Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Bacteriological Profile of Suppurative Infections at the University Departmental Hospital of Borgou/Alibori in Benin

Seindé Espérance Medoatinsa*, Sessi Frida Appoline Tovo, Moussa Alassane, Ahouéfa Félicité Merveille Akonde, Moutawakilou Gomina, Cokou Pascal Agbangnan Dossa, Maximin Senou

Experimental and Clinical Biology Unit, Medical and Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Research Laboratory, National School of Applied Biosciences and Biotechnology of Dassa-Zoumé, National University of Sciences, Technologies, Engineering and Mathematics, Benin

Abstract: Purulent infections are common and can be caused by a variety of microorganisms. The present study focuses on 216 purulent samples and aims to determine their bacteriological profile at the Clinical Biology Department of the Borgou and Alibori Departmental Hospital. Isolation and identification of microorganisms and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using standard microbiological techniques. Sixty-one of the 100 participants (61%) were male. Participants ranged in age from 8 months to 76 years. The most common age group was between 50 and 60 years (22.70%). The prevalence of purulent infection in the study population was 43.52%, with a predominance of monomicrobial cultures (79%). Cytobacteriological examination of the pus showed that of 114 strains isolated responsible for purulent infection, 53 (46.50%) were gram-negative bacteria compared with 61 (53.50%) gram-positive. The most frequently isolated species were: Staphylococcus aureus (47.37%), Escherichia coli (14.04%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (7%). Analysis of the antibiogram results for the isolated strains revealed isolates resistant to the main antibiotic families. Multi-resistant strains such as MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) producing strains were identified. Antibiotic resistance is a real public health problem that can lead to the death of infected patients due to the lack of appropriate drugs for better management, hence the importance of controlling and rationalising medical prescribing in the event of infection.

Keywords: Infection, suppuration, bacteria, antibiotics, resistance

Received October 11, 2024; Revised November 13, 2024; Accepted November 20, 2024

Citation: Seindé Espérance Medoatinsa, Sessi Frida Appoline Tovo, Moussa Alassane, Ahouéfa Félicité Merveille Akonde, Moutawakilou Gomina, Cokou Pascal Agbangnan Dossa, Maximin Senou, Bacteriological Profile of Suppurative Infections at the University Departmental Hospital of Borgou/Alibori in Benin. American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, 12 (4). 104-109. January 2024. doi:10.12691/ajidm-12-4-4

1. Introduction

Suppurative infections are characterised by severe local inflammation with production of pus (whitish or yellowish fluid) consisting of leukocytes, cellular debris and necrotic tissue [1]. It is an invasion and multiplication of pathogenic microorganisms in a part of the body that can lead to tissue damage [2]. These infections can be superficial (skin infections) or deep (internal organs) [3]. The microorganisms responsible for inflammation and suppuration are pyogenic bacteria [2]. In most studies, the majority of isolates are aerobic and include gram-positive cocci (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Enterococcus) and gram-negative bacilli (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus and Pseudomonas) [4]. Antibiotics, molecules capable of inhibiting the growth or elimination of bacteria, represent one of the most important discoveries in medicine and have saved millions of lives every year since the 1940. However, their excessive and sometimes inappropriate use has led to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which in turn pose a major challenge to the proper management of infected patients. The emergence of multi-resistant strains leads to prolonged illness, higher healthcare costs and an increased risk of death from infection. Suppurative infections are still common in developing countries and treatment remains a significant challenge despite advances in microbiological techniques, antibiotics and surgical treatments [2]. To ensure appropriate and effective therapy, it is necessary to identify and treat the site of inflammation. This is the context of the present study, which aims to contribute to the fight against antimicrobial resistance by establishing the bacteriological profile of suppurative infections and the reactivity of isolated bacteria to conventional antibiotics.

2. Materials and Reagents

The following equipment and reagents were used: microscope, oven, culture media (blood agar, methylene blue-eosin agar, colimycin-nalidixic acid agar and Chapman's agar), stains (gentian violet, Lugol's, alcohol, fuschin, etc.) and antibiotic discs (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, ceftazin, cefoxitin, ceftriazone, cotriazone, etc.).

