﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
    <journalTitle>American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics</journalTitle>
    <eissn>2328-7292</eissn>
    <publicationDate>2013-10-22</publicationDate>
    <volume>1</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <startPage>99</startPage>
    <endPage>102</endPage>
    <doi>10.12691/ajams-1-5-4</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>AJAMS2013154</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Robustness and Power of the Kornbrot Rank Difference, Signed Ranks, and Dependent Samples T-test</title>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Norman N. Haidous</name>
        <email>ac6702@wayne.edu</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Shlomo S. Sawilowsky</name>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Evaluation and Research, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">The purpose of the study was to compare the power and accuracy of the Kornbrot rank difference test to classical parametric and nonparametric alternatives when the assumption of normality is not met, the data are ordinal, and the sample size is small. Although the procedure is robust, there was no evidence the rank difference test had power advantages over Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test.</abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajams/1/5/4/ajams-1-5-4.pdf</fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>nonparametric statistics</keyword>
      <keyword>power</keyword>
      <keyword>rank tests</keyword>
      <keyword>Monte Carlo simulations</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>