ISSN (Print): 2377-4320

ISSN (Online): 2377-4339

Editor-in-Chief: Ajay Verma




Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods

1Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Jessore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh

2Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Jessore University of Science & Technology, Jessore, Bangladesh

American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2016, 4(1), 7-13
doi: 10.12691/ajie-4-1-2
Copyright © 2016 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Rubayet Karim, C. L Karmaker. Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2016; 4(1):7-13. doi: 10.12691/ajie-4-1-2.

Correspondence to: Rubayet  Karim, Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Jessore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh. Email:


Selection of the most suitable machine is very crucial in the modern economy to prompt production level as well as revenue generation. In order to endure in the global business scenario, companies must find out the proper way that leads to the successful production environment. Machine selection has become challenging as the number of alternatives and conflicting criteria increase. A decision support system has been developed in this research in machine evaluation process. This framework will act as a guide for decision makers to select the suitable machine via an integrated approach of AHP & TOPSIS. The anticipated methods in this research consist of two steps at its core. In the first step, the criteria of the existing problem are inspected and identified and then the weights of the sector and sub-sector are determined that have come to light by using AHP. In the second step, eligible alternatives are ranked by using TOPSIS. A demonstration of the application of these methodologies in a real life problem is presented.



[1]  Arslan M., Catay B., and Budak E.,(2004), A decision Support System for Machine Tool Selection, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, volume 15, Number 1, 101-109.
[2]  Benitez, J. M., Martin, J. C., & Roman, C. (2007). Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry. Tourism Management, 28(2), 544-555.
[3]  Somashekhar, B.S., Design and evaluation of a flexible manufacturing system for small primatic components, J. Mech. Work, Technol., 17(1988) 479-488.
[4]  Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102, 289-301.
[5]  Ching-Hsue Cheng, Chen-Tung Chen and Sue-Fen Huang (2012). Combining fuzzy integral with order weight average (OWA) method for valuating financial performance in the semiconductor industry. African Journal of Business Management Vol.6 (21), pp. 6358-6368.
Show More References
[6]  Dong-Shang Chang(1989), Economical evaluation concerning the investments of flexible manufacturing systems, 3rd National Conf. on Automation Technology, Taiwan, pp. 655-664.
[7]  Gerrard, W. (1988a). A strategy for selecting and introducing new technology/machine tools”, in Worthington, B, (Ed.), Advances in manufacturing Technology III, Proceedings Fourth National Conference on Production Research, Kogan Page. London, pp. 532-6.
[8]  Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.
[9]  Liang G.S. (1999). Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 112:682-691.
[10]  Lootsma, F. A. (1999). Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgement. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[11]  Saaty, T. L., (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[12]  Stevenson WJ (1993). Production/operations management. 4th edn. Richard D. Irwin Inc., Homewood. J. Intell. Manuf. 19(2008). 1-12.
[13]  Tabucanon, M.T., Batanov, D.N. and Verma, D.K. (1994), “Intelligent decision support system (DSS) for the selection process of alternative machines for flexible manufacturing system(FMS) ”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 25, pp. 131-43.
[14]  Wang, T. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2007). Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. Omega, the International Journal of Management Science, 35, 384-388.
[15]  Wang, T.-Y., Shaw, C.-F. and Chen, Y.-L. (2000), “Machine selection in flexible manufacturing cell: a fuzzy multiple attribute decision making approach”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 38 No. 9, pp.2079-97.
[16]  Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M. S. (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31, 309-319.
[17]  Wang, Y. J. (2007). Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, in press.
[18]  Yang, T., & Hung, C.C. (2007), Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robotics and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing, 23(1), 126-137.
[19]  Yoon, K., & Hwang, C. L. (1985). Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: Part II. Multi-plant strategy and plant relocation. International Journal of Production Research, 23(2), 361-370.
Show Less References


The Accuracy Degree of CFD Turbulence Models for Butterfly Valve Flow Coefficient Prediction

1GUPCO - Gulf of Suez Petroleum Co., 270 Palestine St. 4th Sector, New Maadi, Cairo, Egypt

2Mechanical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, El-Mansoura 35516, Egypt

American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2016, 4(1), 14-20
doi: 10.12691/ajie-4-1-3
Copyright © 2016 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Mohammed M. Said, Hossam S.S. AbdelMeguid, Lotfy H. Rabie. The Accuracy Degree of CFD Turbulence Models for Butterfly Valve Flow Coefficient Prediction. American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2016; 4(1):14-20. doi: 10.12691/ajie-4-1-3.

