SciEP will begin to publish special issues that focus on topics of interest to the
journal's readers. Qualified scientists are encouraged to organize and guest edit
special issues in their expertise areas. Proposals for special issues are welcome
throughout the year and the issue can be published online soon after final versions
of manuscripts are received by the journal's editorial office.
Please provide the following information and forward the completed form (click here
the form) to the special issue editor, at firstname.lastname@example.org
An efficient, easy, and user friendly online submission system reduces the overall
time from submission to publication.
Manuscript Tracking System
All SciEP journals have a high standard of peer review.
SciEP Reviewer Platform
Online submission, rapid peer review and production make the process of publishing
your article simple and efficient.
All the journals in SciEP are free from all access barriers, allowing for the widest
possible global dissemination of your work, leading to more citations.
All articles published in SciEP journals are included in some major bibliographic
databases so that your work can be found easily and cited by researchers around
Nuclear power accounts for just over twenty percent of America’s electrical output
and does not contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately, nuclear power
does produce a deleterious by-product known as radioactive waste. One of the primary
goals of nuclear power proponents is the development of methods that reduce the
volume of radioactive waste, such as cobalt. Radioactive cobalt is usually accompanied
by non-radioactive iron, making it more difficult to solely extract the harmful
cobalt atoms. The application of molecularly imprinted polymers and chitosans increase
the effectiveness of the removal of radioactive cobalt from cooling medium in order
to reduce the overall volume of nuclear waste by having a high selectivity for the
radioactive cobalt ions even in the presence of similar particles ...
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2014 2 (4), pp 143-147.
This study aimed to examine the effects of different taping pressures with or without
external force on the maximum dorsal flexion angle (DFA). Twenty-two healthy male
university students with >5 years of athletic experience participated. A qualified
trainer wound a rigid tape thrice around subject’s wrist joint. Taping pressure
was measured using the pressure measuring system AMI3037-SB. Independent variables
were five experimental conditions (5 hPa, 30 hPa, 60 hPa, and 90 hPa, and control)
and two measurement conditions for the wrist joint DFA with non-external and external
forces. In the former, the subject flexed the wrist joint himself (active DFA),
while in the latter, a trainer helped in flexion (passive DFA). The dependent variable
was the maximum DFA. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA (taping pressure × different
DFA measurement) and multiple comparison tests showed that passive DFA was significantly
larger than active DFA under all taping pressure conditions ...
Build a community of active readers and commenters
Receive the articles published on SciEP