Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Isolation and Identification of Cellulose Degrading Bacteria from Mangrove Soil of Mahanadi River Delta and Their Cellulase Production Ability

B.C. Behera, S. Parida, S.K. Dutta, H.N. Thatoi*

Department of Biotechnology, College of Engineering and Technology (BPUT), Bhubaneswar, India

Abstract: This study was conducted to isolate cellulose degrading bacteria from mangrove soil of Mahanadi river delta, Odisha, India and also to evaluate their cellulase production ability. Results showed that in total fifteen cellulose degrading bacteria were isolated based on their halo zone formation on congored agar medium. Their maximum carboxymethylcellulose hydrolysis capacities (HC value) were ranged from 1.18 to 2.5 cm. A CMCase test of these fifteen isolates showed that their enzyme activity ranged from 2.471 to 98.253 U/ml/min. From the morphological, aand biochemical characterisation, the isolates were identified as Micrococcus spp., Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Xanthomonas spp. and Brucella spp.

Keywords: mangrove, cellulose degrading bacteria, cellulase, biochemical characterisation

Received October 19, 2013; Revised November 27, 2013; Accepted February 07, 2014

Citation: B.C. Behera, S. Parida, S.K. Dutta, H.N. Thatoi, Isolation and Identification of Cellulose Degrading Bacteria from Mangrove Soil of Mahanadi River Delta and Their Cellulase Production Ability. American Journal of Microbiological Research, 2 (1). 41-46. January 2014. doi:10.12691/ajmr-2-1-6

1. Introduction

Mangroves are highly productive marine ecosystem where bacteria actively take part in bio-mineralization and biotransformation of minerals [1]. The distribution of microbial activities in estuarine systems is clearly complex and variable. Leaves and wood provided by mangrove plants to the soil are degraded primarily by large variety of microbes which actively participate in the heterotrophic food chain [2]. Major products of general recycling of organic matter are detritus which is rich in enzymes and proteins and contains large micro-bial population [3]. Thus mangrove-derived detritus constitutes a large reservoir of carbon and energy potentially available to the estuarine food web and Bacteria are the major participants in the carbon, sulfur, nitrogen and phosphorous cycles in mangrove forest [4]. Roughly 30% to 50% of the organic matters in mangrove leaves are leachable water-soluble compounds such as tannins and sugars [5], the remaining fraction of the organic matter presumably consists of plant structural polymers commonly referred to as cellulosic substance. Cellulose is a linear polysaccharide which is constructed from monomer of glucose bound together with 1-4 glucosidal linkage [6]. The transfer of carbon and energy from mangrove detritus to animal consumers appears to occur via grazing of easily digestible and highly nutritive microbial biomass resulting from bacterial and fungal transformation of the lignocellulosic detritus. Thus most of the bacteria and fungi degrade this cellulosic material by producing enzyme called cellulase. Cellulase is the enzyme that hydrolyse the β-1, 4-glycosidic bonds in the polymer to release glucose units [7]. Cellulases are among the industrially important hydrolytic enzymes and are of great significance in present day biotechnology. Cellulases are widely used in the food, feed, textile and pulp industries [8]. The bioconversion of cellulosic materials is now a subject of intensive research as a contribution to the development of large scale conversion process beneficial to mankind [9].

Considering this huge significance of cellulase which contribute 8% of the world wide industrial enzyme demand and the demand is expected to increase by 100% within 2014 [10], surprisingly little is known about the bacterial and fungal cellulase in mangrove swamps and adjacent coastal environments. Keeping the above in vision, the present study aimed to isolate and characterize bacterial isolates with high cellulase-producing ability from mangrove soil of Mahanadi river delta, Odisha, India.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of Cellulose Degrading Bacteria

The soil samples were collected from different location of mangrove forest such as Jumbo, Kharnasi, Triveni, Nuagada, Atharabanki and Mangrove forest at Indian Farmer fertilisers Corporation (IFFCO). After collection, the samples were stored at 4°C in sterile containers. For each soil sample, several sub-samples were taken, homogenized in sterile milli Q water containing 0.85% NaCl (w/v) and serially diluted and pour plate and spread plate techniques were done using Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) agar media [11]. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24-48 h. To visualize the hydrolysis zone, the plates were flooded with 0.1% Congo red solution and washed with 1 M NaCl [11]. The formation of a clear zone of hydrolysis indicated cellulose degradation. The ratio of the clear zone diameter to colony diameter was measured in order to select for the highest cellulase activity producer. The largest ratio was assumed to contain the highest activity [12,13].