Correspondence to: Mohammed  M. Said, GUPCO - Gulf of Suez Petroleum Co., 270 Palestine St. 4th Sector, New Maadi, Cairo, Egypt. Email:


Although engineers are mainly interested in the prediction of mean flow behavior, the turbulence cannot be ignored, because the fluctuations give rise to the extra Reynolds stresses on the mean flow. These extra stresses must be modeled in commercial CFD by selecting convenient turbulence model. The flow inside the control valve is complex and the control valves performance is precisely evaluated by determining the valve coefficient named, flow coefficient. Hence, aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of turbulence model type on the solution accuracy for the valve disk angles 40° and 60° as well as to implement the degree of agreement between experimental and numerical results. The numerical verification has been investigated by FLUENT 6.3 and the valve is meshed by GAMBIT 2. The mesh independent test has been carried out only by standard k-ε to evaluate the mesh effectiveness and attain the best accuracy. Among from these several turbulence models which have been studied here are standard k-ε, realized k-ε, k-ω, and RSM. Butterfly valve, STC model and (DN 50) diameter is chosen to be the test specimen in this research. The results showed that, there is no general turbulent model that can deal successfully with all cases. Numerical and experimental results are in general in good agreement, however are different in details, and showed that, RSM model is the most efficient numerical solver when applied to butterfly valve flow coefficient evaluation. For the future, a significant amount of work still needs to be undertaken in experimental unsteady butterfly valve flow analysis with RSM numerical model.



[1]  Jeon, S.Y., J.Y. Yoon, and M.S. Shin Flow Characteristics and Performance Eevaluation of Butterfly Valves using Numerical analysis. Earth and Environmental Science, 2010. IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems.
[2]  Farid, V.T., et al., Analysis of the Hydrodynamic Torque Effects on Large Size Butterfly Valves and Comparing Results with AWWA C504 Standard Recommendations. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2012.
[3]  Leutwyler, Z. and C. Dalton A CFD Study to Analyze the Aerodynamic Torque, Lift, and Drag Forces for a Butterfly Valve in the Mid-Stroke Position. ASME 2004 Heat Transfer/Fluids Engineering Summer Conference, 2004: p. Paper HT-FED04-56016.
[4]  Wang, L., X. Song, and Y. Park The Improvement of Large Butterfly Valve by Using Numerical Analysis Method. International Conference on Fluid Mechanics (FLUIDS'09), 2009. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS: p. 75-79.
[5]  Prema, B., S. Bhojani, and N. Gopalakrishnan Design Optimization of Butterfly Valve using CFD. Proceedings of the 37th National & 4th International Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, 2010(Paper FMFP10-FP-15.).
Show More References
[6]  Shirazi, N.T., G.A. Reza, and H.A. Gholam Analysis of the Ball Valve Performance in Presence of Cavitation. Life Science Journal,1460-1467, 2012
[7]  Chern, M.J. and C.C. Wang Control of Volumetric Flow-Rate of Ball Valve Using V-Port. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2004. Vol. 126: p. 471-481.
[8]  Aditi, O., G. Sudipto, and C. Kanchan CFD Modeling of Globe Valves for Oxygen Application. 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Australia, 2-7 December 2007, 2007.
[9]  Guoyu, W., et al., Dynamics of attached turbulent cavitating flows. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 37 2001. (2001) 551–581.
[10]  Toro, A.D., Computational Fliud Dynamics Analysis of Butterfly Valve Performance Factors. Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering, 2012.
[11]  Elbakhshawangy, H.F., O.S. Abd El-Kawi, and H.H. Sarhan Numerical Study of Incompressible Flow Characteristics Through Butterfly Valve Journal of Multidisciplinary Engnieering Science and Technology, 2015. Vol 2 (Issue : 7, July-2015).
[12]  Ibrahim, G., Z. Al-Otaibi, and H.M. Ahmed An Investigation of Butterfly Valve Flow Characteristics Using Numerical Technique. Journal of Advanced Science and Engineering Research, 2013. Vol 3, No 2 June (2013) 151-166.
[13]  Jun-Oh, K., et al., Structural Design Strategy of Double-Eccentric Butterfly Valve using Topology Optimization. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 66 2012, 2012.
[14]  Hui, W., Y. Liu, and S. Wang Numerical Simulation on Turbulent Flow in a Daul-Elbow Channel Behind Butterfly Valve. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering 34(6): 450-457. June 2014, 2014.
[15]  Băran, G., D. Bunea, and G.I. Oprina On Cavitation and Cavitational Damage at Butterfly Valves Scientific Bulletin of the “Politehnica” University of Timisoara Transactions on Mechanics Tom 52(66), Fascicola 6, 2007, 2007.
[16]  Mandica, S., Robust Computations of Turbulent Flows. Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Bath (UK) Department of Mathematical Sciences, 2006.
[17]  Huang, C. and R.H. Kim, Three-Dimensional Analysis of Partially Open Butterfly Valve Flows. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1996. 118(3): p. 562-568.
[18]  Versteeg, H.K. and M. Malalasekera An Introduction to Computational Fliud. 2007 ed. 2007.
[19]  ISA, ISA Standards, Recommend Practice and Technical Reports. 1999. Control Valves -Vol. 3.
Show Less References


