Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Osmotic Dehydration of Toddy Fruit Cubes in Sugar Solution Using Response Surface Methodology

Khin Swe Oo*, Soe Soe Than, Thet Hnin Oo

Department of Industrial Chemistry, University of Yangon, Yangon, Myanmar

Abstract: The response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize the effects of immersion time (60, 90 and 120 min), temperature (35, 45 and 55°C) and concentration of sucrose solution (30, 40 and 50°Brix) in osmotic dehydration of toddy fruit tubes (1cm³). Box-Behnken Design was used with water loss (WL, %), solid gain (SG, %), and weight reduction (WR, %) as responses. The models obtained for all the responses were significant (P≤0.05) without a significant lack of fit. The optimum conditions were temperature (45°C), immersion time (120min), concentration of sucrose solution (40°Brix) in order to obtain WL of (33.867g/100g initial sample), SG of (4.478g/100g initial sample) and WR of 29.39 g/100g initial sample, respectively.

Keywords: response surface methodology, Box-Behnken Design, osmotic dehydration, toddy fruit tubes

Received June 03, 2019; Revised July 05, 2019; Accepted July 16, 2019

Citation: Khin Swe Oo, Soe Soe Than, Thet Hnin Oo, Osmotic Dehydration of Toddy Fruit Cubes in Sugar Solution Using Response Surface Methodology. American Journal of Food Science and Technology, 7 (6). 175-181. January 2019. doi:10.12691/ajfst-7-6-2

1. Introduction

In Africa, South Asian (e.g. Sri Lanka and India), Southeast Asia (e.g. Myanmar, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand), Palmyra Palm, sugar palm or toddy palm (Borassus flabellifer Linn.) is commonly available [1,2]. Their all parts can be used for several purposes and the mesocarp or pulp ripe is sweet with abundant carotenoid. When it becomes ripe, it had yellow orange and can be used for foods such as cakes, jelly, ice cream, jams, cordials, beverages and toffee [3]. The important sources of digestible and indigestible minerals, carbohydrates and certain vitamins, particularly vitamins A and C are contained in fruits. The moisture in most of the fruits above 75% and fruits are prone to spoilage by molds and yeasts and this moisture content of fruits are prone to spoilage by molds and yeasts [4]. Fresh nipa palm fruits or fruits in syrup have short shelf-life because they have high moisture content (MC) and water activity (aw). Too high MC and aw will affect the product by microorganism and bad qualities. Osmotic dehydration (OD) and drying processes are promising food preservation preservative techniques that may lead products to low MC and aw [5].

The utilization of appropriate methods of processing and preservation would definitely reduce the spoilage of fruits and vegetables. Osmotic dehydration (OD) is one of the simple, low cost, energy efficient and enhancing the shelf-life of fruits and vegetables, method based on the removal of natural water content from fruits and vegetables by immersing them in hypertonic osmotic solutions prepared with sugars, salts, alcohols and starch solutions [6]. The OD process kinetics is influenced by the nature of the osmotic solute and it has a great impact on the nutritional and sensorial properties of the final product [7]. Rastogi and Raghavararo (1997) reported that osmotic dehydration reduced up to 50% weight of fresh vegetables and fruits [8]. The different types of osmotic agents such as glucose, sorbitol, sucrose and salts are used according to the final products [9]. However combination of different solutes can be used [10]. Water loss from vegetables and fruits took place in first two hours and maximum sugar gain within 30 minutes [11]. Temperature and concentration of osmotic syrups increased the rate of water loss during osmotic dehydration. Although higher temperature has the significant effect on the structure of tissues [12] and also cause deterioration of flavour and enzymatic browning at temperature above 45°C.

The response surface methodologies (RSM) are very useful techniques for optimization and applied in different food processes among that is osmotic dehydration [13,14,15,16,17]. The main advantage is that they reduce the number of experiments needed to obtain statistically valid results and are faster and more informative than traditional assessments which evaluate one variable at a time [16].

The objective of this work was to study the osmotic dehydration of toddy fruit cubes as a function of sugar concentration, temperature and immersion time through Response surface methodology (RSM) in order to identify process conditions for a high water loss at maximum solid uptakes and to optimize the osmotic dehydration as a pretreatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

In this research work, good, sound and unmatured toddy fruits were obtained from Hmawbi Township, Yangon Region. Sugar and potassium sorbate of commercial grade were purchased from local markets.

