Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2333-4371 ISSN (Online): 2333-438X Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/rpbs Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 2015, 3(2), 25-31
DOI: 10.12691/rpbs-3-2-2
Open AccessArticle

Academic Performance of Introductory Psychology Students: The Importance of Critical Thinking

Kerry A. Schwanz1, and Megan McIlreavy1

1Department of Psychology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, USA

Pub. Date: May 04, 2015

Cite this paper:
Kerry A. Schwanz and Megan McIlreavy. Academic Performance of Introductory Psychology Students: The Importance of Critical Thinking. Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 3(2):25-31. doi: 10.12691/rpbs-3-2-2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of critical thinking for academic performance of students enrolled in introductory level psychology courses. Critical thinking skills and academic self-efficacy were significantly related to how students performed at the end of an introductory psychology course. Critical thinking skills along with high school GPA were the best predictors of student learning at the end of the course. Critical thinking was not predictive of overall academic performance as measured by cumulative GPA at the end of the semester. Instead, high school GPA emerged as the sole predictor of cumulative GPA, accounting for 22% of the variance. Results indicated no significant difference in critical thinking, academic self-efficacy, or final exam performance at the end of the semester for students enrolled in psychology courses taught using two different methods; Team-Based Learning vs. a traditional lecture format. The implications for these findings as they relate to academic performance and overall student learning in higher education are discussed.

Keywords:
critical thinking academic self-efficacy team-based learning college students

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Bandura, A. “Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavior change”, Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. Mar. 1977.
 
[2]  Bandura, A. “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency” American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. Feb. 1982.
 
[3]  Bycio, P., & Allen, J. S., “The California Critical Thinking Skills Test and business school performance” American Journal of Business Education, 2(8), 1-8. Nov. 2009.
 
[4]  Cotter, E. M., & Tally, C. S., “Do critical thinking exercises improve critical thinking skills?” Educational Research Quarterly, 33(2), 3-14. Dec. 2009.
 
[5]  Elias, S. M. & MacDonald, S., “Using Past Performance, Proxy Efficacy, and Academic Self-Efficacy to Predict College Performance” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(11), 2518-2531. Oct. 2007.
 
[6]  Facione, P. A. (2000). California critical thinking skills test: Form 2000. Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment.
 
[7]  Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Winterhalter, K. (2010). California critical thinking skills test manual. Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment.
 
[8]  Gadzella, B. M., Baloglu, M., & Stephens, R., “Prediction of GPA with educational psychology grades and critical thinking scores” Education, 122(3), 618-623. Mar. 2002.
 
[9]  Haberyan, A., “Team-based learning in an industrial/organizational psychology course” North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 143-152. Mar. 2007.
 
[10]  Halpern, D. F., “Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains” American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455. Apr. 1998.
 
[11]  Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (Eds.) (2004). Team-based learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
 
[12]  Mone, M. A., “Comparative validity of two measures of self-efficacy in predicting academic goals and performance” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(2), 516-529. Summer. 1994.
 
[13]  Pike, G. R., & Saupe, J. L., “Does high school matter? An analysis of three methods of predicting first-year grades” Research in Higher Education, 43(2), 187-207. Apr. 2002.
 
[14]  Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R., “Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis” Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353-387. Mar. 2012
 
[15]  Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A., “Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes?: A meta-analysis” Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261-288. Mar. 2004.
 
[16]  Stupnisky, R. H., Renaud, R. D., Daniels, L. M., Haynes, T. L., & Perry, R. P., “The interrelation of first-year college students’ critical thinking disposition, perceived academic control, and academic achievement” Research in Higher Education, 49, 513-530.
 
[17]  Wood, R. E., & Locke, E. A., “The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 1013-1024. Winter. 1987.