Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Bacterial Distribution and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of group B Streptococcus β hemolytic (GBS) in Vaginal Infections at Cotonou in Benin

Tchiakpe Edmond*, Zahra Fall Malick, Laurence Carine Yehouenou, Honoré Sourou Bankolé, Bekou Kossi Wilfried, Esse Atchéni Marius, Halimatou Diop Ndiaye, Coumba Touré Kane

Reference National Laboratory Fighting Against AIDS, National Direction of Health, Health Ministry, 04PO Box 378 Cotonou, Benin

Abstract: No orthodox practices disrupt the vaginal flora and expose it to pathogenic microorganisms including group B Streptococcus β hemolytic (GBS). The study aims to describe the bacterial profil and resistance of GBS to antibiotics. Retrospective study included 640 women at Cotonou suspected of vaginal infections or vaginal discharge during 1st January 2004 to 31st December 2015. Three swabs were collected and analyzed to identify the bacteria by standard biochemical reactions, diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis and identification of Trichomonas vaginalis, yeasts and leukocyte count. Antibiogram was performed according to the CA-SFM. Among 640 samples, 502 (78.4%) were positive. The most encountered microorganisms were Candida albicans (37.45%) and GBS (19.92%). GBS sensitivity ranged from 80-100% for augmentin, pefloxacin and nitrofuran. But resistance was observed to netilmicin, tetracyclin, cefoxitin, cephalotin, thiamphenicol, trimethoprim / sulfamethnoxazole between 80-100%. A high percentage of resistance is the result of uncontrolled access to antibiotics and improper antibiotic policy. Routine susceptibility testing will allow to take appropriate treatment of GBS in Benin.

Keywords: vaginal infections, GBS, antibiotics, Cotonou

Citation: Tchiakpe Edmond, Zahra Fall Malick, Laurence Carine Yehouenou, Honoré Sourou Bankolé, Bekou Kossi Wilfried, Esse Atchéni Marius, Halimatou Diop Ndiaye, Coumba Touré Kane, Bacterial Distribution and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of group B Streptococcus β hemolytic (GBS) in Vaginal Infections at Cotonou in Benin. American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, 5 (3). 109-114. January 2017. doi:10.12691/ajidm-5-3-3

1. Introduction

The presence of lactobacillus ensuring generally acid vaginal pH [1,2] notifies the normal state of the cervicovaginal environment which greatly participates in the defense against the growth of pathogens [3]. The use of antibiotics, intrauterine devices, contraceptive pills, pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections are factors causing an imbalance and profound modification of the commensal flora of the vagina promoting the growth by bacterial vaginosis [4,5] including Candida albicans (CA) and Group B streptococcus β hemolytic (GBS). Bacterial vaginosis (BV) misdiagnosed and untreated can lead to severe complications including pelvis inflammatory disease[6], infertility, preterm birth, low birth weight [7], chorioamnionitis and premature rupture of membranes [3]. In fact, it has been reported that women carrying Candida albicans were likely to develop GBS [8]. GBS may be carried by pregnant and non-pregnant women. Alp et al. reported in Turkey that 16.5% of non-pregnant women were GBS carriers compared to 9.8% of pregnant women[9]. Since 1970, GBS were recognized as a major cause neonatal mortality and morbidity in the United States [10]. A GBS transmission rate of 60% to their newborn was reported by Namavar et al. in pregnant women infected with GBS [11]. GBS have also been identified as responsible of stillbirth [12]. The GBS infections are early-onset infections and intra-partum antibiotic prophylaxis treatment is the way to prevent it [13]. According to the Centre for Disease Control and prevention (CDC), all pregnant women should be screened at 35-37 weeks of gestation and providing intra-partum antibiotic prophylaxis [13].

In Benin, none study did not document GBS resistance isolated in vaginal. Hence, the presence study is designed to identify the vagina bacterial infections and susceptibility of GBS towards currently used antibiotics.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Design

It was retrospective cross sectional study conducted on samples collected during a period of twelve year from women at Cotonou between 1st January 2004 and 31st December 2015. For each woman (n= 640) between 2 and 60 years of age, we extracted from the laboratory records, age, sex, vaginal sample culture results, identification of strain responsible of vagina bacterial infections and the corresponding antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results.

2.2. Ethical Committee

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee for Applied Biomedical Sciences (CER-ISBA) of Abomey Calavi University of Benin.

