American Journal of Marine Science
ISSN (Print): ISSN Pending ISSN (Online): ISSN Pending Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/marine Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Marine Science. 2019, 7(1), 1-6
DOI: 10.12691/marine-7-1-1
Open AccessArticle

Bubble Detection with Side-scan Sonar in Shallow Sea for Future Application to Marine Monitoring at Offshore CO2 Storage Sites

Keisuke Uchimoto1, 2, , Makoto Nishimura1, 3, Yuji Watanabe1, 2 and Ziqiu Xue1, 2

1Geological Carbon dioxide Storage Technology Research Association, Kizugawa, 619-0292, Japan

2CO2 Storage Research Group, Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth, Kizugawa, 619-0292, Japan

3CO2 Storage Research Group, Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth, Kizugawa, 619-0292, Japan;Now at KANSO CO., LTD., Osaka, 541-0052, Japan

Pub. Date: June 28, 2019

Cite this paper:
Keisuke Uchimoto, Makoto Nishimura, Yuji Watanabe and Ziqiu Xue. Bubble Detection with Side-scan Sonar in Shallow Sea for Future Application to Marine Monitoring at Offshore CO2 Storage Sites. American Journal of Marine Science. 2019; 7(1):1-6. doi: 10.12691/marine-7-1-1

Abstract

An important challenge in the offshore storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) in deep geological formations is how to monitor storage sites to detect CO2 leakage in the event that it occurs. A promising candidate for the monitoring is to detect CO2 bubbles in the water column using some kinds of sonar. However, the detectability of bubbles is not well known. Here we show the ability of side-scan sonar (SSS) to detect air bubbles in the water column through an in-situ experiment, where two sizes of air bubbles, about 1 cm and 1-2 mm in diameter, released at the seabed around 6 meters deep are observed with SSS. The principal results are the following. When the slant distance between SSS and bubbles is longer than the distance between SSS and the seabed, the detection of the bubbles is difficult because of the echoes from the seabed. Tiny bubbles are much easier to detect with SSS than bubbles with diameter of about 1 cm if the release rates are the same, and the detection limits of the release rate are estimated to be not larger than 20 ml/min for tiny bubbles, and not smaller than 20 ml/min for bubbles with diameter of 1 cm, under the present experimental conditions. Although the results cannot be directly applied to CO2 bubbles because CO2 bubbles are much easier to dissolve in seawater than air bubbles, it is estimated that CO2 bubbles leaking at 4.76 tonnesCO2/year could be detected. This leakage rate is smaller than the release rate at a controlled sub-seabed CO2 release experiment, called QICS, and therefore, SSS will be a useful tool to monitor offshore CO2 storage sites.

Keywords:
side-scan sonar bubble detection CCS offshore CO2 storage leakage marine monitoring

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 5

References:

[1]  IEA (2017), Energy Technology Perspectives 2017, Paris, France.
 
[2]  Dixon, T. and Romanak, K.D., “Improving monitoring protocols for CO2 geological storage with technical advances in CO2 attribution monitoring”, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 41, 29-40. 2015.
 
[3]  van der Zwaan, B. and Gerlagh, R., “Offshore CCS and ocean acidification: a global long-term probabilistic cost-benefit analysis of climate change mitigation”, Clim. Change, 137, 157-170. 2016.
 
[4]  Romanak, K.D., Bennett, P.C., Yang, C., and Hovorka, S.D., “Process-based approach to CO2 leakage detection by vadose zone gas monitoring at geologic CO2 storage sites”, Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L 15405. 2012.
 
[5]  Romanak, K., Sherk, G.W., Hovorka, S., and Yang, C., “Assessment of alleged CO2 leakage at the Kerr farm using a simple process-based soil gas technique: Implications for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) monitoring”, Energy Procedia, 37, 4242-4248. 2013.
 
[6]  Uchimoto, K., Nishimura, M., Kita, J., and Xue, Z., “Detecting CO2 leakage at offshore storage sites using the covariance between the partial pressure of CO2 and the saturation of dissolved oxygen in seawater”, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 72, 130-137. 2018.
 