3. Methodology

The colour (yellow-green to reddish-brown), consistency (cloudy, very thick and sticky) and odour of the pus samples were noted on macroscopic examination. In the Examination in the fresh state, the mobility and abundance of germs were observed at x40. Cultures were grown on agar to obtain distinct, well-separated colonies after plating using the dial technique and incubation at 37°C for 24 hours under aerobic (methylene blue eosin, Chapman) and anaerobic (blood agar and nalidixic acid-colimycin) conditions. For Gram staining, each sample was spread, dried and fixed, then stained with gentian violet, Lugol's, bleached with alcohol and finally restained with fuchsin. Microscopic observation was carried out using a 100 objective and immersion oil. A double stain is used to determine the shape, arrangement (assembly method), purity and biochemical nature of the microorganism wall. This stain is used to classify bacteria according to their ability to bind crystal violet. Testing for catalase has allowed the differential diagnosis of Staphylococcus and Streptococcus, which are Gram-positive cocci. This enzyme breaks down hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen gas. The oxidase test allowed us to make a differential diagnosis between non-oxidative Gram-negative bacilli (Enterobactericeae and Acinetobacter) and oxidative Gram-negative bacilli (Pseudomonas, Pasteurella, etc.). The Api 20 E gallery was used to identify gram-negative bacilli. The Muller Hinton agar diffusion method was used to test the susceptibility of the isolated micro-organisms to conventional antibiotics.

4. Results

√ Sociodemographic results

The figure below shows the breakdown of participants by age.

Figure 1. Age distribution of participants

According to this figure, participants aged between 50 and 60 years are the most represented with a percentage of 22.70%.

The breakdown of participants by gender is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Breakdown of participants by gender

According to the breakdown of participants by gender, males were the most represented at 61%.

√ Prevalence of purulent infections

Of the 216 pus specimens obtained, 94 were positive, or 43.52% of cases, compared with 122 negative specimens, or 56.48% (Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of purulent infections

√ Distribution of samples by culture type

The figure below shows the culture type.

Figure 3. Frequency (%) of positive results in patients by type of culture

Cytobacteriological analysis of the pus allowed us to divide the samples into two groups: monomicrobial cultures with a rate of 79% and polymicrobial cultures with a rate of 21% (Figure 3).

√ Distribution of samples by Gram stain and bacterial group

A total of 114 strains were isolated from 94 positive purulent samples, representing 21 different species. The isolation rates for gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci were 46.5% and 53.5%, respectively. In this distribution, Staphylococcus strains were the most dominant, followed by Enterobacteriaceae (Table 2).

Table 2. Distribution by Gram stain and bacterial group

√ Distribution of positive samples by Gram stain and bacterial species isolated

Table 3 shows that Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated species with 54 strains representing 47.37% of isolates, followed by Escherichia coli with 16 strains (14.04%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 6 strains (05.26%).

Table 3. Distribution of the main bacterial strains isolated

√ Antibiotic resistance

• Resistance profile of Escherichia coli (n=16)

Antibiotic susceptibility testing of the 16 isolated Escherichia coli strains showed variable results. The rate of antibiotic resistance is shown in the table below.

Table 4. Resistance profile of Escherichia coli

• Resistance profile of Klebsiella spp (n=8)

The antibiogram results for the 8 Klebsiella spp strains are shown in Table 5. The resistance rate was 75% for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and 50% for ampicillin, penicillin and gentamicin.

Table 5. Resistance profile of Klebsiella spp

• Enterobacter resistance profile (n=6)

The 6 Enterobacter strains isolated showed significant resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (83.3%), ampicillin and penicillin (66.6%), the most widely used antibiotics of the beta-lactam family.

Table 6. Enterobacter resistance profile

• Resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=6)

Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa continue to be quite susceptible to antibiotics, with the highest resistance rates recorded for piperacillin (33.3%), ticarcillin (16.6%), gentamicin (33.3%) and ciprofloxacin (50%).

