Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Temporal Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera and Their Relationship to Bottom Water Variables from the Southern Part of Gulf of Mannar, Tamilnadu

Rethikala K.R, V. Kumar*, B. Satish

Department of Geology, National College (Autonomous), Tiruchirapalli, Tamilnadu - 620001

Abstract: The study investigates the relationship between the bottom water variables and temporal distribution of benthic foraminifera in the southern part of the Gulf of Mannar. For the study, a systematic collection of sediment and bottom water samples have been made along four traverses from off the coast of Theresapuram, Sippikulam, Mookaiyur and Valinokkam. The samples were collected from 7 stations each, along the 4 traverses and thus the total amounted to 28, ranging in depth from 0.8 to 15.0 metres. The collections were carried out once in four months starting from October 2016 to April 2017, representing the three seasons viz. October (pre-monsoon), January (post-monsoon/winter) and April (summer) and thus the collection amounted to a total of 84 samples. Faunal analysis led to the recognition of 124 foraminiferal species belonging to 59 genera, 39 families, and 21 super families of 5 suborders. The population size both as living and total (living + dead) in each of the stations during different seasons revealed that the maximum living population size was found in stations between 3 and 5 during all the collections and the living population was maximum in summer (April) and was minimum during monsoon (October). Among the 124 foraminiferal species, the following species were considered widespread and abundantly occurring viz. Ammonia beccarii, A. tepida, Asterotalia inflata, Elphidium advenum, Noninoides boueanum and Quinqueloculina seminulum. Various bottom water parameters of all the samples have been estimated and correlated with foraminiferal population. Higher temperature, salinity, pH and dissolved oxygen content noticed during April favoured higher reproduction and abundance of foraminiferal population.

Keywords: Benthic foraminifera, temporal distribution, bottom water characters, Theresapuram, Sippikkulam, Valinokkam, Mookkaiyur, Gulf of Mannar

Received October 06, 2020; Revised November 07, 2020; Accepted November 13, 2020

Citation: Rethikala K.R, V. Kumar, B. Satish, Temporal Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera and Their Relationship to Bottom Water Variables from the Southern Part of Gulf of Mannar, Tamilnadu. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 9 (1). 8-20. January 2021. doi:10.12691/aees-9-1-2

1. Introduction

Benthic foraminifera are recognized as exceptional bio-indicators because of their (1) short life cycles; (2) preservation in marine sediments; (3) diversity and abundance; (4) sensitivity to rapidly changing environmental conditions and (5) easy collection with minimal impact to the environment. In addition, benthic foraminifera are ideal organisms for the studies of marine biogeography and biodiversity [1]. Due to their ability to capture both long term and short term environmental change, application of benthic foraminifera as bio indicators in tropical coral reef environments is a subject of growing interest [2]. Benthic foraminifers are the most diverse taxa, shelled protozoa in marine environment [3,4]. The distribution pattern of foraminifera is mainly controlled by the overall effect of various environment factors [5]. The various species of benthic foraminifera prefer various environmental conditions for higher reproduction [6]. Foraminifera are strongly affected by changes in physical and chemical ecological parameters which may result in growth limitation and reproductive failure [7]. The main controlling factors which determine the foraminiferal abundance and types include temperature, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen and nature of substrate [8,9,10,11,12,13].

The study of foraminifera and its sensitiveness towards the environmental modification has been recognized as one of the important tool to identify coastal pollution and degradation levels in the coastal zone [14]. The main objective of the present work is to observe the influence of bottom water variables on temporal distribution of benthic foraminifera.

Figure 1. Location map of the study area

2. Study Area

The study area is located in the southeast coast of India and extends from off coast of Theresapuram in the south to Valinokkam in the north, confining to the southern part of Gulf of Mannar. It is geographically situated between 78° 09' E - 78° 30' E and 8° 49' N - 9° 05' N, forming a part of Geological Survey of India Toposheets, numbering 58 K/3, 4 and 58 O/3, 4 (Figure 1). The tropical climate prevails throughout the year and the monthly average annual temperature varies from 27°C to 33°C with the maximum in April/May and minimum in January. The humidity is maximum during the month of November with an average of 80% and is minimum during the month of June with an average of 59%. This area comes under the spell of both Southwest monsoon (June to September) and Northeast monsoon (October to December). Northeast monsoon contributes about 50-60 percent of mean annual rainfall which varies from 541.8 - 825.6 mm [15,16].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Field Work

