World Journal of Agricultural Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-0643 ISSN (Online): 2333-0678 Website: Editor-in-chief: Rener Luciano de Souza Ferraz
Open Access
Journal Browser
World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020, 8(2), 52-56
DOI: 10.12691/wjar-8-2-5
Open AccessArticle

Towards Expansion of Coffea canephora Production in Tanzania: The Land Suitability Perspective

Suzana Mbwambo1, , Godsteven Maro1, Harrison Monyo1 and Epafra Mosi1

1Tanzania Coffee Research Institute, P.O. Box 3004, Moshi, Tanzania

Pub. Date: May 26, 2020

Cite this paper:
Suzana Mbwambo, Godsteven Maro, Harrison Monyo and Epafra Mosi. Towards Expansion of Coffea canephora Production in Tanzania: The Land Suitability Perspective. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020; 8(2):52-56. doi: 10.12691/wjar-8-2-5


As an effort to generate information that can be used to expand the Robusta coffee production in Tanzania, a study was conducted in six potential districts (Geita, Sengerema, Kibondo/Kakonko, Kasulu/Buhigwe, Uvinza and Mpanda) and two reference districts in Kagera (Muleba and Karagwe/Kyerwa) to assess the quality of land in general and soil fertility in particular. A total of 354 soil samples were taken from 116 survey sites across the study districts and were analyzed for routine soil fertility parameters. Land evaluation (qualitative, parametric method) was done, with climatic data adopted as proxy from nearby weather stations; and other land characteristics (slope, drainage and soil depth) taken from the field. In fertility assessment, soil pH was used to establish the correction factors for available N, P and K (fN, fP and fK). Then relationships were empirically worked out between the correction factors, OC and the amount of total N, available P and exchangeable K to get the total available forms of each in kg ha-1 which were converted to kg-equivalent (kE) per ha and summed up. Spatial interpolation was done using the inverse distance weighting (IDW) algorithm under QGIS 3.2. Geita and Sengerema compared fairly well with the reference districts in land suitability for Robusta. In the soil’s point of view, they showed to be even more fertile than the reference districts. They are hereby recommended as priority areas in Robusta expansion with the Robusta type of choice being Nganda which appears to be specific to the lacustrine ecosystem. The other four districts could constitute Phase two of the expansion. And because they are farther away from Lake Victoria, investors can adopt the Erecta type which appears to be better adapted to a diversity of agro-ecosystems.

coffea canephora expansion soil fertility Tanzania

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Tanzania Coffee Board (2012). Coffee Sector Development Strategy 2011/2021. Government Document, Moshi, Tanzania. 38pp.
[2]  Montagnon, C. and Brouwers, S. (2013). Consultancy to review and develop strategic action plan (SAP III) and strategic business plan 2013/14 to 2017/18 for Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TaCRI). Report by RD2V/Efficient Innovation, June 2013. 112pp.
[3]  Ngeze, P.B. (2015). Kahawa Tanzania. Tanzania Educational Publishers Ltd, P.O.Box 1222, Bukoba. 286pp.
[4]  International Trade Centre (ITC). 2002. Coffee: An exporter’s guide. ITC/UNCTAD/WTO, 2002, xxii, Geneva. 310pp.
[5]  Marsh A. (2007). Diversification by smallholder farmers: Vietnam Robusta coffee. Agricultural Management, Marketing and Finance (AGSF) Working Document No.19, FAO, Rome. 50pp.
[6]  Agritrade (2013). Promoting African Robusta coffee on international markets. 06 April, 2013.
[7]  Food and Agriculture Organization (2006). Guidelines for soil description. 4th Edition, FAO, Rome. 110pp
[8]  National Soil Services (1990). National Soil Services: Laboratory Procedures for Routine Soil Analysis (3rd Ed). NSS Miscellaneous Publication, Mlingano, Tanzania. 210pp.
[9]  Van Ranst, E., Verloo, M., Demeyer, A. and Pauwels, J. M. (1999). Manual for Soil Chemistry and Fertility Laboratory: Analytical Methods for Soils and Plants, Equipment and Management of Consumables. International Training Centre for Post-Graduate Soil Scientists, Ghent University, Krijgslaan, Ghent, Belgium. 243pp.
[10]  Van Reeuwijk, L.P. (2002). Procedures for soil analysis. Technical Paper No. 9, 6th Edition, 2002, FAO/ISRIC, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 120pp.
[11]  Mbogoni, J.D.J. (2007). Climatic data for Tanzania, adapted from the ISRIC database of 1995. Unpublished working document, ARI Mlingano, Tanga. 28pp.
[12]  Van Ranst, E., Verdoodt, A and Louwagie G. (2002). Land evaluation: Practical exercises manual. Lab. of Soil Sci., Ghent University, Belgium.117pp.
[13]  Maro, G.P., Teri, J.M. and Mosi, E.J. 2010. Validating the agro-ecological system of coffee land evaluation using the parametric approach. Proc. ASIC 23 Conference 03-08 November 2010, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia. 890-893.
[14]  Sys, C., Van Ranst, E. and Debaveye, J. (1993). Land Evaluation Part III Crop Requirements. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Agriculture Publications, Brussels, Belgium. 199pp.
[15]  Khiddir, S.M. 1986. A statistical approach in the use of parametric systems applied to the FAO Framework for land evaluation. PhD Thesis, State University Ghent, Belgium. 141pp.
[16]  Tsirulev, A. 2010. Spatial variability of soil fertility parameters and efficiency of variable rate fertilizer application in the Trans-Volga Samara region. Better Crops Vol. 94 No. 3, 2010. 26-28.
[17]  Janssen, B. H., Guiking, F.C.T., van der Eijk, D., Smaling, E. M. A., Wolf, J. and van Reuler, H. (1990). A system for quantitative evaluation of the fertility of tropical soils. Geoderma46: 299-318.
[18]  Janssen, B.H. (2011). Simple models and concepts as tools for the study of sustained soil productivity in long-term experiments. II. Crop nutrient equivalents, balanced supplies of available nutrients, and NPK triangles. Plant and Soil 339: 17-33.
[19]  Maro, G.P. and Mbogoni, J.D.J. 2009. Soils of Kasulu, Kibondo, Tarime and Rorya districts and their suitability for coffee production. Technical report submitted to MAFSC (PADEP Project), May, 2009. 78 pp.
[20]  Maro, G.P., Msanya, B.M and Mrema, J.P. (2014). Soil fertility evaluation for coffee (Coffea Arabica) in Hai and Lushoto Districts, Northern Tanzania. IJPSS 3 (8): 934-947.
[21]  Hofman G. and Salomez, J. (2004). Chemical soil fertility management: Partim Fertility Management. Lecture notes, Fac. Agric & Appl. Biol. Sci., Ghent University.55pp.
[22]  Baregu, S.; Barreiro-Hurle, J. & Maro, F. 2013. Analysis of incentives and disincentives for coffee in the United Republic of Tanzania. Technical notes series, MAFAP, FAO, Rome.