[7]  Blackford, J., Stahl, H., Bull, J.M., Bergès, B.J.P., Cevatoglu, M., Lichtschlag, A., Connelly, D., James, R.H., Kita, J., Long, D., Naylor, M., Shitashima, K., Smith, D., Taylor, P., Wright, I., Akhurst, M., Chen, B., Gernon, T.M., Hauton, C., Hayashi, M., Kaieda, H., Leighton, T.G., Sato, T., Sayer, M.D.J., Suzumura, M., Tait, K., Vardy, M.E., White, P.R., and Widdicombe, S., “Detection and impacts of leakage from sub-seafloor carbon dioxide storage”, Nat. Clim. Change, 4(11), 1011-1016. 2014.
 
[8]  Sellami, N., Dewar, M., Stahl, H., and Chen, B., “Dynamics of rising CO2 bubble plumes in the QICS field experiment: Part 1-The experiment”, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 38, 44-51. 2015.
 
[9]  Taylor, P., Stahl, H., Vardy, M.E., Bull, J.M., Akhurst, M., Hauton, C., James, R.H., Lichtschlag, A., Long, D., Aleynik, D., Toberman, M., Naylor, M., Connelly, D., Smith, D., Sayer, M.D.J., Widdicombe, S., Wright, I.C., and Blackford, J., “A novel sub-seabed CO2 release experiment informing monitoring and impact assessment for geological carbon storage”, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 38, 3-17. 2015.
 
[10]  Schneider von Deimling, J. and Papenberg, C., “Technical Note: Detection of gas bubble leakage via correlation of water column multibeam images”, Ocean Sci., 8, 175-181. 2012.
 
[11]  Kum, B.C., Cho, J.H., and Shin, D.H., “A preliminary study on the development of detection techniques for CO2 gas bubble plumes”, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, 38(9), 1163-1169. 2014. (in Korean with English Abstract)
 
[12]  Klaucke, I., Sahling, H., Weinrebe, W., Blinova, V., Bürk, D., Lursmanashvili, N., and Bohrmann, G., “Acoustic investigation of cold seeps offshore Georgia, eastern Black Sea”, Mar. Geol., 231(1-4), 51-67. 2006.
 
[13]  Dupré, S., Woodside, J., Klaucke, I., Mascle, J., and Foucher, J.P., “Widespread active seepage activity on the Nile Deep Sea Fan (offshore Egypt) revealed by high-definition geophysical imagery”, Mar. Geol., 275(1-4), 1-19. 2010.
 
[14]  Shitashima K, Maeda Y, and Ohsumi T., “Development of detection and monitoring techniques of CO2 leakage from seafloor in sub-seabed CO2 storage”, Appl. Geochem., 30,114-124. 2013.
 
[15]  Clausner, J.E. and Pope, J., “Side-scan sonar applications for evaluating coastal structures”, Technical Report CERC-88-16, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 1988.
 
[16]  Schneider von Deimling, J., Greinert, J., Chapman, N. R., Rabbel, W., and Linke, P., “Acoustic imaging of natural gas seepage in the North Sea: Sensing bubbles controlled by variable currents”, Limnol. Oceanogr.: Methods, 8(5), 155-171. 2010.
 
[17]  McGinnis, D.F., Schmidt, M., DelSontro, T., Themann, S., Rovelli, L., Reitz, A., and Linke, P., “Discovery of a natural CO2 seep in the German North Sea: Implications for shallow dissolved gas and seep detection”, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 116(C3). 2011.
 
[18]  Dissanayake, A.L., DeGraff, J.A., Yapa, P.D., Nakata, K., Ishihara, Y., and Yabe, I., “Modeling the impact of CO2 releases in Kagoshima Bay, Japan”, J. hydro-environ. Res., 6(3), 195-208. 2012.
 
[19]  Garcia-Gil, S., Vilas, F., and Garcia-Garcia, A., “Shallow gas features in incised-valley fills (Rıa de Vigo, NW Spain): a case study”, Cont. Shelf Res., 22(16), 2303-2315. 2002.