Journal of Linguistics and Literature
ISSN (Print): ISSN Pending ISSN (Online): ISSN Pending Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/jll Editor-in-chief: Mohammad Kaosar Ahmed
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Linguistics and Literature. 2019, 3(1), 35-38
DOI: 10.12691/jll-3-1-6
Open AccessArticle

Output Task Types and Learning of English Grammar: The Case of Iranian Intermediate EFL Students

Peyman Rajabi1, and Nazli Azarpour2

1ELT Department, Malayer Iislamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran

2Faculty of Humanities, Payame Noor University, Malayer Center

Pub. Date: February 19, 2019

Cite this paper:
Peyman Rajabi and Nazli Azarpour. Output Task Types and Learning of English Grammar: The Case of Iranian Intermediate EFL Students. Journal of Linguistics and Literature. 2019; 3(1):35-38. doi: 10.12691/jll-3-1-6

Abstract

This study aimed at exploring the role of output task-based activities in improving Iranian EFL learners’ grammar knowledge. To this end, 90 Iranian EFL learners at Malayer Islamic Azad University participated in the study. After homogenizing the participants’ English proficiency level by administering an Oxford Placement Test, 60 students were selected and randomly assigned into two experimental and control groups. To measure the participants’ level of grammar knowledge a pretest of grammar was administered as well. Then the experimental group received different output task types during 12 sessions of instructions whereas the control group received the mainstream practices (a question-and-answer approach). The results of an Independent T-Test revealed that output task types better promote both noticing and learning of grammar. The positive effect of output demonstrated in the present study is consistent with the function of output in the second language acquisition domain.

Keywords:
task type grammar output tasks

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Long, M. and G. Crookes (1993). Three approaches to task- based syllabus design'. TESOL Quarterly 26(1): 27-56.
 
[2]  Richards, C. R., and T. S. Rodgers, (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. New York: Cambridge University press.
 
[3]  Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
[4]  Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language acquisition and Second language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
 
[5]  Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in Second Language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
 
[6]  Willis, D., & Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
 
[7]  Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
[8]  Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
[9]  Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
[10]  Long, M. (1985). 'A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching' in K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (ed.): Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
 
[11]  Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics 17: 38-62.
 
[12]  Pica, R., R. Kanagy, and J. Falodun. (1993). 'Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction' in S. Gass and G. Crookes (ed.): Task-based Learning in a Second Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
 
[13]  Gass, S., and M. Varonis. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehension of non-native speech. Language Learning 34: 65-89.
 
[14]  Rutherford, W., Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness-raising and Universal gerammar. Applied Linguistics 6, 274-282.
 
[15]  Doughty, C.J. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on from. In: Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and L2 Instruction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 206-257.
 
[16]  Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis? An experimental study on ESL relativization, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 541-577.
 
[17]  Marianne Celce-Murcia (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign Language. Third Edition.
 
[18]  Brindly, G. (1994). “Task-centered assessment in language learning: The promise and the challenge’ in N. Bird, P. Falvey, A. Tsui, D. Allison, and A. McNeill (eds.): Language and learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Language in Education, Hong Kong Education Department.