2.3. Sample Collection

Vaginal and cervical swabs samples (Three) were obtained from each woman as described by Onderdonk et al. [14]

2.4. Processing of Samples

The first swab was inoculated onto blood agar, MacConkey agar and chocolate agar (with 20% CO₂ moist atmosphere) and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 hours [15,16]. Bacterial growth was identified by standard biochemical reactions [17]. The second was used to prepare a gram smears for diagnosis of BV by the Nugent scoring system [18].

The third was taken to prepare the smear on a sterile glass slide for the detection of Trichomonas vaginalis, yeast cells, clue cells, number of leukocytes, type of vaginal flora, and parabasal epithelial cells [19].

Antibiotics’ susceptibility was performed by disk diffusion method in solid middle according to the guidelines of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (CA-SFM) [20]. Antibiotic discs were obtained from Bio-Rad, Marne la Coquette, France.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The statistical test EpiData 3.1 was used to check-in results and EpiData Analysis V2.2.2.182 for data analysis. The chi-2 test was used to compare proportions.

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of Organisms Isolated from Vaginal Infections

Overall 640 vaginal cultures were performed during 2004-2015 period. The rate of positive cultures was (n= 502, 78.4%) of which 506 microorganism (BV, candidiasis, gonorrhoeae, trichomoniasis and others aerobic microorganisms) have been isolated. The distribution of vaginal samples and vaginosis based on age ranges are showed in Figure 1. The mean age of the women in this study was 29.8 years [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 29.00-30.57] ranging from 2 to 60 years (Table 1). Figure 2 illustrates the types and proportions of microorganisms isolated in vaginal from 502 women with vaginal infections or symptomatic vaginal discharge attending the National Laboratory (NL) of Benin Heath Ministry.

The most common microorganisms encountered was Candida albicans (n= 182, 37.45%) followed by Group B streptococcus β hemolytic (n= 100, 19.92%), Staphylococcus aureus (n= 60, 11.95%), Staphylococcus dore (n= 46, 9.16%).

Figure 1. The distribution of vaginal samples and vaginosis based on age ranges

Figure 2. Types and proportion of microorganisms isolated in vaginal from women attending NL at Cotonou, Benin

Table 1. Characteristics of patients included in the study

Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of GBS isolated from women attending NL at Cotonou, Benin

3.2. Percentage of Sensitivity GBS Isolated to Various Antibiotics

Table 2 summarizes the antibiotic susceptibility of vagina bacterial isolates from women attending of NL.

Among penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and carbenicillin were the most active against GBS with rates 67%, 80% and 67% respectively. The resistance rates of 67%, 66% and 62% were observed towards ampicillin, methicillin and oxacillin respectively.

Regarding cephalosporin, third generation antibiotics (cefotaxim, ceftriaxon) were most effective (50% and 59% respectively) while second generation antibiotics (cefuroxim, cefoxitin) and first generation cephalothin were lost effectiveness with resistance rates of 67%, 100% and 100% respectively.

GBS were resistance of all antibiotics class tested among aminoglycosides, tetracyclin and Macrolides. About aminoglycosides, the resistance rates were 80% and 61% for netilmicin and gentamycin respectively while 92% and 60% resistance rates were observed for tetracyclin and minocyclin respectively in tetracyclin group. As macrolide, resistance rates were observed in 50%, 53% and 75% respectively for erythromycin, lincomycin and spiramycin.

GBS were 100% resistant to thiamphenicol in phenicol group while chloramphenicol was effective at 68%.

In quinolone group, 65% and 51% of GBS were resistant to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin respectively while pefloxacin was effective at 100%.

Nitrofuran was more effective at 100% against GBS while 70% of GBS were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, it is the first study conducted in Benin to determine the distribution of vagina bacterial infections and GBS susceptibility in patients attending NL of health Ministry of Benin.

The overall prevalence of vagina bacterial infections was 78.4% in our study. This high rate could be explained by intravaginal pratices that are common in Africa such as cleaning inside the vagina beyond the introitus or insertion of substances into the vagina to dry or tighten the vagina [21]. In addition, Benin is a country neighboring West Africa Nigeria which comes many counterfeit products as gynecological solutions and other pharmaceutical products. Some rates of 49.5% [22], 44% [23] and 27.6% [24] were reported in Vietnam, Thandalam and Iran respectively. Our result was fivefold higher (15.4%) that observed Wondemagegn et al in Ethiopia (p = 0.001) [25]. These differences reported rates could also be explained by economic status, methods of identification of microorganisms, geographical racial differences as highlighted by Wondemagegn et al.

