Journal of Linguistics and Literature
ISSN (Print): ISSN Pending ISSN (Online): ISSN Pending Website: Editor-in-chief: Mohammad Kaosar Ahmed
Open Access
Journal Browser
Journal of Linguistics and Literature. 2020, 4(1), 15-29
DOI: 10.12691/jll-4-1-2
Open AccessArticle

Authenticity and Digital Taxonomy for Pragmatic Integrative Call through Three Approaches: Teachers’ Perspectives

Marvin Wacnag Lidawan1, and Ahmed Saad Al Shlowiy1

1English Language Institute, Royal Commission of Jubail, Jubail City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Pub. Date: November 14, 2019

Cite this paper:
Marvin Wacnag Lidawan and Ahmed Saad Al Shlowiy. Authenticity and Digital Taxonomy for Pragmatic Integrative Call through Three Approaches: Teachers’ Perspectives. Journal of Linguistics and Literature. 2020; 4(1):15-29. doi: 10.12691/jll-4-1-2


The development of multimedia and technology proliferates around 21st century English language learners as it creates media–rich environment, but accessibility of these advances could be different from how other students of technologically equipped-schools conveniently learn. Many third world countries may not afford state-of-the art facilities depriving them of their needed exposures. To address this dilemma, the writers share how learners benefit indiscriminately through the application of Integrative Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). This inquiry sought answers to questions on facilitating students’ critical thinking skills incorporating digital taxonomy alongside authentic materials through Integrative CALL revolving around three conceptualized approaches. Results demonstrate that employment of simply designed language tasks from authentic materials assisted by computer knowledge alongside digital taxonomy tend practically useful. Pragmatic innovation through the three introduced approaches that simplified Integrative CALL could address institutional problems on the scarcity of technological tools for instructions exposing learners to 21st century skills. Employment of authentic material-designed tasks with digital taxonomy promote learners’ critical thinking while varied major pedagogic implications for language acquisition are perceived. This inquiry is a descriptive research utilizing modes in determining central tendencies as well as percentages and frequencies that support gathered data’s significance collated among 35 English instructors’ responses from a higher education institution. Researches that allude to this paper must be piloted to a higher population to quantitatively investigate the correlation or significance of students’ critical thinking achievement with their engagement to digital taxonomy while infusing the interplay of modern authentic materials in Integrative CALL.

order thinking skills task based instructions computer-aided learning internet learning materials 21st century skills digital literacy