2.2. Cellulase Activity Test of the Isolates

For the quantitative estimation of cellulase, the bacterial isolates were grown in Carboxymethyl cellulose broth medium contain (g/l): Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), 10; Tryptone, 2; KH₂PO₄, 4; Na₂HPO₄, 4; MgSO₄.7H₂O, 0.2; CaCl₂.2H₂O, 0.001; FeSO₄.7H₂O, 0.004; Agar, 15 and pH adjusted to 7 [14]. CMCase activity was assayed by using methode described by [15]. The activity was estimated using 1% solution of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) in 0.05 M citrate buffer (pH 4.8) as substrate. The reaction mixture was contained 0.5 ml of substrate solution and 0.5 ml of suitably diluted enzyme solution. The reaction was carried out at 50°C for 30 minutes and the reaction was stopped by adding 3 ml of DNS solution to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was then boiled at 100°C for 5 minute. O.D. was taken with systronics 119 spectrophotometer at 540 nm. One unit of CMCase activity was expressed as 1 μ mol of glucose liberated per ml of enzyme per minute. The values obtained are compared with Glucose standard curve.

2.3. Identification of the Isolates

The bacterial isolates were presumptively identified by means of morphological examination and some biochemical characterisation. The parameters investigated included colony characteristics, shape, size, spore, motility, Gram’s reaction, catalase production, urease production, Voges-Proskauer (V-P) reaction, Indole production, Nitrate reduction, citrate utilization, carbohydrate metabolism (acid-gas production), starch hydrolysis, Tributyrin (or vegetable oil) hydrolysis, Tween-80 hydrolysis, Cholesterol hydrolysis, gelatin hydrolysis, Casein hydrolysis, Growth at different pH and Temperature, Pectin hydrolysis and chitin hydrolysis test were carried out following the standard methods described in Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteria [16]. Response of the organism to different antibiotics was tested on NA medium. NA plates were surface seeded with concentrated bacterial suspension. Different antibiotic discs with effective concentrations were placed over the plates. Inhibition of growth depicted by a clear zone formation around the discs indicated sensitive reaction otherwise the organism was resistant to the antibiotic. Diameter of the inhibition zone was measured with an antibiotic zone scale. Ratio of the inhibition zone and disc area produced the activity level of the antibiotics.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS, version 10 for windows (SPSS Inc; Chicago, IL, USA).

Figure 1. (a) CMC agar plate before staining with Congored (b) CMC agar plate after staining with congored and NaCl

3. Results and Discussion

Cellulose degrading bacteria were isolated from mangrove soils of Mahanadi delta using CMC agar medium (Figure 1. a). 15 morphologically distinct bacterial isolates which were giving halo zones in CMC agar medium were selected and named as Cellulose degrading bacteria, CDB1–15 (Figure 1. b). In the present study, less number of cellulose degrading bacteria were observed from mangrove soil of Mahanadi delta in comparison to the finding of Ramanathan et al., [17], who observed comparatively large number of cellulose degrading bacteria from Sundarban mangroves of West Bengal, India. The clearing zone size and colony diameter of these isolates were measured when incubated aerobically at 37°C; the result showed that maximum clearing zone ranged from 0.9 and 2.1 cm and the average HC value, i.e. ratio of zone size to colony diameter ranged from 1.18 to 2.5 cm, demonstrating that all the isolates have the ability to degrade the carboxymethyl cellulose and indicating high ability of Cx cellulase production (Table 1). Distinct Cx cellulase production was detected by bacterial isolate CDB-5 as evidenced by its maximum HC value of 2.5. This finding is very similar to the findings of Hatami et al. [18], who also observed the ratio of the zone diameter to colony diameter ratio 0.4 to 2.1. Lu et al. [19], observed maximum clearing zone ranged between 2.5 to 6.4 cm with maximum HC value of 4.85-13.11 cm. But the observed HC value is lower than the value observed by Gupta et al. [20], who observed maximum HC value of 9 to 9.8 cm.

