Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Effect of Refractive Error (Ametropia) on Central Visual Field of Young Adults in Owerri Municipal, Imo State, Nigeria

Nwakuche I. P.*, Iwuagwu F. O., Ikonne E. U.

Department of Optometry, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano State, Nigeria

Abstract: The present study investigated the effect of refractive error or ametropia on the spatial array of vision among young adults in Owerri Municipal, Imo State, Nigeria. The examined ametropias were myopia and hyperopia. A total of 100 persons were used for this study, 40 % had normal binocular central visual field, while 60 % of the total number had abnormal central visual field. The result revealed that ametropes whose degree of error > ±7.00 D had no normal binocular central visual field, while those with < ±3.00 D had a higher percentage normal visual field in decreasing diopters. A non-significant difference (p<0.05) was observed on the effect of myopes and hyperopes on the central visual fields of the examined subjects. The result obtained from the effect of gender on ametropic condition indicated no association between central visual field involvements with sex in ametropic condition of the eye. However, the ametropic condition of the higher degree affects the central isopter size drastically. There were significant relationship (p< 0.05) observed in myopia, hyperopia and the blind spot size. The present study has established that ametropia affects the central visual field efficiency in young adults.

Keywords: ametropia, refractive error, visual field, myopes, hyperopes

Received May 18, 2019; Revised June 26, 2019; Accepted July 05, 2019

Citation: Nwakuche I. P., Iwuagwu F. O., Ikonne E. U., Effect of Refractive Error (Ametropia) on Central Visual Field of Young Adults in Owerri Municipal, Imo State, Nigeria. American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine, 7 (2). 26-29. January 2019. doi:10.12691/ajmsm-7-2-1

1. Introduction

Worldwide, the scourges of visual impairment owed to uncorrected refractive error affect over 200 million people [1]. The global statistics of World Health organization (WHO) has revealed population strength of over 160 million with visual impairment, while 37 million out of the population are blind people, and 1.4 million of the score are children under the age of 15, while 125 million people have severely impaired vision [2].

These problems often progress by inability of the eyes to focus on a central point. The sensational spatial array of vision available to observation which includes the total area covered by the eye when focused on a central point is referred to as visual field. Visual systems provide relevant information and offer molecular regulatory network to guide various cellular and feedback eye relay to the brain such as locomotion, reading and accommodation [3,4]. Again, visual field can be examined to measure the extent and distribution of the field of vision. The test may be performed by a number of methods including what are termed tangent screen exam, confrontation, and automated perimetry. Furthermore, many deviations from the normal health status can adversely affect the visual field. Hence, visual field assessment could serve as a monitoring parameter for the diagnosis of recurrent diseases and acts as guide for the treatment of some idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), multiple sclerosis, glaucoma and some other optic neuropathy [5]. In a similar role, some medications such as antimalarial drugs like chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine and lifestyle activities like excessive use of cigarettes, or chronic exposure to its compounds, affects visual discrimination, supporting the existence of overall deficits in visual processing of unhealthy lifestyles [6].

It has been established that peripheral vision is potentially important for this activity performed by the cell. However, there may be some observable conditions where the image fails to focus as a result of refractive errors. This is a clinical condition called ametropia. The central visual field is significantly impaired in ametropic conditions of the eye especially in myopia and hyperopia. Most of these conditions can cause a reduction in the visual performance of an individual which unfortunately leads to unpleasant ocular symptoms. The most commonly known symptoms are repeatedly complaints including: eye strain, headaches, blurred vision and intermittent double vision [7].

Recently, an increasing numbers of myopia cases have been globally felt. However, the leading cause and reliable ameliorative measures has not been fully established [8]. Myopia and hyperopia are frequent types of refractive error. People with myopia remain at risk for conditions caused by excessive axial elongation. Similarly, retinal detachment, myopic maculopathy, myopic retinopathy and glaucoma are predisposing factors for high myopia. Again, restriction in the lower visual field during stair walking results in more cautious locomotor behaviour such as walking slower and using the handrails. In daily activities, tasks or conditions that restrict or alter the lower visual field information may elevate the risk for missteps and falls [9].

In all, the prevalence of refractive errors in children and young adults has long been documented and becomes more frequent in the population as age increases. Also, certain pathological conditions of the eye such as optic nerve defect, Retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma, affect the size of the field. Therefore, the present study investigated the effect of major ametropia; myopia and hyperopia on the central visual field of young adults.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Location

The present study was conducted in a large cross-sectional examination of young adult in Owerri Municipal, Imo State. The ametropic conditions investigated were myopes and hyperopes. A total of hundred (100) persons were used for this study, 40 % of them had normal binocular central visual field, while 60 % of the total number had abnormal central visual field.