Table 7. Resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

• Resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus (n=54)

Almost 70% of the strains were resistant to penicillin. There were 21 strains resistant to oxacillin (39%). There were also significant rates of resistance to other antibiotics.

Table 8. Resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus

5. Discussion

Pyogenic infections are a public health problem. Knowledge of the pathogens responsible for these infections and their susceptibilities is useful for choosing an appropriate antimicrobial treatment, but also for an effective fight against antimicrobial resistance [5]. Between March and June 2024, at the Clinical Biology Department, Bacteriology Section of the Borgou Alibori Departemental Hospital, 94 samples were found positive out of 216 pus samples collected, giving a positivity rate of 43.51%. This result is lower than that reported in a study conducted in India in 2021, which found an overall positivity rate of 85.02% [6]. The results obtained in the present study are lower than those reported by Bankar et al. in 2018 [7] (78.55%) and Gomatheswari and Jeyamurugan in 2017 (71.49%) [8]. During the study period and based on the inclusion criteria, there was a male predominance with a frequency of 61% compared to 39% for females (sex ratio M/F= 1.56). These results are lower than those of Hamid et al. (2020) [9] in a cross-sectional study in Sudan, who reported male predominance with a sex ratio M/F= 2.73. Macia's team, in 2017 [10], reported a male prevalence of 50.60%, which corresponds to a sex ratio of 1.02. These results also differ from those of Maharjan et al., in 2020 [11], who reported a female predominance (52.9%) with a sex ratio M/F= 0.89. In the present study, cytobacteriological analysis of pus allowed us to classify cultures into two groups: mono-microbial cultures with a rate of 79% and polymicrobial cultures with a rate of 21%. These results are consistent with those reported by Verma, (2012) [12] and Amin et al, (2017) [1] who found rates of 84.31% and 79.92% of mono-microbial cultures, respectively. Infections are polymicrobial if they are deep and/or chronic and/or already treated with antibiotics. The sampler, instruments, rooms and hospital environment can also be sources of sample contamination. The medical literature reports that suppurative infections are dominated by Gram-positive bacteria [13]. Gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were isolated from all positive cultures by Gram staining. Cytobacteriological analysis identified 46.5% of Gram-negative bacteria and 53.5% of Gram-positive bacteria. Our results are in agreement with those of Bankar et al, (2018) [7] (51.97% Gram-negative and 47.36% Gram-positive) and Sharma et al, (2018) [6] (89% Gram-negative and 11% Gram-positive). The distribution of isolated strains according to bacterial groups shows that Staphylococcus is the most isolated pathogen with 47.37% of positive cases (54 strains), followed by Enterobacteriaceae with a rate of 40.35% (46 strains), then non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli and Streptococcus with a rate of 6.14% (7 strains) and 4.39% (5 strains) respectively, and finally Enterococcus. These results are similar to those found by Chacón-Quesada and colleagues in 2021 [13], where gram-positive cocci, and especially staphylococci, are more common in surgical site infections than other bacterial groups. However, these results are in complete contrast to those of Rahma et al., (2021) [14], where Enterobacteriaceae accounted for 70% of the 1291 strains isolated. These results also contradict those obtained by Gomatheswari and Jeyamurugan (2017) [8], who found a predominance of Enterobacteriaceae followed by Gram-positive cocci. Staphylococcus aureus was the most isolated bacterial species in