Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Label_Title

Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Common Tooth Preparation Errors, Preventive Strategies and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Dr Vishnu Govind Thekkumbad, Dr Urmi Reshamdalal*, Dr Dakshana Varma, Dr Sameera A Khan, Dr Sri Valli Durga Bala Vinuthna Darisipudi, Dr Latifa Elbanna, Dr Sandeep Singh

BDS, Vaidik Dental College and Research Center, Daman, Gujarat, India.

Abstract: Tooth preparation is a fundamental clinical procedure in fixed prosthodontics and a key determinant of the biological, mechanical and esthetic success of full-coverage restorations. Despite well-established guidelines, errors in tooth preparation remain common in both undergraduate training and routine clinical practice, adversely affecting restoration longevity and patient outcomes. This narrative review aims to identify the most frequently reported tooth preparation errors for full-coverage restorations, evaluate their clinical consequences, and highlight preventive strategies supported by current evidence. Common errors include inadequate or excessive occlusal and axial reduction, improper taper, compromised retention and resistance form, poorly defined finish lines, inappropriate margin placement, surface irregularities, and pulpal trauma. Contributing factors include operator-related variables, tooth anatomy, restorative material requirements, and instrument selection. Preventive approaches emphasize adherence to biologic and mechanical principles, material-specific preparation guidelines, meticulous preoperative planning, and improved visualization. The review also underscores the importance of education, simulation-based training, structured feedback, and emerging digital assessment technologies in reducing preparation errors. Improved preparation accuracy is essential for enhancing treatment predictability and long-term success in fixed prosthodontics.

Keywords: Tooth preparation errors, Fixed prosthodontics, Full-coverage restorations, Clinical consequences, Preventive strategies

Received February 17, 2026; Revised March 19, 2026; Accepted March 26, 2026

Citation: Dr Vishnu Govind Thekkumbad, Dr Urmi Reshamdalal, Dr Dakshana Varma, Dr Sameera A Khan, Dr Sri Valli Durga Bala Vinuthna Darisipudi, Dr Latifa Elbanna, Dr Sandeep Singh, Common Tooth Preparation Errors, Preventive Strategies and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Narrative Review. American Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 14 (1). 1-7. January 2026. doi:10.12691/ajmbr-14-1-1

1. Introduction

Tooth preparation is a fundamental clinical procedure in fixed prosthodontics and plays a decisive role in the success and longevity of full-coverage restorations. The procedure involves controlled reduction and shaping of tooth structure to create adequate space for restorative materials while fulfilling the biological, mechanical, and esthetic requirements of the definitive prosthesis. Well-established principles of tooth preparation, including retention and resistance form, structural durability, marginal integrity, and preservation of periodontal and pulpal health, have been extensively documented in prosthodontic literature and continue to guide clinical practice. [1]

Despite the availability of clear guidelines, deviations from ideal tooth preparation are frequently encountered in both undergraduate training and routine dental practice. Studies evaluating clinical and preclinical preparations have consistently reported errors such as excessive taper, inadequate occlusal or axial reduction, poorly defined finish lines, and inappropriate margin placement. These errors compromise the geometric form of the preparation and adversely affect the fit, retention, and durability of the final restoration. Consequently, restoration failure, increased need for retreatment, and compromised patient outcomes remain significant concerns. [2]

Accurate tooth preparation is essential to ensure adequate retention and resistance, maintain sufficient restorative material thickness, and achieve precise marginal adaptation. Inadequate reduction can result in overcontoured restorations or insufficient material thickness, predisposing the restoration to fracture and marginal discrepancies, while excessive reduction increases the risk of pulpal injury and weakens the remaining tooth structure. Furthermore, improper finish line design or placement may negatively impact periodontal health by promoting plaque accumulation, gingival inflammation, and attachment loss, thereby compromising both esthetics and long-term stability of the restoration. [3,4]

Given the clinical significance of tooth preparation quality, a comprehensive understanding of common preparation errors and their consequences is essential for improving treatment outcomes. This narrative review aims to summarize and critically discuss the most frequently reported errors in tooth preparation for full-coverage restorations, examine their biological and mechanical implications, and highlight preventive strategies to minimize these errors in clinical practice. By synthesizing current evidence, this review seeks to provide clinicians and students with a clear framework for improving preparation accuracy and enhancing the long-term success of fixed prosthodontic treatment.

