Social and Economic Geography
ISSN (Print): 2381-3199 ISSN (Online): 2381-3202 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/seg Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Social and Economic Geography. 2015, 1(1), 1-8
DOI: 10.12691/seg-1-1-1
Open AccessArticle

Management Model of Enterprises of High-tech Business in the Globalized Knowledge Market: Regional Aspect

Guzel I. Gumerova1 and Elmira Sh. Shaimieva2,

1Agency for educational projects and programs, Moscow,Russia

2Institute of Economics, Management and Law, Kazan,Russia

Pub. Date: March 07, 2015

Cite this paper:
Guzel I. Gumerova and Elmira Sh. Shaimieva. Management Model of Enterprises of High-tech Business in the Globalized Knowledge Market: Regional Aspect. Social and Economic Geography. 2015; 1(1):1-8. doi: 10.12691/seg-1-1-1

Abstract

In the study on the developing of a management model of enterprises of high-tech business the ratings analysis of high-tech companies on the Russian and international levels is carried out. The authors’ classification of enterprises of high-tech businesses with the release of three groups of enterprises, taking into consideration the three types of economic activity: high-, middle- and low-tech is used. The main provisions of the authors’ classification of enterprises of high-tech businesses are confirmed. Regional aspect of the formation of Russian (regional) rating of the leading enterprises-innovators is identified. The complex of recommendations on high-tech businesses’ functioning in the global knowledge market theoretical and practical plans is proposed. The methodological base of the research are the materials of the Russian, European agencies for the period 2008-2014: Rosstat, OECD, statistical data of the National Research University “Higher School of Economics” (Moscow), in the framework of three interrelated stages of the research. The work uses the program documents: “Strategy of innovative development of the Russian Federation up to 2020”. The empiric base of the research is the materials of high-tech businesses ratings according to Thomson Reuters (USA) and “TekhUspekh” (Russia).

Keywords:
management model high-tech businesses globalized knowledge market

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Adizes, I. K., Upravlenie zhiznennym tsiklom korporatsii. Saint Petersburg, Piter. 2013.[in Russian].
 
[2]  Acemoglu, D., “When Does Labor Scarcity Encourage Innovation?”, Journal of Political Economy, 6, 2010. 1037-1078.
 
[3]  Albert, S., Bradley, K., “The Impact of Intellectual capital”, Open University Business School Working Paper. 15, 1996.
 
[4]  Amin, A., Cohender, P., Architectures of Knowledge. Firms, Capabilities and Communities. Oxford. 2003.
 
[5]  Aranguren, M., Larrea, M., “Regional Innovation Policy Processes: Linking Learning to Action”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 2011. 569-585.
 
[6]  Betz, F., “Control in Knowledge Economies”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 2014. 761-783.
 
[7]  Borowik, I., “Knowledge Exchange Mechanisms and Innovation Policy in Post-Industrial Regions: Approaches of the Basque Country and the West Midlands”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 2014. 37-69.
 
[8]  Chang, Y., Chen, M., Lin, Y.-Po, Gao, Yu-Sh., “Measuring Regional Innovation and Entrepreneurship Capabilities”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 2012.90-108.
 
[9]  Carayannis, E.G, Papadopoulos, C.B., “The Innovation Diplomacy Concept and the Hellenic-American Innovation Bridge as a Special Case-in-Point”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 2011. 257-326.
 
[10]  Giotopoulos, I., “Dynamics of Firm Profitability and Growth: Do Knowledge-Intensive (Business) Services Persistently Outperform?”, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 21, 2014. 291-319.
 
[11]  Davenport, Th., Gilbert, J., Heinrich V.P., Knowledge Management. Case Book. Munich. 2002.
 
[12]  Giudice, M.D., Peruta, M. R.D., Maggioni, V., “Collective Knowledge and Organizational Routines within Academic Communities of Practice: an Empirical Research on Science–Entrepreneurs”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 2013. 260-278.
 
[13]  Herstad, S., Pålshaugen, Ø., Ebersberger, B., “Industrial Innovation Collaboration in a Capital Region Context”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 2011. 507-532.
 
[14]  Isaksen, A., Karlsen, J,. “Organisational Learning, Supportive Innovation Systems and Implications for Policy Formulation”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 2011. 453-462.
 
[15]  Jones, Ch., “R&D-Based Model of Economic Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 103 (4), 1995. 759-784.
 
[16]  Kassicieh, S., “The Knowledge Economy and Entrepreneurial Activities in Technology-Based Economic Development”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1, 2010. 24-47.
 
[17]  Lesser, E.L., Knowledge and Social Capital. Boston, Butterworth – Heinemann. 2000.
 
[18]  Mandeville, T., “An Information Economics Perspective on Innovation”, International Journal of Social Economics, 25 (2/3/4), 1998. 357-364.
 
[19]  Mil'ner, B. Z., Innovatsionnoe razvitie: ekonomika, intellektual'nye resursy, upravlenie znaniyami. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2009. [in Russian].
 