the present study (47.37%) followed by Escherichia coli (14.04%), P. aeruginosa (5.26%), Streptococcus pyogenes (4.39%) and K. pneumoniae (3.50%). Our results are better than those reported by Amin et al, (2017) (14.3%) and Gomatheswari and Jeyamurugan, (2017) [8] (18.5%). Staphylococcus aureus is a common human commensal that can colonise the skin, nose and throat with the anterior nares as the main reservoir. It is the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections. It causes a wide variety of infections, ranging from benign (impetigo) to immediate death. It’s the most common pathogen isolated from surgical site infections, skin abscesses and purulent cellulitis. However, the results of the present study differ from those of Kanakadurgamba et al., 2021 [15] who reported that E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the predominant isolates, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and S. aureus. Although E. coli is in second place in the present work, it is still relatively low compared to its predominance reported in the literature by Le Turnier's team in 2017 [16]. Antibiotic resistance is a growing global concern. The evolution of bacteria towards antibiotic resistance or poly-resistance would be inevitable as it represents a particular aspect of the general evolution of bacteria [17]. Although the antibiogram results in the present study show that E. coli is resistant to amoxicillin and penicillin with rates of 93.75% and 56.25% respectively. Resistance to ceftazidine and ceftriaxone, which are 3rd generation cephalosporins, was 43.75%. In addition, the rate of resistance to amoxicillin is higher than that reported by Hamez et al., [18] who reported that 15% of E. coli strains were resistant to amoxicillin. Resistance to aminopenicillins (ampicillin) and first-generation cephalosporins in E. coli is often mediated by the production of β-lactamases that confer resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins or carbapenems. The spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, such as E. coli, is considered a major public health problem due to the inability to treat the infections they cause [19]. Klebsiella strains show resistance to amoxicillin (75%), ampicillin and penicillin (50%) through the production of a chromosomal penicillinase. Our results are lower than those obtained by Amin et al, (2017) [1] (88.9%) and Gomatheswari and Jeyamurugan, (2018) [8] (83%) for ampicillin. The 6 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains also showed resistance to 3rd generation antibiotics: Cefoxime and ceftaxidine (25%). The carbapenemase-producing strains in this study are less frequent than those reported by Sharma et al., in 2021 [6]. For S. aureus, several studies report that it is the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections and that MRSA is a public health problem [20]. In this study, over 72% of the strains were resistant to penicillin G (penicillinase) and 23 strains (42.60%) were resistant to oxacillin (MRSA). They are therefore resistant to beta-lactams. These results are superior to those of a Libyan study, which reported low levels of resistance to ciprofloxacin (3.31%), penicillin (34.93%), erythromycin (18.02%) and gentamicin (2.94%) [20]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the species with the least resistance to the antibiotics tested. The highest rates of resistance are found for piperacillin and gentamicin (33.3%), ticarcillin (16.6%) and ciprofloxacin (50%) compared to those reported by Sami in 2012 [21] and Li et al., in 2016 [22]. For aminoglycosides (gentamicin), the rate is 33.3%. This rate is higher than the rate reported in an Ethiopian study, which was 7.8% [20]. P. aeruginosa has several three-component efflux systems, some of which confer resistance to β-lactams when they are highly expressed.

