Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning
ISSN (Print): ISSN Pending ISSN (Online): ISSN Pending Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/jitl Editor-in-chief: Laila S. Lomibao
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning. 2021, 1(1), 25-28
DOI: 10.12691/jitl-1-1-5
Open AccessArticle

Oral Fluency: Basis for Designing a Communicative Competence Structured Module

Charito G. Ong1, and Eunice S. Villegas1

1University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, CM Recto Avenue, Lapasan Highway, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Pub. Date: March 15, 2021

Cite this paper:
Charito G. Ong and Eunice S. Villegas. Oral Fluency: Basis for Designing a Communicative Competence Structured Module. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning. 2021; 1(1):25-28. doi: 10.12691/jitl-1-1-5

Abstract

This study analyzed and observed the oral discourse of Local Community College students. A descriptive analysis was conducted to find out the communicative competence level among the one hundred fifty randomly chosen respondents. A triangulation method was initiated to ensure the legitimacy of the gathered data. Focus Group Discussion, Classroom Observation, and Individual Interview were used to collect and validate the data gathering procedure. Results showed that one hundred five out of one hundred fifty respondents belong to the unconscious incompetence level while the remaining forty-five fall under the conscious competence level. The study concluded with the findings that the design of a communicative competence based module was necessary to develop oral fluency. The paper recommended for students to be constantly exposed to communicative activities in their classes to further develop their communication competencies.

Keywords:
communicative competence fluency module

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Sirbu, A., 2015. The significance of language as a tool of communication. Scientific Bulletin" Mircea cel Batran" Naval Academy, 18(2), p.405.
 
[2]  Ong, C. G. (2017). Digital Story Creation: Its Impact towards Academic Performance. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
 
[3]  Ella, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (2013). Rote or Rule? Exploring the Role of Formulaic Language in Classroom ForeignLanguage Learning. Language Learning.
 
[4]  Oberg, K. (2013). Formulaic Sequences for Improving Oral Fluency [University of Wisconsin-River Falls]. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/65364/KristopherOberg.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
 
[5]  Tuan, A., & Syder, F. H. (2017). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Language and Communication. A case study. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics.
 
[6]  McGuire, M. and Larson-Hall, J., 2017. Teaching formulaic sequences in the classroom: Effects on spoken fluency. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), pp.1-25.
 
[7]  Rossiter, M.J., 2009. Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), pp.395-412.
 
[8]  Krashen, S., 1994. The input hypothesis and its rivals. Implicit and explicit learning of languages, pp.45-77.
 
[9]  Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language in Computer-supported Communication: Theory Meets Reality. Language Awareness.
 
[10]  Creswell, J.W., 2009. Mapping the field of mixed methods research.
 
[11]  Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P. and Borg, W.R., 2007. In Burvikovs AE. Educational Research: An Introduction (Eighth ed. ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson Publishing Allyn and Bacon.
 
[12]  Krueger, P., Brazil, K., Lohfeld, L., Edward, H.G., Lewis, D. and Tjam, E., 2002. Organization specific predictors of job satisfaction: findings from a Canadian multi-site quality of work life cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Services Research, 2(1), pp.1-8. Vancouver.
 
[13]  Coopman S.J. & J. Lull 2008. Public Speaking: the Evolving Art. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
 
[14]  Hennink M.M. (2017) Cross-Cultural Focus Group Discussions. In: Barbour R., Morgan D. (eds) A New Era in Focus Group Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
 
[15]  Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-606.
 
[16]  Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis.
 
[17]  Owen, H., 2011. Skilled Interpersonal Interaction: Research, Theory, and Practice, London. England: Routledge.