Role of Actors Outside Government in Strengthening the Country Monitoring and Evaluation System in Zambia

Vincent Kanyamuna^1, , Million Phiri², Haggai Kanenga³ and Munalula Mulonda¹

¹Department of Development Studies, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

²Department of Population Studies, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

³School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Cite this paper:
Vincent Kanyamuna, Million Phiri, Haggai Kanenga and Munalula Mulonda. Role of Actors Outside Government in Strengthening the Country Monitoring and Evaluation System in Zambia. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2020; 6(1):22-29. doi: 10.12691/wjssh-6-1-4

Abstract

Actors outside of government have a crucial role to play in building, strengthening and sustaining a country’s system for monitoring and evaluation. Specifically, the role of parliament, civil society and donors can improve, in innovative ways, the operations of government monitoring and evaluation systems. For Zambia, these actors are key in the development process of the country and their role in making the public sector monitoring and evaluation system better becomes significant. This research study investigated the participation of parliament, civil society organisations and donors in strengthening Zambia’s whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system. It was found that although their role was recognised, it was rather weak and fragmented. There was generally lack of formalised arrangements pertaining to how these actors needed to engage government in strengthening the function of monitoring and evaluation across the public sector. While donors provided some notable financial and technical support, parliament and civil society had weaker evidence. Nonetheless, donor support was not flexible but fundamentally restricted to areas of their (donor) interest as opposed to national monitoring and evaluation priorities. In the midst of these positive and negative aspects regarding the role of non-state actors, the study has brought out salient insights which if addressed may help improve Zambia’s whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system. The research has established that going forward, the Government of Zambia will need to engage parliament, civil society and donors meaningfully if these actors were to help accelerate the development and strengthening of the country’s system for monitoring and evaluation. Similarly, the non state actors are also challenged to design and implement their monitoring and evaluation activities alongside government priorities and plans.

Keywords:
actors outside government parliament monitoring evaluation civil society donors culture of results evidence-based whole-of-government M & E system results

