Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2328-3912 ISSN (Online): 2328-3920 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/aees Editor-in-chief: Alejandro González Medina
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2019, 7(2), 74-84
DOI: 10.12691/aees-7-2-5
Open AccessArticle

Physico-chemical and Biological Characterization of Groundwater: A Case Study of Auraiya District, Uttar Pradesh, India

Yogesh Kumar1, Deepak Singh2, and Usha Mina2

1Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

2School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India

Pub. Date: March 29, 2019

Cite this paper:
Yogesh Kumar, Deepak Singh and Usha Mina. Physico-chemical and Biological Characterization of Groundwater: A Case Study of Auraiya District, Uttar Pradesh, India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2019; 7(2):74-84. doi: 10.12691/aees-7-2-5

Abstract

Groundwater is an important resource which is extensively used for agriculture, drinking, industrial and commercial purposes. Contamination and overexploitation of it may lead to the exhaustion of this vital resource. To assess the physico-chemical and biological characteristics for groundwater quality, five villages of the Auraiya District (Uttar Pradesh) India were selected from where the groundwater samples were collected during the period of January, 2015 to December, 2016. For each site and each season samples were collected in replicates. The pH at all the locations is mostly alkaline ranging between 7.2 - 8.1 which is well within the prescribed standard limits. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) are ranging between 578 to 819 mg/l. Electrical Conductivity of the collected water samples, ranging from 903.3 - 1796.7 μS/cm. The value of BOD and COD were found to be ranging from 3-8.0 and 64-320 mg/l, respectively. Ratio of BOD:COD indicate that the groundwater quality is not polluted. The total coliforms are also negligible having values below the 2.0 MPN/100 mL at all the five locations indicating thereby that there is no bacteriological contamination of the groundwater. The water samples were also analysed to know the concentration of five heavy metals viz., Fe, Cu, Zn, Cd and Cr. The Cd and Cr were not detected in the samples while Fe, Cu, Zn levels were found to be within the prescribed standard limits given for drinking water. Results of the present study indicates that the quality of groundwater available in the bore wells and tube wells are suitable for drinking and domestic purposes as per the standards and which shows that the water quality is not affected by changes in the land use as well as industrial activities occurring in Auraiya district.

Keywords:
groundwater physico-chemical-biological characteristics heavy metals total coliforms BOD:COD ratio

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Vörösmarty, C.J., McIntyre, P.B., Gessner, M.O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S.E., Sullivan, C.A. Liermann, C.R., et al., 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555-561.
 
[2]  Ross, D.J., Tate, K.R, Scott, N.A, Felthman, C.W., 1999. Land-use change: effects on soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus pools and fluxes in three adjacent ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem, 31, 803-813.
 
[3]  Chen, C.R., Condron, L.M., Davis, M.R., Scerlock, R.R., 2000. Effects of afforestation on phosphorus dynamics and biological properties in a New Zealand grassland soil. Plant Soil 220, 151-163.
 
[4]  Parfitt, R.L., Scott, N.A., Ross, D.J., Salt, G.J., Tate, K.R., 2003. Landuse change effects on soil C and N transf,ormations in soils of high N status: comparisons under indigenous forest, pasture and pine plantation. Biogeochemistry, 66, 203-221.
 
[5]  Withers, P.J., Jarvie, H.P., 2008. Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in rivers: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 400, 379-395.
 
[6]  Chen, J., Lu, J., 2014. Effects of Land Use, Topography and socio-economic factors on river water quality in a mountainous watershed with intensive agricultural production in east China. PLoS ONE, 9-10.
 
[7]  Abler, D., Shortle, J., Carmichael, J., Horan, R., 2002. Climate change, agriculture and water quality in the Chesapeake Bay region. Climate Change, 55, 339-359.
 
[8]  Amiri, B.J., Nakane, K., 2009. Modeling the linkage between river water quality and landscape metrics in the Chugoku district of Japan. Water Resource Management, 23, 931-956.
 