For the present study, the bottom water and sediment samples were collected from 28 stations ranging in depths from 0.8 m to 15 m. The sediment samples were collected for three different seasons representing October 2016 (Monsoon), January 2017 (winter) and April 2017 (summer). The sediment samples were collected from 7 stations each, in all the four transects from off the coast of Theresapuram, Sippikulam, Mookaiyur and Valinokkam. Thus the collection amounted to a total of 84 samples. All the sediment samples were collected by taking necessary precautions, making use of Petersen grab. At each station, samples of water from the sediment water interface were collected using a Nansen reversible water sampler and temperature of each sample was noted using built in thermometer. Dissolved oxygen content of each sample was also observed by using portable dissolved oxygen analyser. The pH values were measured using pH meter and the salinity was detected using salino-meter after making necessary precautions in sampling and standardisation. A unit volume of 100 ml wet sediment taken from the top layer was preserved immediately in a 10 % neutralized formaldehyde solution for the study of living Foraminifera.

3.2. Laboratory Work

For identifying living foraminifera [17] staining technique with rose Bengal [18] have been used. Foraminiferal tests were then separated from the residue by floatation method using carbon tetrachloride [19]. Foraminifera were recognized at the species level, following the clasification of Loeblich, A. R. Jr. and Tappan, H. [20]. After the identification of the species, the specimens belonging to different species were picked, counted and mounted on foraminiferal slides with help of a stereo-binocular microscope. A series of Scanning Electron Microscope photomicrographs were taken to illustrate the various views of the foraminiferal taxa.

4. Results and Discussion

The benthic foraminifera are valuable biological indicators of environmental change, particularly with respect to sea level [21] and water quality [22,23]. The utility of benthic foraminifera as bio indicator is largely due to their high taxonomic diversity and abundance [24]. According to Kumar V. et al., [25] the variation of foraminiferal assemblages and species distribution in an area mainly depends on spatial and temporal variation in substrate and bottom water characteristics. Alve, E.et al. [26] gave a detailed review about the benthic foraminiferal response to estuarine pollution. According to Lee Y.G. et al. [27] dissolution of foraminiferal tests was caused by low pH due to the decrease in salinity which was the resultant of influx of fresh water during rainy season. The Lei Yet al., [28] noted that abundance of foraminiferal species and their population were positively correlated to the salinity in the intertidal zone of the Yellow sea in China.

Table 1. Taxonomy chart of Benthic Foraminiferal Species of southern part of Gulf of Mannar

4.1. Foraminifera

The foraminiferal studies from the sediments collected from the present study area led to the recognition of 124 foraminiferal species belonging to 59 genera, 39 families, and 21 super families of the suborders Textulariina, Spirillina, Miliolina, Lagenina and Rotaliina (Table 1). Of all the species identified, 53 were calcareous perforate (Sub order Rotaliina) 41 were calcareous porcelaneous imperforate (Sub order Miliolina), 18 were arenaceous agglutinated (Sub order Textularina), 11 were calcareous hyaline forms (Sub order Lagenina) and 1 was calcareous imperforated hyaline (Sub order Spirillinina). Among these 124 living species, 6 species were found as abundant and wide spread in the present study area viz., Ammonia beccarii, A. tepida, Asterotalia inflata, Elphidium advenum, Noninoides boueanum and Quinqueloculina seminulum. Least represented species in the study area include Siphonina pulchera, Monalysidium politum, Quinqueloculina echinata and Quinqueloculina sulcata.

4.1.1. Living Population

Living foraminifera were found in all the 84 samples collected from the study area. Among the 124 species, 6 were found to be abundant and found as living in all the samples collected. The distribution of abundant living foraminifera reveals that the sub order Rotaliina was best represented with 5 species (Ammonia beccarii, Ammonia tepida, Asterotalia inflata, Noninoides boueanum and Elphidium advenum) followed by Miliolina with 1 species (Quinqueloculina seminulum). Ammonia beccari was found to be the most abundant living species followed by Quinqueloculina seminulum in the present area. The temporal distribution of abundant species revealed that they have maximum living population in April and minimum in October except for Quinqueloculina seminulum which have minimum living population in January (Figure 2). Siphonina pulchera was found to be the least represented species and found only in one sampling station (station: TP3).

Figure 2. Temporal distribution of actual number of abundant species in different seasons

Figure 3. Spatial and temporal variation of living populatio

The living population size varied from 32 to 553 specimens per 100 ml of wet sediment. The maximum count of living population was found in Mookaiyur (station: MK 5) in April, and minimum in Valinokkam (station: VN1) in January. The observation on spatial distribution of living foraminifera in the study area revealed that the living foraminifera were found to abundant in stations 3, 4 and 5 which forms the middle segment of the traverse, while the minimum population was found at the near shore stations (stations 1 and 2). Seasonally, the maximum population was observed during summer (April) with 2335 specimens and the minimum with 1934 specimens during monsoon (October) (Figure 3).