2.2. Method of Preparation

Good, sound and unmature toddy fruits were washed, peeled with a sterile knife and cut in to uniform cubes (1cm³ thickness) and steam blanched for 1minute. Then the cubes were dipped in the 0.1% potassium sorbate solution for 5 minutes and drained. Osmotic dehydration was done in sucrose solution with different concentrations such as 30, 40 and 50°Brix. The sample to solution ratio was constant 1:5 (w/w). The toddy fruit cubes was weighed and submerged in salt solution at 30, 40 and 50°C. The temperature was maintained constant using a hot water bath and the samples were removed from the solution at different time intervals of 60, 90 and 120 min. In each of the experiments, fresh osmotic solutions were used. After removing from the sugar solution, the samples were drained and the excess solution at the surface was removed with filter paper for subsequent weight measurement. After dehydration the samples were dried in hot air oven at 40°C about 6 hours until equilibrium moisture content was obtained. All experiments were done triplicates and the average value was taken for calculation.

2.3. Methodology

The methodology involved osmotic dehydration with different concentration of sucrose solution, determination of water loss, solid gain, weight reduction and optimization of response parameters with RSM.

2.3.1. Water Loss, Solid gain and Weight Reduction

Water Loss (WL), Solid Gain (SG) and Weight Reduction (WR) were calculated and given in Equations (1, 2 and 3) [18].

[picture] | (1)

[picture] | (2)

[picture] | (3)

Where, Mo- Initial mass of the samples (g)

M-Mass of sample after dehydration (g)

mo- Initial mass of the solids in sample(g)

m- Mass of the solids in the sample after dehydration (g)

2.4. Design of Experiment

The Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a statistical modeling technique applied for multiple regression analysis using quantitative data obtained from properly designed experiments. The Box-Behnken Design (BBD) of three variables and seventeen trials were used for designing the experiments of osmotic dehydration [19].

Table 1. Codes and Actual Levels of the Independent Variables for the Design of Experiment

The response surface methodology assumes that there is a polynomial function that relates the responses to the independent variables namely Duration of osmosis (A), Temperature of the solution (B) and Salt concentration (C) in the process. Therefore, the experimental data obtained from the design (Table 1) were fitted to a polynomial of the form found in equation 4 [20].

[picture] | (4)

where, the response (Y) is (WL, SG and WR %), the an are constants and A, B, C are independent variables.

2.5. Optimization

Optimization was carried by attempting to combine various factors that simultaneously satisfy the requirements placed on each of the response and factors. There are several response variables describing the quality characteristics and performance measurements of the system, are to be maximized while some are to be minimized. RSM was applied to determine the optimum conditions for producing a model for osmotic dehydration of toddy fruit cubes with maximum water loss, weight reduction and minimum solid gain.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Variables on Water Loss, Solid Gain and Weight Reduction

The effects of variables such as osmotic solution temperature, osmotic solution concentration and duration on water loss, solid gain and weight reduction were studied and a second order polynomial equation was fitted with the experimental data.

3.2. Statistical Analysis on Model Fitting

The experimental responses as a function of process variables such as Time (A), Temperature (B) and Sugar Concentration (C) during osmotic dehydration of toddy fruit cubes are shown in Table 2.

The value of water loss (%), solid gain (%) and weight reduction (%) were within the ranges of 16.4-32.6, 2.4-4.8 and 13.0-27.9 respectively. Regression analysis and ANOVA results are shown in Table 3. The model F values of three responses such as WL, SG and WR were 18984.66, 107.21 and 17409.73 implying that the model is significant. At the same time WL, SG and WR showed that they possess non -significant lack- of- fit. These values indicated that the models were fitted and reliable. The adequacy of the model is further checked by Coefficient of determination (R²) was found to be 1.0000, 0.9928 and 1.0000 for WL, SG and WR respectively. As the calculated R² was found to be approximately equal to 1 it was considered to be high enough for predication purposes and the predicted R2 for WL, SG and WR of 0.9995, 0.9279 and 0.9997 were in reasonable agreement with adjusted R² of 0.9999, 0.9835 and 0.9999. The values of R² and adjusted R² obtained in the study implied that the predicted values are in good agreement with the experimental values. The values of Adeq precision are 358.4607, 30.1582 and 352.1277 for WL, SG and WR respectively. The values of Adeq precision obtained in this study are greater than 4.0 indicating that these responses had better precision and reliability. The values of coefficient of variation (C.V %) were 0.2240, 2.87 and 0.2429 for WL, SG and WR respectively which showed that the deviations between experimental and predicted values are low.