[9]  White, M.D.; Greer, K.A. The effects of watershed urbanization on the stream hydrology and riparian vegetation of Los Peñasquitos Creek, California. Landsc. Urb. Plan. 2006, 74, 125-138.
 
[10]  Tong, S.T.Y., Chen, W., 2002. Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. Journal of Environmental Management, 66, 377-393.
 
[11]  Merrill, S.D., Tanaka, D.L., Krupinsky, J.M., Liebig, M.A., Hanson J.D., 2007. Soil water depletion and recharge under ten crop species and applications to the principles of dynamic cropping systems, Agronomy Journal, 99, 931-938.
 
[12]  ES, 2016. Economic Survey, 2016, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India.
 
[13]  KVK, 2015. Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Auraiya (http://auraiya.kvk4.in/district-profile.html).
 
[14]  DIC, 2016. District Industrial Centre, Auraiya, Ministry of MSME, GOI, 2016. (http://auraiya.nic.in/geography.html).
 
[15]  COI, 2011, Census of India, 2011. Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, Series 10, Part XII-A, UTTAR PRADESH District Census Handbook Auraiya. Village and Town Directory Directorate of Census, Operations, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow (www.censusindia.gov.in).
 
[16]  Krishikosh egranth, 2014. (www.Krishikosh.egranth.ac.in).
 
[17]  CGWB report, 2018, (www.cgwb.gov.in).
 
[18]  Delzer, G.C., McKenzie, S.W., 2003. Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations 09-A7.0 Chapter A7. Section 7.0. Five-Day Biochemical Oxygen Demand.
 
[19]  APHA, 2006 - American public health association, American water works association, and water environment federation, standard method for analysis of water and wastewater-section 9222B standard total coli form membrane filter procedure: Washington, D.C., American public health Association.
 
[20]  Lenore, S.C., Arnold, E.G., Andrew, D.E., 2006. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington D.C., U.S.A.: American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF), 2006.
 
[21]  Samudro, G., Sarwoko M., 2010. Review on BOD, COD and BOD / COD Ratio: A Triangle Zone for Toxic, Biodegradable and Stable Levels.” International Journal of Academic Research, 2(4), 235-239,
 
[22]  Lee, A.H., Hamid, N., 2014. BOD/COD ratio as an indicator for pollutants leaching from landfill. J. Clean Energy Technology, 2, 263-266.
 
[23]  Ngang, B.U., Agbazue, V.E., 2016. A seasonal assessment of groundwater pollution due to Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Chemical Oxygen Demand and elevated temperatures in Enugu Northern Senatorial District, South East Nigeria. Journal of Applied Chemistry 9, 66-73.
 
[24]  BIS., 1992. Indian standard specifications for drinking water, IS: 10500, available at http://hppcb.gov.in/EIAsorang/Spec.pdf.BIS, Indian standard specifications for drinking water, IS: 10500, available at http://hppcb.gov.in/EIAsorang/Spec.pdf.
 
[25]  FAO, 2013. Water quality for agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization, Irrigation and Drainage Papers. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/t0234e/t0234e00.html.
 
[26]  WHO/UNEP, GEMS., 1989. Global freshwater quality. Oxford, Alden Press.
 
[27]  Kahlown, M.A., Tahir, M.A., Rashid, H., Bhatti, K.P., 2006. Water Quality Status. Fourth Technical Report 2004-06, PCRWR,
 
[28]  NAFDAC., 1999. National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC): Guidelines for registration and production of packaged water in Nigeria, Abuja.
 
[29]  World Health Organization (WHO). 2008. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. (Third edition incorporating the first and second addenda). Vol. 1: Recommendations. Geneva: W.H.O., 2008.
 
[30]  WHO, 1993 Guidelines for drinking water quality, Vol.1: Recommendations, 2ed edition, Geneva Switzerland, WHO.