In this study, Candida albicans (n= 182, 37.45%) was the most microorganism isolated followed by GBS (n= 100, 19.92%). CA is responsible of 80-92% of yeast infections [26]. Several studies have shown association between Candida albicans and GBS [8,27]. CA is the normal microflora of oral cavity, vagina and gastrointestinal tract [28], but can become pathogenic under certain conditions such as pregnancy [29]. It is the third most prevalent of pediatric health care-associated bloodstream fungal infection [28]. A rate of 46.5% has been reported in Iran [28]. Our result was significantly different that observed Giraldo et al. in preterm labor women (p= 0.01) but not significantly different in full term labor women (p= 0.25) in the same study [3].

GBS infections are important health problems that can be treated or preventable. Some variable rates have been reported in Wordwide. Several studies have reported GBS infections rates ranging 16%-30% [30,31,32]. A 19.92% rate reported in our study was significantly high (p=0.007) that reported (13.6%) by Alp et al. in Turkey [9]. Our rate was also significantly high that described by Alp et al. in pregnant women (9.8%) (p= 0.03) and not pregnant women (16.5%) (p=0.001) [9]. The study conducted in Ethiopia by Mengist et al. among pregnant women has shown 10.4% rate of GBS, that is lower (p=0.01) compared in our study [33]. The high sample size may explain the significant difference of GBS rate observed in our study compared to others studies.

Vaginal GBS infections are treated with administration of proper antibiotics. Thus, GBS susceptibility and resistance have been identified in this study. GBS were susceptible to amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and carbenicillin with 67%, 80% and 67% rates respectively. Susceptible similar rates were also reported in Pakistan [34] with amoxicillin (81.3%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (100%) [35]. GBS resistance rate to ampicillin was 62%, similar that observed in Ethiopia [25]. In contrary, some studies reported susceptibility to this antibiotic at 62.8% in Iran [36], 96 % in Pakistan [34], 100% in Ethiopia [33].

GBS isolates were susceptible to third generation cephalosporin (cefotaxim and ceftriaxon) at 50% and 59% respectively. Nasri et al. [36] and Mumtaz et al. [34] reported 54.2% and 90% GBS susceptible rates to cefotaxim while resistant to ceftriaxon has been described in Iran [37] and 9.7% were found in Ethiopia [33].

All GBS isolates were resistant to second and first generation cephalosporin (cephalothin), also aminoglycosides, tetracyclin, Macrolides, thiamphenicol, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole tested in our study, implying their impossible use for GBS infections treatment in Benin. These resistances to antibiotics might be attributed to the wide use of antimicrobial drugs. As above highlighted, in Benin, people easily take care at Dantokpa market with antibiotics without physician prescription.

The 50% resistant GBS rate to erythromycin is not surprisingly and has been already reported ranging from 0.7% to 51.3% [38,39]. Also, 6.5% resistance rate has been reported in Ethiopia [33]. These data suggest that routine susceptibility testing is recommended to ensure proper therapy during erythromycin use as second-choice drugs in individuals with penicillin allergy [40]. In addition, this antibiotic cannot longer use intrapartum prophylaxis of early-onset GBS neonatal sepsis as highlighted in study performed in Geneva [41].

We found 100% of GBS resistance to cefoxitin that has also been described in use for broad-spectrum treatment of endometritis or chorioamnionitis [42]. Resistance to tetracyclin (92%), gentamycin (61%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (70%) and ciprofloxacin (65%) reported in our study has previously described. Those findings are consistent with findings from another studies that showed 97%, 50%, 82.5% and 9.7% of resistance to tetracyclin, gentamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin respectively [33,34,40]. Respectively, resistance rates of 29% and 45.2% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and tetracyclin have been also reported in Ethiopia [33]. Most of the GBS have been found resistant towards lincomycin (53%), while study performed in Parkistan showed susceptibility rate of 66.7% [34].

Nitrofuran was 100% effective against all GBS isolates in our study. But Ghiasi et al. describes resistance to this antibiotic in Iran [37].

This study was not without limitations because bacterial identification by culture method use may be origin introduce bias highlight the limitations of laboratory setups in Benin. All information was obtained in the laboratory records, hence the possibility data mistakes results. In addition, vaginal infections and antibiotic susceptibility may not be representative of the community because the study is based in NL.

5. Conclusion

A high percentage of resistance is the result of uncontrolled access to antibiotics and improper antibiotic policy. Routine susceptibility testing will allow to take appropriate treatment of GBS in Benin.