3.3. Effect of Process Variables on Water Loss

In (Figure 1), the increase in mass transfer properties (WR, SG and WL) of osmotic dehydration of toddy cubes during the early stages when osmotic solution concentration increased from 30 to 50oBrix. Spiazzi, E. A., & Mascheroni, R. H. (1997) said due to the fact that penetration of smaller molecular weights of the solute (sugar) into the plant tissue and the outflow of water from the inner tissue rapidly enchance to the osmotic solution and also increased the WR and WL [21]. Moreover, enhances in osmotic pressure gradient because of higher concentration of the solution. The loss of functionality of plasmatic membrane of the cell which allow the solute to penetrate into the plant tissues and improved the SG through the early stages of osmotic dehydration (Figure 1). However, the mass transfer properties of toddy cubes decreased beyond 45oBrix level of sugar concentration (Figure 1) which described that the diffusion strength of osmotic solution (sugar solution) into the plant material and the comparative moisture content on the outside of product were independent on the concentration of the solution and hence reduced the moisture transport phenomenon of the toddy cubes [22].

[picture] | (5)

Table 2. The Box-Behnken Design for Osmotic Dehydration of Toddy Fruit Cubes

Table 3. Regression Coefficients for Osmotic Dehydration of Toddy Fruit Cubes

Figure 1. Effect of Process Variables on Water loss

3.4. Effect of Process Variables on Solid Gain

One of the vital parameters which control the osmotic dehydration properties of the toddy cubes is the temperature of the osmotic solution. The effect of osmotic solution temperature on the mass transfer properties of the toddy cubes and the consequences were depicted in Figure 2. It was observed that there was an increment in water loss from the plant materials and simultaneous uptake of solids (Figure 2) [23,24] through swelling and plasticizing of cell membranes [25,26] while the temperature of the osmotic solution was enhanced from 35 to 45℃. In (Figure 2), after osmotic solution temperature of 45℃, the mass transfer properties of toddy cubes decreased which may be due to decreased the viscosity of osmotic solution and increased the exchange of solids into the plant material.

The present results are also in agreement with findings of [27] obtained during the optimization of the osmotic dehydration of peach slices. This positive interaction between process time and osmotic agent concentration was also reported by [28] during the osmotic dehydration studies on beetroot in salt solution. The regression model of solid gain as a function of process parameters for osmotic dehydration of toddy cubes are given in equation (6). The positive values of interaction term between A, B and C indicated that increase in their level increased solid gain. The negative values of quadratic terms of process variables for osmotic dehydration of toddy cubes indicated that higher values of these variables affected solid gain.

[picture] | (6)

Figure 2. Effect of Process Variables on Solid Gain

3.5. Effect of Process Variables on Weight Reduction

Weight reduction indicates the amount of water loss by the sample during the osmotic dehydration process. The regression model of weight reduction as a function of process parameters is given in equation (7).

[picture] | (7)

Figure 3. Effect of Process Variables on Weight Reduction

The results revealed that, increase in the immersion time of the toddy cubes in the osmotic solution up to 120 minutes caused an improvement in the mass transfer parameters of the toddy cubes (Figure 3). The transport phenomena become very rapid during the early stages of dehydration and also helped to the progression of mass transfer of solutes due to the feasible membrane enlargement or plasticizing, which forced to increase the cell membrane permeability to the sugar molecules to infuse into the plant material [29] and advanced the loss of water from the plant tissues [30]. It was also visualized that after an osmotic dehydration time of 140 minutes, equilibrium level was attained between the sample and the osmotic solution which brought a negative trend in mass transfer rate and decreased the mass transfer properties of the slices [31]. The presence of negative values of interaction term between A, B and C indicated that increase in their level decreased weight reduction. The positive values of quadratic terms of process variables of osmotic dehydration of toddy cubes indicated that higher values of these variables reduced weight reduction. The response surface plot for osmotic dehydration of toddy cubes indicated in Figure 3 represents weight reduction as a function of time, temperature and concentration of the osmotic solution. Weight reduction increases with increase in sugar concentration and time as shown in Figure 3. The reason was that the viscosity of osmotic solution was lowered and the diffusion coefficient of water increases at high temperature.