4.1.2. Total Population

The total (living + dead) population size ranged from 105 to1790 specimens per 100 ml of wet sediment, the maximum being at station MK5 in April and minimum at VN1 in January. The study on temporal distribution of total population in the study area revealed that minimum total population size was observed in October (24615) and maximum in April (28883). In general, during all the seasonal collections the total population size was maximum in stations (3, 4 and 5), which were intermediate in the traverse from the shore (Figure 4).

4.2. Bottom Water Parameters

The present study revealed the relationship existing between the foraminiferal population with the bottom water parameters. Seasonal and spatial variation in the values for each parameter have been correlated with the population of foraminifera. Kumar. V, et al., [29] has reported that the foraminiferal population have a positive relationship with the environmental parameters such as temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen content of bottom water in the Palk Bay area, off Rameswaram. Sivakumar, K., [30] has reported that in the Bay of Bengal, off Chennai, foraminiferal population has a positive correlation with temperature and dissolved oxygen content of bottom water. Gangaimani, T., [31] after studying the inner shelf sediments of Gulf of Mannar concluded that the higher temperature and dissolved oxygen content of bottom water are favourable for abundance of foraminiferal population. Alve et al. [32] observed that the spatial and temporal variations in the bottom water characteristics largely determine the variation of foraminiferal assemblages in the Norwegian Skagerrak coast (NE North Sea).

4.2.1. Depth

Water depth is an important factor in determining the foraminiferal distribution. The other ecological variables which determines the abundance and diversity of foraminifera are directly associated with changes in depth. According to Kumar et al., [33] stations near to the shore with less than 1m depth in the Pak bay contain negligible living population. Kumar et al., [34,35] observed that the foraminiferal population shows an increase with respect to depth. Examination of living specimens have linked depth distribution in certain foraminifera (Uvigerina peregrina) to macro fauna -influenced microhabitat such as zones containing biotic structures [36,37]. Denne R. A. et al. [38], from an investigation in the North-western Gulf of Mexico, demonstrated that the depth distribution of benthic foraminifera is strongly correlated with the limits of water masses. The deep sea foraminifera are adapted to limited or no supply of food materials for long periods [39]. The response of foraminifera to phytodetritus found to be varied with the depth at which the species were found in ocean. Thus the depth had a great influence on foraminiferal responses to food and play an important role in the changes in diversity and abundance of foraminifera observed during various seasons and in different geographical regions.

In the present study area comprising 28 stations, depth ranges from 0.80 m to 15 m. Stations TP1, SK1, MK1 and VN1 are the nearest stations with depth ranges from 0.8m - 1.2m and stations TP7, SK7, MK7 and VN7 are the farthest with depth ranges from 10.6m - 15m (Figure 5). It is observed that in all seasons the diversity and the population size (living and total) of foraminifera were found to be minimum at nearest stations, because of wave agitation and sandy substrate, and maximum at the stations (3, 4 and 5) which forms the middle segment of the traverse with a depth range from 4.2 m to 11.6 m where the other parameters are congenial for higher reproduction (Figure 5.1 - Figure 5.3).

Figure 4. Variation in total population for different stations and seasons

Figure 5. Depth variation for different stations and seasons

Figure 5.1. Distribution of Living and Total Foraminiferal population in relation with depth (October)

Figure 5.2. Distribution of Living and Total Foraminiferal population in relation with depth (January)

Figure 5.3. Distribution of Living and Total Foraminiferal population in relation with depth (April)

4.2.2. Temperature

Temperature is an important parameter that governs the growth and reproduction of foraminifera in coastal areas [40,41]. Kurtarkar et al., [42] suggested that the foraminiferal response to temperature variation is species-specific; the shell size of several benthic foraminifera increased with decreasing temperature but a few other benthic foraminifera shows a decrease in shell size with decreasing temperature. The studies of Titelboim et al. [43], about the response of some benthic foraminifera such as Pararotalia calcariformata to extremely warm temperatures (42°C) in a thermally- polluted area revealed that foraminifera can both survive and grow well in warm waters. Laboratory culture experiment on benthic foraminifera (Cymbaloporetta plana) by Kurtarkar et al. Titelboim et al., [44] discovered that out of all the specimens fed with the same amount of food, both the growth was more rapid and the reproduction were more frequent in specimens kept in comparatively warmer waters. Based on the study in Gulf of Mannar off Tuticorin, Manivannan, V. et al., [45] observed that, temporally, the temperature prevailed during summer season shows a higher population.

