Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Radiology
ISSN (Print): 2379-5298 ISSN (Online): 2379-5301 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/oral Editor-in-chief: Bouguezzi Adel
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Radiology. 2015, 3(1), 20-24
DOI: 10.12691/oral-3-1-5
Open AccessA Clinical Study

The Effect of Mouth Rinsing with Stabilized Chlorine Dioxide on Periodontitis

Shuichi Tsubura1, 2, , Kimio Uchiyama2, 3, Manabu Yamada2, Osamu Mimori2, Shigeru Hiyama2, Katsuma Katoh2 and Masaki Shibata2

1Department of Biochemistry, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Hamaura-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Japan

2Department of Dentistry and Oral surgery, NHO Tochigi Medical Center, Nakatomatsuri, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan

3Clinical Research Department, NHO Tochigi Medical Center, Nakatomatsuri, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan

Pub. Date: August 02, 2015

Cite this paper:
Shuichi Tsubura, Kimio Uchiyama, Manabu Yamada, Osamu Mimori, Shigeru Hiyama, Katsuma Katoh and Masaki Shibata. The Effect of Mouth Rinsing with Stabilized Chlorine Dioxide on Periodontitis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Radiology. 2015; 3(1):20-24. doi: 10.12691/oral-3-1-5

Abstract

MATATACOROTM (containing 10 mg/l stabilized chlorine dioxide: MA-T, no alcohol, and is an odorless antibacterial agent) is useful for sterilization and disinfection. The aim of this study was to investigate whether MA-T is an appropriate mouth rinse for patients selected from whom undergoing initial periodontal treatment. The effect of rinsing with MA-T was compared with that with ConcoolTM (containing 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate: CX), Neosterine GreenTM (containing 0.02% benzethonium chloride: NG), and purified water (PW). MA-T rinsing resulted in a marked change in the BANA-score and in the VAS scale. The mean BANA scores (score ± SD) on day 0 and day 30 were 1.55±0.50 and 0.4±0.50 (p<0.001) for MA-T, 1.65±0.48 and 0.75±0.44 for CX, 1.43±0.50 and 0.88±0.61 for NG, and 1.83±0.38 and 1.48±0.55 for PW, respectively. The intra-oral feeling caused by mouth rinsing was self-assessed using the VAS scores (mean ± SD) on day 0 and day 30; they were 48.23±14.70 and 74.43±7.33 (26.2 mm increase) for MA-T, 50.45±11.94 and 62.23±8.88 (11.8 mm increase) for CX, 54.13±8.11 and 63.73±8.18 (9.6 mm increase) for NG, and 54.70±6.06 and 59.18±6.11 (4.5 mm increase) for PW, respectively. These results suggest that MA-T induced marked reduction of periodontopathic oral bacteria and increased feeling of freshness after the treatment period. These results suggest that MA-T is an appropriate mouth rinse for patient with periodontitis.

Keywords:
stabilized chlorine dioxide mouth rinse periodontitis oral bacteria freshness

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Nishimura, F., Iwamoto, Y., Mineshiba, J. et al, “Periodontal disease and diabetes mellitus: the role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in a 2-way relationship,” J Periodontol, 74(1). 97-102. Jan. 2003.
 
[2]  Becker, W., Becker, B.E., Caffesse, et al, “A longitudinal study comparing scaling, osseous surgery, and modified Widman procedures: results after 5 years,” J Periodontol, 72(12). 1675-84. Dec. 2001.
 
[3]  van Winkelhoff, A.J., Rams, T.E. and Slots, J., “Systemic antibiotic therapy in periodontitis,” Periodontol 2000, 10. 45-78. Feb. 1996.
 
[4]  Slots, J. and Rams, T.E., “Antibiotics in periodontal therapy: advantages and disadvantages,” J Clin Periodontol, 17(7). 479-93. Aug. 1990.
 
[5]  Ciancio, S.G., Lauciello, F., Shibly, O., et al, “The effect of an antiseptic mouthrinse on implant maintenance: Plaque and peri-implant gingival tissues,” J Periodontol, 66(11). 962-65. Nov. 1995.
 
