Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2333-4371 ISSN (Online): 2333-438X Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/rpbs Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 2015, 3(2), 32-38
DOI: 10.12691/rpbs-3-2-3
Open AccessArticle

Near Infrared Spectroscopic Study of Brain Activity during Cognitive Conflicts on Facial Expressions

Munehide Nakagawa1, Mie Matsui1, , Masatoshi Katagiri1 and Takatoshi Hoshino1

1Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Japan

Pub. Date: May 20, 2015

Cite this paper:
Munehide Nakagawa, Mie Matsui, Masatoshi Katagiri and Takatoshi Hoshino. Near Infrared Spectroscopic Study of Brain Activity during Cognitive Conflicts on Facial Expressions. Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 3(2):32-38. doi: 10.12691/rpbs-3-2-3

Abstract

The Stroop task has been typically used for measuring cognitive functions of inhibition and interference. However, this task has limited applications with young children, because reading ability is required to perform the task. Using a new, non-letter Stroop-like task named the ‘happy-sad task,’ in which participants are instructed to say ‘happy’ for a sad face and ‘sad’ for a happy face, we can assess differences in inhibition in participants from early childhood to adulthood. We investigated whether differences between the happy-sad task and the letter Stroop task could be observed in brain activation of healthy participants (N = 30), by using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and skin conductance responses (SCR). We focused on the right and left anterior prefrontal cortex and frontal pole, which are known as centers for response inhibition and processing of emotions. We used region-of-interest analysis that approximately covered these regions and compared brain activation patterns between the two tasks. Results indicated that there was prefrontal activation during both tasks. Particularly, the incongruent condition of the happy-sad task resulted in greater activation than the letter Stroop task. In addition, SCR amplitude for the happy-sad task was greater than that for the letter Stroop task. These findings suggest that brain activity in the happy-sad task is associated with suppression of emotions and inhibition of behavior.

Keywords:
happy-sad task letter Stroop task near-infrared spectroscopy skin conductance response anterior prefrontal cortex inhibition

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 7

References:

[1]  Miller, E. K. (2000). The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Annual review of neuroscience, 1, 59-65.
 
[2]  Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
 
[3]  Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
 
[4]  Comalli, P.E.Jr, Wapners, S., & Werener,H. (1962). Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100, 47-53.
 
[5]  Charchat-Fichman, H., & Oliveira, R. M. (2009). Performance of 119 Brazilian children on Stroop paradigm-Victoria version. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 67, 445-449.
 
[6]  Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 3 1/2-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53, 129-153.
 
[7]  Montgomery, D.E., & Koeltzow, T.E. (2010). A review of the day-night task: The Stroop paradigm and interference control in young children. Developmental Review, 30, 308-330.
 
[8]  Lagattuta, K. H., Sayfan, L., & Monsour, M. (2011). A new measure for assessing executive function across a wide age range: children and adults find happy-sad more difficult than day-night. Developmental Science, 14, 481-489.
 
[9]  Adleman, N.E., Menon, V., Blasey, C.M., White, C.D., Warsofsky, I.S., Glover, G.H., et al. (2002). A developmental fMRI study of the Stroop color-word task. Neuroimage, 16, 61-75.
 
[10]  MacDonald, A.W., Cohen, J.D., Stenger, V.A., & Carter, C.S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838.
 
[11]  Bench, C.J., Frith, C.D., Grasby, P.M., Friston, K.J., Paulesu, E., Frackowiak, R.S., et al. (1993). Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia, 31, 907-922.
 
[12]  Peterson, B. S., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J. C., Zhang, H., Anderson, A. W., & Gore, J. C. (1999). An fMRI study of Stroop word-color interference: Evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems. Biological Psychiatry, 45, 1237-1258.
 
[13]  Laird, A.R., McMillan, K.M., Lancaster, J.L., Kochunov, P., Turkeltaub, P.E., Pardo, J.V., et al. (2005). A comparison of label-based review and ALE meta-analysis in the stroop task. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 6-21.
 
[14]  Taylor, S.F., Kornblum, S., Lauber, E.J., Minoshima, S., & Koeppe, R.A. (1997). Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies. Neuroimage, 6, 81-92.
 
[15]  Aron, A.R., Robbins, T.W., & Poldrack, R.A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170-177.
 
[16]  Ehlis, A.C., Herrmann, M.J., Wagener, A., & Fallgatter, A.J. (2005). Multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy detects specific inferior-frontal activation during incongruent stroop trials. Biological Psychology, 69, 315-331.
 
[17]  Hyodo, K., Dan, I., Suwabe, K., Kyutoku, Y., Yamada, Y., Akahori, M., et al. (2012). Acute moderate exercise enhances compensatory brain activation in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 33, 2621-2632.
 
[18]  Léon-Carrion, J., Damas-López, J., Martín-Rodríguez, J. F., Domínguez-Roldán, J. M., Murillo-Cabezas F., Barroso Y Martin, J.M., et al. (2008). The hemodynamics of cognitive control: The level of concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin in the superior prefrontal cortex varies as a function of performance in a modified stroop task. Behavioural Brain Research, 193, 248-256.
 
[19]  Schroeter, M.L., Zysset, S., Kruggel, F., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2003). Age dependency of the hemodynamic response as measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 19, 555-564.
 
