Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera with Reference to Sediment Characters from off the Coast of Manapad, South East Coast of India

V. Kumar, Twinkle Jacob*

Department of Geology, Kristu Jyoti College, Changanacherry, Kerala, India-686104

Abstract: In order to assess the distribution of foraminifera with reference to sediment characters from the inner shelf sediments of Gulf of Mannar, off Manapad to Tiruchendur, the following objectives were taken up i. to inventory the foraminifera fauna and to observe their quantitative composition ii. to ascertain the distribution of living and total (living + dead) population of the fauna and iii. to correlate the temporal and spatial distribution of the fauna with observed substrate characteristics. For the study, 54 sediment samples were collected once in four months for a year, representing summer, pre-monsoon and winter/post monsoon, from the study area. A total of 99 species were identified, belonging to the suborders Textulariina, Miliolina, Lagenina and Rotaliina. The following six species were found to be abundant viz. Ammonia beccarii, Ammonia tepida, Asterorotalia inflata, Noninoides boueanum, Quinqueloculina seminulum and Spiroloculina communis. Spatially, the population, in general, increased with the depth and was found to be higher along the deeper part of the collection (stations 8, 9 and 10) and minimum population was found to occur in near shore stations (stations 1 and 18). The living population was found to be maximum during summer (May) and minimum during pre-monsoonal period (September). The species distribution revealed that the foraminiferal population has a positive correlation with depth, calcium carbonate and organic matter content of the substrate. In general, the higher values of CaCO₃ found in stations 7 to 13, support higher foraminiferal population in the area. The population was also found to be maximum when the organic matter percentage was between 1.90 and 2.00 % along with other amiable environmental parameters. The congenial substrate for the population abundance was siltysand.

Keywords: benthic foraminifera, spatial, temporal distribution, sediment characters, Manapad, Tiruchendur, Gulf of Mannar

Received June 27, 2019; Revised August 10, 2019; Accepted August 30, 2019

Citation: V. Kumar, Twinkle Jacob, Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera with Reference to Sediment Characters from off the Coast of Manapad, South East Coast of India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 7 (3). 110-116. January 2019. doi:10.12691/aees-7-3-5

1. Introduction

The present study was carried out from off the coast of Manapad to Tiruchendur (Figure 1), that lies between N 8°22’ to N 8°27’latitudes and E 78°4’ to E 78°10’ longitude (Table 1) and forms a part of Survey of India’s toposheet no. 58 L/3. The area has a raised beach with a sand bar parallel to the coastline, that lies north of Kulashekarapattinam. The samples were collected from 18 stations, once in four months for a period of one year and thus the total samples amounted to 54.

The main objectives of the study comprise

i. to inventory the foraminifera fauna and to observe their quantitative composition

ii. to ascertain the distribution of living and total (living + dead) population of the fauna and

iii. to correlate the temporal and spatial distribution of the fauna with observed substrate characteristics.

Figure 1. Study area map showing sample locations

Table 1. Geographic locations of sample stations

2. Materials and Methodology

The samples were collected using motor launch and mud grab by taking necessary precautions in the months of May 2016, September 2016 and January 2017. A unit volume of 100 ml of wet sediment was preserved in 10 % formaldehyde solution for foraminiferal study.

The remaining sediment samples were preserved in polythene covers and labeled for laboratory work. To distinguish living from dead foraminifera, Walton’s Rose Bengal staining technique [26] was adopted. The foraminifera separated from the sediment were classified and their population (living and dead) was analyzed quantitatively. Krumbein and Pettijohn’s pipette method [7] was followed to find out sand-silt-clay ratio of the substrate and the sediment types were recognized by Trefethen’s textural nomenclature [24]. Calcium carbonate content of the sediment was determined using rapid titration method of Piper [19]. Organic matter content in the sediments was estimated using chromic acid method of Walkley and Black as detailed out by Jackson [5].