2.2. Refractive Error

The magnitude of error existing in these patients was determined through Retinoscopy and subjective refraction on these patients.

The refractive error readings were reported as a spherical equivalent (SE) (sphere power plus half-negative cylinder power). Hyperopia was defined to be spherical equivalent higher than +0.5 D and emmetropia to be higher than −0.5 and lower than +0.5 D. Myopia was defined to be with a SE lower than −0.5 D.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to characterize the participants’ clinical data using GraphPath Prism statistical software version 7.03. The data were tested at 95 % level of confidence using Chi-square.

3. Results

The effect of magnitude error (diopters) on percentage central visual field result is shown in (Table 1). The table indicates that ametropes whose degree of error is above ±7.00 D had no normal binocular central visual field.

Table 1. Effect of magnitude error (diopters) on percentage central visual field

Table 2 revealed the degree of ametropic conditions on central visual field. The effect was tested on myopes and hyperopes. There were no significant relationship (p<0.05) observed on the effect of myopes and hyperopes on the central visual fields. The abnormal central isopter for myopes were higher than those of the hyperopes.

Table 2. Effect of myopes and hyperopes on central visual field of the eye

Table 3 showed the effect of gender on central visual field in ametropic condition of the eye. From the result, there was no significant difference observed (p<0.05) between the central isopter and abnormal central isopter in both male and female gender.

Table 3. Effect of gender on central visual field in ametropic condition of the eye

The result of the normal blind spot at various distances 1 and 2 m showed an increase in 2 mm stimulus target as the distance changes in both directions (vertical and horizontal) as shown in (Table 4).

Table 4. Normal blind spot at 1 meter and 2 meters distance for a white 2mm stimulus target

There were significant relationship (p< 0.05) observed in myopia, hyperopia and the blind spot size (Table 5).

Table 5. Relationship between ametropia and blind spot size of the eye

4. Discussion

In the world today, visual impairment has been a challenging threat especially in technological less advantaged countries. Again, visual impairment secondary to uncorrected refractive errors in childhood is an important health problem, and can lead to social, educational and economical disability in adulthood [10,11]. Olunye and Sargent [12] has reported that visual impairment is generally correlated along with hearing impairment, as a sensory disorder. There is no scientific documentation that evaluated the effect of refractive error on central visual field in Owerri municipal, Imo State, Nigeria. In this study, the empirical correlation between ametropia and the central visual field of the eye especially on the central isopter and the blind spot size were evaluated.

The result revealed that ametropes whose degree of error > ±7.00 D had no normal binocular central visual field, while those with < ±3.00 D had a higher percentage normal visual field in decreasing diopters. Traquair indicated that slight increase in the central isopter size from fixation point is seen in myopic condition and slight decrease in central isopter size from fixation point occurs in hyperopia condition of the eye. Hrynchak et al. [13] describes the prevalence of refractive errors for myopia is <−0.50 D. The reports from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) revealed a mean ocular refraction (MOR) for refractive errors between -0.5 D and + 0.5 for people between the ages of 20 and 59, while those above 60 years had a higher refractive peaks between + 0.5 and + 2.0 D [14]. Wood and Guggenham [15] revealed that refractive error usually myopia and hyperopia have age-related effects.

The purpose of the eye’s optical system is to cast an image of the external world onto the photoreceptor layer of rods and cones in the retina to support vision [16]. In this study, there were no significant relationship (p<0.05) observed between ametropes (myopes and hyperopes) on the central visual fields. Although, refractive errors are the major causes of visual impairment, they can be easily corrected with spectacles as a cost effective treatment modality [17]. Myopia or short sightedness exists when parallel light rays enter the eye and focus in front of the retina. Concave or minus lenses are often used in the correction of myopia. Minus or concave lenses are used due to its divergence property of light rays entering the eye. It moves light to the focal point back to the plane of the retina [18]. On other hand, hyperopia or long sightedness exists when parallel light rays enter the eye and focus behind the retina. Plus lenses are used in the correction of hyperopia. Plus or convex lenses are used due to its light ray converging ability which moves light to the focal point up to the plane of the retina [19]. Irving et al. [20] reported that mean ocular refraction and refractive error distribution vary with age. The highest magnitude of myopia is found in young adults

The result also revealed a non-linear significant relationship between genders (male and female) in ametropic condition of the eye. Gong et al. [21] had reported that gender is one of the risk factors accounting for the high prevalence of myopia in adolescent. They opined that myopia incidence of female is higher than that of male. The present study suggested that the central visual field loss in ametropic condition of the eye may not be sex-related

One of the most striking factors in visual field assessment is the evaluation of the size of the blind spot. The blind spot is the area on the retina without receptors that respond to light. However, an image that falls on this region will not be seen. It is in this region that the optic nerve exits the eye on its way to the brain. The result of the present study revealed significant relationship (p< 0.05) in ametropes (myopia and hyperopia) and the size of blind spot. Furthermore, blind spot enlargement can be caused by a range of medical conditions and monitoring the size of the blind spot scotoma can indicate progression of disease [22]. The nerve and the retinal elements had been implicated to be involved in the ametropic condition of the eye. This nerve and retinal elements is often manifested in size and location of the blind spot especially in patients with high refractive error.

