Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Performance Analysis of Blood Culture by an Automated Blood Culture System at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South India

K V Ramana*, Padmawali palange, Sanjeev D Rao, Ritu Vaish, B Mohan Rao

Department of Microbiology, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, Telangana, India

Abstract: This Prospective study analyses culture result of 134 blood culture samples received in microbiology laboratory during a five months period between October 2014 and February 2015. We have documented time required for the culture to become positive, time at which culture could be considered negative and the spectrum of isolated organismsms including their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. The specimens were processed by using automated system BacT/Alert 3D/60. Microorganism’s identification was performed by routine conventional and automated identification system and antibiotic susceptibility testing was done by Kirby bauer disk diffusion method. The mean detection time for isolates was 14.5 +/- 5.7 hours. Among organisms isolated included were Gram positive bacteria, Gram negative bacteria and yeasts with 22 (16.4%), 14 (10.4%) and 19 (14.2%) respectively. All our cultures were positive within 34 hours.

Keywords: automated culture system, BacT/Alert 3D, turnaround time, blood culture

Received July 10, 2015; Revised July 30, 2015; Accepted August 07, 2015

Citation: K V Ramana, Padmawali palange, Sanjeev D Rao, Ritu Vaish, B Mohan Rao, Performance Analysis of Blood Culture by an Automated Blood Culture System at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South India. American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 3 (3). 45-49. January 2015. doi:10.12691/ajcmr-3-3-3

1. Introduction

Blood culture remains to be the best choice for the diagnosis of suspected bloodstream infections. Newer and rapid techniques combined with conventional methods for the isolation, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing would be instrumental in reducing the time required for laboratory diagnosis of septicaemia. Early confirmation of bacteraemia is crucial for better patient management which can aid clinicians to initiate appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Blood culture is considered as one of the most important clinical microbiology laboratory procedure in tertiary care centres [1,2,3,4,5].

The BacT/Alert 3D/60 (BacT) (bioMe´rieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.) blood culture system is an automated, continuous monitoring system that is widely used in clinical laboratories. This system allows rapid and accurate detection of microorganisms in blood. The BacT/Alert system uses a colorimetric sensor which measures the reflected light. The carbon dioxide (CO₂) produced and dissolved in the growth medium in the event of growth of microorganisms changes the colour of the gas permeable sensor installed at the bottom of each culture bottle from blue-green to yellow. The instrument is calibrated in such way that the light colour results in an increase of reflectance and this change is monitored and recorded by the instrument every 10 minutes. Computer algorithms determine whether sustained linear increases or increasing rates of change in CO2 production indicate microbial growth [6,7,8].

Despite the availability of advanced and molecular techniques in diagnostic microbiology laboratories, recent studies have confirmed the usefulness of automated blood culture system as the preferred choice for diagnosis of blood stream infections. This can be attributed to a better turnaround time for the generation of results as compared to traditional blood culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The main drawback include the infrastructure costs associated with automation which many developing countries can ill afford [5,9,10,11].

2. Material and Methods

This was a 5 months prospective study of all blood cultures carried out between October 2014 and February 2015 at the clinical Microbiology Laboratory of a tertiary care teaching hospital located in south India. Blood cultures were performed using the BacT/alert PF (bioMe´rieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.) culture bottles which are commercially available separately for both paediatric age group and adult patients. All culture bottles were incubated for a maximum duration of one week before being considered as negative. Cultures showing growth were processed manually for isolation and subsequent identification. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by conventional methods and automated system (Biomrieux Inc., Durham, NC, USA) where ever necessary. Serial blood cultures were reviewed, and the data was analysed for age and gender of the patients, time to positivity, microorganism type and the antibiotic susceptibility pattern.

3. Results

A total of 134 blood cultures were carried out during the period; of which, 98 (73%) were blood specimens from paediatric group while 36 (27%) from adults. There were 79 (59%) males and 55 (41%) females, in total as shown in [Table 1].

Out of 134 specimens, 56 (42%) showed organisms growth after given positive signal by BacT/alert system. Whereas 78 (58%) were reported as sterile after 7 days of incubation [Table 2]. Comparison of microorganisms isolated between the blood specimens obtained from paediatric age group and the adults is detailed in [Table 3]. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial and fungal isolates are elaborated in [Table 4], [Table 5] and [Table 6].

Table 1. Age category and gender of patients

Table 2. Adults and paediatrics specimen results

Table 3. Clinical isolates recovered by system and time to detect the isolates

Table 4. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolated Gram positive organisms

Table 5. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolated Gram negative organisms

Table 6. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolated yeasts

4. Discussion

The results of current study revealed that there were more number of males than females, and more paediatric patients than adults investigated for bloodstream infection. [Table 1] Although the reason for the more number of paediatric patients was not quite clear, one reason could be due to the fact that it is difficult to elicit signs and clinical history in paediatric patients, thus it is essential to perform blood culture among paediatric age group to rule out septicaemia.

