Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Quadricuspid Aortic Valve: A Case Report and Review

Pramod Theetha Kariyanna, Jonathan Francois, Amog Jayarangaiah, Yuvraj Singh Chowdhury, Richard Grodman, Moro O. Salifu, Isabel M. McFarlane*

Department of Internal Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn NY 11203, USA

Abstract: Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital valvular abnormality with less than 200 cases reported to date. The first QAV was reported in 1862 by Balington. Clinical manifestations of patients with a QAV depend on the functional status of the QAV and the associated cardiac disorders. Most QAV are asymptomatic and are incidentally found. Severe aortic regurgitation and/or stenosis can develop overtime, requiring aortic valve replacement or repair. Transesophageal echocardiography is the preferred modality to diagnose QAV. We present a case of QAV which was incidentally diagnosed in a 43-year-old woman who presented with gastroenteritis.

Keywords: Quadricuspid aortic valve, congenital variant of aortic valve, Hurwitz and Robert’s classification

Received April 09, 2020; Revised May 11, 2020; Accepted May 18, 2020

Citation: Pramod Theetha Kariyanna, Jonathan Francois, Amog Jayarangaiah, Yuvraj Singh Chowdhury, Richard Grodman, Moro O. Salifu, Isabel M. McFarlane, Quadricuspid Aortic Valve: A Case Report and Review. American Journal of Medical Case Reports, 8 (8). 253-256. January 2020. doi:10.12691/ajmcr-8-8-11

1. Introduction

Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital valvular abnormality, with an estimated incidence of <0.05% [1,2]. The first case of QAV was reported in 1862 by Balington [3]. To our knowledge, there is less than 200 cases reported in the literature however, the actual incidence is likely underreported. Advances in cardiac imaging have permitted that more cases be reported. Most QAV are incidental findings. QAV is most often isolated but can be associated with other cardiac abnormalities and complicated with a progressive aortic valve regurgitation [4]. We present a case of QAV which was incidentally recognized in a 43-year-old female who presented with gastroenteritis.

2. Case Report

A 43-year-old female with a history of hypertension, diabetes and myomectomy (for a leiomyoma 14 years ago) presented to the emergency department after having over 20 episodes of non-bloody non-bilious vomiting for two days prior to presentation. She had not been able to either eat any food or take her medications. Her symptoms had begun 5-6 hours after eating a creamy potato salad in her cafeteria at work. Her family history was significant for diabetes in her mother and siblings and coronary artery disease on her father (myocardial infarction at the age of 68). Patient’s two daughters had no medical issues. There had been no congenital abnormalities diagnosed on the patient or her family members. Her home medications included Amlodipine 10 mg PO daily, Atenolol 50 mg PO daily, Losartan- Hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg-12.5 mg daily, Insulin Apart 11 UI thrice daily, Insulin Degludec 34 IU SC daily, Gabapentin 300 mg thrice daily and ferrous sulphate 325 mg daily. On examination, blood pressure was167/81 mm of Hg, heart rate 105 beats per min, temperature 98.9oF and was saturating 99% on room air. She was symptomatic for lightheadedness on standing. Examination revealed a fatigued woman with dry mucus membranes. She had a rapid regular pulse and no murmurs on auscultation. Her lungs were clear to auscultation and the abdomen was non tender to palpation. She had hyperactive bowel sounds on auscultation. Initial panel of lab tests revealed a troponin of 0.020 ng/ml (normal <0.015 ng/ml) and creatinine of 1.2 mg/dl (bloodwork at her primary physician’s office a month ago had showed a creatinine of 0.8 mg/dl) (Table 1). She was diagnosed with staphylococcal toxin-mediated gastroenteritis and was treated with intravenous hydration and metoclopramide as needed to which she responded very well. Within 24 hours of her stay she was able to tolerate an oral diet and her acute kidney injury resolved. Her mild troponin elevation was diagnosed as a Type II elevation likely as a result of her acute kidney injury related troponin retention. Given her risk factors of hypertension and diabetes she also had an echocardiogram performed. The study demonstrated an incidental finding of a Hurwitz and Roberts classification type A QAV (Figure 1). There were no associated valvular abnormalities or dilatation of the aorta seen. She was discharged home with a plan to follow.

Figure 1. Hurwitz and Roberts’s classification type A valve noted in transthoracic echocardiography (Short axis aortic valve level). Arrows pointing at the four valves. Also Note The plus (+) shaped commissure

Table 1

3. Discussion

The bicuspid aortic valve is the most common aortic valve abnormality (2% of general population) followed by unicuspid valve [5,6]. QAV is a rare congenital cardiac defect with an incidence of 0.008% and 0.043% in autopsies and echocardiographic studies, respectively [1,2,7]. The incidence in aortic valve surgery for pure aortic insufficiency is 1% [8]. QAV has a male predominance with a male: female ratio of 1.61: 1 [9]. Balington in 1862 was the first to report QAV [3].

