Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2333-4371 ISSN (Online): 2333-438X Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/rpbs Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 2013, 1(1), 6-10
DOI: 10.12691/rpbs-1-1-2
Open AccessArticle

Incidence and Gender Differences for Handedness among Greek Adolescents and Its Association with Familial History and Brain Injury

F. Vlachos, , E. Avramidis, G. Dedousis, E. Katsigianni, I. Ntalla, M. Giannakopoulou and M. Chalmpe

Pub. Date: March 23, 2013

Cite this paper:
F. Vlachos, E. Avramidis, G. Dedousis, E. Katsigianni, I. Ntalla, M. Giannakopoulou and M. Chalmpe. Incidence and Gender Differences for Handedness among Greek Adolescents and Its Association with Familial History and Brain Injury. Research in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 1(1):6-10. doi: 10.12691/rpbs-1-1-2

Abstract

Handedness is marked by the preference of one hand over another for fine motor tasks, especially writing. Usually, only one hand is considered dominant; however, there are individuals who exhibit the ability to use both hands equally (mixed-handers). The aim of this study was to identify the incidence for handedness in a sample of Greek adolescents and examine possible gender differences in handedness among these adolescents and their siblings. 634 secondary school students (Mean age 13.38, SD = 1.47) who attended mainstream public schools participated in this study. All students completed the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI). Students were divided in three groups, namely right-handers (an EHI +50 to +100), mixed-handers (an EHI -49 to +49) and left-handers (an EHI -100 to -50). This process resulted in the classification of 544 adolescents (85.8%) as right-handed, 46 adolescents (7.3%) as left-handed and 44 adolescents (6.9%) as non-lateralized (ambidextrous). Contrary to previous research, the statistical analysis conducted did not reveal any significant differences in the prevalence of handedness between genders. Nevertheless, our data suggest that men might be more prone to ambidexterity. Similarly, although some interesting trends were observed in our data, the statistical analyses performed did not confirm the familial effect upon handedness and the pathological left-handedness hypotheses. The paper concludes with underlining the significance of the evidence presented here and discusses the inconclusive findings often reported in the literature concerning the association of handedness with family history and brain injury.

Keywords:
handedness incidence gender familial effect brain injury

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 2

References:

[1]  Corey, D.M., Hurley, M.M., and Foundas, A.L., “Right and left handedness defined: A multivariate approach using hand preference and performance measures,” Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 14, 144-152, 2001.
 
[2]  Holder, M.K. "Why are more people right-handed?". Scientific American, Scientific American Inc. Retrieved 2008-04-14, 1997.
 
[3]  Hoosain, R., “Left-handedness and handedness switch amongst the Chinese,” Cortex, 26, 451-454, 1990.
 
[4]  Gladue, B.A., and Bailey, J.M., “Spatial ability, handedness, and human sexual orientation,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, 20(5), 487-497, 1995.
 
[5]  Cavill, S., and Bryden, P., “Development of handedness: comparison of questionnaire and performance-based measures of preference” Brain and Cognition, 53, 149-151, 2003.
 
[6]  Vlachos, F., Left-handedness: Myths and reality, Ellinika Grammata, Athens, Greece, 1998.
 
[7]  Papadatou-Pastou, M., Martin, M., Munafó, M.R., and Jones, G.V., “Incidence of handedness: A systematic review of laterality among 1.8M individuals”, Manuscript in preparation.
 
[8]  Kerasioti-Karakatsani, Z., Giouroukos, T., Karakatsanis, N., and Matsaniotis, N., “Left- handedness in Greece,” Deltio of the A’ Paediatrician Clinic at the University of Athens, 33, 35-45, 1986.
 
[9]  Polemikos, N., “Left-handedness: Frequency of and reaction to left-handed children by teachers and parents,” Pediatrica Chronica, 18, 95-104, 1991.
 
[10]  Papadatou-Pastou, M., Martin, M., Munafó, M. R., and Jones, G.V., “Sex differences in left-handedness: A meta-analysis of 144 studies,” Psychological Bulletin, 134, 677-699, 2008.
 
[11]  McKeever, W.F., “A new family handedness sample with findings consistent with X-linked transmission,” British Journal of Psychology, 91, 21-39, 2000.
 
[12]  McManus, I.C., and Bryden, M.P,. The genetics of handedness, cerebral dominance, and lateralization. In: Boller F, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of neuropsychology, 6, 115-143, 1992.
 
[13]  McManus, I., Right Hand, Left Hand, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
 
[14]  Satz, P., Orsini, D., Saslow, E., and Henry, R., “The pathological left-handedness syndrome”, Brain and Cognition, 4, 27-46, 1985.
 
[15]  Johnston, D.W., Nicholls, M.E., Shah, M. and Shields, M.A., “Handedness, health and cognitive development: evidence from children in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 2012.
 
[16]  Oldfield, R., “The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory”, Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113, 1971.
 
[17]  Dorthe, N., Blumenthal, T., Jason, D. and Lantz, P., “The use of next-of-kin in assessing handedness”, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 203-208, 1995.
 
[18]  McMeekan, E., and Lishman, W., “Retest reliabilities and interrelationship of the Annett Hand Preference Questionnaire and the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory”, British Journal of Psychology, 66, 53-59, 1975.
 
[19]  Ransil, B., and Schachter, S., “Test–retest reliability of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory and global handedness preference measurement, and their correlation”, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1355-1372, 1994.
 
[20]  Williams, S., “Factor analysis of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory”, Cortex, 22, 325-326, 1986.
 
[21]  Raczkowski, D., Kalat, J., and Nebes, R. “Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items”, Neuropsychologia, 12, 43-47, 1974.
 
[22]  Triggs, W., Calvanio, R., Levine, M., Heaton, R., and Heilman, K., “Predicting hand preference with performance on motor tasks”, Cortex, 36, 679-689, 2000.
 
[23]  Verdino, M. and Dingman, S. “Two measures of laterality in handedness: The Edinburgh handedness inventory and the Purdue pegboard test of manual dexterity”, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 476-478, 1998.
 
[24]  Segalowitz, S.J., and Brown, D. “Mild head injury as a source of developmental disabilities”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 551-559, 1991.
 
[25]  Segalowitz, S.J., and Lawson, S. “Subtle symptoms associated with self-reported mild head injury”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 309-319, 1995.
 
[26]  Peters, M. Reimers, R. and Manning, J., “Hand preference for writing and associations with selected demographic and behavioral variables in 255,100 subjects: The BBC internet study”, Brain and Cognition, 62, 177-189, 2006.
 
[27]  Medlanda, S., Duffy, D., Wright, M., Geffenc, G., Hayd, D., Levye, F., Boomsmaf, D., “Genetic influences on handedness: Data from 25,732 Australian and Dutch twin families”, Neuropsychologia, 47, 330-337. 2009.
 
[28]  Ramadhani, M., Pathological left-handedness revisited: origins and later life health outcomes, Febodruk BV, Enschede, the Netherlands, 2006.
 
[29]  Gutwinski, S., Löscher, A., Mahler, L., Kalbitzer, J., Heinz, A., and Bermpohl, F., “Understanding left-handedness”. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 108(50), 849-853, 2011.