However, the total number of organisms isolated in paediatrics 51 (38%) were more than in adults 5 (4%) which supports the paediatrician’s suspicion of septicaemia [Table 2]. This difference may be due to ingestion of antibiotics prior to blood sample collection, a situation that reduces the positivity rate in the adult population in an environment of inappropriate antibiotics use like ours. This finding is similar to other study from Nigeria [11].

The total blood cultures reported sterile were more from paediatric patients 47 (35%) as compared to adults 31 (23%) [Table 2]. Isolation of skin commensals were more from paediatrics specimens than from adults [Table 3]. Most likely factors responsible for the high rate of positive cultures among paediatric age blood cultures include, but are not limited to, poor sample collection techniques, un-trained phlebotomists and use of non standard skin antiseptics, which, unfortunately, do not include iodine or iodophore. Difficulty in collecting blood from paediatric patients also could account for the higher contamination rate. A previous study has shown that contamination rate among blood cultures can be significantly reduced by paying scrupulous attention towards aseptic skin cleansing using isopropyl alcohol and a tincture of iodine and improved venipuncture technique. The use of dedicated phlebotomists has also been found to have similar improvement effect.

In this study, overall recovery rate of cultivable microbes from paediatric blood culture was 38%. Two studies from Bangladesh and Dhaka have shown microbial isolation rates among bacteraemia as 09.88% and 14.38% respectively [12,13]. In another study from Bangladesh, the recovery rate of microbial pathogens among blood cultures was found to be 11.6% [14]. Isolation rate of 20% was reported from a study done in Nepal [15]. Slightly higher isolation rate was reported from Children's Hospital at Myanmar, where isolation rate in cases of suspected septicaemia was found as 54.2% [16]. A study of blood stream infections among children from New Delhi, India had reported the positivity of blood culture as 42% [17]. Similar study from Japan found blood culture positivity among paediatric age group as 53.6% [18].

In the present study, culture positive rate in adult patients was 4% which was contradictory to a study done by Wadud et al in 2009 which has revealed a significantly high rates of blood culture positivity in adult patients (63.51%) [13]. The disparity among various studies regarding the positivity rates of blood culture could be attributed to empirical use of broad-spectrum antibiotics before collection of blood samples.

In the current study, most of the positive cultures were obtained within 24 hours of incubation (The mean detection time for isolates was 14.5 +/- 5.7 hours.) and no positive isolates were identified beyond 2 days of incubation. The maximum incubation time of three days appears to be sufficient to consider a blood culture sample as negative. The explanation behind such observation was well supported by the outcome of a study from USA, where blood cultures had been routinely incubated for 4 days instead of the 5 days recommended by the manufacturer. It was noticed that after day 5; numerous contaminants were detected, which has led them to adopt the policy of incubating blood culture for a maximum period of 4 days [19]. Further D J Hardy et al 1992 in their study have noted that more than 96% of cultures were positive within 2 to 3 days of incubation and have suggested to reduce the routine incubation time from 7 days to 5 or 6 days and recommended that subculture of 5 to 7 day instrument-negative BacT/Alert blood culture bottles is not necessary [8]. A study by Bourbeau P P et al concluded that 3 days of incubation was sufficient for the detection of routine bacteria and yeast from blood specimens [20].

The present study has revealed Candida spp 19 (34%) as the most frequent fungal isolate (Table 1).This finding is in agreement with the results of earlier studies. Early and efficient detection of yeast was noticed after using BacT/Alert when compared with conventional and other systems [5,6,7,21].

Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS), Micrococcus spp were isolated in this study, similar to studies elsewhere throughout the world. This suggests that not always CoNS and Micrococcus spp grown in blood cultures should be considered as contaminants. These organisms have been repeatedly isolated from blood cultures which have constituted to third most common cause of bacteraemia. Because of their high prevalence, especially in patients with prosthetic implants and central venous catheters, they should be considered as clinically significant.

Klebsiella species were most commonly isolated amongst gram negative bacteria followed by others like E coli, Citrobacter spp, Acinetobacter spp. This finding is similar with other studies [3,9,15]. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern showed that most of the bacteria were susceptible to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones suggesting limited use of other higher level antibiotics [Table 4 and Table 5]. This will help us to formulate antibiotic policy at hospital level.

The study revealed that among Candida species isolated all (100%) were susceptible to amphotericin B and nystatin. Candida species resistant to fluconazole and clotrimazole were observed in our study [Table 6]. The study results support the emergence of resistance among Candida species to most commonly used antifungal agents.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, diagnosis of bacteraemia in tertiary care hospital settings should be carried out preferably utilizing automated techniques in order to reduce the time for the generation of results thereby improving the patient outcomes and reduce the cost associated with long hospital stays. It is also necessary to regularly evaluate the changing patterns of blood stream infections and the antibiotic sensitivity profile of isolated microorganisms. This analysis will be of great help in establishing hospital antibiotic policies. Further to this study, we recommend future prospective studies to concentrate on the possible factors responsible for the contaminations and to evaluate the impact of interventions.

Sources of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

[1]  
J. M. Loonen, A. R. Jansz, J. Stalpers, P. F. G. Wolffs, A. J. C. van den Brule. An evaluation of three processing methods and the effect of reduced culture times for faster direct identification of pathogens from BacT/ALERT blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MSEur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis (2012) 31:1575-1583.