Integrated Decision Making in Production Department inside Internal Supply Chain

1Department of statistical, College of Administration and Economic, University of Sumer, Al-Refaee, Thi-qar, Iraq

2Branch of Industrial Engineering, Department of Production Engineering and Metallurgy, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq

American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2016, 4(1), 21-28
doi: 10.12691/ajie-4-1-4
Copyright © 2016 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Watheq H. Laith, Sawsan S.Abed Ali, Mahmoud A. Mahmoud. Integrated Decision Making in Production Department inside Internal Supply Chain. American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2016; 4(1):21-28. doi: 10.12691/ajie-4-1-4.

Correspondence to: Watheq  H. Laith, Department of statistical, College of Administration and Economic, University of Sumer, Al-Refaee, Thi-qar, Iraq. Email:


The most important drawback of existing methods used to solve the sequencing problems is the sequence must have a few products and dependent setup time for single demand. The main advantage of this new methodology, it using two methods to determine optimum products sequences with many products and muti-demands and also applied in Wasit company, that has production line produce multi-products. First, modified assignment method (MAM) depends on fundamental of TSP and using it decision maker to determine optimum products sequences step by step or demand by demand to short planning. The second method genetic algorithm (GA) depend on fundamental of (TSPPCA) and using it decision maker to determine optimum products sequences as global optimal or optimal entirely or long planning.



[1]  Riddalls C.E., Bennett S., (2001). The Optimal Control of Batched Production and its Effect on Demand Amplification, International Journal of Production Economics Vol (72).
[2]  Cheng, T., Liu, Z. and Yu, W. (2001). Scheduling jobs with release dates and deadlines on a batch processing machine. IIE Transactions v(33).
[3]  Pinedo, M. (2002). Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms and Systems, 2nd ed, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[4]  Kreipl S. and Pinedo M (2004). Planning and Scheduling in Supply Chains:An Overview of Issues in Practice, Production and Operations Management Society, Spring Vol. (13).
[5]  Zhu, X. and Wilhelm, W.E. (2006). Scheduling and lot sizing with sequence-dependent setup: A literature review, IIE Transactions V(38), pp (987-1007).
Show More References
[6]  Charnprasitphon A. (2007). Modeling and Analysis of the Batch Production Scheduling Problem for Perishable Products with Setup Times, PhD thesis, School of Industrial and System Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
[7]  Jingxu H. (2008). Heuristic Procedures to Solve Sequencing and Scheduling Problems in Automobile Industry, Doctor thesis in Industrial Engineering./ The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
[8]  Clark A., Morabito, R. and Toso, E. (2010). Production setup sequencing and lot-sizing at an animal nutrition plant through ATSP subtour elimination and patching. Journal of Scheduling, Vol. (13).
[9]  Salmasi, N., Logendran, R., Skandari, M. (2011). Makespan minimization of a flowshop sequence dependent group scheduling problem. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. Vol. (56).
[10]  Costa A., Fichera S. and Cappadonna, F. (2013). A Genetic Algorithm for Scheduling Both Job Families and Skilled Workforce. Int. J. Oper. Quant. Manag. V. (19).
[11]  Watheq H. L, Swsan S. A.and Mahmoud A. M. (2015). Determine The Optimal Sequence - dependent Setup Cost and / or Setup Time for Single Demand with Multiple Products Using Modified Assignment Method, Industrial Engineering Letters, Vol.5, No.8.
[12]  Watheq H. L, Swsan S. A. and Mahmoud A. M. (2015). Determine the Optimal Sequence-Dependent Completion Times for Multiple Demand with Multi-Products Using Genetic Algorithm Vol.5, No.8.
Show Less References