In the present study area temperature varies between 27.1°C and 33.2°C. The highest temperature (33.2°C) was observed for SK6, SK7 and MK7 stations in April and the lowest temperature (27.1°C) was recorded for MK1, MK2, MK4 and MK7 stations in October. Seasonal variation in temperature can be positively correlated with both the living and total population. The higher population observed during April (Summer) was positively correlated with the high mean temperature observed during April (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Seasonal variation of temperature in correlation with living population

4.2.3. Salinity

Foraminifers are very sensitive to change in salinity values. This change affects the foraminiferal assemblages by influencing the growth rate of foraminifera and disturbing the preservation conditions. The spatial and temporal change in salinity can influence the abundance and diversity of species. According to Kasilingam, K. et al., [46] the general trend in modern shallow water foraminiferal assemblage is increasing spatial diversity with increasing salinity gradients and environmental stability. Kumar V. et al., [47] from their study in Uppanar river estuary, confirmed that salinity is the important controlling environmental parameter which governs the spatial distribution of foraminiferal population and the faunal population and diversity decreases with decreasing salinity values. The higher salinities are found to be more favourable for the abundance of living population [48,49,50].

In the present study area the average salinity varied from 30.89 ppt in the month of January to 33.08 ppt in the month of April. The salinity did not show any appreciable variation among the stations. Temporally the salinity showed positive correlation with living and total population abundance (Figure 7). The lack of evaporation and mixing of fresh water may be the reasons for low salinity values in January. Seasonally, foraminiferal population had a positive relationship with salinity values.

4.2.4. Dissolved Oxygen

Dissolved Oxygen has repeatedly been shown to be a limiting factor for benthic foraminifera [51] and to have an influence on morphology in terms of shell and pore size [52]. Oxygen minimum zones are subsurface hydrographic zones in which oxygen depletion acts as biological barrier in benthic environments [53,54]. Some low oxygen benthic foraminifera have been observed to migrate to habitats with low oxygen conditions [55,56,57,58,59,60]. In benthic foraminifera, species with smaller shells, larger pores and higher pore densities have been linked with low oxygen [61,62,63]. Kumar, et al., [64] observed that the dissolved oxygen content did not show notable change between stations of a traverse but temporally, they showed variation and the population of foraminifera is positively correlated with an increase of dissolved oxygen content in the Cauvery river of Poombuhar area.

The distribution of dissolved oxygen overall ranged between 4.4 ml/l-6.4 ml/l in the study site. The observation on values of dissolved Oxygen content in the present study area revealed that they have spatially not much relevance to influence the foraminiferal population. In the present study, the lowest mean value of dissolved oxygen (4.67ml/l) was observed in the month of October and the highest mean value (6.00 ml/l) in the month of April. Temporally foraminiferal population is positively correlated with dissolved oxygen content (Figure 8).

4.2.5. pH

Gangaimani, T., [65] observed that the pH values of the bottom waters do not vary much in the different stations during any season and hence a correlation with foraminiferal population cannot be achieved. Kumar et al., [66] observed that pH has only very little variation both spatially and temporally and hence a convincing correlation between foraminiferal population and pH values cannot be achieved. The reduced pH is generally associated with low abundance and diversity of foraminifera [67].

Spatially the pH values of the bottom water showed a negligible variation in the study area and hence, this may not be a critical environment factor to control the population distribution. Seasonally highest mean value was observed in April (8.09) and a positive relationship with foraminiferal population and abundance was noticed (Figure 9).

Figure 7. Seasonal variation of salinity in correlation with living and total population

Figure 8. Seasonal variation of Dissolved Oxygen in correlation with living and total population

Figure 9. Seasonal variation of pH in correlation with living and total population

5. Statistical Interpretation

In the study area, Pearson correlation (r) linear regression method was used for the statistical interpretation to compare the water parameters determined with the benthic foraminiferal population for all the three seasons such as October, January and April (Table 2 - Table 4). The results of the correlation matrix shows a significant positive correlation between the foraminiferal population with depth, temperature, salinity, pH and D/O. The correlation matrix shows that the foraminiferal population is not only controlled by depth but also due to temperature salinity, pH & D/O of the study area.

6. Summary and Conclusion

For the present study, systematic collection of sediment and bottom water samples, along four traverses, off the coast of Theresapuram, Sippikulam, Mookaiyur and Valinokkam, Gulf of Mannar have been made for three seasons. Faunal analysis led to the recognition of 124 foraminiferal species belonging to 59 genera, 38 families, and 21 super families of 5 suborders. Among the 124 foraminiferal species, the following species were considered to be widespread and abundantly occurring; Ammonia beccarii, A. tepida, Asterotalia inflata, Elphidium advenum, Noninoides boueanum and Quinqueloculina seminulum. The population size both as living and total (living + dead) in each of the stations during different seasons revealed that the maximum living population size was found in stations between 3 and 5 during all the collections and the living population was maximum in summer (April) and was minimum during monsoon (October).