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Wong, C. (2012). Toward Building Performance - Oriented Management in China: The critical role of Monitoring and Evaluation and the Long road Ahead (No. 27). The World Bank, Washington D.C.
[2]	Kanyamuna, V. (2019). Analysis of Zambia’s Whole-of-Government Monitoring and Evaluation System in the context of National Development Plans. Doctorate Thesis. University of South Africa.
[3]	Booth, David, & Lucas, H. (2002). Good Practice in the Development of PRSP Indicators and Monitoring Systems. Overseas Development Institute, London.
[4]	Chabane, C. (2013). The Role of Monitoring and Evaluation in the Public Service, Republic of South Africa - The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. Pretoria, South Africa.
[5]	Zaltsman, A. (2006). Evaluation Capacity Development: Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries - Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay. Washington, D.C.
[6]	Hardlife, Z., & Zhou, G. (2013). Utilisation of monitoring and evaluation systems by development agencies: The case of the UNDP in Zimbabwe. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(3), 70-83.
[7]	Hauge, A. O., & Mackay, K. (2004). Sharing best practices and lessons learned: Monitoring and Evaluation for Results - Lessons from Uganda.
[8]	Hwang, H. (2014). Building Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity in young systems: The experiences of Rwanda, Vietnam and Yemen. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
[9]	Kanyamuna, V., Mubita, A., Ng’andu, E., Mizinga, C., & Mwale, A. (2018). An Assessment of the Demand-Side of the Monitoring and Evaluation System of the Health Sector in Zambia. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 75-86.
[10]	Mackay, K. (2006b). Institutionalizing of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems to Improve Public Sector Management. IEG World Bank, Washington DC.
[11]	Kanyamuna, V., Munalula, M., & Mulele, C. S. (2019). Monitoring and Evaluation Legislation in Zambia - Gap Analysis. International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies (IJHAS), 4(1), 15-25.
[12]	Burdescu, R., Villar, A. del, Mackay, K., Rojas, F., & Saavedra, J. (2005). Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Five experiences from Latin America. Prem Notes, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
[13]	Castro, M. F. (2009). Insider Insights: Building a Results-Based Management and Evaluation System in Colombia. ECD Working Paper 18, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
[14]	Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation Systems. A Handbook for Development Practitioners. Washington D.C., World Bank: Washington D.C., World Bank.
[15]	GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2016. 2015 Annual Progress Report for the Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development. Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning.
[16]	GRZ. (2017b). Seventh National Development Plan (7NDP 2017-2021), Accelerating Development Efforts towards Vision 2030 without Leaving Anyone Behind (Vol. 1).
[17]	World Bank. (2003). “Toward Country-led Development: A Multi-Partner Evaluation of the Comprehensive Development Framework”, Synthesis Report. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
[18]	Kanyamuna, V., Mubita, A. & Kotze, D.A. (2020), Is the policy environment for Zambia supportive of thriving whole-of-government monitoring and evaluation system? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(1) 542-554.
[19]	GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2009. Mid-Term Review of the Fifth National Development Plan 2006-2010: Broad based wealth and job creation through citizenry participation and technological advancement. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
[20]	GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2010. Sixth National Development Plan 2011-2015: Sustained Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
[21]	GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2012. 2011 Annual Progress Report for the Sixth National Development Plan 2011-2015: Sustainable Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
[22]	GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2013. 2012 Annual Progress Report for the Sixth National Development Plan 2011-2015: Sustainable Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
[23]	GRZ. (2014). Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development - Volume I. Ministry of Fiinance and National Planning, Lusaka, Zambia.
[24]	GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2016. 2015 Annual Progress Report for the Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development. Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning.
[25]	GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2017b. Seventh National Development Plan (7NDP 2017-2021), Accelerating Development Efforts towards Vision 2030 without Leaving Anyone Behind (Vol. 1). Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning.
[26]	Kanyamuna, V. (2013). Sector Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in the context of Poverty Reduction Strategies: A comparative case study of Zambia’s Health and Agriculture sectors. Masters Dissertation. University of Antwerp, Belgium.
[27]	Holvoet, N. & Renard, R. 2005. Putting the New Aid Paradigm to Work, Challenges for Monitoring and Evaluation, Discussion Paper No. 2. Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.
[28]	Mackay, K., & Gariba, S. (2000). The role of Civil Society in assessing Public Sector Performance in Ghana: Proceedings of a workshop, ECD. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
[29]	Mackay, Keith. (2006). Institutionalization of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems to Improve Public Sector Management. In ECD Working Paper Series. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
[30]	Mehrotra, S. (2013). The Government Monitoring and Evaluation System in India: A Work in Progress.
[31]	Morra Imas, L. G., & Rist, R. C. (2009). The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations. Washington, D.C., World Bank: Washington, D.C., World Bank.
[32]	Mubita, A., Mulonda, M., Libati, M., Mwale, N. & Kanyamuna (2017) Urban Informality and Small Scale Enterprise (SME) Development in Zambia: An Exploration of Theory and Practice, Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport 5(1): 19-29.
[33]	Naidoo, I. (2010). Monitoring and Evaluation in South Africa. Many purposes, multiple systems. In M. Sergone (Ed.), From Policies to Results: Developing capacities for country monitoring and evaluation systems (pp. 303-320). New York: UNICEF: New York: UNICEF.
[34]	Kanyamuna, V., & Phiri, M. (2019) Who said Monitoring and Evaluation is not rooted in firm theoretical foundations? A review of relevant literature. International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 1(4): 1-22.
[35]	Booth, David. (2005). Missing links in the politics of development: Learning from the PRSP experiment.
[36]	Bamberger, M. (2010). Institutionalising Impact Evaluation. A key element in strengthening country-led monitoring and evaluation systems. In M. Segone (Ed.), From Policies to Results: Developing capacities for country monitoring and evaluation systems. Geneva: UNICEF.
[37]	Bedi, T., Coudouel, A., Cox, M., Goldstein, M., & Thornton, N. (2006). Beyond the numbers : Understanding the institutions for monitoring poverty reduction strategies.
[38]	Tania, A., & Ronette, E. (2010). Implementing a government wide monitoring and evalution system in south africa.
[39]	Segone, M. (Ed.). (2008). Bridging the gap: The role of Monitoring and Evaluation in evidence-based policy-making. UNICEF, Geneva.: UNICEF, Geneva.
[40]	Holvoet, N. & Inberg, L. 2011. Sector Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in the Context of Changing Aid Modalities: The Case of Niger’s Health Sector, Working Paper 2. Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.
[41]	Kanyamuna, V., Kotzé, D. A. & Phiri, M. “Monitoring an Evaluation Systems: The Missing Strand in the African Transformational Development Agenda.” World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. 5(3): 160-175.
[42]	Kanyamuna, V., Kotzé, D. A. & Phiri, M. “Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: The Missing Strand in the African Transformational Development Agenda.” World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. 5(3): 160-175.
[43]	World Bank. (2012). Designing a Results Framework for achieving Results: A How-To-Guide. IEG, Washington, DC.: IEG, Washington, DC.
[44]	Estrella, M., & Gaventa, J. (1997). Who Counts Reality? Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: A Literature Review. In International Workshop on Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (Vol. 53).
[45]	Mulonda, M., Kanyamuna, V., & Kanenga, H. (2018). State-Civil Society Relationship in Zambia. International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies (IJHAS), 3(4), 17-26.
[46]	Glady Lopez Acevedo, Katia Rivera, Lycia Rivera, L. L. & H. H. (2010). Challenges in Monitoring and Evaluation: An Opportunity To Institutionalize M&E Systems. Fifth Conference of the Latin America and the Caribbean Monitoring and Evaluation (M & E) Network, 204.
[47]	World Bank. (2012b). Improving the Quality of Public Expenditure through the use of Performance Information in Mexico. IEG, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
[48]	Görgens, M., & Kusek, J. (2009). Making Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Work: A Capacity Development Toolkit. Washington DC, IBRD World Bank: Washington DC, IBRD World Bank.
[49]	Brushett, S. (1998). Evaluation Capacity Development in Zimbabwe : Issues and Opportunities. OED, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
[50]	Republic of South Africa. (2007). Policy Framework for the Government-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation System. The Presidency, Pretoria, South Africa.