References

[1]   | Boskey ER, Cone RA, Whaley KJ, Moench TR: Origins of vaginal acidity: high D/L lactate ratio is consistent with bacteria being the primary source. Hum Reprod 2001, 16(9):1809-1813.
[2]   | Boskey ER, Telsch KM, Whaley KJ, Moench TR, Cone RA: Acid production by vaginal flora in vitro is consistent with the rate and extent of vaginal acidification. Infection and immunity 1999, 67(10): 5170-5175.
[3]   | Giraldo PC, Araujo ED, Junior JE, do Amaral RL, Passos MR, Goncalves AK: The prevalence of urogenital infections in pregnant women experiencing preterm and full-term labor. Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology 2012, 2012: 878241.
[4]   | Fosch S, Fogolin N, Azzaroni E, Pairetti N, Dana L, Minacori H, Tita I, Redona M, Gribaudo G: [Vulvovaginitis: correlation with predisposing factors, clinical manifestations and microbiological studies]. Revista Argentina de microbiologia 2006, 38(4):202-205.
[5]   | Vahidnia A, Tuin H, Bliekendaal H, Spaargaren J: Association of sexually transmitted infections, Candida species, gram-positive flora and perianal flora with bacterial vaginosis. The new microbiologica 2015, 38(4): 559-563.
[6]   | Sharma H, Tal R, Clark NA, Segars JH: Microbiota and pelvic inflammatory disease. Seminars in reproductive medicine 2014, 32(1): 43-49.
[7]   | Sirota I, Zarek SM, Segars JH: Potential influence of the microbiome on infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Seminars in reproductive medicine 2014, 32(1):35-42.
[8]   | Beigi RH, Meyn LA, Moore DM, Krohn MA, Hillier SL: Vaginal yeast colonization in nonpregnant women: a longitudinal study. Obstetrics and gynecology 2004, 104(5 Pt 1): 926-930.
[9]   | Alp F, Findik D, Dagi HT, Arslan U, Pekin AT, Yilmaz SA: Screening and genotyping of group B streptococcus in pregnant and non-pregnant women in Turkey. Journal of infection in developing countries 2016, 10(3): 222-226.
[10]   | Platt JS, O'Brien WF: Group B streptococcus: prevention of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Obstetrical & gynecological survey 2003, 58(3): 191-196.
[11]   | Namavar Jahromi B, Poorarian S, Poorbarfehee S: The prevalence and adverse effects of group B streptococcal colonization during pregnancy. Archives of Iranian medicine 2008, 11(6):654-657.
[12]   | Goldenberg RL, Thompson C: The infectious origins of stillbirth. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2003, 189(3): 861-873.
[13]   | Plumb J, Clayton G: Group B streptococcus infection: risk and prevention. The practising midwife 2013, 16(7):27-30.
[14]   | Onderdonk AB, Lee ML, Lieberman E, Delaney ML, Tuomala RE: Quantitative microbiologic models for preterm delivery. Journal of clinical microbiology 2003, 41(3):1073-1079.
[15]   | Forbes BA DF, Alice SW, Baily and Scott's.: Diagnostic microbiology. Mosby Elservier Company 2007, 12th ed. USA:P.867.
[16]   | Mackie TJ MJ: Laboratory strategy in the diagnosis of infective syndromes. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, editors. Practical Medical Microbiology 14th ed Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone 2006:p. 796.
[17]   | Allen SD JW, Koneman EW, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed Philadelphia: Lippincott 2005:p. 1443-1535.
[18]   | Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL: Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. Journal of clinical microbiology 1991, 29(2):297-301.
[19]   | M C: Examination of urogenital specimens. In District Laboratory Practice in Tropical countries. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2000, Volume 2:93-94.
[20]   | CA-SFM: Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. http://wwwsfm-microbiologieorg/UserFiles/files/casfm/CASFM_2012pdf 2012.
[21]   | Low N, Chersich MF, Schmidlin K, Egger M, Francis SC, van de Wijgert JH, Hayes RJ, Baeten JM, Brown J, Delany-Moretlwe S et al: Intravaginal practices, bacterial vaginosis, and HIV infection in women: individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS medicine 2011, 8(2):e1000416.
[22]   | Go VF QV, Celentano DD, Moulton LH, Zenilman JM: Prevalence and risk factors for reproductive tractinfections among women in rural vietnam. Souttheast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2006, 37:185-189.
[23]   | Mathiew R SR, Kalyani M, Jayakumars S, Lai B, Banu S Microbiological profile of vaginosis among women of the reproductive age group, who attended a tertiary care hospital. JCDR 2011, 8(5):1548-1551.