[20]  Mil'ner, B. Z., Rumyantseva, Z. P., Smirnova, V. G., Blinnikova, A. V., Upravlenie znaniyami v korporatsiyakh. Moscow: Delo, 2006. [in Russian].
 
[21]  Minaychev, A., “Research of top 100 most innovative companies in 2013 by Thomson Reuters”. Ibusiness. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://ibusiness.ru/blog/isslyedovaniya/29623 [Accessed Oct. 29, 2014].
 
[22]  Methodology of calculation of indicators “Share of the production of high-tech and science-intensive sectors in the gross domestic product”, “Share of the production of high-tech and science-intensive sectors in the gross regional product of a subject of the Russian Federation”, Rosstat. № 21. [Online]. Available: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xv_RngTpI_sJ:www.gks.ru/metod/metodika_21.docx+&cd=1&hl=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ru [Accessed Jan. 14, 2014].
 
[23]  Official web-site of Nasdaq. [Online]. Available: http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/wfm [Accessed Nov. 11, 2014].
 
[24]  Official web-site of “Predstavlyayushchiy broker” company. [Online]. Available: http://evotrade.ru/indices/dax/ [Accessed Nov. 08, 2014].
 
[25]  Official web-site of Foundation for small businesses development in scientific-technical sphere. [Online]. Available: http://www.fasie.ru/vse-aktualnye-novosti/617-rejting-tekhuspekh [Accessed Nov. 16, 2014].
 
[26]  Official web-site of Expert-online. [Online]. Available: http://expert.ru/expert/2012/50/srednij-klass-tehnologicheskogo-biznesa/ [Accessed Nov. 18, 2014].
 
[27]  Patton, S., “Beating the Boomer Brain Drain Blues”, CIO Magazine. 2006.
 
[28]  Platonova, E.D., Ulitina, E.V., Samoilov, V.A., Koreshkov, O.V., “Main theoretical and methodological approaches to elaborating the out-sourcing business model of the modern business structure”, Naukowedenie, 6, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/121EVN613.pdf [Accessed Nov. 18, 2014]. [in Russian].
 
[29]  Popov, E.W., Wlasow, M.W., “Institutional analysis of the production processes of new knowledge”, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 4, 2006. 135-145.
 
[30]  Popov, E.W., Wlasow, M.W., “Institutional analysis of the development of the knowledge economy”, Poblemy sowremennoi ekonomiki, 3 (23), 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.m-economy.ru/art.php?nArtId=1474 [Accessed Nov. 18, 2014]. [in Russian]
 
[31]  Romer, P., ''Endogenous Technological Change'', Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 1990. 71-102.
 
[32]  Scientific Indicators: 2012, Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, Moscow. 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.hse.ru/primarydata/in2012 [Accessed Oct. 18, 2014].
 
[33]  Strategy of innovative development of the Russian Federation up to 2020. Approved by a decree of the Russian government on 8 December 2011 N 2227-р.
 
[34]  Science, technology and innovation in Europe. Europain Communication. 2008.
 
[35]  Suleiman, S., Kassicieh, K., “The Knowledge Economy and Entrepreneurial Activities in Technology-Based Economic Development”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(1), 2010. 24-47.
 
[36]  Schoonmaker, M., Carayannis, E. G., “Assessing the Value of Regional Innovation Networks”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2010. 1(1). 48-66.
 
[37]  Scholten, S., Scholten, U., “Platform-based Innovation Management: Directing External Innovational Efforts in Platform Ecosystems”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(2), 2012. 164-184.
 
[38]  Sholokhova, O.V., Demchenko, D.M., Odinokov, A.V., Principles of intellectual property. Module 12. Intellectual property in the Internet. Scientific-educational material. Moscow, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.msu.ru/projects/amv/doc/h6_1_6_1_r2_nom12.pdf [Accessed Oct. 12, 2014].
 
[39]  Thomson Reuters 2013: Top 100 global innovators. Honoring The World leaders in innovation. Findings and methodology. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://top100innovators.com/top100-2013.pdf [Accessed Oct. 10, 2014].
 
[40]  Top 50 of “TekhUspekh” rating. National rating of the most rapidly developing Russian high-tech businesses according to “TekhUspekh”. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.ratingtechup.ru/rate/ [Accessed Oct. 10, 2014].
 
[41]  Teece, D.J., “The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology”, Annals of the American Association of Political and Social Sciences, 1981. 458. 81-96.
 
[42]  Teece, D.J., “Firm Organization, Industrial Structure and Technological Innovation”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31(2), 1996. 193-224.
 
[43]  Weick, K.E., “The Nontradicional Quality of Organizational Learning”. Organization Science, 1, 1991. 116-124.
 
[44]  Westley, F.R., “Middle Managers and Strategy: Microdynamics of Inclusion”. Strategie Management Journal, 11, 1990. 337-351.
 
[45]  Wooldridge, B., Floyd, S.W., “The Strategy Process, Middle Management Involvement, and Organizational Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 11 (3), 1990. 231-241.