Table 1. Evaluation of cellulase activity of some cellulose degrading bacteria in CMC agar plate through halo zone formation

Figure 2. Cellulase production ability of the fifteen cellulose degrading bacterial isolates from mangrove soil of Mahanadi river delta, Odisha, India

3.1. Measurement of Cellulase Production

Experiments were carried out to determine the cellulase production ability of 15 bacterial isolates (CDB-1, CDB-2, CDB-3, CDB-4, CDB-5, CDB-6, CDB-7, CDB-8, CDB-9, CDB-10, CDB-11, CDB-12, CDB-13, CDB-14 and CDB-15). The cellulase production ability of the bacterial isolates in the production medium were in the following order, CDB-10 (13.591 U/ml/min) < CDB-1 (17.321 U/ml/min) < CDB-9 (18.53 U/ml/min) < CDB-3 (22.24 U/ml/min) < CDB-6 (24.71 U/ml/min) < CDB-15 (27.298 U/ml/min) < CDB-13 (29.653 U/ml/min) < CDB-11 (32.124 U/ml/min) < CDB-7 (34.971 U/ml/min) < CDB-8 (44.48 U/ml/min) < CDB-4 (58.701 U/ml/min) < CDB-2 (59.307 U/ml/min) < CDB-14 (63.013 U/ml/min) < CDB-5 (96.374 U/ml/min) < CDB-12 (98.253 U/ml/min). Their cellulase production efficiency ranged between 2.471 to 98.253 U/ml/min (Figure 2). Among these two bacterial isolate CDB-12 showed maximum cellulase production ability of 98.253 U/ml/min followed by CDB-5 (96.374 U/ml/min). Our finding is higher than the finding of Tabo and Monsalud [21] who observed 56.60 U/ml, (Bacillus cereus), 66.50 U/ml (Bacillus licheniformis), 50.33 U/ml, (Bacillus spp.), 51.04 U/ml, (Bacillus pumilus), 48.70 U/ml, (Bacillus pumilus) of cellulase activity from philipines mangrove soil. Recently it has also been reported the cellulase production by Bacillus cereus strain up to 102 U/ml at 48 hour of incubation [22]. This finding is nearly similar to the cellulase production by the bacterial isolate CDB-12 and CDB-5 in the present study.

Table 2. Biochemical identification of 15 cellulose degrading bacteria (CDB), ND = Not Detected

