Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Studies of Avifaunal Diversity in Sasihithlu Estuary of Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, India

Abhishek Bharadwaj R*, Devi Prasad A.G

Department of Studies In Environmental Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru, India, 570006

Abstract: Birds are excellent bio indicators of environment. Avifaunal diversity provides various ecological, environmental and scientific services to mankind. The present study is aimed at the primary assessment of avian diversity of Sasihithlu estuary in Dakshina Kannada. The study was conducted from January 2018 to January 2019. Field exploration in different bioregions of estuary was undertaken during different seasons. A total of 138 species of birds were recorded belonging to 17 orders and 49 families. This includes 86 resident species and 52 migratory species. Of the recorded species, one is Endangered, one is Vulnerable and eight are Near Threatened species. A greater diversity of bird species was recorded during November to January and a lesser diversity was recorded during June to October.

Keywords: avifauna, wetland, estuary, mangrove, Sasihithlu

Received October 04, 2020; Revised November 05, 2020; Accepted November 11, 2020

Citation: Abhishek Bharadwaj R, Devi Prasad A.G, Studies of Avifaunal Diversity in Sasihithlu Estuary of Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 9 (1). 1-7. January 2021. doi:10.12691/aees-9-1-1

1. Introduction

The quality of ecosystems can be assessed by studying its avian diversity [1,2,3]. The status of habitats can be evaluated by observing behavioural and reproductive pattern of birds as they are excellent bio monitors of environment [4,5]. Birds play an important role in maintaining the species diversity, its population and ecological balance of an area [6,7]. Destruction of natural habitat and growing human intervention coupled with intense human activities has led to the decline of avifaunal diversity and population [6]. Studies have showed a significant impact of urbanisation on species richness and abundance of birds [8]. Occurrence of birds, their diversity and population serves as an important tool to study the health of an area and to assess habitat alterations [9,10,11]. Studying the avian diversity helps in understanding the structure and functioning of ecosystem [12,13]. This can also be used to access the degree of pollution of an ecosystem [14,15,16].

Wetlands are some of the most productive ecosystems and among them, estuaries are considered as the second most productive ecosystem of the world. Unique conditions of the estuaries harbour mangroves. Mangroves are a special group of flora which are adapted to grow in estuarine conditions [17,18]. High diversity and density of life is supported by wetlands and estuaries. They are one of the most important avian habitats and they sustain a very high diversity of avifauna, migratory water birds in particular [19,20,21,22]. Estuaries and wetlands are represented by avian species which are restricted to such conditions [17,23,24]. Contrary to this, wetlands are severely disturbed, damaged and destroyed by humans. Rising human population and resulting urbanisation along with environmental pollution and other anthropogenic activities are responsible for the degradation of wetlands which results in decreased biodiversity [25,26]. Mangrove ecosystems are deeply impacted by rising sea level resulting from climate change [27,28,29]. Wetlands have been reduced to half in the last century [30,31]. With high productivity, these areas are definitely rich in biodiversity and there is a lot of scope for conservation related research [32]. There are lots of opportunities for new discovery and documentation. Estuarine avifaunal diversity in India has not received much attention [17,33]. As documentation of avifaunal diversity in coastal areas of Karnataka is lacking, an attempt has been made in the present study focussing on documentation of avifaunal diversity along with the threats and factors for their occurrence and distribution. The baseline data from this study offers scope for management of estuary and formulating conservation strategies which in turn helps in avifaunal conservation.

2. Study Area

Sasihithlu is an estuary which is a confluence point of two rivers, Nandini and Shambhavi as shown in Figure 1. It is located 25 kms north of Mangaluru (13.02 N & 74.47 E) and has an elevation of 3 m above sea level. The climate and weather pattern is typical to that of coastal area. The temperature of the region varies from 26 C to 42 C with an annual precipitation of about 3,500 mm. The area is greatly influenced by tidal activity. The area has a diverse vegetation type which includes both natural and cultivated flora and also has a significant growth of mangroves. Floral diversity of the area was taken into account to understand the bird - vegetation association. Five sampling sites were selected as mentioned in Table 1, with a minimum distance of 500 m from each other to ensure Quasi Independence [34]. The sites were selected in Delta Point (mouth of the estuary), Hejmady and Chitrapu (parts of Shambhavi river) and Kollachikambla (part of Nandini river) which are the main zones of Sasihithlu estuary.