Table 2. Correlation Matrix of Benthic Foraminiferal Population with Water Parameters for the October Season

Table. 3. Correlation Matrix of Benthic Foraminiferal Population with Water Parameters for the January Season

Table 4. Correlation Matrix of Benthic Foraminiferal Population with Water Parameters for the April Season

The bottom water characters considered for the present study include depth, temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and pH. The diversity and the population size of foraminifera were found to be minimum at nearest stations and maximum at the stations which forms the middle segment of the traverse with a depth range of 4.2 m to 11.6 m. Though this segment was with intermediate depth range of the present study, the other parameters prevailed in these stations were more congenial for higher reproduction and hence the maximum population. Spatially the comparison between bottom water parameters and population was inconvincible. Higher temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and pH content noticed during April has favoured higher reproduction and hence abundance of foraminiferal population. Hence temporally, the values of temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and pH are positively correlated with foraminiferal population abundance.

The bottom water characters considered for the present study include depth, temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and pH. The diversity and the population size of foraminifera were found to be minimum at nearest stations and maximum at the stations which forms the middle segment of the traverse with a depth range of 4.2 m to 11.6 m. Though this segment was with intermediate depth range of the present study, the other parameters prevailed in these stations were more congenial for higher reproduction and hence the maximum population. Spatially the comparison between bottom water parameters and population was inconvincible. Higher temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and pH content noticed during April has favoured higher reproduction and hence abundance of foraminiferal population. Hence temporally, the values of temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and pH are positively correlated with foraminiferal population abundance. (repetation of last paragraph)

Acknowledgements

The authors are sincerely thankful to the Principal and the Secretary of National College (Autonomous), Tiruchirappalli for providing the lab and infrastructural facilities and their helpful cooperation. The first author is grateful to Rev. Sr. Lillirose (Administrator, B.K College, Amalagiri, Kerala), Rev. Sr. Rose Valiyaparambil (Former Principal, B.K College, Amalagiri, Kerala), Dr. Leena Mathew (Principal, B.K College, Amalagiri, Kerala ) for giving permission to pursue the research.

References

[1]   | Buzas, M.A., Hayek, L.A.C., Haywardb, B.W., Grenfelb, H.R. and Sabaab, A.T, “Biodiversity and community structure of deep sea foraminifera around New Zealand”, Deep-sea Research, 154, 1641-1654. 2007.
[2]   | Renema, W, “Terrestrial influence as a key driver of spatial variability in large benthic foraminiferal assemblage composition in the Central Indo- Pacific” Earth Science Review, 177. 514-544. Feb. 2018..
[3]   | Haynes, J.R., Foraminifera, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981, 433.
[4]   | Lee, Pawlowski, J., Debenay,J.P.,Whittaker, J., Banner,F., Gooday , A.J., Tendal, O., Haynes, J., Faber, W.W., “The illustrated guide to the protozoa”, Society of Protozoologists, (2) Allen Press, Laurence. 872-951. 2000
[5]   | Moghaddasi, B., Nabavi, S.M.B., Vosoughi, G., Fatemi S.M.R and Jamili, S, “Abundance and distribution of benthic foraminifera sediments”, Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3(2). 210-217. 2009.
[6]   | Nagendra, R., Sathiyamoorthy, P., Nallappa, Reddy, A., Ramachandran, A, “Spatial distribution of Benthic foraminifera in the Palar Estuary, Tamil Nadu”, Geological Society Of Indi, 86. 305-316. 2015.
[7]   | Gesline, E., Heinz, P., Jorissen, F., Hemleben, C, “Migratory responses of deep sea benthic foraminifera to variable oxygen conditions: investigations,” Marine Micropaleontol, 53 (3). 227-243. 2004.
[8]   | Kumar, V, “Ecology distribution and systematics of Recent benthic foraminifera from the Palk Bay, Off Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu,” Unpublished PhD thesis, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli ,1988.
[9]   | Boltovskoy, E., Scott, D.B., Medioli, E.S, “Morphological variations of benthic foraminiferal tests in responses to changes in ecological parameters,” Paleontology, 65. 175-185. 1991.
[10]   | Debenay, J.P., Guir, L.D., Parra, M, “Ecological factors acting on the microfauna in mangrove swamps, The case of foaraminiferal assemblage in French Guiana”, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55. 509-533. 2002.
[11]   | Nigam, R., Saraswat, R., Kurtarkar, S.R, “Laboratory experiment to study the effect of salinity variations on benthic foraminiferal species - Pararotalia nipponica (Asano),” Geological Society of India, 67(1). 41-46. 2006.
[12]   | Suresh Gandhi, M., Sonia Nathan, A, “Benthic foraminifera and geochemical studies with influence on pollution studies along the coast of Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu-ITS”, India, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7, 917-925. 2014.

