<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>American Journal of Applied Psychology</journalTitle>
<eissn>2333-4738</eissn>
<publicationDate>2017-01-17</publicationDate>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<startPage>12</startPage>
<endPage>17</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/ajap-5-1-3</doi>
<publisherRecordId>AJAP2017513</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">From Perceived Similarity of Ideals to Relationship Satisfaction: A Path Analysis Using Dyadic Data</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Iulia-Diana Muraru</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Magdalena Iorga</name>
<email>magdaiorga@yahoo.com</email>
<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nicoleta Turliuc</name>
<affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
</author>

</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Psychologist, Special School 'C. Paunescu', Iasi, Romania</affiliationName>
<affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Gr.T.Popa', Iasi, Romania</affiliationName>
<affiliationName affiliationId="3">Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, University 'Al.I.Cuza', Iasi, Romania</affiliationName>
</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">Aim: The purpose of this study is to develop, using the ideal standards model (with its five dimensions: warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, status-resources, intimacy-loyalty and passion) and dyadic data analysis, a complex model assessing the relationship between perceived ideal similarity and relationship satisfaction. Material and Methods: Couples completed measures about perceived ideal similarity, communication about ideals, importance of ideals, perception of the current partner/relationship, coping strategies used when the partner/relationship is less than ideal and relationship satisfaction. Results: The fit indices for the proposed models are very good (GFI &gt; .90, AGFI &gt; .90, CFI &gt; .90, RMSEA &lt; .08, NFI &gt; .90, CFI&gt;.90) with the exception of status-resources dimension. As a result, it was eliminated from the analysis. Perceived similarity of ideals led to own (warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, and passion) and partner (intimacy-loyalty) communication about those ideals. More communication about ideals led to own (warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, intimacy-loyalty) and partner (warmth-trustworthiness, passion) increased real-ideal discrepancy scores. These, in turn, motivated own (warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, intimacy-loyalty, passion) and partner (intimacy-loyalty) use of coping strategies to manage the discrepancies between actual and ideal partner/relationship. The use of coping strategies led to higher rate regarding own (warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, intimacy-loyalty, passion) and partner (intimacy-loyalty, passion) relationship satisfaction. Conclusions: Given the importance that ideal standards play in relationship/partner evaluation, it could be helpful to shed light on the processes that have an impact on relationships improving/deteriorating over time. Thus, the impact of perceived ideal similarity on marital satisfaction could be of particular interest.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajap/5/1/3/ajap-5-1-3.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>ideal standards model</keyword>
<keyword>dyadic data analysis</keyword>
<keyword>perceived ideal similarity</keyword>
<keyword>communication about ideals</keyword>
<keyword>real-ideal discrepancies</keyword>
<keyword>coping strategies</keyword>
<keyword>relationship satisfaction</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