2. Principles of Tooth Preparation

Tooth preparation for fullcoverage restorations must be guided by a balance of biologic, mechanical, and esthetic considerations to ensure longterm clinical success. The overarching goal is to create a tooth form that accommodates the restorative material and maintains health of the surrounding tissues while preserving as much natural structure as possible. [5]

Biologic considerations are fundamental to protecting the health of the tooth and its supporting tissues. Preservation of tooth structure is essential because excessive removal increases the likelihood of pulpal injury, thermal sensitivity, and compromised resistance form. Preparation designs should also avoid iatrogenic damage to adjacent teeth and soft tissues, and maintain a ferrule effect wherever possible to enhance structural integrity and fracture resistance. Furthermore, the placement of finish lines must respect periodontal architecture to prevent violation of biologic width and subsequent inflammation or attachment loss. [6]

Mechanical considerations focus on the geometry of the preparation and its ability to withstand functional forces. Retention form refers to the preparation’s capacity to resist dislodgement along the path of insertion, while resistance form prevents displacement under oblique or lateral forces. Achieving adequate resistance and retention requires careful control of taper and axial wall configuration, as well as ensuring sufficient surface area and enhancement features such as grooves when necessary. Structural durability of the restoration is also influenced by appropriate reduction to allow for optimal material thickness without weakening the remaining tooth, and by maintaining marginal integrity through welldefined finish lines. [7]

Esthetic considerations are increasingly relevant in modern restorative practice, particularly for anterior crowns where visibility and translucency matter. Adequate facial reduction and proper finish line placement allow for sufficient ceramic thickness and seamless integration of shade and contour, contributing to a natural appearance without jeopardizing structural or biologic requirements. [8]

Across all these principles, preservation of tooth structure remains a unifying theme. Conservation of enamel and dentin not only protects pulpal health but also enhances retention and resistance by maximizing available surface area and reducing the need for excessive taper. Excessive tooth reduction compromises both biomechanical stability and longterm prognosis, underscoring the importance of minimally invasive yet deliberate preparation design. [9]

3. Ideal Requirements of Tooth Preparation

Successful tooth preparation requires careful attention to several fundamental requirements that collectively determine the longevity and success of fixed prosthodontic restorations. These include retention form, resistance form, structural durability, marginal integrity, and preservation of the periodontium. Understanding these principles allows the clinician to balance biomechanical stability, biological health, and esthetics.

3.1. Retention Form

It refers to the characteristic of a tooth preparation that resists displacement of the restoration along the path of insertion. Proper retention depends on factors such as the taper of axial walls, surface area, and presence of auxiliary features like grooves or boxes. A preparation that is too tapered or has insufficient height may compromise retention, leading to restoration dislodgement. Conversely, excessive taper or inadequate wall height reduces mechanical interlocking and decreases the adhesive potential of luting agents, respectively. [10]

3.2. Resistance Form

Prevents dislodgement of the restoration under lateral, oblique, or functional forces. While retention form addresses vertical displacement, resistance form specifically counters forces that may tip or rotate the restoration. Key factors influencing resistance include axial wall height, occlusal reduction, convergence angle, and the presence of anti-rotational features. Proper resistance form is particularly critical in teeth with short clinical crowns or in situations where the path of insertion is challenged by angulation or adjacent teeth. [11]

3.3. Structural Durability

Maintaining sufficient tooth structure while allowing adequate space for restorative materials is essential for long-term structural durability. Over-reduction of enamel and dentin can weaken the tooth, increase the risk of fracture, and compromise the ferrule effect. The ferrule effect refers to a circumferential band of sound tooth structure at the cervical portion of the tooth that encircles the preparation, providing a bracing effect that improves resistance to functional and lateral forces, enhances retention, and reduces the likelihood of fracture. Conversely, under-reduction may result in insufficient material thickness, leading to premature fracture of the crown or compromised esthetics in all-ceramic restorations. The selection of reduction depth should therefore consider restorative material properties, occlusal forces, and esthetic requirements. [12]

3.4. Marginal Integrity

Marginal Integrity is critical to prevent microleakage, secondary caries, and periodontal complications. Well-defined and continuous margins provide an accurate seating surface for the restoration and facilitate precise cementation. Margin types (shoulder, chamfer, bevel) should be selected based on restorative material and esthetic considerations. Margins must also respect biologic width to avoid chronic inflammation and attachment loss. [13]

3.5. Preservation of the Periodontium

It is an essential biological consideration. Proper margin placement, careful soft tissue management, and avoidance of excessive subgingival extension are critical for maintaining gingival health. Infringement of the biologic width or trauma to the gingiva during preparation may result in recession, inflammation, and long-term periodontal compromise.