[20]  Schroeter, M.L., Zysset, S., Wahl, M., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2004). Prefrontal activation due to stroop interference increases during development-an event-related fNIRS study. Neuroimage, 23, 1317-1325.
 
[21]  Taniguchi, K., Sumitani, S., Watanabe, Y., Akiyama, M., & Ohmori, T. (2012). Multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy reveals reduced prefrontal activation in schizophrenia patients during performance of the kana Stroop task. The journal of medical investigation, 59, 45-52.
 
[22]  Koizumi, H., Yamamoto, T., Maki, A., Yamashita, Y., Sato, H., Kawaguchi, H., et al. (2003). Optical topography: practical problems and new applications. Applied Optics, 42, 3054-3062.
 
[23]  Matsuoka, K., Masatake, U., Kasai, K., Koyama, K., & Kim, Y. (2006). Estimation of premorbid IQ in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease using Japanese ideographic script (Kanji) compound words: Japanese version of National Adult Reading Test. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60, 332-339.
 
[24]  Suda, M., Fukuda, M., Sato, T., Iwata, S., Song, M., Kameyama, M., et al. (2009). Subjective feeling of psychological fatigue is related to decreased reactivity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Research, 1252, 152-160.
 
[25]  Cadenhead, K.S., Perry, W., Shafer, K., & Braff, D.L. (1999). Cognitive functions in schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 37, 123-132.
 
[26]  Kim, M-S., Oh, S.H., Jang, K.M., Che, H., & Im, C-H. (2011). Electrophysiological correlates of cognitive inhibition in college students with schizotypal traits. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 68-76.
 
[27]  Ito, S., Ohbe, S., Ohta, M., Takao, T., & Sakamoto, S. (2008). The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire Brief. Japanese Bulletin of Social Psychiatry, 17, 168-176. (In Japanese)
 
[28]  Baumgartner, T., Esslen, M., Jäncke, L. (2006). From emotion perception to emotion experience: emotions evoked by pictures and classical music. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 34-43.
 
[29]  Derrfuss, J., Brass, M., Neumann, J., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2005). Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: meta-analyses of switching and Stroop studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 22-34.
 
[30]  Floden, D., Vallesi, A., & Stuss, D.T. (2011). Task context and frontal lobe activation in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 867-879.
 
[31]  Kemmotsu, N., Villalobos, M.E, Gaffrey, M.S., Courchesne, E., & Müller R.A. (2005). Activity and functional connectivity of inferior frontal cortex associated with response conflict. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 335-342.
 
[32]  Chong, T.T., Williams, M.A., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J.B. (2008). Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation. Neuroimage, 40, 298-307.
 
[33]  Keuken, M.C., Hardie, A., Dorn, B.T., Dev, S., Paulus, M.P., Jonas, K.J., et al. (2011). The role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in social perception: an rTMS study. Brain research, 1383, 196-205.
 
[34]  Pobric, G., & Hamilton, A. F. (2006). Action understanding requires the left inferior frontal cortex. Current Biology, 16, 524-529.
 
[35]  Sprengelmeyer, R., Rausch, M., Eysel, U.T., & Przuntek, H. (1998). Neural structures associated with recognition of facial expressions of basic emotions. Proceedings of Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 265, 1927-1931.
 
[36]  Herrmann, M.J., Ehlis, A.C., & Fallgatter, A.J. (2003). Prefrontal activation through task requirements of emotional induction measured with NIRS. Biological Psychology, 64, 255-263.
 
[37]  Ochsner, K.N, Ray, R.R., Hughes, B., McRae, K., Cooper, J.C., Weber, J., et al. (2009). Bottom-up and top-down processes in emotion generation: common and distinct neural mechanisms. Psychological Science, 20, 1322-1331.
 
[38]  Gross, J.J. (2002). Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281-291.
 
[39]  Gilbert, S.J., Spengler, S., Simons, J.S., Steele, J.D., Lawrie, S.M., Frith, C.D., et al. (2006). Functional specialization within rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10): a meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 932-948.
 
[40]  Ohira, H., Nomura, M., Ichikawa, N., Isowa, T., Iidaka, T., Sato, A., et al. (2006). Association of neural and physiological responses during voluntary emotion suppression. Neuroimage, 29, 721-733.
 
[41]  Kobayashi, N., Yoshino, A., Takahashi, Y., & Nomura, S. (2007). Autonomic arousal in cognitive conflict resolution. Autonomic neuroscience, 132, 70-75.
 
[42]  Nagai, Y., Critchley, H.D., Featherstone, E., Trimble, M R., & Dolan, R.J. (2004). Activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex covaries with sympathetic skin conductance level: a physiological account of a “default mode” of brain function. Neuroimage, 22, 243-251.
 
[43]  Raine, A., Reynolds, G. P., & Sheard, C. (1991). Neuroanatomical correlates of skin conductance orienting in normal humans: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychophysiology, 28, 548-558.
 
[44]  Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1994). Neuroanatomical correlates of electrodermal skin conductance responses. Psychophysiology, 31, 427-438.
 
[45]  Fukui, Y., Ajichi, Y., & Okada, E. (2003). Monte Carlo prediction of near-infrared light propagation in realistic adult and neonatal head models. Applied Optics, 42, 2881-2887.
 
[46]  Ovaysikia, S., Tahir, K.A., Chan, J.L., & DeSouza, J F. (2011). Word wins over face: emotional Stroop effect activates the frontal cortical network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, Article 234.