[2]   | Smith, J. A., E. A. Bryce, J. Ngui-Yen, and F. J. Roberts. Comparison of BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems in an adult hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995; 33:1905-1908.
[3]   | Thorpe, T. C., M. L. Wilson, J. E. Turner, J. L. DiGuiseppi, M. Willert, S. Mirrett, and L. B. Reller. BacT/Alert: an automated colorimetric microbial detection system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990; 28:1608-1612.
[4]   | Wilson, M. L., M. P. Weinstein, S. Mirrett, L. G. Reimer, R. J. Feldman, C. R. Chuard, and L. B. Reller. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995; 33:2265-2270.

[5]  
James H. Jorgensen, Stanley Mirrett, L. C. Mcdonald, Patrick R. Murray, Melvin P. Weinstein, J. Fune, Christa W. Trippy, Marianne Masterson, and L. Barth Reller. Controlled Clinical Laboratory Comparison of BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F Resin Medium with BacT/Alert Aerobic FAN Medium for Detection of Bacteremia and Fungemia. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 53-58.

[6]   | Rohner P, Pepey B, and Auckenthaler R. Comparison of BacT/Alert with Signal Blood Culture System. J. Clin. Microbiol, Feb. 1995; 33:313-317.
[7]   | Wilson, M. L., M. P. Weinstein, L. G. Reimer, S. Mirrett, and L. B. Reller. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992; 30:323-329.
[8]   | D J. Hardy, Barbara B. Hulbert, and Paula C. Migneault. Time to Detection of Positive BacT/Alert Blood Cultures and Lack of Need for Routine Subculture of 5- to 7-Day Negative Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992; 30:2743-2745

[9]  
Andries W Dreyer, Nazir A Ismail, Deliwe Nkosi, Kathy Lindeque, Marliza Matthews, Danie G van Zyl, Anwar A Hoosen. Comparison of the VersaTREK blood culture system against the Bactec9240 system in patients with suspected bloodstream infections. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2011,10:4.

[10]   | Nicasio Mancini, Silvia Carletti, Nadia Ghidoli, Paola Cichero, Roberto Burioni, and Massimo Clementi, The Era of Molecular and Other Non-Culture-Based Methods in Diagnosis of Sepsis. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS. 2010, 23: 235-251.
[11]   | Chukwuemeka II, Samuel Y. Quality assurance in blood culture: A retrospective study of blood culture contamination rate in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Niger Med J 2014;55:201-3.
[12]   | Saleh AA, SattarANI, Ahmed S and Miah MRA. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Salmonell species isolated by blood culture in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka. BJMM 2008 Jul; 2(2); 22-36.
[13]   | ABMA Wadud, Ml Khalil, AKM Shamsuzzaman, Kms Islam, BB Mondal, MZ Banda, MSK Shahid Ullah. Bacteriological profiles of Blood culture isolates by BacT/ALERT 3D automated system Journal of Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College 2009;1:21-26.
[14]   | Saha SK, Baqui AH, Hanif M, Darmstadt GL, Ruhulamin M, Nagatake T, et al. Typhoid fever in Bangladesh: implications for vaccination policy. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2001 May; 20(5):521-524.
[15]   | Shrestha P, Das BK, Bhatta NK, Jha DK, Das B, Setia A, et al. Clinical and Bacteriological Profiles of Blood Culture Positive Sepsis in Newborns. J. Nepal Paediatr.Soc 2008; 27(2): 64-67.
[16]   | Than Nu Shwe, Mar Mar Nyein, Wut Yi and Aung Mon. Blood culture isolates from children admitted to Medical Unit III, Yangon Children's Hospital. 1998. Southeast Asian J Trap Med Public Health 2002 Dec; 33(4): 764-771.
[17]   | Ghanshyam D. Kumhar, V.G. Ramachandran and Piyush Gupta. Bacteriological Analysis of Blood Culture Isolates from Neonates in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India. J Health Popul Nutr 2002 Dec: 20(4): 343-347.

[18]  
Niimi Yoshihiro, Saito Takako and Izumo Taeko. Isolation of microorganisms from blood cultures during 8 years at Sakai Municipal Hospital Frequency of isolation, number of samples per Bacteriological profiles of Blood culture isolates by BacT/ALERT 3D automated system case, and CVC-related bacteremla Sakai Municipal Hospital Medical Journal 2004; 7: 64-71.

[19]   | Doern GV, Brueggemann AB, Dunne WM, Jenkins SG, Halstead DC.McLaughlin JC. Four-day incubation period for blood culture bottles processed with the Difco ESP blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35:1290-2.
[20]   | Paul P. Bourbeau and Michael Foltzer. Routine Incubation of BacT/ALERT FA and FN Blood Culture Bottles for More than 3 Days May Not Be Necessary. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43: 2506-2509.
[21]   | Lynn L. Horvath, Benjamin J. George, Clinton K. Murray, Linda S. Harrison, and Duane R. Hospenthal. Direct Comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D Automated Blood Culture Systems for Candida Growth Detection. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:115-118.