Adherence to these requirements ensures that the prepared tooth provides mechanical stability, biological protection, and restorative predictability. [14] Failure to meet these ideal criteria is a common cause of clinical complications, which will be explored in subsequent sections on common errors and their consequences.

4. Classification of Tooth Preparation Errors

Tooth preparation errors can be classified into several categories based on their origin, including operator-related, tooth-related, material-related, and instrument-related factors. Understanding these categories allows clinicians to identify the source of errors and implement strategies to prevent them.

4.1. Operator-Related Errors

Operator-related errors are among the most common sources of faulty tooth preparation. These include inaccurate taper, uneven axial or occlusal reduction, incorrect finish line design, and improper margin placement. Studies have shown that dental students and less experienced clinicians are more likely to produce over-tapered preparations, inadequate occlusal clearance, or uneven axial walls, which compromise retention and resistance. Operator fatigue, lack of planning, and poor visualization during preparation also contribute to errors. Use of magnification, preoperative assessment, and adherence to standardized guidelines can significantly reduce these errors. [15]

4.2. Tooth-Related Factors

Certain anatomical characteristics of the tooth itself may predispose to preparation errors. Short clinical crowns, irregular occlusal anatomy, tilted or malaligned teeth, and teeth with previous restorations can all complicate preparation. Inadequate ferrule height or pulp chamber size may increase the risk of over-reduction or under-preparation. Variations in enamel and dentin thickness across different tooth types further necessitate careful evaluation before reduction. Preoperative planning, including radiographs and study models, helps mitigate errors arising from tooth-specific challenges. [16]

4.3. Material-Related Factors

The choice of restorative material can influence preparation errors. All-ceramic and zirconia crowns require precise axial and occlusal reduction to provide adequate thickness and prevent fracture, while metal-ceramic crowns tolerate slightly less reduction. Errors occur when operators fail to adjust preparation depth according to material properties, resulting in thin restorations, compromised strength, or over-reduction. Knowledge of material-specific requirements is essential to prevent both mechanical failure and esthetic compromise. [17]

4.4. Instrument-Related Factors

Instrument selection, sharpness, and handling also contribute to preparation quality. Dull burs, inappropriate bur shapes, and worn rotary instruments can produce rough walls, unsupported margins, and uneven taper. Excessive pressure or improper angulation while using handpieces may result in over-preparation or iatrogenic damage. Regular maintenance of burs, correct sequencing of rotary instruments, and adherence to controlled cutting techniques reduce instrument-related errors. [18]

5. Tooth Preparation Errors, Clinical Consequences, and Preventive Strategies

Tooth preparation errors remain a significant contributor to biological, mechanical, and esthetic failures in fixed prosthodontic restorations. Given the multifactorial nature of these errors, ranging from occlusal and axial reduction inaccuracies to improper finish line design and pulpal trauma, a structured overview is essential for both clinical understanding and prevention. [19,20,21] [22,23,24] [25,26,27] [28,29,30] Table 1

Table 1. Tooth Preparation Errors, Clinical Consequences, and Preventive Strategies

6. Role of Education and Skill Development

Errors in tooth preparation are frequently attributed not only to clinical complexity but also to deficiencies in training and skill acquisition. Education plays a pivotal role in shaping clinicians’ understanding of biological, mechanical, and esthetic principles that govern successful tooth preparation. Strengthening educational strategies at undergraduate and postgraduate levels has been emphasized as a key approach to reducing preparation-related errors and improving treatment outcomes.

6.1. Undergraduate Teaching of Tooth Preparation

Undergraduate dental education serves as the foundation for developing competence in tooth preparation. Traditional teaching methods rely heavily on didactic instruction combined with laboratory demonstrations and clinical observation. However, studies have shown that students often struggle to translate theoretical principles into consistent clinical performance, particularly in achieving ideal taper, finish line design, and occlusal reduction. Early reinforcement of preparation principles, standardized assessment criteria, and repeated clinical exposure have been shown to enhance procedural accuracy and confidence among dental students. A recent study by Almohefer et al. evaluated the technical quality of preclinical tooth preparations performed by undergraduate dental students for full-coverage ceramic crowns using standardized assessment criteria. Analysis of 221 typodont tooth preparations revealed a high frequency of unacceptable results, particularly in occlusal and axial reduction, where the majority of students failed to achieve recommended reduction depths. While acceptable taper angles and marginal placement were observed in approximately half of the preparations, deficiencies in reduction accuracy and preparation geometry were common. The authors highlighted the need for continuous evaluation and targeted teaching strategies to improve technical competence during preclinical prosthodontic training, emphasizing the importance of structured skill development before clinical practice. [31]