6. Conclusion

Suppurative infections are common infections that can be caused by a variety of microorganisms and require antibiotic therapy. Excessive and sometimes inappropriate use of antibiotics has led to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. It is therefore important to control the epidemiological profile of bacterial infections and their susceptibility to antibiotics. The results obtained in this study show that purulent samples have a positivity rate of 43.51%. The cytobacteriological examination of purulent samples allowed us to isolate 114 germs, with a predominance of gram-positive bacteria (53.5%). The most frequently isolated species were Staphylococcus aureus (47.37%), Escherichia coli (14.04%) and Klebsiella (7%). Analysis of the antibiogram results for the isolated strains revealed high levels of resistance to the main families of antibiotics tested, particularly in Enterobacteriaceae. Klebsiella pneumoniae showed high levels of resistance to beta-lactams, including third-generation cephalosporins, and to quinolones.

References

[1]  
Amin, M.A., El-Khlousy, M., Elberry, A.A., Hussein, R.R., Mostafa Kamel, N. (2017). Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Pus Isolates in Beni-Suef University Hospital from 2008-2014: An Observational Study. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 43(139): 206-10.

[2]   | Singh, S., Khare, M., Patidar, R.K., Bagde, S., Sahare, K., Dwivedi, D., Singh, V. (2013). Antibacterial activities against pyogenic pathogens, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 4(18): 2974-79.
[3]   | Gheit. A., (2011). Les principales bactéries isolées des pus superficiels et leur comportement vis-à-vis des antibiotiques.
[4]   | Biradar, A., Farooqui, F., Prakash, R., Khaqri, S.Y., Itagi, I. (2016). Aerobic bacteriological profile with antibiogram of pus isolates. Indian J Microbiol Res, 3(3): 245-249.
[5]   | Afshan, N., & Shahid, M. (2013). Isolation of Gram Positive and Gram Negative Organisms from Pus Samples: One Center Study. 4, 3.
[6]   | Sharma, R., Batra, S., Balothia, V., & Agarwal, S. (2021). Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Pus Culture Isolates from a Tertiary Care Hospital, SMS Medical College Jaipur. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(11): 7502-7508.

[7]  
Bankar, N., Wankhade, A., Brahmane, R., Hathiwala, R., Chandi, D. (2018). Bacteriological Profile of pus/ wound swab and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from pus & wound swab of Indoor Patients of Tertiary Care Hospital, Durg, Chhattisgarh India. International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science, 3 (4): 2455-8737.

[8]  
Gomatheswari, S., Jeyamurugan, T. (2017). Bacteriological Profile and the Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Microorganisms Isolated from Pus/Wound Swab Isolates in Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6 (10): 1405-1413.

[9]   | Hamid, M. H., Arbab, A. H., & Yousef, B. A. (2020). Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility of diabetic Foot infections at Ribat University hospital; a retrospective study from Sudan. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 19(2): 1397– 1406.
[10]   | 10- Macía-Rodríguez, C., Alende-Castro, V., Vazquez-Ledo, L., Novo-Veleiro, I., & González-Quintela, A. (2017). Skin and soft-tissue infections: Factors associated with mortality and re-admissions. Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica, 35(2): 76- 81. 40.
[11]   | Maharjan, N., & Mahawal, B. S. (2020). Bacteriological profile of wound infection and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of various isolates in a tertiary care center. Journal of Lumbini Medical College, 8(2): 218-224.
[12]   | Verma, P. (2012). A study on isolation of different type of bacteria from pus. International Journal Of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, 3 (11), 2107-2110.
[13]   | Chacon-Quesada T., Rohde V., von der Brelie C. (2021).Less surgical site infections in neurosurgery during COVID-19 times-one potential benefit of the pandemic? Neurosurg Rev, 44, 3421-3425.
[14]   | Rahma OE, Yothers G, Hong TS, et al. Use of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Initial Results From the Pembrolizumab Arm of a Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(8):1225–1230.
[15]   | Kanakadurgamba, T., Koripella, R. L., Gowtham, B., & Peddapalli, A. R. (2021). Study of Aerobic Bacterial Etiology and Their Antibiogram from Pus Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
[16]   | Le Turnier, P., Boutoille, D., Joyau, C., Veyrac, G., & Asseray, N. (2017). Bacterial infections and NSAIDs exposure Seek septic complications. European journal of internal medicine, 41: e33-e34.
[17]   | Ziai, S. (2014). La résistance bactérienne aux antibiotiques: apparition et stratégies de lutte (Thèse de doctorat).
[18]   | Hamez M., Dabboussi F., Izard D. (2009). Sensibilité des enterobacteries aux antibiotiques: etude sur quatre ans (1998-2001) dans le nord de Liban. Santé: cahiers d’études et de recherches francophones. Vol 13.
[19]   | Burbano Barreros, L. D., González Romero, A. C., Araujo Baptista, L. M., & Cruz Tenempaguay, R. E. (2020). Microorganismos más frecuentes en infecciones cutáneas en el Hospital Provincial General Ambato. Revista Eugenio Espejo, 14(2): 19-29.
[20]   | Atia, A., Ashour, A., Shaban, N., & Omar, F. (2020). Incidence of Bacterial Skin Infections in Libya: A Retrospective Population-Based Study. Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine, 3(1): 3-6.
[21]   | Sami, K., (2012). Les principales bactéries isolées des pus profonds et leur comportement vis-à-vis des antibiotiques.
[22]   | Li, X., Chen, Y., Gao, W., Ouyang, W., Wei, J., & Wen, Z. (2016). Epidemiology and Outcomes of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections among Inpatients in Southern China from 2008 to 2013. PloS one, 11(2): e0149960.