Figure 1. Map and google image of the study area

Table 1. Details of the sampling sites

3. Materials and Methods

Periodic field work was conducted from January 2018 to January 2019. Bird surveys were made for three to four days every month. The data was collected from 05:30 am to 08:30 am and 04:30 pm to 07:00 pm which corresponds with the peak time of avifaunal activity [35,36,37,38]. Direct Count Methods like point count method and area search methods were used for the survey. Regular sampling was done by walking at a constant pace in fixed routes in the sampling sites. Birds were documented based on visual and audio data.

Canon EOS 70D and 600D DSLR cameras with 18 - 135 mm and 75 - 300 mm lens were used to photograph the birds. Bird calls were recorded using the voice recorder in Samsung Galaxy M30 mobile phone. Celestron binoculars were used to observe and monitor the birds from a distance without disturbing their activity. Garmin Etrex 30X GPS machine was used to take the waypoints (latitude and longitude) and altitude of the area. Field Guides were used for bird identification [39,40,41].

4. Results and Discussion

Sasihithlu Estuary harbours a rich avifaunal diversity. Perennial supply of fresh water from the rivers Nandini and Shambhavi and an ample forest cover composed of mangroves, its associates and other native flora provides a suitable habitat for avifauna. The study area in and around estuary has revealed the presence of 138 species of birds belonging to 17 orders and 49 families as mentioned in Table 2.

Table 2. Checklist of birds recorded during the study

The documented birds were categorised as residents and migrants as shown in Figure 6. Passeriformes was the dominant order with 21 families followed by Charadriiformes with seven families, Coraciiformes with three families, Accipitriformes, Pelecanioformes, Piciformes, Suliformes with two families and Anseriformes, Apodiformes, Ciconiiformes, Columbiformes, Cuculiformes, Galliformes, Gruiformes, Psittaciformes, Strigiformes and Falconiformes were represented by one family. Great Knot (Calidris tenuirostris), an Endangered species, was documented once during the study period. one Vulnerable species, Wooly-necked Stork (Ciconia aeruginosus) was recoreded from the study area. Eurasian Oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus), Eurasian curlew (Numenius arquata), Curlew Sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea), Bar-tailed Godwit (Limosa lapponica), Painted Stork (Mycteria leucocephala), Black-headed Ibis (Threskiornis melanocephalus), Glossy Ibis (Plegadis falcinellus) and Oriental Darter (Anhinga melanogaster) were the Near Threatened species which were documented during the study.

Figure 2. Small Blue Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) with a kill

Figure 3. Greater Crested Terns (Thalasseus bergii) on exposed sandbanks

Figure 4. Lesser Black-backed Gull (Larus fuscus), Slender-billed Gull (Chroicocephalus genei), Brown-headed Gulls (Chroicocephalus brunnicephalus) along with Crested Terns (Thalasseus Sps.) during low tide

Figure 5. Eurasian Curlew (Numenius arquata), a Near Threatened species and Whimbrel (Numenius phaeopus)