6.2. Simulation and Preclinical Training

Simulation-based learning and preclinical training have gained prominence as effective tools for developing psychomotor skills before clinical exposure. Phantom head exercises, typodont-based preparations, and digital simulation systems allow students to practice tooth preparation in a controlled environment without patient-related risks. Several studies report that simulation training improves students’ spatial awareness, consistency of taper, and marginal accuracy. The introduction of virtual reality and digital evaluation systems has further enhanced feedback precision, allowing objective assessment of preparation geometry and reduction depth. The role of virtual simulation in preclinical dental education has been increasingly explored. Heidaridarani et al. evaluated the impact of a virtual reality (VR) simulator on the competence of undergraduate dental students during preclinical operative dentistry training. In this case-control study, students who received blended training using both a VR simulator and conventional acrylic teeth demonstrated significantly greater improvement in overall performance compared with those trained exclusively using traditional methods. The VR-trained group showed superior progression across multiple assessment criteria and a greater reduction in catastrophic errors. These findings suggest that VR simulation enhances skill acquisition, facilitates early error recognition, and may serve as an effective adjunct to conventional preclinical instruction, supporting its integration into contemporary dental curricula. [32]

6.3. Clinical Assessment and Feedback

Continuous assessment and structured feedback are essential for refining clinical skills. Faculty-guided evaluation using standardized rubrics, magnification, and photographic or digital documentation has been shown to reduce repeated errors in clinical tooth preparation. Constructive feedback encourages reflective learning and helps students recognize common mistakes such as over-tapering, inadequate reduction, and poorly defined margins. Effective mentorship during clinical training significantly influences long-term clinical competence and adherence to preparation principles. The use of digital assessment systems for evaluating tooth preparation has also been investigated in undergraduate preclinical education. Alsharif et al. assessed the effectiveness of the PrepCheck digital tooth preparation analysis software as a supplementary feedback tool during a crowns course. Although students who received digital feedback demonstrated a positive trend in preparation quality and reported an improved learning experience, no statistically significant differences were observed when compared with conventional visual assessment alone. Qualitative feedback indicated that students valued the objective and visual nature of the digital analysis, despite challenges related to time constraints during implementation. The authors concluded that digital preparation assessment systems such as PrepCheck may complement traditional teaching methods and enhance student engagement, although further research is required to determine their long-term educational benefits and optimal integration into dental curricula. [33]

7. Future Directions and Emerging Concepts

Advancements in materials science, digital dentistry, and minimally invasive approaches are reshaping contemporary concepts of tooth preparation. Future trends emphasize precision, conservation of tooth structure, and evidence-based decision-making.

7.1. Digital Tooth Preparation Assessment

Digital technologies such as intraoral scanners and computer-aided evaluation software enable real-time assessment of tooth preparations. These systems can quantify taper, occlusal clearance, and finish line continuity with high accuracy, reducing operator subjectivity. Digital assessment tools are increasingly being incorporated into dental education and clinical practice to improve preparation quality and standardization. [34]

7.2. Minimally Invasive Preparation Concepts

The shift toward minimally invasive dentistry has influenced crown preparation philosophies, advocating maximal preservation of sound tooth structure while meeting restorative requirements. Advances in adhesive dentistry and high-strength ceramics have allowed for reduced preparation depths without compromising restoration durability. Conservative preparation designs are associated with improved pulpal health, reduced postoperative sensitivity, and enhanced long-term prognosis. [35]

7.3. Evidence-Based Preparation Guidelines

Despite well-established principles, variability persists in clinical practice due to differences in materials and techniques. Future emphasis lies in developing standardized, evidence-based preparation guidelines tailored to specific restorative materials. Systematic reviews and clinical studies are increasingly guiding preparation dimensions, margin designs, and taper recommendations to optimize outcomes and reduce failure rates. [36]

8. Limitations of the Existing Literature

Although numerous studies address tooth preparation principles and errors, the existing literature has several limitations. Many studies are laboratory-based and may not fully replicate clinical conditions such as saliva contamination, patient movement, and anatomical variability. Additionally, there is considerable heterogeneity in study designs, outcome measures, and assessment criteria, making direct comparison challenging. Long-term clinical trials evaluating the direct relationship between preparation errors and restoration survival remain limited. Furthermore, variations in operator experience and educational background introduce bias, highlighting the need for standardized research methodologies and multicenter clinical studies.