3. Results and Discussion

Post et. al. [20] after their detailed work in Gulf of Papua, suggested that the distribution of benthic foraminifera strongly correlate to changes in water depth, percent carbonate mud, percent gravel, organic carbon flux, temperature and salinity. Enge et.al. [2] detected that species composition of calcareous foraminifera vary strongly between depths. During the study on recent benthic foraminifera with respect to environmental variables from the shoreface and inner shelf off Valencia (Western Mediterranean), Lopez-Belzunce M. et. al. [13] found that depth, energy conditions, type of substrate (bioclastic), organic matter and presence of seagrass are the main factors influencing the distribution of dead foraminiferal assemblages. They inferred that the highest proportions of bioclastic sands with high organic matter and carbonate content correspond to samples with the highest numbers of living foraminifera. Recently, Martins M.V.A. et. al. [17] pointed out that bathymetry, sediment characteristics and the supply of organic matter clearly controls the distribution pattern of living foraminiferal assemblages in the continental shelf of the Campos Basin. Martins M.V.A et. al. [15] made a detailed study on the density and diversity of living and dead foraminifera in the Aveiro continental shelf and found higher density and diversity of living species in the middle continental shelf due to the substrate stability, reduced deposition of fine sedimentary particles and availability of organic matter. Hence, in the present study, relationship between the distribution of living and total foraminiferal population was analysed with respect to substrate characteristics like sediment type, calcium carbonate and organic matter.

Foraminiferal study of the samples collected led to the recognition of 99 benthic foraminiferal species belonging to 47 genera, 33 families, 17 super families of the suborders Textulariina, Miliolina, Lagenina and Rotaliina, following the classification of Loeblich and Tappan [12].

3.1. Living Population

Living foraminifera was found to be present in all the samples collected and studied. The living population size varied from 80 (Station 1 of September) to 394 specimens (Station 9 of May) per 100 ml of wet sediment. Spatially, maximum population was found in the farthest stations from the shore (stations 8, 9 and 10) and minimum population was found to occur in near shore stations (stations 1 and 18). The living population was found to be maximum (4099 specimens) during summer (May) and minimum (3442 specimens) during pre-monsoonal period (September). Seasonal variations of living population are given in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Seasonal variations of living population

3.2. Total Population

The total (living + dead) population size ranged from 286 (Station 1 of September) to 1190 specimens (Station 9 of May) per 100 ml of wet sediment. Temporally, the lowest population (11090 specimens) was observed during pre-monsoon and in the stations nearest to the shore, while the maximum (13212 specimens) was noticed during summer and spatially, at the stations farthest from the shore.

Among the 99 benthic foraminiferal species observed in the study area, the following 6 benthic foraminiferal species were found to be abundant as their population was more than 150 specimens per 100 ml of wet sediment in the study area viz. Ammonia beccarii, Ammonia tepida, Asterorotalia inflata, Noninoides boueanum, Quinqueloculina seminulum and Spiroloculina communis. The living and total population sizes of these abundant species are given in Table 3 to 8.

3.3. Sand-silt-clay Ratio

The correlation between texture of sediment and foraminiferal population was understood from several studies. Reddy and Reddy [21] suggested that higher foraminiferal count is related to the presence of silt dominated clay. V. Kumar et. al. [9] found that fines of the substrate has positive effect on the foraminiferal population in Thamirabarani river estuary. V. Kumar and K. Sivakumar [10] found siltysand substrate to be favorable for the abundance of foraminiferal species. After their study on the ecological and pollution aspects of benthic foraminifera from the Palk Bay, off Rameswaram, Kumar et al. [11] deduced that the siltysand type substrate favors higher foraminiferal population. Mendes et al. [18] from their study observed that the type of substrate controls the type foraminiferal assemblage. According to them, Eggerella scaber, Planorbullina mediterranensis and Cribrononion gerthi shows highest number of tests in sediments dominated by sandysilt while Bulimina aculeate, Epistominella vitrea and Cassidulina laevigata displays highest number of tests in samples characterized by sandy silty clay.

Of the twelve sediment types suggested by Trefethen [24], only sand and siltysand types were present in the study area (Table 2). The favorable substrate for the foraminiferal abundance was found to be siltysand. The data related to sand silt clay percentages in the trilinear diagram for all 54 samples are summarized in the following Table 2.