Figure 6. Migratory status of birds

The Gulls and Terns were mostly seen on the exposed sandbanks during high and low tides as documented in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Sanderlings along with Plovers and Sandpipers were seen foraging and feeding near the water's edge on insects carried by water. Whimbrels, Eurasian Curlews (Figure 5), Egrets, Herons, Kingfishers and Ibises were mostly seen in the shallows adjacent to the mangroves. Majority of other birds were documented in the mangrove patches and associated areas with good tree cover. Studies have showed that the areas with a considerable green cover is an important factor which supports the avifauna [42] and the vegetation determines the avian community [43]. Forested regions along with a good diversity and density of trees sustain a rich avifaunal diversity [4,44,45]. Orioles, Drongos, Warblers, Bulbuls, Kites, Eagles and other birds of prey, Bee-eaters, Flycatchers, Swifts and Swallows and Sunbirds were predominantly documented in the wooded areas. Black Kite and Brahminy Kite, Lesser Sand Plover, Black-headed Gull and Brown-headed Gull, Small Blue Kingfisher (Figure 2) and White-breasted Kingfisher, Indian Jungle Crow, Lesser Crested Tern and Greater Crested Tern, Whimbrel, Common Sandpiper, Western Reef Egret and Striated Heron were the common birds of the estuary, whereas sightings of Black-capped Kingfisher, Stork-billed Kingfisher, Eurasian curlew, Dunlin, Sanderling, Ruddy Turnstone, Eurasian Marsh Harrier, White-bellied Sea Eagle and Common Greenshank were uncommon. Crab Plover, Eurasian Oystercatcher, Sandwich Tern, Great Knot, Curlew Sandpiper and Bar-tailed Godwit were the rare birds of estuary. Few threats to the area and avifauna like habitat alteration and degradation, dredging which effects the normal flow of water, environmental pollution and intense anthropogenic activities were also documented during the study.

5. Conclusion

The studies have shown that Sasihithlu estuary is rich in terms of avifauna. The estuary and the associated wetlands serve as an important habitat for birds. It also provides favourable habitat for many migratory birds. Over fishing and extraction of shells, conversion of mangroves and wetlands into aquaculture ponds for fish and shrimp farming, dredging, solid waste deposition by rivers and sea, water pollution, riverine and coastal erosion and increased human interference caused by tourism are the major threats to the area and the avifauna. Habitat alteration has a significant impact on avian populations, its diversity and occurrence. As there were no studies undertaken in this area with regards to avifaunal conservation, the present study can be used as a baseline data to assess the status of avifauna and to formulate conservation strategies.

Acknowledgements

I wish to express my sincere thanks to Dr. Shwetha and Dr. Sharath V.G for their guidance, encouragement and motivation during the course of the study. I am grateful to Dr. Usha M and Mr. Arjun M.S for their valuable suggestions and constant support. Thanks to Mr. Dileep Saliyan and Mr. Chandra Kumar for providing all the required data and facilities during the fieldwork.

Conflict of Interests

There is no conflict of interest with respect to this research article.