3.6. Numerical Optimization of Process Parameters

The criteria variables were set such that the independent variables (Time, Temperature and Concentration) would be minimum from an economical point of view [29]. The main criteria for constraints optimization for osmotic dehydration of toddy cubes were maximum possible water loss and weight reduction. The desired goals for each factor and response are shown in Table 4. In order to optimize the process parameters for osmotic dehydration of toddy cubes by numerical optimization which finds a point that maximize the desirability function; equal importance of `3’ was given to all the three process parameters and three responses.

Table 4. Criteria and Output for Numerical Optimization of Process Parameters

3.7. Verification of the Model for Osmotic Dehydration of Toddy Fruit Cubes

Osmotic dehydration experiments were conducted at the optimum process condition (A= 120 min, B=45°C and C=40%) for testing the adequacy of the model equations for predicting the response values. The observed experimental values (mean of three experiments) and values predicted by the equations of the model are presented in Table 5. The experimental values were found to be very close to the predicted values of process responses such as water loss, solid gain and weight reduction. Therefore, it could be concluded from above discussion that model are quite adequate to assess the behavior of the osmotic dehydration of toddy tubes.

Table 5. Predicted and Experimental Values of Response at Optimum Process Conditions for Osmotic Dehydration of Toddy Fruit Cubes

4. Conclusion

Response surface methodology was effective in optimizing process parameters for the osmotic dehydration of toddy tubes in osmotic aqueous solution of sugar having concentration in the range of 30-50, temperature 35-55°C and process duration 60-120min. The results exhibited that, all the independent variables have considerable influence on the osmotic dehydration process of toddy tubes. Three second order polynomial models were framed for the responses (WR, SG and WL) from the observed data. The regression equations obtained in this study can be used for optimum conditions for desired responses within the range of conditions in the study.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Dr Soe Soe Than, Professor and Head of Industrial Chemistry Department, University of Yangon, for supporting facilities throughout the research.