9. Conclusion

Tooth preparation remains a critical determinant of success in fixed prosthodontics, directly influencing biological health, mechanical stability, and esthetic outcomes. Errors in occlusal and axial reduction, finish line design, margin placement, and pulpal protection can compromise restoration longevity and patient satisfaction. This narrative review highlights common tooth preparation errors, their clinical consequences, and preventive strategies grounded in existing literature. Emphasis on comprehensive education, skill development, and emerging digital technologies is essential for minimizing errors and improving clinical outcomes. Adherence to evidence-based preparation principles and continued professional development will play a vital role in enhancing the quality and predictability of crown restorations in contemporary dental practice. [37]

References

[1]   | Rosella D, Rosella G, Brauner E, Papi P, Piccoli L, Pompa G. A tooth preparation technique in fixed prosthodontics for students and neophyte dentists. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2016 Feb 12; 6(3-4): 104-109.
[2]   | Almohefer SA, Alkattan RK, Aldakhayel GD, Alolaiqi FF, Alharbi LH, Madfa AA. The technical quality of preclinical tooth preparation by undergraduate dental students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 May 23; 16: 903-915.
[3]   | Hajaj T, Rominu M, Constantin GD, Dobos M, Veja I. Influence of marginal tooth preparation designs on periodontal health and long-term stability: A narrative review. J Clin Med. 2025 Oct 4; 14(19): 7038.
[4]   | Podhorsky A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Tooth preparation for full-coverage restorations—a literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jun; 19(5): 959-968.
[5]   | Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: An art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Apr; 85(4): 363-376.
[6]   | Savadi A, Rangarajan V, Savadi RC, Satheesh P. Biologic perspectives in restorative treatment. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2011 Sep; 11(3): 143-148.
[7]   | Sayed ME, Porwal A, Hamdi BA, Hurubi SY, Hakami AK, Hakami AJ, et al. Impact of auxiliary features on retention of short dental crowns: An in-vitro analysis of box and groove preparations. Med Sci Monit. 2024 Mar 6; 30: e943401.
[8]   | Dos Santos DM, Moreno A, Vechiato-Filho AJ, Bonatto Lda R, Pesqueira AA, Laurindo Júnior MC, de Medeiros RA, da Silva EV, Goiato MC. The importance of the lifelike esthetic appearance of all-ceramic restorations on anterior teeth. Case Rep Dent. 2015; 2015: 704348.
[9]   | Dennison JB, Hamilton JC. Treatment decisions and conservation of tooth structure. Dent Clin North Am. 2005 Oct; 49(4): 825-845, vii.
[10]   | Vinaya K, Rakshith H, Prasad DK, Manoj S, Sunil M, Naresh S. To evaluate & compare retention of complete cast crown in natural teeth using different auxiliary retentive features with two different crown heights—An in vitro study. Int J Biomed Sci. 2015 Jun; 11(2): 99-106.
[11]   | Parker MH. Resistance form in tooth preparation. Dent Clin North Am. 2004 Apr; 48(2): v-vi, 387-396.
[12]   | Arola DD, Gao S, Zhang H, Masri R. The tooth: Its structure and properties. Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Oct; 61(4): 651-668.
[13]   | Roulet JF. Marginal integrity: Clinical significance. J Dent. 1994; 22 Suppl 1: S9-S12.
[14]   | Nugala B, Kumar BS, Sahitya S, Krishna PM. Biologic width and its importance in periodontal and restorative dentistry. J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jan; 15(1): 12-17.
[15]   | Revilla-León M, Ntovas P, Li J, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Gómez-Polo M. Tooth preparation-related factors that impact the accuracy of intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported restorations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Nov; 134(5): 1555.e1-1555.e20.
[16]   | Sharma A, Rahul GR, Poduval ST, Shetty K. Short clinical crowns (SCC) – treatment considerations and techniques. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012 Oct 1; 4(4):e230-e236.
[17]   | Santos MJMC, Zare E, McDermott P, Santos Junior GC. Multifactorial contributors to the longevity of dental restorations: An integrated review of related factors. Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 12; 12(9): 291.
[18]   | Jayna M, Jayna A, Yadav B, Dabas N. Clinical insight into tooth preparation: An update. Saint's Int Dent J. 2015; 1(1): 2-7.
[19]   | Alfaer AS, Alotaibi NF, Alotaibi RN, Abdulmajeed ZW, Azaiah EH, Bosaleh AH, et al. Over-reduction in tooth preparation. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2023; 10: 398-401.
[20]   | Singh S, Ghalaut P, Rathee M, Divakar S, Dixit P, Tomar SS. Assessment of four different tooth preparation techniques for porcelain fused to metal crown: An in vitro study. Saudi J Oral Sci. 2025; 12(2): 137-142.
[21]   | Elbanna L, Singh S, Kalakota S, Genedy A, Madireddi P, Hanumanthu R, Bhola R. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: Principles, workflow, and clinical applications – A comprehensive review. IP Indian J Conserv Endod. 2025; 10(3): 146-154.
[22]   | Velasquez-Plata D, Andres CJ. The art of crown preparation: A review of principles. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 1996 Fall; 75(3): 6-11; quiz 12.
[23]   | Li ZY, Bai HF, Wang Y, Sun YC. [Research status of tooth preparation quantitative guide technique]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 9; 53(2): 137-140. Chinese.
[24]   | Ahmed WM, Abdallah MN, McCullagh AP, Wyatt CCL, Troczynski T, Carvalho RM. Marginal discrepancies of monolithic zirconia crowns: The influence of preparation designs and sintering techniques. J Prosthodont. 2019 Mar; 28(3): 288-298.
[25]   | Davenport JC, Basker RM, Heath JR, Ralph JP, Glantz PO, Hammond P. Tooth preparation. Br Dent J. 2001 Mar 24; 190(6): 288-294.
[26]   | Osborne JW. Conservative tooth preparation, minimal intervention, and/or narrow-parallel preparations: A narrative. Oper Dent. 2020 Mar/Apr; 45(2): 113-116.
[27]   | Goodacre CJ. Designing tooth preparations for optimal success. Dent Clin North Am. 2004 Apr; 48(2): v, 359-385.
[28]   | Sengottaiyan AK, Bennani V, Veerasamy A. Influence of tooth preparation design on margin discrepancy and internal gap in digitally fabricated fixed complete coverage zirconia prostheses: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Sep; 134(3): 616-627.

