Currrent Issue: Volume 3, Number 2, 2015


Article

Cost Efficiency of Thai National GAP (QGAP) and Mangosteen Farmers’ Understanding in Chanthaburi Province

1Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Japan


American Journal of Rural Development. 2015, 3(2), 15-23
doi: 10.12691/ajrd-3-2-1
Copyright © 2015 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Pongthong Pongvinyoo, Masahiro Yamao, Kenji Hosono. Cost Efficiency of Thai National GAP (QGAP) and Mangosteen Farmers’ Understanding in Chanthaburi Province. American Journal of Rural Development. 2015; 3(2):15-23. doi: 10.12691/ajrd-3-2-1.

Correspondence to: Pongthong  Pongvinyoo, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Japan. Email: drkokung01@hotmail.com

Abstract

GAP has been implemented in mangosteen commodity, which is the important export commodity in Thailand since 2003. The direct market for GAP –based mangosteen has not yet developed. Therefore, the farmers could not get a direct benefit from GAP adoption, and they believed that GAP could not give them any visible benefits. The present study seeks to expose the GAP realistic economic incentives from farmers’ GAP experiences in mangosteen commodity. One-hundred and twelve (112) respondents were randomly selected from 1,968 GAP mangosteen-certified farmers in Chanthaburi province which is the biggest mangosteen cultivation area in Thailand. This study reviewed that GAP certified farmers were satisfied with income from their investment more than the ordinary farmers (cost efficiency = 1.74 and 1.27, respectively). However, the production cost per rai was 11,554.7 THB/rai, higher than the ordinary farmers’ cost (7,007.9 THB/rai). The GAP standard itself provides direct incentive through its knowledge and appropriate farming techniques which are classified as non-economic incentives. The proportion of high-quality mangosteen can be increased if the farmers effectively practice GAP on their farms.

Keywords

References

[1]  Agricultural Statistics of Thailand 2013. Bangkok: Office of Agricultural Economics.
 
[2]  Agricultural Statistics of Chanthaburi province 2014. Chanthaburi: Chanthaburi provincial agricultural extension Office (in Thai). Bangkok: Office of Agricultural Economics.
 
[3]  Amekawa Y., “Rethinking Sustainable Agriculture in Thailand: A Governance Perspective,” J. Sustain. Agric., vol. 34, no. 917401288, pp. 389-416, 2010.
 
[4]  Amekawa Y., “Can a public GAP approach ensure safety and fairness? A comparative study of Q-GAP in Thailand,” J. Peasant Stud., vol. 40, no. February, pp. 189-217, 2013.
 
[5]  Department of Agriculture. 2009. Thai Fruit Strategy 2010 - 2014 (in Thai). Bangkok: Department of Agriculture.
 
Show More References
[6]  Hobbs J., Incentives for the adoption of Good Agricultural Practices Background paper for the FAO Expert Consultation Incentives for the adoption of Good Agricultural Practices Background paper for the FAO Expert Consultation, no. November. 2003.
 
[7]  Hosono, K. 2007. Change of environment that surrounds tropical fruit and tendency of tropical fruit producing area in Thailand - A case study of tropical fruit producing area in Chanthaburi province. Journal of Kyushu Kyoritsu University, Faculty of Economics, 11-25.
 
[8]  Mankeb P., Limunggura T., In-go A., and Chulilung P., “Adoption of Good Agricultural Practices by Durian Farmers in KohSamui District , Surat Thani Province , Thailand eastern and the southern parts of Thailand . The,” 2009.
 
[9]  Pongvinyoo P., Yamao M., and Hosono K., “Factors Affecting the Implementation of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) among Coffee Farmers in Chumphon Province, Thailand,” Am. J. Rural Dev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 34-39, 2014.
 
[10]  Rejesus R.M., “Good Agricultural Practices GAP Certification: Is It Worth It?,” 2009.
 
[11]  Salakpetch S., “Quality management system: good agricultural practice (gap) for on-farm production in Thailand,” Control, pp. 91-98, 2004.
 
[12]  Wannamolee W., “Development of GAP for Fruit and Vegetables in Thailand” in Training of Trainers in Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Benchmarking: Global GAP for Fruit and Vegetable, 2008.
 
[13]  Yamane, Taro. 1973. Statistics and Introduction Analysis. 3. New York: Harper & Row.
 
Show Less References