[13]  
Suresh Gandhi, M., Kasilingam, K., Arumugam, T., Lalthansangi, Rajeswara Rao, N, “Distribution of benthic foraminifera ,sediment characteristics and environmental conditions in and around Manalmelkkudi Spit ,Palk Strait,Tamil Nadu, East Coast of India,” Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 46 (4). 513-533. 2017.

[14]   | Mohan, S, “Benthic foraminiferal responses to inner shelf environments of Northern part of Gulf of Mannar, Southeast cost of India,” Unpublished PhD thesis, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, December 2010.
[15]   | Muthukrishnan, A., S. Aruchamy, K. Banukumar, and P. Alaguraja, “Climatic balance on coastal ecosystems in Gulf of Mannar: Geoclimatic techniques,” International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences. 3(3). 668-691. 2013
[16]   | Kumaraswamy, K., “An integrated approach to the drinking water problem of Madras city, India”: Environment. Res. Forum, vols. 3 & 4. 205-230. 1996.
[17]   | Walton, W.R, “Techniques for recognition of living foraminifera,” In: Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research,3.56-60. 1952.
[18]   | Phleger, F.B, “Ecology of foraminifera, Northwest Gulf of Mexico, Foraminiferal distribution,” Geological Society of Ameica Memoir, 46. 88. 1951.
[19]   | Cushman, J.A, Foraminifera, Their classification and Economic use” .4th Edition, with an illustrated key to the Genera. Hardward University Press, Massachusetts. 1959. 588.
[20]   | Loeblich, A. R, Jr. and Tappan, H., Foraminiferal genera and their classification, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York,vols.1 and ,2, 970+212 , 846pls,1988.
[21]   | Gehrels, W.R., “Using foraminiferal transfer functions to produce high-resolution sea level records from salt marsh deposits, Maine, USA,” The Holocene 10, 367-376. 2000.
[22]   | Alve, E, “Benthic foraminiferal responses to estuarine pollution: a review” Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 25(3). 190-203. July 1995.
[23]   | Frontalini, F., Coccioni, R, “Benthic foraminifera as bioindicators of pollution a review of Italian research over the last three decades” Revue de Micropaléontologie, 54. 115-127. 2011.

[24]  
.Schonfeld , J., Alve, E., Geslin, E., Jorissen, F., Korsun,S., Spezzaferri, S., Abramobich,S., Almogi - Labin, A., du Chatelet, E.A., Barras, C., Dergamin, L., Bicchi, E., Bouchet, V., Cearreta, A., Di Bella, L., Dijkstra, N., Disaro, S.T., Ferraro, L., Frontalini, F., Gennari, G., Golikova, E.,Haynnert, K., Hess, S., Husum, K., Martins, V., McGann, M., Oron, S., Romano, E., Sousa, S.M., Tsujimoto,A., The FOBIMO (FOraminiferaL BIo Monitoring) initiative -towards a standardized protocol for soft bottom benthic foraminiferal monitoring studies, Marine Micropaleontology, 94-95.1-13. 2012.

