Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase - Producing Klebsiella pneumonia and Escherichia coli from Blood Cultures of Hospitalized Patients in Abakaliki Metropolis

E.A. Nwakaeze, C. Anyim*, N. Ngwu J, C. Nwankwo

Department of Applied Microbiology, Ebonyi State University Abakaliki, Nigeria

Abstract: The incidence of antibiotic resistance in extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae has obviously increased in recent era. Twelve strains of Gram-negative bacteria comprising of 6 Escherichia coli and 6 Klebsiella pneumoniae were isolated from blood samples of hospitalized patients in Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki I (FETHA I). The extended spectrum β-lactamases detection was ascertained using double disc diffusion methods. Identification of organisms was done using appropriate microbiological technique. Antibiotics susceptibility test was carried out on Mueller-Hinton agar using the disc diffusion method. Ofloxacin and cefoxitin were 83.3% active against E. coli, followed by sulphamathroxazole with 66.7% activity. While ofloxacin was 100% active against K. pneumoniae, followed by cefoxitin and tetracycline with 83.3% activity. Amikacin and ciprofloxacin showed the highest resistance against E. coli and K. pneumoniae. This resistance is associated with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) production which was detected in K. pneumoniae and E. coli. ESBL production was observed in 80% of Gram negative bacilli. ESBL-producing organisms have significant impact on several important clinical outcomes and hence clinical microbiology laboratories should take into account the varying epidemiology of ESBL producers in order to improve treatment strategies and expand therapeutic options.

Keywords: Keywords: ESBL, antibiotic resistance, blood cultures, hospitalized patients, gram-negative bacteria

Received April 29, 2013; Revised May 29, 2013; Accepted June 30, 2013

Citation: E.A. Nwakaeze, C. Anyim, N. Ngwu J, C. Nwankwo, Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase - Producing Klebsiella pneumonia and Escherichia coli from Blood Cultures of Hospitalized Patients in Abakaliki Metropolis. American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, 1 (4). 75-78. January 2013. doi:10.12691/ajidm-1-4-4

1. Introduction

ESBLs are a rapidly evolving group of β -lactamases which share the ability to hydrolyse third-generation cephalosporins and aztreonam, yet are inhibited by clavulanic acid [1]. ESBL mediate resistance to all three generations of cephalosporins, including monobactams (e.g. aztreonam) [2]. The β-lactamase-mediated carbapenem resistance among K. pneumoniae isolates and others is an emerging problem [3]. This resistance has spread to strains of Escherichia coli and to other Gram-negative bacteria as well [4].

Most ESBL are encoded on a large plasmid that can be horizontally transferred to different genera of bacteria, which may be involved with both prevention and treatment aspects of nosocomial infections, particularly with septicemic patients [2,5]. Rapid detection of ESBL is important, not only for treatment guidelines but also to facilitate improved prevention of nosocomial infections [6]. ESBL can be detected using a standard screening test showing reduced susceptibility to five antibiotics, such as ceftazidime, ceftriazone, cefotaxime, aztreonam and cefpodoxime, as detected by standard disk diffusion and minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) [7].

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP) isolates are a major concern for clinicians, since they markedly increase the rates of treatment failure and death particularly in intensive care units and amongst pediatric patients and also in medical and surgical wards [8]. Subsequently, the role of routine surveillance cultures as a means of screening for ESBL-E colonization among hospitalized patients is unclear. Rectal surveillance cultures, together with isolation precautions and antibiotic-restriction measures, have been instrumental in ESBL outbreak management [9,10,11], but routine surveillance is costly and may not be effective in predicting clinical disease [12,13].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Two hundred blood samples were recovered over a period of two months (October 2012 to November 2012) from hospitalized patients attending Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki I (FUTHA I) were immediately transported to the Department of Applied Microbiology Laboratory for culture, isolation and identification. The isolates were identified on the basis of conventional microbiological procedures [14].

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test

Antibiotic sensitivity of the isolates to various antibiotics: amikacin, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, sulphamathroxazole and tetracycline were determined by the disc diffusion methods [15]. The results were interpreted as per National Committee for clinical laboratory standards (NCCLS) recommendations [14]. Isolates which were resistance or intermediate susceptibility by NCCLS criteria to any of third generation cephalosporins were selected for ESBL detection/ screening phenotypically.

2.3. ESBL Detection by NCCLs Phenotypic Method

The NCCLs ESBL phenotypic confirmatory test with ceftazidime (CAZ) and clavulamc acid (CA) were used for all the Gram negative isolates by the disc diffusion method [16]. Muller-Hinton agar plates and disks containing of ceftazidime with 10μg of clavulamc acid (CA) were used.

Susceptibility test results were interpreted according to the NCCLs = 5 mm enhanced in the zone diameter of CAZ and CA was considered indicative of ESBL production. However resistance to the third generation cephalosporins is highly suggestive of the presence of ESBLs in E. coli and K. pneumoniae [17].

3. Results

The various results for the test and analysis carried out are shown below:

Two bacteria isolates from blood of hospitalized patients were suspected in this work as indicated in Table 1.