3.2. Identification of the Isolates

These fifteen selected bacterial isolates were subjected to various morphological and Biochemical characterisation (Table 2) and antibiotic sensitivity test (Table 3) with a view to identify them. The colony characteristics of the isolates were found variable. The isolates were undulate, convex, and circular having gummy and sticky consistency. The size of the vegetative cell of the isolates was 0.8 to 2.1 μm. Microscopic observation of the isolates revealed that most of them are rod shaped and motile. The isolates were found variable towards Gram’s stain. All the isolates were sensitive to penicillin G, polymyxin B, Erythromycin, Gentamycin and Ciprofloxacin and resistant to Nystatin. Except CDB-7 all the isolates were sensitive to norfloxacin and bacitracin. Similarly except CDB-7 and CDB-13 all other isolates are sensitive to chloromphenicol. Only CDB-8, CDB-12 and CDB-13 were only resistant to Tetracyclin. On the basis of their morphological characterisation, antibiotic sensitivity test and biochemical characterisation these isolates were identified as Bacillus brevis (CDB1), Bacillus alcalophilus (CDB-2) Xanthomonas spp. (CDB3), Micrococcus spp (CDB-4), Brucella spp (CDB5), Micrococcus spp (CDB-6), Xanthomonas spp (CDB7), Brucella spp (CDB8), Bacillus subtilis (CDB-09), Pseudomonas stutzeri (CDB10), Pseudomonas spp (CDB11), Bacillus spp (CDB-12), Pseudomonas spp (CDB13), Bacillus spp (CDB-14) and Micrococcusspp (CDB-15). Our finding is similar to the findings of Tabo and Monsalud [21] who also reported occurrence of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus spp, and Bacillus pumilus from philipines mangrove soil. Thatoi et al. [23], also reported the cellulytic activity of Pseudomonas spp, Bacillus spp, Bacillus polymyxa, and Bacillus brevis from mangrove soil of Bhitarakanika, Odisha.

Table 3. Antibiotic sensitivity test of fifteen cellulose degrading bacterial isolates

4. Conclusion

From the present study it can be concluded that all the fifteen CDB isolated from mangrove soil of Mahanadi river delta could efficiently produce cellulase in the medium which could probably help taxonomists, enzymologists, and even some industrialists in their own researches. Use of these CDB as bio-inoculants can be incorporated to enhance organic matter decomposition in soil to increase soil fertility and to minimize the fertilizer application. They can also be apply to reduce environmental pollution and promotes sustainable agriculture.

References

[1]   | Gonzalez-Acosta, B., Bashan, Y., Hernandez-Sa-avedra, N. Y., Ascenaio, F. and Cruz-Aguero, G, “Seasonal Seawater Temperature as the Major Determinant for Populations of Culturable Bacteria in the Soils of an In-tact Mangrove in an Arid Region,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 55 (2). 311-321. Feb. 2006.
[2]   | Alongi, D. M, “The Role of Bacteria in Nutrient Recy-cling in Tropical Mangrove and Other Coastal Benthic Ecosystems,” Hydrobiologia, 285. 19-32. Jun. 1994.
[3]   | Holguin, G., Bashan, Y. and Vazavez, P, “The Role of Soil Microorganism in the Productivity, Conservation and Rehabilitation of Mangrove Ecosystem: An Overview,” Biology of Fertile Soils, 33 (4). 265-278. Feb. 2001.
[4]   | Rojas, A., Holguin, G., Glick, B. R. and Bashan, Y, “Syn-ergism between Phyllobacterium sp. (N2-Fixer) and Ba-cillus licheniformis (P-Solubilizer), both from a Semiarid Mangrove Rhizosphere” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 35. 181-187. Apr. 2001.
[5]   | Cundell, A. M., Brown, M. S., Stanford, R. and Mitchell, R, “Microbial degradation of Rhizophora mangle leaves immersed in the sea,” Estuarine and coastal marine Science, 9. 281-286. Sept. 1979.
[6]   | Bobbie, J. and Leatherwood, J.M, “Derepressed synthesis of cellulose by Cellulomona,” Journal of Bacteriology, 128. 609-615. Nov. 1976.
[7]   | Nishida, Y., Suzuki, K.I., Kumagai, Y., Tanaka, H., Inoue, A. and Ojima, T, “Isolation and primary structure of a cellulase from the Japanese sea urchin” Strongylocentrotus nudus. Biochimie. 1-10. Aug. 2007.
[8]   | Nakari, S.T. and Penttila, M, “Production of Trichoderma ressei cellulases on glucose containing media” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61. 3650-36505. Oct. 1995.
[9]   | Kumakura, M, “Preparation of immobilized cellulase beads and their application to hydrolysisof cellulosic materials,” Process Biochemistry, 32.555-559. Sept. 1997.