[25]   | Kumar V., Sivakumar, K. and Jeevanandam, S, “Sediment- Benthic foraminifera Relationship of the Inner Shelf Sediments of Bay of Bengal, Off Chennai, Southeast Coast of India,” Journal of Indian Association of Sedimentologists, 23(1&2). 87-93. 2004.
[26]   | Alve, E. and Bernhard, J.M, “Vertical migratory response of benthic foraminifera to controlled oxygen concentrations in an experimental mesocosm,” Marine Ecology Progress Series. 116. 1995.
[27]   | Lee Y.G., Kim Y.W., Jeong D.U., Sick Lee J.S., Woo H.J., and Shin H. C, “Benthic foraminifera as bioindicators of salinity variation in Lake Shihwa, South Korea,” Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 45(3). 235-249. July 2015
[28]   | Lei Y., LiT., Jian, Z and Nigam, R, “Taxonomy and distribution of benthic foraminifera in an intertidal zone of the Yellow sea, PR China: Correlation with sediment, temperature and salinity”, Marine Micropaleontology,133. 1-20. 2017.
[29]   | Kumar, V. R., Vijayan, T. Gangaimani and S. Jeevanatham, “Substrate Characteristics and Benthic Foraminiferal Distribution from the Gulf of Mannar, Off Tiruchendur, Southeast Coast of Tamil Nadu, India.” Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 7 (6). 255-263. 2019
[30]   | SivaKumar, K., Distribution and Ecology of recent benthic foraminifera from the shelf sediments of Bay of Bengal, off Chennai, Unpublished PhD thesis, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, 2002.
[31]   | Gangaimani, T, “Ecology and distribution of recent benthic foraminifera the inner shelf sediments of Gulf of Mannar, off-Tuticorin, southeast cost of India, Unpublished PhD thesis, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, p 233, July 2009.
[32]   | Alve, E., Hess, S., Bouchet, V.M.P., Dolven, J.K. and Rygg, B, “Intercalibration of Benthic foraminiferal macrofaunal biotic indices; An example from the Norwegian Skagerrak coast (NE North Sea)”, Ecological Indicators ,96. 107-115. Jan. 2019.
[33]   | Kumar V., Sivakumar, K., Gangaimani, T and Anand, K.J., “Morphological abnormalities of Benthic foraminifera from the Palk Bay, Off Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu: A tool for environmental monitoring”, Pollution Research, 25(1). 35-42. 2006.
[34]   | Kumar, V and Twinkle Jacob, “Bottom Water Characteristics and Their Influence on Temporal Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera from off-Manapad, Gulf of Mannar, South East Coast of India.” Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 7(6). 245-254. 2019.
[35]   | Kumar, V., Christinal, J and Selvaraj, “Influence of changes in the substrate characters on the benthic foraminifera from the inner shelf of Gulf of Mannar, off Kayalpattinam, Southeast coast of India”, The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis, 12(2). 1894. 2020.
[36]   | Loubere, P., Meyers, P. and Gary, A, “Benthic foraminiferal microhabitat selection, carbon isotope values, and association with larger animals; a test with Uvigerina peregrina”, The Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 25(1). 83-95. 1995
[37]   | Davis, C.V., Myhre, S.E. and Hill, T.M, “Benthic foraminiferal shell weight: Deglacial species-specific responses from the Santa Barbara Basin”, Marine Micropaleontology, 124. 45-53. 2016.
[38]   | Denne, R.A. and Sen Gupta, B.K, “Matching of benthic foraminiferal depth limits and water-mass boundaries in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico; an investigation of species occurrences. The Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 23(2), 108-117. 1993.
[39]   | Linke, P, “Metabolic adaptations of deep-sea benthic foraminifera to seasonally varying food input”, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 81. 51-63. 1992
[40]   | Nigam, R.., Kurtarkar, S.R., Saraswat, R., Linshy, V.N., Rana S.S, “Response of benthic foraminifera Rosalina leei to different temperature and salinity under laboratory culture experiment”, Journal of Marine Biological Association, 88. 699-704. 2008.
[41]   | Saraswath, R., Nigam, R and Pachkhande, S, “Difference in optimum temperature for growth and reproduction in benthic foraminifera Rosalina globularis: Implications for paleoclimatic studies”, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 405. 105-110. 2011.
[42]   | Kurtarkar, S.R., Linshy, V.N., Kaithwar, A., Saraswat, R. and Nigam, R, “Experimental studies on benthic foraminifera: an update on the changing trends and challenges over the past decade”, Micropaleontology and its applications. Scientific Publishers (India), 311-330. 2017.

[43]  
Titelboim ,D., Sadekov, A., Almogi-Labin, A., Herut, B., Kucera, M., Schimidt, C., Hyams-Kaphzan, O., Abramovich, S., Geochemical signatures of benthic foraminiferal shells from heat -polluted shallow marine environment provide field evidence for growth and calcification under extreme warmth, Global Change biology, 00: 1-8, 2017.

