@article{ajmcr2021927,
author={{Patel, Krunal H and Uppin, Vaibhavi and Chandrakumar, Harshith and Chowdhury, Yuvraj Singh and Ramalho, Jonathan and Elamir, Basil and Sacicciioli, Loius and Gill, Harjinder and Hennis, Sarah and McFarlane, Samy I.},
title={Dilated Accessory Hemiazygos Vein Mimicking Aortic Dissection in Setting of Absent Left Brachiocephalic Vein},
journal={American Journal of Medical Case Reports},
volume={9},
number={2},
pages={125--130},
year={2021},
url={http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajmcr/9/2/7},
issn={2374-216X},
abstract={Although uncommon, aortic dissection can be rapidly fatal with a 20% out-of-hospital mortality which increases at a rate of 1 to 3% every hour [1]. An expeditious diagnosis of acute aortic dissection is therefore imperative. One of the most advantageous diagnostic modalities utilized in the setting of acute aortic dissection is a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). In an acute setting, TEE is preferred because of its ability to provide a timely and definitive diagnosis [2]. Despite its diagnostic convenience, clinicians must be aware that there are several entities that may mimic aortic dissection. One of these entities includes a dilated accessory hemiazygos vein. In this report, we present a case of a 66-year-old woman who was found to have a possible Stanford type B dissection in the descending thoracic aorta on a TEE exam in the context of work up prior to an elective electrophysiology study and ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. CT angiography, however, revealed a dilated accessory hemiazygos vein, a rare congenital vascular anomaly that could potentially mimic aortic dissection leading to misdiagnosis and potentially unnecessary interventions.},
doi={10.12691/ajmcr-9-2-7}
publisher={Science and Education Publishing}
}