References

[1]   | Abdulali, Humayun. 1949. Some peculiarities of avifaunal distribution in Peninsular India. Proc.Natnl.Instt,Sci.India. 15: 387-393.
[2]   | Aich, A. and Mukhopadhyay, S. 2008. Comparison of avifauna at the edges of contrasting forest patches in Western Ghat Hills of India. Ring 30: 5-14.
[3]   | Ranganathan, J.; Krishnaswamy, J. and Anand, M. 2010. Landscape-level effects on avifauna within tropical agriculture in the Western Ghats: Insights for management and conservation. Biological conservation 143: 2909-2917.
[4]   | Harisha, M. and Hosetti, B. 2009. Diversity and distribution of avifauna of Lakkavalli range forest, Bhadra wildlife sanctuary, western ghat, India. Ecoprint: An International Journal of Ecology 16: 21-27.
[5]   | Srinivasan, U. and Prashanth, N.S. 2006. Preferential routes of bird dispersal to the Western Ghats in India: An explanation for the avifaunal peculiarities of the Biligirirangan Hills. Indian Birds 2: 114-119.
[6]   | Manjunath, K. and Joshi, B. 2012. Avifaunal diversity in Gulbarga region, north Karnatak. Recent Research in Science and Technology 4(7): 27-34.
[7]   | Gatesire, T.; Nsabimana, D.; Nyiramana, A.; Seburanga, J. and Mirville, M. 2014. Bird diversity and distribution in relation to urban landscape types in Northern Rwanda. The Scientific World Journal,Volume 2014, Article ID 157824, 12 pages.
[8]   | Shahabuddin, G. 1997. Preliminary observations on the role of coffee plantations as avifaunal refuges in the Palni Hills of the Western Ghats. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 94: 10-21.
[9]   | Kuruvilla, K. 2014. Avian diversity of Vadakkechira area, a green lung of Thrissur. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 8(7): 55-60.
[10]   | Kuruvilla, K. and Maria, K.A. 2017. A Study on the Avifauna of Palakkal Kole Wetland, Thrissur: A Ramsar Site of South India. Zoological Research 13(1): 12-19.
[11]   | Sol, D.; González Lagos, C.; Moreira, D.; Maspons, J. and Lapiedra, O. 2014. Urbanisation Tolerance and the Loss of Avian Diversity. Ecology Letters 17(8) 942-950.
[12]   | Ortega-Álvarez, R. and MacGregor-Fors, I. 2009. Living in the big city: Effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landscape and urban planning 90: 189-195.
[13]   | Turner, W.R. 2003. Citywide biological monitoring as a tool for ecology and conservation in urban landscapes: The case of the Tucson Bird Count. Landscape and Urban Planning 65(3) 149-166.
[14]   | Gaston A.J. 1975. Methods for estimating bird populations. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 72(2): 271-283.
[15]   | Bel'skii, E.; Bezel', V. and Polents, E. 1995. Early stages of the nesting period of hollow-nesting birds under conditions of industrial pollution. Russian Journal of Ecology 26(1): 38-43.
[16]   | Ohlendorf, H.M.; Risebrough, R.W. and Vermeer, K. 1978. Exposure of marine birds to environmental pollutants. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Research Report Vol. 9.
[17]   | Kumar, K.V. and Kumara, V. 2014. Species diversity of birds in mangroves of kundapura, udupi district, Karnataka, southwest coast of India. Journal of Forestry Research 25: 661-666.
[18]   | Pawar, P.R. 2013. Monitoring of impact of anthropogenic inputs on water quality of mangrove ecosystem of Uran, Navi Mumbai, west coast of India. Marine Pollution Bulletin 75: 291-300.
[19]   | Daniels, R.R. 1996. Landscape ecology and conservation of birds in the Western Ghats, South India. Ibis 138: 64-69.
[20]   | Pramod, P.; Joshi, N.; Ghate, U. and Gadgil, M. 1997. On the hospitality of Western Ghats habitats for bird communities. Current Science 122-127.
[21]   | Ramachandra, T.; Rajinikanth, R. and Ranjini, V. 2005. Economic Valuation of Wetlands. Journal of Environmental Biology 26(3): 439-447.
[22]   | Sandilyan, S.; Thiyagesan, K. and Nagarajan, R. 2010. Major decline in species-richness of waterbirds in the Pichavaram mangrove wetlands, southern India. Wader Study Group Bulletin 117: 91-98.
[23]   | Boominathan, M.; Chandran, M.S. and Ramachandra, T. 2008. Economic valuation of bivalves in the Aghanashini estuary, west coast, Karnataka. ENVIS Technical Report: 30. Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science.
[24]   | Praveen, J.; Subramanya, S. and Raj, V.M. 2016. A checklist of the birds of Karnataka. Indian Birds 12: 89-118.
[25]   | Dineshbabu, A.; Durgekar, N.R. and Zacharia, P. 2011. Estuarine and marine decapods of Karnataka inventory. Fishing chimes 30: 20-24.
[26]   | Mariappan, N.; Kalfan, B.A. and Krishnakumar, S. 2013. Assessment of bird population in different habitats of agricultural ecosystem. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences 1(11): 306-316.
[27]   | Ananda, K. and Sridhar, K. 2002. Diversity of endophytic fungi in the roots of mangrove species on the west coast of India. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 48(10): 871-878.
[28]   | Kumar, K.V. and Kumara, V. 2011. Avifaunal diversity of mangrove ecosystem, Kundapura, Udupi district, Karnataka, India. Recent Research in Science and Technology 3(10): 106-110.
[29]   | Rao, T.A.; Suresh, P. and Sherieff, A. 1987. Little known attributes of some mangrove plants of the Karnataka coast. Current Science 56: 725-727.
[30]   | Shirodkar, S.R. and Nayak, V.N. 2010. Distribution and Seasonal Abundance of Macro Benthos of Gangavali Estuary, Uttar Kannada, West Coast of India. Journal of Ecobiotechnology 2/5: 80-84.
[31]   | Rajpar, M.N. and Zakaria, M. 2011. Bird Species Abundance and Their Correlationship with Microclimate and Habitat Variables at Natural Wetland Reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Zoology, Volume 2011, Article ID 758573, 17 pages.
[32]   | Manohara, G.; Harisha, M. and Hosetti, B. 2016. Status, diversity and conservation threats of migratory wetland birds in Magadi Bird Sanctuary, Gadag district, Karnataka, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology studies 4(4): 265-269
[33]   | Sowmya, K. and Jayappa, K. 2016. Environmental sensitivity mapping of the coast of Karnataka, west coast of India. Ocean & Coastal Management 121: 70-87.
[34]   | Ralph, C.J.; Sauer, J.R. and Droege, S. 1995. Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts. Gen Tech Rep PSW- GTR-149 Albany, CA. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 187 pages.
[35]   | Cunningham, M.; Johnson, D.H. and Svingen, D.N. 2006. Estimates of breeding bird populations in the Sheyenne National Grassland, North Dakota. Prairie Naturalist 38(1): 39-56.
[36]   | Sharath, V.G. and Devi Prasad, A.G. 2019. Avifaunal Diversity in Western Ghats Regions of Shimoga and Chikmagalur Districts, Karnataka, India. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 13(3): 71-89.
[37]   | Simons, T.R.; Shriner, S.A. and Farnsworth, G.L. 2006. Comparison of breeding bird and vegetation communities in primary and secondary forests of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Biological Conservation 129: 302-311.
[38]   | Zhang, M.-X.; Kyaw, M.; Li, G.-G.; Zhao, J.-B.; Zeng, X.- L.; Swa, K. and Quan, R.-C. 2017. Bird Diversity in Northern Myanmar and Conservation Implications. Zoological Research 38(5) 264-280.
[39]   | Ali, S. 2002. The Book of Indian Birds.(13th Edition). Oxford University Press, Delhi. 326 pages.