[24]   | Bahram A HB, Zohre T: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and impact of genital hygiene pratices in non-pregnant women in Zanjan, Iran Oman Med J 2009, 24: 288-293.
[25]   | Mulu W, Yimer M, Zenebe Y, Abera B: Common causes of vaginal infections and antibiotic susceptibility of aerobic bacterial isolates in women of reproductive age attending at Felegehiwot Referral Hospital, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC women's health 2015, 15: 42.
[26]   | Hibbard LT, Snyder EN, McVann RM: Subgluteal and retropsoal infection in obstetric practice. Obstetrics and gynecology 1972, 39(1):137-150.
[27]   | Regan JA, Klebanoff MA, Nugent RP: The epidemiology of group B streptococcal colonization in pregnancy. Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Obstetrics and gynecology 1991, 77(4): 604-610.
[28]   | Mohammadi R, Ataei B: Candidiasis in Pediatrics; Identification and In vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of the Clinical Isolates. Iranian journal of pediatric hematology and oncology 2016, 6(1): 43-51.
[29]   | Achkar JM, Fries BC: Candida infections of the genitourinary tract. Clinical microbiology reviews 2010, 23(2):253-273.
[30]   | Kiely RA, Cotter L, Mollaghan AM, Cryan B, Coffey A, Lucey B: Emergence of group B Streptococcus serotype IV in women of child-bearing age in Ireland. Epidemiology and infection 2011, 139(2):236-238.
[31]   | Motlova J, Strakova L, Urbaskova P, Sak P, Sever T: Vaginal & rectal carriage of Streptococcus agalactiae in the Czech Republic: incidence, serotypes distribution & susceptibility to antibiotics. The Indian journal of medical research 2004, 119 Suppl: 84-87.
[32]   | Leclair CM, Hart AE, Goetsch MF, Carpentier H, Jensen JT: Group B streptococcus: prevalence in a non-obstetric population. Journal of lower genital tract disease 2010, 14(3): 162-166.
[33]   | Mengist A, Kannan H, Abdissa A: Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of anorectal and vaginal group B Streptococci isolates among pregnant women in Jimma, Ethiopia. BMC research notes 2016, 9: 351.
[34]   | Mumtaz S, Ahmad M, Aftab I, Akhtar N, ul Hassan M, Hamid A: Aerobic vaginal pathogens and their sensitivity pattern. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008, 20(1): 113-117.
[35]   | Abdelaziz ZA, Ibrahim ME, Bilal NE, Hamid ME: Vaginal infections among pregnant women at Omdurman Maternity Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. Journal of infection in developing countries 2014, 8(4):490-497.
[36]   | Nasri K, Chehrei A, Manavi MS: Evaluation of vaginal group B streptococcal culture results after digital vaginal examination and its pattern of antibiotic resistance in pregnant women. Iranian journal of reproductive medicine 2013, 11(12):999-1004.
[37]   | Ghiasi M, Fazaeli H, Kalhor N, Sheykh-Hasan M, Tabatabaei-Qomi R: Assessing the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among infertile women of Qom city. Iranian journal of microbiology 2014, 6(6): 404-408.
[38]   | Ferjani A, Ben Abdallah H, Ben Saida N, Gozzi C, Boukadida J: [Vaginal colonization of the Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant woman in Tunisia: risk factors and susceptibility of isolates to antibiotics]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 2006, 99(2): 99-102.
[39]   | Al-Sweih N, Jamal M, Kurdia M, Abduljabar R, Rotimi V: Antibiotic susceptibility profile of group B streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) at the Maternity Hospital, Kuwait. Medical principles and practice: international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre 2005, 14(4): 260-263.
[40]   | Dutra VG, Alves VM, Olendzki AN, Dias CA, de Bastos AF, Santos GO, de Amorin EL, Sousa MA, Santos R, Ribeiro PC et al: Streptococcus agalactiae in Brazil: serotype distribution, virulence determinants and antimicrobial susceptibility. BMC infectious diseases 2014, 14:323.
[41]   | Capanna F, Emonet SP, Cherkaoui A, Irion O, Schrenzel J, Martinez de Tejada B: Antibiotic resistance patterns among group B Streptococcus isolates: implications for antibiotic prophylaxis for early-onset neonatal sepsis. Swiss medical weekly 2013, 143: w13778.
[42]   | Berkowitz K, Regan JA, Greenberg E: Antibiotic resistance patterns of group B streptococci in pregnant women. Journal of clinical microbiology 1990, 28(1):5-7.