Table 2. Soil texture of samples

3.4. Calcium Carbonate

Jayaraju and Reddy [6] observed a positive correlation between CaCO3 and foraminiferal population in the Tuticorin and Kovalam stretch. Manivannan et. al. [14] suggested CaCO₃ as an important controlling factor for foraminiferal population in the Gulf of Mannar. V. Kumar et. al. [8] found an increase in living population size with increasing CaCO₃ content in the Palk Bay, off Rameshwaram. S.M. Hussain et. al. [4] found that higher CaCO₃ in beach sands of Kovalam favors maximum distribution of foraminifera. Suresh Gandhi et. al. [23] spotted out calcium carbonate as the major controlling factor for the thriving of foraminiferal fauna in and around the region of Manalmelkudi Spit, Palk Strait.

In the present study area, CaCO₃ varied between 20.5% (station 1, September) to 25.81% (station 12, May). Station wise mean percentage of CaCO3 was obsreved to be the maximum in station 12 and it was also higher in stations 13 and 14. Temporally, the mean value was highest (24.77%) during May, and the lowest (22.87%) for September and was positively correlated with the foraminiferal abundance. Spatially, the higher values of CaCO3 were found in stations 7 to 14 which supported higher foraminiferal population size in the area.

3.5. Organic Matter

The preservation of organic matter depends greatly on the sediment texture. Sediment fines are less permeable and thus preserve more organic matter. Venkata Rao and Subba Rao [25] found lower organic matter content in sandy sediments and higher content in the fine sediments of Suddagedda river estuary. Kumar et al. [11] after a detailed study on the foraminiferal population and sediment parameters from the Palk Bay, off Rameswaram have stated that the organic matter of the area is low due to low sedimentation rate. The living foraminiferal population has inverse relationship with organic matter content. Eric Armynot et al. [3] confirmed that foraminifera density is low and species richness is high in sediments with a low organic matter content (<2%) and foraminifera density is high and species richness at an intermediate value in sediments with very high organic matter content. M.V.A. Martins et. al. [16] revealed that opportunistic species populate in areas where the substrate is composed of fine-grained sediments enriched in organic matter. Arslan M. et. al. [1] after studying Askar boat harbor samples of Eastern Bahrain concluded that higher organic matter content supports dominance of Ammonia, Glabratellina, and Murrayinella in sediments and an impotence in the population of Miliolid.

In the area under study, organic matter content was maximum (2.364%) in station 9 of May and minimum (0.653%) in Station 2, September. Seasonally, mean value of organic matter content was the highest (1.99%) in May and the lowest (1.45%) in September. Spatially, the mean organic matter content was found to be higher (>1.98%) between stations 6 and 13 and favored higher population, when the other parameters were congenial.

3.6. Distribution of abundant Foraminifera

Solai A. et. al. [22] suggested that the distribution of foraminifera from off Tuticorin and Tiruchendur is controlled by bathymetry and the nature of the substrate. According to Lopez-Belzunce M. et. al. [13], the environmental variables like bathymetry, substrate grain size composition on the inner shelf and shoreface influence the dead foraminifera distribution and for the living assemblages, the main variables affecting are bioclastic sand substrate, the carbonate proportion and the organic matter content. This was observed to be synonymous with the present study. The relation between substrate characteristics, depth and abundant foraminiferal population for different seasons is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Correlation between sediment parameters and population for May2016, September 2016 and January 2017

Table 3. Occurrence of living and total population of Ammonia beccarii in actual numbers per unit volume

Table 4. Occurrence of living and total population of Ammonia tepida in actual numbers per unit volume

Table 5. Occurrence of living and total population of Asterorotalia inflata in actual numbers per unit volume

Table 6. Occurrence of living and total population of Nonionoides boueanum in actual numbers per unit volume

Table 7. Occurrence of living and total population of Quinqueloculina seminulum in actual numbers per unit volume

Table 8. Occurrence of living and total population of Spiroloculina communis in actual numbers per unit volume

From the above tables, ecological study of the abundant and wide spread foraminiferal species revealed the following:

Ÿ Among the six abundant and wide spread fauna viz. Ammonia beccarii, Ammonia tepida, Asterorotalia inflata, Noionoides boueanum, Quinqueloculina seminulum and Spiroloculina communis prefered the environmental conditions that prevailed during April (summer) for higher reproduction in the present area.