[29]  
Shah N, Badwaik P, Sheth VH, Bhatnagar V, Bhanushali N, Patil P. Effect of different finish line preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium metal alloy copings fabricated using CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 May; 127(5): 716-728.e6.

[30]   | Srimaneepong V, Heboyan A, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Marya A, Fernandes GVO, Rokaya D. Fixed prosthetic restorations and periodontal health: A narrative review. J Funct Biomater. 2022 Feb 1; 13(1): 15.
[31]   | Aleisa K, Al-Dwairi ZN, Alwazzan K, Al-Moither M, Al-Shammari M, Lynch E. Convergence angles of clinical tooth preparations achieved by dental students at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. J Dent Educ. 2013 Sep; 77(9): 1154-1158.
[32]   | Heidaridarani MM, Farzaneh F, Rezvani G, Ahmady S, Ardakani FD, Mahrooz MH. Effect of a virtual reality simulator for preclinical instruction of operative dentistry on level of competence of undergraduate dental students. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Oct 21; 25(1): 1453.
[33]   | Alsharif H, Boyle R, Maillou P, Cherukara GP. A study on digital tooth preparation assessment software in undergraduate pre-clinical skills teaching. BDJ Open. 2024 Dec 5; 10(1): 91.
[34]   | Gratton DG, Kwon SR, Blanchette DR, Aquilino SA. Performance of two different digital evaluation systems used for assessing pre-clinical dental students’ prosthodontic technical skills. Eur J Dent Educ. 2017; 21(4): 252-260.
[35]   | LeSage BP. Minimally invasive dentistry: Paradigm shifts in preparation design. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2009 Mar-Apr; 21(2): 97-101; quiz 102, 116.
[36]   | Qumseya B, Goddard A, Qumseya A, Estores D, Draganov PV, Forsmark C. Barriers to clinical practice guideline implementation among physicians: A physician survey. Int J Gen Med. 2021 Nov 2; 14: 7591-7598.
[37]   | Tiu J, et al. Clinical tooth preparations and associated measuring methods: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 13(3): 175-184.