During week 5 of embryogenesis, two mesenchymal ridges manifest in the cephalad portion of the truncus arteriosus. These ridges fuse and descend in a spiral fashion into the ventricles forming aorticopulmonary septum. At the junction of the conus and truncus three mesenchymal swellings appear and subsequently grow to form triangular-shaped valves. These swellings with their covering endothelium become excavated on their distal aspect to form the cusps. This process is usually completed by week 9 of gestation [2].

The embryological mechanism leading to QAV remains unknown, but a variety of mechanisms have been described. The suggested mechanisms are the following: an inflammatory episode leading to the separation of normal valve cushion, anomalous septation of the conotruncus, removal of one of the valve cushions and the division of one of the three mesenchymal ridges [2,10,11,12]. It is also possible that the formation of QAV may be related to an abnormality in the development of coronary arteries as the aortic valves develop right after the development of coronary arteries [13]. Furthermore, true QAV must be distinguished from Pseudo-QAV, which presents following infective endocarditis or rheumatic heart disease. The differentiating factor is the presence of corpus arantii on each cusp, found in congenital QAV [10].

Hurwitz and Roberts described the seven most common types of QAV, based on the size of the valve leaflets. The description and distribution of the types are found in Table 2 and Figure 2 [11]. Type A, B and C make 85% of all cases. A more recent classification has been published by Nakamura et al, based on the position of accessory cusps (Table 3) [14]. Based on these classifications our patient had Hurwitz type A QAV.

Table 2. Hurwitz and Robert’s classification of Quadricuspid Aortic Valves [11]

Table 3. Nakamura classification of Quadricuspid Aortic Valves [14]

Figure 2. Hurwitz and Roberts classification of Quadricuspid Aortic Valves (below) [11]

Clinical manifestations of QAV are unspecific - palpitations, dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain and features of congestive heart failure have all been reported, but young patients are mostly asymptomatic. Unequal stress distribution, fibrous thickening, and abnormal leaflet coaptation of QAV results in clinical manifestations, usually in the 5th or 6th decade of life [15]. The most common complication of QAV is aortic regurgitation in 75% of cases, aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation in 9% of cases and normal functioning valve in only 16% of cases [15]. The prevalence of isolated aortic stenosis remains unclear, it is reported to be 0.7% or between 7% and 12% [7,16]. QAV usually presents as an isolated congenital anomaly, but it has been reported to be associated with other cardiac abnormalities in approximately 18-32% of cases, including nonobstructive cardiomyopathy [17], ventricular septal defect [11], supravalvular stenosis with left coronary artery atresia [18], pulmonary valve stenosis [19], Ehlers’-Danlos syndrome [20] and patent ductus arteriosus [21]. Infective endocarditis occurs in 1.4% of patients with QAV [11,22,23].

Echocardiography is the most used imaging modality to diagnose QAV. More than half of reported QAV were detected by echocardiography (51%), followed by surgery (22.6%), autopsy (15.6%) and aortography (6.5%) [24]. Transesophageal echocardiography is the preferred diagnostic tool of QAVs as it provides accurate assessment of valvular anatomy and visualizes correctly the coronary ostia [2,11].

QAV’s management depends on symptoms and associated complications. Surgical indications are severe aortic stenosis, severe aortic regurgitation, or QAV valvular dysfunction associated with other clinically significant abnormalities [25,26]. The treatment of choice is generally aortic valve replacement. However, successful aortic valve repair by tricuspidization and bicuspidization techniques have been reported [26,27]. During the repair procedure, due precautions should be taken in regards to the location of the coronary ostia to avoid ostial obstruction at the time of valve replacement or repair [2,7]. Perioperative complications are rare and the survival rate after 5 and 10 years follow up, is 89.9% and 84.9% respectively [25]. This is the second QAV case report that we have encountered, the prior reported case was a Hurwitz and Roberts classification type B QAV.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported, in part, by the efforts of Dr. Moro O. Salifu M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A., M.A.C.P., Professor and Chairman of Medicine through NIH Grant No. S21MD012474.