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
[2]  Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics, 1(1), 2-43.
[3]  Mackenzie, W. (2012) Intelligence Quest. Project-based learning and multiple intelligences international society for technology in education.
[4]  Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[5]  Lantolf, J. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Survey Article. Language Teaching, 33, 79-96.
[6]  Zong, G. (2008). Developing preservice teachers’ global understanding through computer mediated communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education 25(5), 617-625.
[7]  Banas, J. R., & York, C. S. (2014). Authentic learning exercises as a means to influence preservice teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy and intentions to integrate technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 728-746.
[8]  Alshumaimeri, Y. A. & Alzyadi, M. A. (2015). Using material authenticity in the Saudi English textbook design: A content analysis from the viewpoint of EFL teachers. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 229-241.
[9]  Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning (1st ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Press.
[10]  McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the web 2.0 era. Paper presented at the ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore. Retrieved February 9, 2017, from
[11]  Thorne, S. & Payne, J. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, Internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 371-397.
[12]  Kao, S.F. (2008). The best time for learning English. Taipei Times. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from
[13]  Barnes, K., Marateo, R. C., & Ferris, S. P. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate, 3(4), 771-772.
[14]  Mahib urRahman, M., & Alhaisoni, E. (2013). Teaching English in Saudi Arabia: Prospects and challenges. Academic Research International, 4(1), 112-118.
[15]  Nuttal, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. (New Edition). Oxford: Heinemann.
[16]  Breen, M. (1985). Authenticity in the language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 60-70.
[17]  Brosnan, D., Brown, K. & Hood, S. (1984). Reading in Context. Developing the reading strategies of adult E.S.L. learners. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Center. NSW AMES.
[18]  Berardo, S. (2006). The Use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 64-66.
[19]  Melvin, B. S. & Stout, D. S. (1987). Motivating language learners through authentic materials. In W. Rivers (ed.) Interactive Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[20]  Richard, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[21]  Gebhard, J. G. (1996). Teaching English as a foreign language: A teacher self-development and methodology. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
[22]  Motteram, G., (2013). The Benefits of new technology in language learning. Retrieved April 23, 2017, from language-learning.
[23]  Zhu, Z. (2003). Teachers’ professional development in technology-pedagogy integration: experiences and suggestions. Retrieved May 11, 2017, from in-education- projects/training-ofteachers/training-of-teachers-and- facilitators/experts meeting-june-2003/papers/china/.
[24]  Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[25]  Lombardi, M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview Ed. By Oblinger, D. ELI Paper 1: 2007. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from
[26]  Tuzi, F., Mori, K., Young, A. (2008). Using TV commercials in ESL/EFL classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 14, 5-11.
[27]  Lovell, J. (1987). Potential applications are wide-ranging. Ed300848 1988-00-00 using film, video and TV in the classroom. Mentioned by ERIC Development Team. ERIC Digest, 11. Retrieved March 5, 2017, from
[28]  Wood, D. J., (1995). Good video movies for teaching English as a foreign or second language. Bulletin of the International Cultural Research Institute of Chikushi Jogakuen College, 6, 105-125.
[29]  Zhang, H. (2012). The application of English movies in higher vocational English teaching. Sino-US English Teaching, 9(3), 1010-1014.
[30]  Williams III, S. E. (1999). Teaching Academic Skills through the Exploration of Music. Retrieved April 12, 2017, from
[31]  Reisland, E. (2009). New horizons for learning. Visual literacy and the classroom. Retrieved March 21, 2017, from
[32]  Sweeting. A. (2009). Language through Film, Sydney Phoenix Education Pty. Limited.
[33]  Miller, R. (2011). Deconstructing film posters. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from
[34]  Lohr. L. (2003). Creating graphics for learning and performance: Lessons visual literacy. Upper Saddle River, N.J. Pearson Education, Inc.
[35]  Lavery, C. (2015). Using cartoons and comic strips. British Council & BBC. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from
[36]  Ferlazzo, L. (2012, October 4). Using photos with English-language learners. Edutopia. George Lucas Educational Foundation. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from
[37]  Zucker, A., Staut, C. & Tinker, R. (2015). Teaching graph literacy across the curriculum. Retrieved May 27, 2017, from acrosscurriculum.pdf.
[38]  Bayri, G. (2010). The student perception of visual arts in the speaking classroom. International Journal of Arts and Sciences 3(11): 166-180. Retrieved January 8, 2017.
[39]  McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
[40]  Firth, J. R., (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-55. In Palmer, F.R. (ed.) (1968). Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952-59. London and Harlow: Longman.
[41]  Leech, G. N. (1966). English in Advertising. London: Longman.
[42]  Vestergaard, T. & Schroder, K. (1985). The language of advertising. Oxford: B. Blackwell.
[43]  Afzal, N & Harun, M. (2013). On opinion and persuasive writing: teaching English through editorials, 4(2). Retrieved January 14, 2017, from
[44]  Eisenberg, J. (2014). How to teach close reading using a recipe. Retrieved February 22, 2017, from
[45]  Tomalin, B. & Stempeski, S. (1988). Cultural Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[46]  Coats, G. (2016). Analyzing song lyrics as an authentic language learning opportunity. Retrieved January 21, 2017, from
[47]  Zane Education. (2015). The benefits of using educational video in the classroom. Retrieved March 23, 2017, from
[48]  Griffin, L. (2015). Using video in the classroom. Library video company. Retrieved March 18, 2017, from (March 13, 2017).
[49]  Abbasian, G., Mahmoudi, H. Shahbazi, A. (2016). Improving Intermediate EFL learners ‘pragmatic competence. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(5), 264-275.
[50]  Losada, C., Insuasty, E. & Osorio, M. (2016). The impact of authentic materials and tasks on students’ communicative competence at a Colombian Language School. Retrieved February 8, 2017, from
[51]  Kuang, W. (2000). English teachers' barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. VI, No. 12, December 2000. Rerieved December 16, 2017, from
[52]  Hooper, S., & Rieber, L. P. (1995). Teaching with technology. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.), Teaching: Theory into practice, (pp. 154-170). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[53]  Davies, G., Steel, D. (1981) “First steps in computer-assisted language learning at Ealing College of Higher Education. Paper presented at the CAL 81 Symposium, University of Leeds”. Retrieved December 16, 2017, from
[54]  Thomas, M., Hayo, R., Warschauer, M. (2013) Contemporary computer-assisted language learning. Newgen Imaging Systems Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India. Great Britain
[55]  Warschauer M. (1996). Computer Assisted Language Learning: An Introduction. In Fotos S. (ed.) Multimedia language teaching, Tokyo: Logos International: 3-20.
[56]  Jones, C., & Fortescue, S. (1988). Using computers in the language classroom. New York: Longman.
[57]  Rogers, C. V., & Medley, F. W. J. (1988). Language with a purpose: Using authentic materials in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 21, 467-478. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
[58]  Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: an overview. Language teaching forum. 31, Pp.57-71.
[59]  Jeong, B., (2007). Learner experiences in web-based language learning. Computer Learning. Volume 20, 2007.Issue 1. 21-36.
[60]  Abu-Seileek A. (2004). “Designing a computer assisted language learning program and testing its effectiveness on students' writing ability in English,” PhD Thesis, Amman Arab University for Graduate Studies, 2004.
[61]  McEnery T., Barker A., and Wilson A., “A Statistical Analysis of Corpus Based Computer versus Traditional Human Teaching Methods of Part of Speech Analysis,” Computer Journal Assisted Language Learning, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 259-274.
[62]  Salomon, G. (1997). "Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: Some issues to be concerned with." Presented at EARLI, Athens, and August 1997. Retrieved December 14, 2017, from
[63]  Chapelle, C. (1998). “Multimedia call: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA.” Language Learning and Technology, 2 (1), 22-34.
[64]  Amiri, E., Hashemy, S. & Hayati, D. (2012). A study of the application of digital technologies in teaching and learning English language and literature. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 1(5), 103-107.
[65]  Latif, F. (2012) Application of computer and technology in Iranian Business English courses. Retrieved December 14, 2017, from (September 5, 2015).
[66]  Abdallah, M. & Mansour, M., (2015). Virtual task-based situated language-learning with Second life: Developing EFL pragmatic writing and technological self-efficacy. Arab World English Journal, Retrieved December 16, 2017, 2, 150-182.
[67]  Anderson, L. W., & D. Krathwohl (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
[68]  Churches, A. (2008). Bloom’s taxonomy. Bloom’s digitally. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from
[69]  Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 4-9.
[70]  Al-Khayyat, A., (2015). The effect of CALL proposed program on university students' achievement in English. Retrieved December 14, 2017, from
[71]  Brinton, D. M. (2001). The use of media in language teaching. In C. Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 459). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle
[72]  Hobbs, R. (2007). Digital and media literacy. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from,