[44]   | Kurtarkar, S.R., Saraswat, R., Kaithwar, A, and Nigam, R, “How will Benthic Foraminifera Respond to Warming and Changes in productive?:A Laboratory Culture Study on Cymbaloporetta plana,” Journal: Acta Geologica Sinica,volume 93,(1). 175-182. 2019.
[45]   | Manivannan, V., Kumar, V., Ragothaman, V. and Hussain, S.M., “Calcium carbonate-A major factor in controlling foraminiferal population in the Gulf of Mannar, off Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu”. In Proceedings XV Indian Colloquium on Micropaleontology and Stratigraphy. 381-385. 1996.
[46]   | Kasilingam, K., Gandhi, M.S. and Rao, N.R, “Textural characteristics and ecology of near shore benthic foraminifera from Kottaipattinam to Kodiyakarai, Palk Strait, Southeast Coast of India” Regional Studies in Marine Science, 29. 100632. 2019.
[47]   | Kumar, V. and Manivannan, , “Benthic Foraminiferal Response to estuarine Environments-A Case Study from Cauvery River, Poombuhar, Tamil Nadu” Ecology Environment And Conservation, 7. 185-200. 2001.
[48]   | Bandy, O.L, “Ecology of foraminifera in northeastern Gulf of Mexico”, US Government Printing Office; 1956.
[49]   | Rasheed, D.A, and Ragothaman, V, “Ecology and distribution of Recent foraminifera from the Bay of Bengal off Porto Novo, Tamil Nadu State, India”, Proceedings VII ICMS, 263-298, 1978.
[50]   | Linshy, V.N., Rana, S.S., Kurtarkar, S., Saraswat, R. and Nigam, R..”Appraisal of laboratory culture experiments on benthic foraminifera to assess/develop paleoceanographic proxies”. 2007.
[51]   | Gupta, B.K.S. and Machain, M.L, “Benthic foraminifera in oxygen-poor habitats”, Marine Micropaleontology, 20(3-4). 183-201. 1993.
[52]   | Helley, J.J, and Levin, L.A, “Global distribution of naturally occurring marine hypoxia on continental margins”, Deep-Sea Research, 151(9). 1159-1168. 2004.
[53]   | Middelburg, J.J. and Levin, L.A., “Coastal hypoxia and sediment biogeochemistry. Biogeosciences Discussions, 6(2). 2009.
[54]   | Paulmier, A. and Ruiz-Pino, D., “Oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) in the modern ocean. Progress in Oceanography, 80(3-4), pp.113-128. 2009.
[55]   | Alve, E. and Bernhard, J.M,. “Vertical migratory response of benthic foraminifera to controlled oxygen concentrations in an experimental mesocosm”. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 137-151. 1995.
[56]   | Moodley, L., Van der Zwaan, G.J., Rutten, G.M.W., Boom, R.C.E. and Kempers, A.J, “Subsurface activity of benthic foraminifera in relation to porewater oxygen content: laboratory experiments”, Marine Micropaleontology, 34(1-2). 91-106. 1998.
[57]   | Gross, Onno. “Influence of temperature, oxygen and food availability on the migrational activity of bathyal benthic foraminifera: evidence by microcosm experiments.” Life at interfaces and under extreme conditions. Springer, Dordrecht. 123-137. 2000.
[58]   | Gesline, E., Debenay, J.P., Duleba, W., Bonetti, C., Morphological abnormalities of foraminiferal tests in Brazilian environments:Comparison between polluted and non-polluted areas, Mar. Micropaleontol, 45, 151-168, 2002.
[59]   | Fontanier, C Mackensen, A., Jorissen, F.J., Anschutz,p., I., Griveadud, C.,” Stable oxygen and carbon isotopes of live bentic foraminifera from the Bay of Biscay;:microhabitat impact and seasonal variability”, Mar.Micropaleontol.58(3),159-183. 2006.
[60]   | Perez-Cruz, L.L., Machain, Castillo, M.L., ”Benthic foraminifera of the oxygen minimum zone, continental shelf of the Gulf of Tehuantepec, Mexico,” Foraminifer.Res.20 (4), 312-325.1990.
[61]   | Kuhnt, T., Friedrich, O., Schmiedl, G., Milker, Y., Mackensen, A., Luckge, A., “Relationship between pore density in benthic foraminifera and bottom water oxygen content”, Deep-Sea Research, 176, 85-95, 2013.
[62]   | Kuhnt, T., Schiebel, R., Schmiedl, G., Milker,Y.,Mackensen, A., Friedrich,O., “Automated and manual analyses of the pore density to oxygen relationship in Globobulimina turgida,” Foraminifer. Res. 44 (1), 5-16. 2014.
[63]   | Kumar, V., Manivannan V., and Ragothaman V. ”Spatial and Temporal variations in foraminiferal abundance and their relation to substrate characteristics in the Palk Bay, off Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu”, Proceedings XVI ICMS, Dehradun, p.367-379. 1996.
[64]   | Kumar, V., and Manivannan V., Benthic foraminiferal responses to bottom water characteristics in the Palk Bay, off Rameswaram, Southeast cost of India, marine science, vol.30. pp.173-179. 2001.
[65]   | Gangaimani, T., “Ecology and distribution of recent benthic foraminifera the inner shelf sediments of Gulf of Mannar,off Tuticorin, southeast cost of India,” Unpublished PhD thesis , Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli. p 233.July 2009
[66]   | Kumar, V., and Sivakumar, K., “Influence of estuarine environment on benthic foraminifera: A Case study from Uppanar river estuary, Tamil Nadu.”, Journal of Environment and pollution. Vol.8 (3), pp.277-283. 2001.
[67]   | Kasilingam, K., Suresh Gandhi, M., Rajeshwara Rao., “Near- shore foraminifera along the Palk strait, Southeast Coast of India, Tamilnadu.” Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India volume 65 (1), 90-106. June 30, 2020.