Table 1. Morphological and biochemical test result of bacterial isolates from blood of hospitalized patients

Table 2. Inhibition zone diameter (mm) of the antimicrobial agents on E. coli isolates

Table 3. Inhibition zone diameter (mm) of the antimicrobial agents on K. pneamoniae isolates

4. Discussion

There is currently a great need for reliable and efficient tests to detect ESBLs in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. Conventional susceptibility testing methods, on their own, fail to offer reliable susceptibility results for β-lactam antibiotics when testing those species that harbour ESBLs [18]. Past attempts to identify risk factors for infection due to ESBL-producing organisms have come to very different conclusions [19]. Hospital acquired due to ESBL producing organisms have been known to cause high mortality [20]. ESBL production by K. pneumoniae was reported in bacteremic patients [2]. Although E. coli strains have been isolated in the highest numbers in bacteremic patients, the highest percentage of ESBL production was found in K. pneumoniae [21,22,23].

Screening disk diffusion has proven to be a useful method for the detection of ESBL production, particularly in for E. coli and K. pneumoniae.

Ciprofloxacin and amikicin has been reported to be used in sensitive screening indicator for ESBL production [24,25]. It is observed in this work that ciprofloxacin and amikacin showed 83.3% resistance to the E. coli isolates with 16.7% activity as shown in Table 1. This work is in line with what was reported by Ben-Ami et al. [24], 65% of healthcare associated strain of Enterobactericeae isolated from blood samples were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Tetracycline showed 66.7% resistance to E. coli with 33.3% activity. All the cases of ciprofloxacin, amikacin and tetracycline resistance to E. coli isolated from blood cultures were suspected to be due to ESBL production. The results alert the microbiologist to perform the confirmation test with the suspected organism. However, it is important that screening antibiotic disks are included in the screening program. The NCCLS guideline has been shown to work very well [3]. Cefoxitin and ofloxacin showed 83.3% sensitivity to the E. coli isolates followed by sulphamathroxazole with 66.7% activity. This is an indication that these antibiotics can be used in the treatment of infection associated with the organism.

Table 4. Detection of ESBL production

In this work, 66.7% of the K. pneumoniae were resistant ciprofloxacin and amikacin with 33.3% sensitivity. This is in disagreement with the work of Iroha et al. [26] who revealed that 31.2% of K. pneumoniae were resistant to ciprofloxacin. The reason for high resistant of ciprofloxacin in this work might be associated with wide widespread and indiscriminate use in our environment. ESBL production was observed in E. coli (51.8%) and K. pneumoniae (22.5%). This conforms to the work of Narayanaswamy and Mallika [27] who reported 54.43% to E. coli producing ESBL. Ofloxacin and clindamycin were shown to the most sensitive to K. pneumoniae with 100% activity, followed by cefoxitin with 83.3%. This is an indication that these antibiotics can be used the treatment of infection associated with the organism. In our study, there were two strain of E. coli and one strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae that had an inhibition zone diameter of above 5mm (Table 4), indicating negative in ESBL production. This strain could be misread as sensitive to the combination disc (CAZ and CA) if investigating microbiologist did not follow carefully the NCCLS guidelines with the confirmation tests to validate ESBL production. However, some false negatives have also been reported, particularly with strains that produce AmpClike β-lactamase [28]. The loss of an outer membrane protein combined with co-existing TEM-1 and SHV-1 β- lactamases has been reported to give a false identification of ESBL producing K. pneumoniae [29]. These findings have important implications with regard to possible interventions aimed at curbing such outbreaks. Efforts should emphasize limiting contact transmission of resistant isolates as well as controlling antibiotic use.

In conclusion, this study has shown the significance of regular antibiotic susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates in various environments. Cautious attention to barrier precautions to prevent the nosocomial spread of ESBL-producing E. coli or K. pneumoniae infections must be stressed. And also clinical microbiology laboratories should take into account the changing epidemiology of ESBL producers in order to establish a proper treatment procedure, improving treatment strategies and expanding therapeutic options.

