ, Suh SO (2009) Successful vaginal delivery following laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction in an adult survivor of an omphalocele without prior surgical repair: report of a case. Hernia 13:431-434.
[28]   | Schoenmaeckers E, Stirler V, Raymakers J, Rakic S. Pregnancy following laparoscopic mesh repair of ventral abdominal wall hernia. JSLS 2012;16: 85-8
[29]   | Malhotra M, Sharma JB, Wadhwa L et al. Successful pregnancy outcome after cesarean section in a case of gravid uterus growing in an incisional hernia of the anterior abdominal wall. Indian J Med Sci 2003; 57: 501-503
[30]   | AltchekA,RudickJ. Preperitoneal herniorrhaphy: Adjunct to cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 470-471
[31]   | Ochsenbein-Kolble N, Demartines N, Ochsenbein-Imhof N, Zimmermann R. Cesarean section and simultaneous hernia repair. Arch Surg 2004; 139: 893-985
[32]   | Bani D. Relaxin: A pleiotropic hormone. Gen Pharmacol 1997; 28: 13-22.
[33]   | Oma E, Henriksen NA, Jensen KK: Ventral hernia and pregnancy: A systematic review. Am J Surg 2019; 217: 163-168.
[34]   | Agbakwuru E, Olabanji J, Alatise O, Okwerekwu R, Esimai O. Incisional Hernia in Women: Predisposing Factors and Management Where Mesh is not Readily Available Libyan J Med. 2009 Jun 1; 4(2): 66-9.
[35]   | Ahmed Alenazi A, Alsharif MM, Hussain MA, Alenezi NG, Alenazi AA, Almadani SA, Alanazi NH, Alshammari JH, Altimyat AO, Alanazi TH. (2017). Prevalence, risk factors and character of abdominal hernia in Arar City, Northern Saudi Arabia in 2017. Electronic physician, 9 (7): 4806.
[36]   | Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 2002; 73(5): 474-80.
[37]   | Carlson MA, Ludwig KA, Condon RE. Ventral hernia and other complications of 1000 midline incision. South Med J 1995; 88(4): 450-453.
[38]   | Sugerman H.J. (2001). Hernia and Obesity. In: Bendavid R., Abrahamson J., Arregui M.E., Flament J.B., Phillips E.H. (eds) Abdominal Wall Hernias. Springer, New York, NY: 672-674.
[39]   | Greenall MJ, Evans M, Pollock AV. Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part 2: Influence on postoperative puhnonary complications. Br J Surg. 1980; 67: 191-4.
[40]   | Jenkins TPN. The burst abdominal wound: A mechanical approach. Br J Surg 1976; 63: 873-876D.