World Journal of Agricultural Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-0643 ISSN (Online): 2333-0678 Website: Editor-in-chief: Rener Luciano de Souza Ferraz
Open Access
Journal Browser
World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2019, 7(1), 21-24
DOI: 10.12691/wjar-7-1-4
Open AccessSpecial Issue

Quality and Nutritive Value of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) as Affected by Production Environment and Genotype

Amna A. Abdalla1, Ahmed M. El Naim2, and Musa B. Taha1

1Agricultural Research Corporation, P. O. Box 126 Wad Medani, Sudan

2Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Kordofan, Elobeid, Sudan

Pub. Date: January 22, 2019

Cite this paper:
Amna A. Abdalla, Ahmed M. El Naim and Musa B. Taha. Quality and Nutritive Value of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) as Affected by Production Environment and Genotype. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2019; 7(1):21-24. doi: 10.12691/wjar-7-1-4


Faba beans (Vicia faba L.) represent an essential source of food protein for many people in Sudan, especially those who cannot afford to buy animal meat. The demand for faba bean seeds is greatly increased in recent years, and consequently its production area was extended where the climate is marginally suitable, these marginal environments’ were affect the quality aspects of faba bean. An experiment was conducted for three consecutive seasons (2005/2006, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008), at five environments representing different soil types. The objective was to study the effect of these environments on cookability (quality) of Faba bean with consideration to the prevailing temperature and relative humidity of these environments. The environments were: (E1): Al Salama location to represent lower terrace soil (Riverian); (E2): Hudeiba Research Station Farm to represent middle terrace soil (Kuru); (E3): Almatara location; to represent high terrace soil; (E4): Wad Medani location= Gazira Research Station Farm to represent central clay plain soil (Vertisols); (E5): Ed Damer Food Security Scheme location to present high terrace soil. Six Faba bean lines were selected: Small-medium seeded (H.72/7/1, Daba.1/1, Z B F.1/1, C.86, Triple White and Large seeded Turki. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that soil types had significant effects on cookability aspect. The high cookability seed of faba bean under all production environments was recorded from lower terrace soil (Riverian) in E1 (Al Salama location) and the poor cookability seeds of faba bean were recorded from the high terrace soils in E3 (Almatara location) and E5 (Ed Damer) Food Security Scheme). The new production area E4 (Wad Medani) location) produced a moderate cookability seed.

broad bean seed quality nutritive value

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Abdalla, A. A., Ahmed, M. F. Taha, M. B. and El Naim, A.M. (2015). Effects of Different environments on yield components of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 5(1): 1-9.
[2]  Hawatin, G. and Stewart, R. (1979). The development, production and problems of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in West Asia and North Africa. FABIS Newsletter. 1, 7-9.
[3]  Picard, J. J., Bond, D. A., Monti, L. and Steuckardt, R. (1988). Production of pea, faba bean and chickpea in Europe, Pp. 1065-1080. in: R.J. Summerfield (ed.). World Crops: cool season food legumes Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
[4]  FAO. (2012). Statistical Yearbook. World food and Agriculture, Rome, Italiy.
[5]  Askar, A. (1986). Faba beans (Vicia faba L.) and their role in the human diet. Fd. sci. Pres. Fd. Nutr Bulletin 8 (3).
[6]  Clarke, H. E. (1970). Evaluation of Vicia faba (Broad Bean) in Animal Nutrition. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 29, 64 -79.
[7]  Eden, A. A. 1968 A Survey of the Analytical Composition of Field Beans (Vicia faba). J. Agri. Sci. 70, 229-301.
[8]  Salih, S. H. (1996). Faba bean research in the Sudan. In: Rehabilitation of faba bean. Wolfgane B. and Sadiki, M. (eds). ACTEs pub. 24 August -27 may, Al Rabat.
[9]  Elsheikh EAE, Elzidany AA. 1997. Effect of Rhizobium inoculation, organic and chemical fertilizers on proximate composition, in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD), tannin and sulphur content of faba beans. Food Chem 59: 41-45.
[10]  Youssef, M. M. (1978). Astudy of facters affecting the cookability of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) Ph. D. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Univ. of Alexanderia, Egypt.
[11]  Halstead, R. L. and Gfeller, F. (1964). The cooking quality of field peas Can. J. Plant. Sci. 44, 221-228.
[12]  Magboul, B. L., Youssef, K.M. and Khattab, A.H. (1976). A not on chemical composition of broad bean, haricot beans and cotton seed. Sudan J. Fd. Sci. Technol. 8 (1), 85-88.
[13]  Shehata, A. M. El-Tabey, Youssef, M. M., El-Rouby, M. M., Mesallam, A. S., El-Banna, A. and El-Shimy, H. (1981). Relationship between cooking characteristics of faba bean and agronomical variables (proposal review).
[14]  Gfeller, F. and Halstead, R.L. (1967). Selection for cooking quality in field peas. Can. J. Plant Sci., 47: 631-634.
[15]  Sefa-Dedeh, S., Stanley, D. W., and Voisey, P. W. (1979 a). Effect of storage time and conditions on the hard –to-cook defect in cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata). J. Food Sci. 44,790
[16]  Youssef, M. M. and Bushuk, W. 1984. Microstructure of the seed coat of faba bean (Vicia faba L ) seeds of different cookability. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc. 61 (4), 381-383.
[17]  Youssef, M. M., Bushuk, W., Murray, E. D., Zillman, R. and El-Tabey Shehata, A. M. (1982). Relationship between Cookability and Some Chemical and Physical Properties of Faba Beans (Vicia faba L.). J. Food Sci. 47, 1695-1709.
[18]  Annicchiarico, P. and Iannucci, A. (2008). Breeding strategy for faba bean in Southern Europe based on cultivar responses across climatically contrasting environments. Crop Sci. 48 (3), 983-991.
[19]  John, S., Arunasalam, K. Yeung, D. Kakuda, Y. and Mittal, G. (2004). Phytate from edible beans: Chemistry, processing and health benefits. Food, Agri and Envi. 2 (1), 49-58.