[6]  Christine, H., Charles, R.D.H., Naresh, C., et al, “Comparative efficacy of an antiseptic mouthrinse and an antiplaque/antigingivitis dentifrice,” J Am Dent Assoc, 132(5). 670-75. May. 2001.
 
[7]  Charles, C.H., Mostler, K.M., Bartels, L.L., et al, “Comparative antiplaque and antigingivitis effectiveness of a chlorhexidine and an essential oil mouthrinse: 6-month clinical trial,” J Clin Periodontol, 31(10). 878-84. Oct. 2004.
 
[8]  Wirthlin, M.R., Ahn, B.J., Enriquez, B., et al, “Effects of stabilized chlorine dioxide and chlorhexidine mouthrinses in vitro on cells involved in periodontal healing,” J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr, 54(3). 67-71. 2006.
 
[9]  Wirthlin, M.R., Choi, J.H. and Kye, S.B., “Use of chlorine dioxide mouthrinses as the ultrasonic scaling lavage reduces the viable bacteria in the general aerosols,” J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr, 54(2). 35-44. 2006.
 
[10]  Holland, G.R., Narhi, M.N., Addy, M., et al, “Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity,” J Clin Periodontol, 24(11). 808-13. Nov. 1997.
 
[11]  Gould, D., Kelly, D., Goldstone, L., et al, “Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: Developing and using illustrated patient stimulations to collect the data,” J Clin Nursing, 10(5). 697-706. Sep. 2001.
 
[12]  Loe, H. and Silness, J., “Periodontal disease in pregnancy. 1. Prevalence and severity,” Acta Odontol Scand, 21.533-51. Dec. 1963.
 
[13]  Loesche, W.J., Bretz, W.A., Lopatin, D., et al, “Multi-center clinical evaluation of a chairside method for detecting certain periodontopathic bacteria in periodontal disease,” J Periodontol, 61(3).189-96. Mar. 1990.
 
[14]  Haffajee, A.D., Cugini, M.A., Dibart, S., et al, “Clinical and microbiological features of subjects with adult periodontitis who responded poorly to scaling and root planning,” J Clin Periodontol, 24(10). 767-76. Oct. 1997.
 
[15]  Anne, D.H, G. Torresyap, and Sigmund S.S, “Clinical changes following four different periodontal therapies for the treatment of chronic periodontitis: 1-year results,” J.Clinic Periodontol, 34. 243-253. July. 2007.
 
[16]  Robert, W., Grayson, W. and Marshall Jr., “Evaluation of ultrasonic scaling unit waterline contamination after use of chlorine dioxide mouthrinse lavage,” J Periodontol. 72(3). 401-10. Mar. 2001.
 
[17]  Lundstrom JR, Williamson AE, Vilhaver AL, et al. “Bactericidal activity of stabilized chlorine dioxide as an endodontic irrigant in a polymicrobial biofilm tooth model system,” J Endod, 36(11). 1874-78. Nov. 2010.
 
[18]  Fitzgibbon, E.J., Bartzokas, C.A., Martin, M.V., et al, “The source, frequency and extent of bacterial contamination of dental unit water system,” Br Dent J. 157(3). 98-101. Aug. 1984.
 
[19]  Karpay, R.I., Plamondon, T.J., Mills, S.E., et al, “Combining periodic and continuous sodium hypochlorite treatment to control biofilms in dental unit water systems,” J Am Dent Assoc, 130(7). 957-65. Jul. 1999.
 
[20]  Williams, H.N., Paszko-Kolva, C., Shahamat, M., et al, “Molecular techniques reveal high prevalence of Legionella in dental units,” J Am Dent Assoc, 127(8). 1188-93. Aug. 1996.
 
[21]  Tippett, B.F., Edwards, J.L. and Jenkinson, H.F., “Bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines- a possible source of cross-infection,” NZ Dent J, 84(378). 112-13. Oct. 1988.