Ÿ In the study area, wherever the environmental conditions were uncongenial (stations 1and 18) and wherever the substrate was sandy, the population and species diversity were also less and hence resulted in the lower predominance of abundant species.

Ÿ Samples collected in deeper segment viz. samples 7 to 13 accounted for higher population and was positively correlated with higher CaCO3 and moderate organic matter content of the substrate.

Ÿ The less population encountered during September was mainly because of the bay depression and monsoon rain and the resultant modifications of the substrate characters.

Ÿ The accommodative substrate that favored the population abundance was siltysand.

4. Conclusion

Spatially, the living population of all the species of foraminifera was found to be more concentrated in the deeper part of the collections (station 9 and closely followed by stations 8 & 10). The living as well as total (living + dead) population size were less in all the near shore stations because of the wave agitation. The monsoon weather and bay depressions supported by fresh water influence accounted for the minimum population noticed in September.

Temporally, the mean value of CaCO3 was the highest (24.77%) during May, and the lowest (22.87%) for September and was positively correlated with the foraminiferal abundance. In general, the higher values of CaCO₃ found in stations 7 to 13, supported higher foraminiferal population in the area. The population was found to be maximum when the organic matter percentage was between 1.90 and 2.00 % along with other amiable environmental parameters. In the present area, the population was more in the siltysand type of substrate, which is always associated with comparatively deeper waters.

The congenial environments for the abundance of living population in general, wide spread and abundant foraminifera in particular of the study area are higher CaCO₃ content (> 23.0%) and optimum (1.9 – 2.0 %) organic content of the substrate.

Acknowledgements

The authors are sincerely thankful to the authorities of National College (Autonomous), Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu, for providing the lab facilities and also for their help in various capacities.

References

[1]   | Arslan M., Kaminski M.A., Khalil A., Ilyas M., Tawabini B.S. Benthic Foraminifera in Eastern Bahrain: Relationships with Local Pollution Sources, Polish Journal of Environental Studies, Vol 26(3), 969-984, 2017.
[2]   | Enge, A. J., Wukovits, J., Wanek, W., Watzka, M., Witte, U. F., Hunter, W. R. and Heinz, P., Carbon and nitrogen uptake of calcareous benthic foraminifera along a depth-related oxygen gradient in the OMZ of the Arabian Sea, Fronti. Microbiol., v.7: 71, 2016.
[3]   | Eric Armynot du Chatelet, Viviane Bour-Roumazeilles, Armelle Riboulleau and Alain Trentesaux, Sediment (grain size and clay mineralogy) and organic matter quality control on living benthic foraminifera, Revue de micropaleontologie, V. 52, pp.75-84, (2009).

[4]  
Hussain, S.M., Merin Maria Joy, Rajkumar, A., Mohammed Nishath, N. and Shabhangi T.F., Distribution of calcareous microfauna (foraminifera and ostracoda) from the beach sands of Kovalam, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, Southwest coast of India, Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India, 61: 267-272, 2016.