[10]  
Costa, R.B., Silva, M.V.A., Freitas, F.C., Leitao, V.S.F., Lacerda, P.S.B., Ferrara, M.A. and Bon, Eps, Mercado e perspectivas de Uso de Enzimas Industriaise Especiais no brasil. In Bon EPS, Ferrara MA, Corvo ML, Vermelho AB, Paiva CLA, Alencastro RB, Coelho RRR (eds) Enzimas em Biotechnologia, producao, Aplicac, oes e Mercados, 1st edn. Reo de Janeiro, Interciencia, 2008. pp 463-488.

[11]   | Apun, K., Jong, B. C. and Salleh, M. A, “Screening and isolation of a cellulolytic and amylolytic Bacillus from sago pith waste,” Journal of Genneral and Applied Microbilogy, 46. 263-267. Oct. 2000.
[12]   | Howard, R.L., Masoko, P. and Abotsi, E, “Enzyme activity of a Phanerochaete chryso-sporium cellobiohydrolase (CBHI. 1) expressed as a heterologous protein from Escherichia coli,” African Journal of Biotechnology, 2 (9). 296-300. Sept. 2003.
[13]   | Ariffin, H. N., Abdullah, M.S., Umi Kalsom, Y., Shirai, and Hassan M.A, “Production and characterisation of cellulase by Bacilluspumilus EB3,” International Journal of Engeenering & Technology, 3 (1). 47-53. Jun. 2006.
[14]   | Ray, A.K., Bairagi, A., Ghosh, K.S. and Sen S.K, “Optimization of fermentation conditions for cellulase production by Bacil l u s su btilis CY5 and Bacillus circulans TP3 isolated from fish gut,” Acta Ichthyologica ET Piscatoria, 37 (1). 47-53. Jul. 2007.
[15]   | Mandels, M. and Weber, J: The production of cellulases. In: Cellulases and Their Appli-cations. Hajny, G.J. & E.T. Reese (eds), American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1969, 391-414.
[16]   | Buchanan, R.E. and Gibbons, N.E, “Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. (Eighth edition), The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1974, pp. 747-842.
[17]   | Ramanathan, A.L., Singh, G., Majunder, J., Samal, A.C., Chahuan, R., Ranjan, R.K., Rajkumar, K. and Santra, S.C, “A study of microbial diversity and its interaction with nutrients in the sediment of Sunder ban mangrove,” Indian Journal of Marine Science, 37. 159-165. June. 2008.
[18]   | Hatami, S., Alikhani, H.A., Besharati, H. N., Salehrastin, M., Afrousheh, and Yazdani Jahromi, “Investigation on aerobic cellulolytic bacteria in some of north forest and farming soils,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium, 5. 193-219. 2008.
[19]   | Lu, W.J., Wang, H.T., Yang, S.J., Wang, Z.C. and Nie, Y.F, “Isolation and characterisation of mesophilic cellulose degrading bacteria from flower stalks-vegetable waste co-composting system,” Journal of General Applied Microbiology, 51. 353-360. Dec. 2005.
[20]   | Gupta, P., Samant, K. and Sahu, A, “Isolation of cellulose-degrading bacteria and determination of their cellulolytic potential,” International Journal of Microbiology, Oct. 2012.
[21]   | Tabao, N.S.C. and Monsalud, R.G, “Characterization and identification of high cellulose producing bacterial strains from philippine mangroves,” Philipine journal of Systemetic Biology, 4. 13-20. June. 2010.
[22]   | Mukesh Kumar, D.J., Poovai P.D., Puneeth Kumar, C.L., Sushma Saroja, Y., Manimaran, A. and Kalaichelvan, P.T, “Optimization of Bacillus cereus MRK1 cellulase production and its Biostoning activity” Der Pharmacia Lettrer, 4 (3). 881-888. 2012.
[23]   | Thatoi, H.N., Behera, B.C., Dangar, T.K. and Mishra, R.R, “Microbial biodiversity in mangrove soil of Bhitarakanika, Odisha, India,” International Journal of Environmental Biology, 2 (2). 50-58. Apr. 2012.