[40]  
Ali, S. and Ripley, S.D. 1983. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan (Compact Edition). Oxford University Press and BNHS, Mumbai Ali, S and SD Ripley (1995) The Pictorial Guide to the Birds of Indian Sub-continent Oxford University Press and BNHS, Mumbai Baskaran, ST (1992) Sighting of Dusky Horned Owl Newsletter for Birdwatchers 32: 10.

[41]   | Jathar, G.A. and Rahmani, A.R. 2006. Endemic birds of India. Buceros 11: 1-53.
[42]   | Chowdhury, R.; Sarkar, S.; Nandy, A. and Talapatra, S.N. 2014. Assessment of bird diversity as bioindicators in two parks, Kolkata, India. International Letters of Natural Sciences 16: 131-139.
[43]   | Aggarwal, A.; Tiwari, G. and Harsh, S. 2015. Avian diversity and density estimation of birds of the Indian Institute of Forest Management Campus, Bhopal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(2): 6891-6902.
[44]   | Balda, R.P. 1975. Vegetation structure and breeding bird diversity. Proceedings of the symposium on management of forest and range habitats for nongame birds. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep WO- 1.
[45]   | Putz, F.E. and Chan, H. 1986. Tree growth, dynamics, and productivity in a mature mangrove forest in Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 17: 211-230.