[5]   | Jackson, M.L., Soil chemical analysis, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 498p, (1967).
[6]   | Jayaraju, N., and Reddappa Reddy, K., Foraminiferal ecosystem in relation to coastal estuarine sediments of Kovalam Tuticorin, South India, Jour. Geol. Soc. India, 46: 565-573, 1995.
[7]   | Krumbein, W. C., and Pettijohn, F.J., Manual of Sedimentary Petrography, D. Appleton Century Co., Inc. New York, 549p, 1983.
[8]   | Kumar, V., Manivannan, V., and Ragothaman,V., a. Spatial and temporal variations in foraminiferal abundance and their relation to substrate characteristics in the palk bay, off Rameshwaram, Tamil Nadu, Proceedings XV ICMS, Dehradun, 367-379, 1996.
[9]   | Kumar, V., Manivannan, V., and Ragothaman, V., b. Distribution and Species diversity of Recent foraminifera from the Thamirabarani river estuary, Punnaikkayal, Tamil Nadu, Journal of Palaeontological Society of India, 35: 53-60, 1996.
[10]   | Kumar, V., and Sivakumar, K. Influence of estuarine environment on the benthic foraminifera-A case study from the Uppanar river estuary of Tamil Nadu, Journal of Environment and Pollution, 3:277-283, 2001.
[11]   | Kumar, V., Sivakumar, K., Gangaimani, T. and Anand, K.J., Morphological abnormalities of benthic foraminifera from the Palk bay, off Rameswaram, Tamilnadu: A tool for environmental monitoring, Pollution Research, vol. 25(1) pp. 35-42, (2006).
[12]   | Loeblich, A.R. Jr., and Tappan, H., Foraminiferal genera and their classification, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, vols. 1 and 2, 970 + 212 p., 846 pls., 1988
[13]   | Lopez-Belzunce, M; Blazquez, Ana M; Lluis Pretus, J., Recent benthic foraminiferal assemblages and their relationship to environmental variables on the shoreface and inner shelf off Valencia (Western Mediterranean), Marine Environmental Research, Vol.101, 169-183, 2014.
[14]   | Manivannan, V., Kumar, V., Ragothaman, V., and Hussain, S. M., Calcium carbonate – A major factor in controlling foraminiferal populatios in Gulf of Mannar, off Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu, Proceedings XV Indian Colloquiumon Micropalaeontology and Stratigraphy, Dehradun, 381-385, 1996.
[15]   | Martins M.V.A, Hohenegger J., Frontalini F., Dias J.M.A., Geraldes M.C., Rocha F., Dissimilarity between living and dead benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the Aveiro Continental Shelf (Portugal), PLoS ONE 14(1), 2019.
[16]   | Martins M.V.A., Silva F., Laut L.L.M., Frontalini F., Clemente I.M.M.M., Miranda P., Figueira R., Sousa S.H.M., Dias J.M.A., Response of Benthic Foraminifera to Organic Matter Quantity and Quality and Bioavailable Concentrations of Metals in Aveiro Lagoon (Portugal), PLoS ONE 10 (2), 2015.
[17]   | Martins M.V.A., Yamashita C., Sousa S.H.M., Koutsoukos E.A.M., Disaró S.T., Debenay J.P and Duleba W., Response of Benthic Foraminifera to Environmental Variability: Importance of Benthic Foraminifera in Monitoring Studies, Monitoring of Marine Pollution, Houma Bachari Fouzia, IntechOpen, 2019.
[18]   | Mendes, I., Gonzalez, R., Dias, J.M.A., Lobo, F. and Martins, V., Factors influencing recent benthic foraminifera distribution on the Guadiana shelf (Southwestern Iberia), Marine Micropaleontology, vol.51, pp. 171 192, (2004).
[19]   | Piper, C.S., Soil and plant analysis, University of Adelaide press, Adelaide, 1-368, 1947.
[20]   | Post, A.L., Sbaffi, L., Passlow, V., and Collins, D.C., Benthic foraminifera as environmental indicators in Torres Strait–Gulf of Papua, in Todd, B.J., and Greene, H.G., eds., Mapping the Seafloor for Habitat Characterization: Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 47, p. 329-347, 2007.
[21]   | Reddy, A.N., and Reddy K.R., Seasonal distribution of foraminifera in Araniyar river estuary of Pulicat, Southeast coast of India, Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 23: 39-42, 1994.
[22]   | Solai, A., Suresh Gandhi, M., and Rajeshwara Rao, N., Recent benthic foraminifera and their distribution between Tuticorin and Tiruchendur, Gulf of Mannar, Southeast coast of India, Arab Journal of Geosciences, 6: 2409-2417, 2012.

[23]  
Suresh Gandhi. M., Kasilingam. K., Arumugam T., Lalthansangi & Rajeswara Rao. N., Distribution of benthic foraminifera, sediment characteristics and its environmental conditions in and around Manalmelkudi Spit, Palk Strait, Tamil Nadu, East coast of India, Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, Vol. 46(4), 521-532, 2017.

[24]   | Trefethen, J.M., Classification of sediments, American Journal of Science, 248: 55-62, 1950.
[25]   | Venkata Rao, T., and Subba Rao, M., Recent foraminifera from Kakinada Channel, East Coast of India, II Indian Colloquium on Micropalaeontology and Stratigraphy, Lucknow, 144-169, 1972.
[26]   | Walton, W.R., Techniques for recognition of living foraminifera, Contr. Cushman Found. Foram. Res., 3: 56-60, 1952.