References

[1]   | Ariyasena, D. D., Jansz, ER. and Abeysekera, A. M. (2001). Some studies directed at increasing the potential use of palmyrah (Borassus flabellifer L) fruit pulp. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 81: 1347-1352.
[2]   | Tamunaidu, P. and S.Shiro. (2011). Chemical characterization of various parts of nipa palm (Nypa fruticans). Industrial Crops and Products 34(3): 1423-1428.
[3]   | Chakraborty, I., Chaurasiya, A. K. and Saha, J. 2011. Quality of diversified value addition from some minor fruits. Journal of Food Science and Technology 48(6): 750-754.
[4]   | Janisiewicz, W.J., W.S. Conway and B. Leverentz. 1999. Biological control of postharvest decays of apple can prevent growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in apple wounds. Journal of Food Protection. 62:1372-1375.
[5]   | Pojchananaphasiri, W. and Lertworasirikul, S. (2017). Quality prediction of nipa palm fruit during osmotic dehydration and drying process. International Food Research Journal, 24(1), 247-252.
[6]   | Erle, U., & Schubert, H. (2001). Combined osmotic and microwave-vacuum dehydration of apples and strawberries. Journal of Food Engineering, 49,193-199.
[7]   | Forni, E., Sormani, A., Scalise, S., & Torregiani, D. (1997). The influence of sugar composition on the color stability of osmodehydrofrozen intermediate moisture apricots. Food Research International, 31, 87-94.
[8]   | Rastogi, NK and K. Raghavarao. (1997). Water and solute diffusion coefficients of carrot as a function of temperature and concentration during osmotic dehydration. Journal of Food Engineering. 34:429-440. 100.
[9]   | Singh, B., Paramjit S. Panesar Vikas Nanda M B. Bera, (2008). Optimization of Osmotic Dehydration Process of Carrot Cubes in Sodium Chloride Solution, International Journal of Food Engineering, 4(2) 1-24.
[10]   | Taiwo, K.A., M.N. Eshtiaghi, B.I.O. Ade-Omowaye and D. Knorr (2003). Osmoticdehydration of strawberry halves: influence of osmotic agents and pretreatment methods on mass transfer and product characteristics. Int. J. of Food Science and Technology. 38: 693-707.
[11]   | Conway, J., F. Castaigne, G. Picard and X. Vovan.(1983). Mass transfer consideration in the osmotic dehydration apples. Can.Instute of Food Science and Technology Journal. 16: 25-29.
[12]   | Lazarides, HN. (2001). Reasons and possibilities to control solids uptake during osmotic treatment of fruits and vegetables. pp. 33-42.
[13]   | Azoubel, P.M. and F. Murr. (2003). Optimization of osmotic dehydration of cashew apple (Anacardium occidentale L.) in sugar solutions. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 9(6), 427-433.
[14]   | Corzo, O, Gomez, E.R, (2004). Optimization of osmotic dehydration of cantaloupe using desired function methodology, Journal of Food Engineering, 64, 213-219.
[15]   | Valdez-Fragoso, A., S.I. Martínez-Monteagudo, F. Salais-Fierro, J. Welti-Chanes, and H. Mújica-Paz. (2007). Vacuum pulseassisted pickling whole jalapeño pepper optimization. J. Food Eng. 79(4), 1261-1268.
[16]   | Ozdemir, M., B. Ozen, L. Dock, and J. Floros.(2008). Optimization of osmotic dehydration of diced green peppers by response surface methodology. LTW - Food Sci. Technol. 41(10), 2044-2050.
[17]   | Chauhan, O.P., A. Shah, A. Singh, P.S Raju, and A.S. Bawa. (2009). Modeling of pretreatment protocols for frozen pineapple slices. Food Sci. Technol.LEB. 42(7), 1283-1288.
[18]   | Singh B, Kumar A, Gupta AK. (2007). Study of mass transfer kinetics and effective diffusivity during osmotic dehydration of carrot cubes, Journal Food Engineering; 79: 471-480.
[19]   | Box, G. E., Behnken, D. W., (1960). Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative three variables, Technometrics, 2: 455-475.
[20]   | Montgomery, D. Diseño y análisis de experimentos. (1991). 3th ed. Iberoamérica, Mexico DF.
[21]   | Spiazzi, E. A., & Mascheroni, R. H. (1997). Mass transfer model for osmotic dehydration of fruits and vegetables-I. Development of the simulation model. Journal of Food Engineering, 34, 387-410.
[22]   | Lenart, A., & Flink, J. M. (1984). Osmotic concentration of potato. II. Spacial distribution of the osmotic effect. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 19, 65-89.
[23]   | Ispir, A., & Togrul, Đ. T. (2009). Osmotic dehydration of apricot: Kinetics and the effect of process parameters. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 87, 166-180.
[24]   | Khan, M. R. (2012). Osmotic dehydration technique for fruit preservation - A review. Pakistan Journal of Food Science, 22, 71-85.
[25]   | Contreras, J. E., & Smyral, T. G. (1981). An evaluation of osmotic concentration of apple rings using corn syrup solid solution. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal, 14, 310-314.
[26]   | Lazerides, H. N., Gekas, V., & Mavroudis, N. (1997). Apparent mass diffusivities in fruit and vegetable tissues undergoing osmotic processing. Journal of Food Engineering, 31, 315-324.
[27]   | Baljeet Singh Yadav & Ritika B. Yadav & Monika Jatain. (2012). Optimization of osmotic dehydration conditions of peach slices in sucrose solution using response surface methodology. J Food Sci Technol: 49(5): 547-555.
[28]   | Manivannan P, Rajasimman M. (2008). Osmotic dehydration of beetroot in salt solution: optimization of parameters through statistical experimental design. Int J Chem Biomol Eng 1(4): 215-222.
[29]   | Jain S.K, Verma R.C., Murdia L.K., Jain H.K.,Sharma G.P, (2011). Optimization of process parameters for osmotic dehydration of papaya cubes, Journal Food Science Tech.48(2): 211-217.
[30]   | Lazarides, H. N., Katsanidis, E., & Nickolaidis, A. (1995). Mass transfer kinetics during osmotic pre-concentration aiming at minimal solid uptake. Journal of Food Engineering, 25, 151-166.
[31]   | Ertekin, F. K., & Cakaloz, T. (1995). Osmotic dehydration of peas: I. influence of osmosis on drying behavior and product quality. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 20, 105-119.