﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
    <journalTitle>American Journal of Food Science and Technology</journalTitle>
    <eissn>2333-4835</eissn>
    <publicationDate>2016-10-15</publicationDate>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>6</issue>
    <startPage>182</startPage>
    <endPage>187</endPage>
    <doi>10.12691/ajfst-4-6-5</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>AJFST2016465</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Nutritional Evaluation of Breadfruit and Beniseed Composite Flours</title>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Peters Henry</name>
        <email>henrosticx2004@yahoo.com</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mgbang John Edward</name>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Essien N. A.</name>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ikpeme Christine Emmanuel</name>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Calabar, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria</affiliationName>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Biochemistry, University of Calabar, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">This study assessed the chemical composition, functional, mineral, and anti-nutritional properties of composite flour produced from breadfruit and beniseed. Matured and freshly harvested breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) and beniseed (Sesame indicum) were obtained from a local market in Calabar. Three blends were prepared by homogenously mixing breadfruit flour and beniseed flour in the percentage proportions as 70:30 (sample B), 80:20 (sample C), and 90:10 (sample D) while 100% wheat flour (sample A) was used as control. Proximate, functional, mineral, and anti-nutritional properties of the composite flour were examined using standard methods. Results obtained indicated that the chemical composition of the composite flour ranged from 25.40 to 36.23mg/100g moisture, 19.63 to 22.33mg/100g protein, 19.33 to 26.23mg/100g fat, 2.37 to 8.82mg/100g ash, 0.33 to 3.25mg/100g crude fibre, 65.73 to 141.67mg/100g calcium, 62.74 to 138.80mg/100g magnesium, 117.13 to 834.36mg/100g sodium. Residual anti-nutrients in the composite flour ranged from 3.30 to 7.94mg/100g oxalate and 0.26 to 0.79mg/100g phytate. The functional properties of the composite flour ranged from 140.8 to 170.03g/ml water absorption capacity, 0.76 to 4.79g/ml bulk density and 145.0 to 170.10g/ml oil absorption capacity. Sample B (70:30 ratio of breadfruit flour and beniseed flour) showed significant (p&lt;0.05) improvement in the chemical composition, functional, and mineral properties of the flour when compared to the other substitution levels and control There was significant (p&lt;0.05) reduction of anti-nutrients in sample B compared to the other substitution levels and control. The result has shown that sample B (70:30) composite flour showed improved chemical composition and could be utilized for product development in different food system.</abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajfst/4/6/5/ajfst-4-6-5.pdf</fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>breadfruit flour</keyword>
      <keyword>beniseed flour</keyword>
      <keyword>functional quality</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>