References

[1]   | Feldman BJ, Khandheria BK, Warnes CA, Seward JB, Taylor CL, Tajik AJ. Incidence, description and functional assessment of isolated quadricuspid aortic valves. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 937-8.
[2]   | Timperley J, Milner R, Marshall AJ, Gilbert TJ. Quadricuspid aortic valves. Clin Cardiol 2002; 25: 548-52.
[3]   | James KB, Centorbi LK, Novoa R. Quadricuspid aortic valve. Case report and review of the literature. Tex Heart Inst J 1991; 18: 141-3.
[4]   | Khan SK, Tamin SS, Araoz PA. Quadricuspid aortic valve by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a case report and review of the literature. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35: 637-41.
[5]   | Roberts WC. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol 1970; 26: 72-83.
[6]   | Falcone MW, Roberts WC, Morrow AG, Perloff JK. Congenital aortic stenosis resulting from a unicommisssural valve. Clinical and anatomic features in twenty-one adult patients. Circulation 1971; 44: 272-80.
[7]   | Yotsumoto G, Iguro Y, Kinjo T, Matsumoto H, Masuda H, Sakata R. Congenital quadricuspid aortic valve: report of nine surgical cases. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 9: 134-7.
[8]   | Olson LJ, Subramanian R, Edwards WD. Surgical pathology of pure aortic insufficiency: a study of 225 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59: 835-41.
[9]   | Tutarel O. The quadricuspid aortic valve: a comprehensive review. J Heart Valve Dis 2004; 13: 534-7.
[10]   | Peretz DI, Changfoot GH, Gourlay RH. Four-cusped aortic valve with significant hemodynamic abnormality. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23: 291-3.
[11]   | Hurwitz LE, Roberts WC. Quadricuspid semilunar valve. Am J Cardiol 1973; 31: 623-6.
[12]   | Simonds J. Congenital malformation of aortic and pulmonary valves. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 1923; 166(4): 584-95.
[13]   | Bogers AJJC, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Poelmann RE, Péault BM, Huysmans HA. Development of the origin of the coronary arteries, a matter of ingrowth or outgrowth? Anatomy and Embryology 1989; 180: 437-441.
[14]   | Nakamura Y, Taniguchi I, Saiki M, Morimoto K, Yamaga T. Quadricuspid aortic valve associated with aortic stenosis and regurgitation. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 49: 714-6.
[15]   | Tutarel O. Quadricuspid aortic valves and anomalies of the coronary arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 897; author reply 897.
[16]   | Mecozzi G, Pratali S, Milano A, Nardi C, Bortolotti U. Severe quadricuspid aortic valve stenosis after mediastinal irradiation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 1198-9.
[17]   | Janssens U, Klues HG, Hanrath P. Congenital quadricuspid aortic valve anomaly associated with hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy: a case report and review of the literature. Heart 1997; 78: 83-7.
[18]   | Rosenkranz ER, Murphy DJ, Cosgrove DM. Surgical management of left coronary artery ostial atresia and supravalvar aortic stenosis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1992; 54: 779-781.
[19]   | Possati F, Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G et al. [Quadricuspid aortic valve and pulmonary valve stenosis. A rare combination in the adult]. Minerva Cardioangiol 1984; 32: 815-8.
[20]   | Robicsek F, Sanger PW, Daugherty HK, Montgomery CC. Congenital quadricuspid aortic valve with displacement of the left coronary orifice. Coll Works Cardiopulm Dis 1968; 14: 87-90.
[21]   | Seol SH, Kim U, Cho HJ, Kim DK, Kim DI, Kim DS. Quadricuspid aortic valve with patent ductus arteriosus. Tex Heart Inst J 2010; 37: 726-7.
[22]   | Matsukawa T, Yoshii S, Hashimoto R, Muto S, Suzuki S, Ueno A. Quadricuspid aortic valve perforation resulting from bacterial endocarditis--2-D echo- and angiographic diagnosis and its surgical treatment. Jpn Circ J 1988; 52: 437-40.
[23]   | Takeda N, Ohtaki E, Kasegawa H, Tobaru T, Sumiyoshi T. Infective endocarditis associated with quadricuspid aortic valve. Jpn Heart J 2003; 44: 441-5.
[24]   | Godefroid O, Colles P, Vercauteren S, Louagie Y, Marchandise B. Quadricuspid aortic valve: a rare etiology of aortic regurgitation. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006; 7: 168-70.
[25]   | Tsang MY, Abudiab MM, Ammash NM et al. Quadricuspid Aortic Valve: Characteristics, Associated Structural Cardiovascular Abnormalities, and Clinical Outcomes. Circulation 2016; 133: 312-9.
[26]   | Yuan SM. Quadricuspid Aortic Valve: A Comprehensive Review. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 31: 454-460.
[27]   | Luciani GB, Morjan M, Faggian G, Mazzucco A. Repair of quadricuspid aortic valve by bicuspidization: a novel technique. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11: 348-50.
[28]   | Kariyanna PT, Jayarangaiah A, Seshadri S, Adrah R, Sharma A, Rozin A. A rare case of quadricuspid aortic valve. Research 2016; 3: 1488.