5. Conclusion

The present study has established that ametropia affects the central visual field efficiency in young adults. Again uncorrected refractive error, particularly myopia, is often a problem in young people. Poor vision and the inability to read material written on the blackboard can have a serious impact on the performance of an individual both at school and at work. Clearly, we suggest that a large proportion of vision loss can be corrected with the simple provision of an appropriate pair of spectacles. Also to assess and improve vision by providing corrective measures should be taken seriously so as to ameliorate the dangers of blindness

References

[1]   | Aldebasi Y. Young public’s awareness to refractive error deficiency. Inter J Health Sci 2011; 5(1), 9-15.
[2]   | Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Org, 2004; 82, 844-851.
[3]   | Harada T, Harada C, Parada LF. Molecular regulation of visual system development: more than meets the eye. Genes Deve 2019; 21, 367-378.
[4]   | Aghaia G, Dibajnia P, Ashkesh E, Nazarid M, Falavarjania KG. Behavior disorders in children with significant refractive errors. J Curr Ophthalmol 2016; 28(4), 223-225.
[5]   | Kedar S, Ghate D, Corbett JJ. Visual fields in neuro-ophthalmology. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011; 59(2), 103-109.
[6]   | Fernandes TP, Silverstein SM, Almeida NL, Santos NA. Visual impairments in tobacco use disorder. Psych Res, 2019; 271: 60-67.
[7]   | Lamoureux EL, Saw S, Thumboo J, Wee HL, Aung T, Mitchell P, Wong TY. The impact of corrected and uncorrected refractive error on visual functioning: The Singapore malay eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019; 50(6), 2614-2620.
[8]   | Matsuda K, Park K. Recent trend of increasing myopia can be traced to infancy. Med Hypoth, 2018; 128, 78-82.
[9]   | Miyasike-daSilva V, Singer JC, McIlroy WE. A role for the lower visual field information in stair climbing. Gait Post, 2019; 70, 162-167.
[10]   | He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, Xu J, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004; 45,793-9.
[11]   | Kilic-Topraka E, Topra I. Future problems of uncorrected refractive errors in children. Proce Soc Behav Sci, 2014; 159, 534-536.
[12]   | Oluonye N, Sargent J. Severe visual impairment: practical guidance for paediatricians. Paediatr Child Health, 2018; 28(8), 379-383.
[13]   | Hrynchak PK, Mittelstaedt A, Machan CM, Bunn C, Irving EL. Increase in myopia prevalence in clinic based populations across a century. Optom Vis Sci, 2013; 90, 1331-1341.
[14]   | Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, Ferris FL. 3rd, Sperduto R. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol, 2008; 126, 1111-1119.
[15]   | Wood A, Guggenheim JA. Refractive error has minimal influence on the risk of age-related macular degeneration: A Mendelian randomization study. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019.
[16]   | Thibos LN. Refractive Error and Wavefront Sensing. Encyclo Modern Optics (Second Edition), 2018; 5: 108-115.
[17]   | Pascolini D, Mariotti S P. Global estimates of visual impairment. Br J Ophthalmol, 2012; 96(5), 614-618.
[18]   | Gwiazda J. Treatment options for myopia. Optom Vis Sci, 2009; 86(6): 624-628.
[19]   | Sutter E, Foster A, Francis V. Optics and Refraction. Comm Eye Health, 2000; 13(33): 8.
[20]   | Irving, E. L., Machan, C. M., Lam, S., Hrynchak, P; K. Lillakas, L. (2019). Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age. J. Optom., 12(1): 55-63.
[21]   | Gong J, Xie H, Mao X, Zhu X, Xie Z, Yang H, Gao Y, Jin X, Pan Y, Zhou F. Relevant factors of estrogen changes of myopia in adolescent female. Chin Med J, 2015; 5: 128(5): 659-663.
[22]   | Rhodes MJ (2013). A systematic review: What is the normative size of the blind spot scotoma in adults? Ophthalmol Res Inter J, 2013; 1(1): 51-66.