References

[1]   | Paterson, D. L., Bonomo, R. A. Extended-spectrum b-lactamases: A clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev., 18: 657-686, 2005.
[2]   | Sturenburg, E., Mack, D. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: implications for the clinical microbiology laboratory, therapy, and infection control. J. Infect., 47: 273-295, 2003.
[3]   | Tenover, F. C., Kalsi, R. K., Williams, P. P., Carey, R. B., Stocker, S., Lonsway, D., Rasheed, J. K., Biddle, J. W., McGowan, J. E., Hanna, B. Carbapenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae not detected by automated susceptibility testing. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 12: 1209-1213, 2006.
[4]   | Sanders, C.C., Barry, A.L., Washington, J.A., Shubert, C., Moland, E.S., Traczewski, M.M., Knapp, C., Mulder, R. Detection of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae with the Vitek ESBL test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34: 2997-3001, 1996.
[5]   | Bradford, P.A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 14: 933-951, 2001.
[6]   | Shah, A.A., Hasan, F., Ahmed, S., Hameed, A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESbLs): Characterization, epidemiology and detection. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 30: 25-32, 2004.
[7]   | NCCLS, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, NCCLS. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing. 7th ed. Approved standard, M2-A7, 2001.
[8]   | Harish, B.N., Menezes, G.A., Shekatkar, S. and Parija, S.C. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae from blood culture Journal of Medical Microbiology, 1: 999-1000, 2007.
[9]   | Lucet, J.C., Decre, D., Fichelle, A. Control of a prolonged outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae in a university hospital. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:1411-1418, 1999.
[10]   | Paterson, D.L., Ko, W.C., Von-Gottberg, A. Antibiotic therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: implications of production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Clin. Infect. Dis., 39: 31-37, 2004.
[11]   | Asensio, A., Oliver, A., Gonzalez-Diego, P. Outbreak of a multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain in an intensive care unit: antibiotic use as risk factor for colonization and infection. Clin. Infect. Dis., 30: 55-60, 2005
[12]   | Gardam, M.A., Burrows, L.L., Kus, J.V. Is surveillance for multidrug-resistant enterobacteriaceae an effective infection control strategy in the absence of an outbreak? J. Infect. Dis., 186: 1754-1760, 2002.
[13]   | Thouverez, M., Talon, D., Bertrand, X. Control of Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase in intensive care unit. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 25:838-841, 2004.
[14]   | Cheesbrough, M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries, part 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. PP. 137-150, 2006.
[15]   | Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M., Sherris, J.C., Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk methodAm. J. Clin. Pathol. 45(4): 493-496, 1996.
[16]   | Ramseh, N., Sumahi, C.S., Balasubramanian, V., Palaniappan, K.R., Kannan, V.R. Urinary tract infection and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of extended spectrum of beta lactamase producing clinical isolates. Advances in Biological Research, 2(5-6): 78-82, 2008.
[17]   | Jones, R.N., Kugler, K.C., Pfaller, M.A., Winokur, P.L. Characteristics of pathogens causing urinary tract infections in hospitals in North America: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 35: 55-63, 1999.

[18]  
Dashti, A.A., West, P., Paton, R., Amyes, S.G.B. Characterization of extended-spectrum b-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Kuwait and UK strains identified by the Vitek system, and subsequent comparison of the Vitek system with other commercial ESBL-testing systems using these strains, Journal of Medical Microbiology, 55: 417-421, 2006.

[19]   | Meyer, K.S., Urban, C., Eagen, J.A., Berger, B.J., Rahal, J.J. Nosocomial outbreak of Klebsiella infection resistant to late-generation cephalosporins. Ann. Intern. Med., 119:353-8, 1993.
[20]   | Ho, P.L.,Chan, W.M., Tsang, K.W., Wong, S.S., Young K. Bacteremia caused by Escherichia coli producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase: a case-control study of risk factors and outcomes. Scand J. Infect. Dis., 34: 567-573, 2002.
[21]   | Xiong, Z., Zhu, D., Wang, F., Zhang, Y., Okamoto, R., Inoue, M. Investigation of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase in Klebsiellae pneumoniae and Escherichia coli from China. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 44: 195-200, 2002.
[22]   | Jain, A., Roy, I., Gupta, M.K., Kumar, M., Agarwal, S.K. Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in septicaemic neonates in a tertiary care hospital. J. Med. Microbiol., 52: 421-425, 2003.
[23]   | Chiew, Y.F. Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase in Singapore routine clinical microbiology laboratory. J. Hosp. 56: 328-329, 2004.
[24]   | Ben-Ami, R., Schwaber, M.J., Navon-Venezia, S., Schwartz, D., Giladi, M., Chmelnitsky, I., Leavitt, A., Carmeli, Y. Influx of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae into the hospital. Clin. Infect. Dis., 42:925-934, 2006.
[25]   | Zaki, M.S. Extended spectrum β-lactamases among gram-negative bacteria from an Egyptian pediatric hospital: A two-year experience. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries, 1(3): 269-274, 2007.
[26]   | Iroha, I.R., Oji, A.E., Afiukwa, T.N., Nwuzo, A.C., Ejikeugwu, P.C. Extended spectrum beta lactamases mediated resistance to antibiotics among Klebsiella pneumoniae in Enugu Metropolis. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 15: 2(3):196-199, 2009.
[27]   | Narayanaswamy, A. and Mallika, M. prevalence and susceptibility of extended spectrum beta-lactamases in urinary isolates of Escherichia coli in a tertiary care hospital, Chennai-South India. Internet Journal of Medical Update, 6(1): 39-43, 2011.
[28]   | Coudron, P.E., Hanson, N.D., Climo, M.W. Occurrence of extended-spectrum and AmpC beta-lactamases in bloodstream isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae: isolates harbor plasmid-mediated FOX-5 and ACT-1 AmpC beta-lactamases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 772-777, 2003.
[29]   | Wu, T.L., Siu, L.K. and Su, L.H. Outer membrane protein change combined with co-existing TEM-1 and SHV-1 beta-lactamases lead to false identification of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47: 755-761, 2001.