Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics
ISSN (Print): 2373-6690 ISSN (Online): 2373-6704 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/jgg Editor-in-chief: Maria TSAKIRI
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics. 2016, 4(2), 29-35
DOI: 10.12691/jgg-4-2-2
Open AccessArticle

The Application of VIKOR Model on the Measurement and Ranking of Geo-morph Sites in the Geo-tourism Areas of Damavand

Saeedeh Fakhari1 and Azam Ali khademi2,

1Assistant Professor of Geomorphology, Department of Geography Sciences, Kharazmi University

2MA in English, Azad university central Tehran branch

Pub. Date: April 05, 2016

Cite this paper:
Saeedeh Fakhari and Azam Ali khademi. The Application of VIKOR Model on the Measurement and Ranking of Geo-morph Sites in the Geo-tourism Areas of Damavand. Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics. 2016; 4(2):29-35. doi: 10.12691/jgg-4-2-2

Abstract

The researchers examine the application of VIKOR model on the measurement and rank of geo-morph sites in the tourism areas of Damavand. Thus, the main objective of the study is: to determine the best geo-morph site with the help of criteria’s and indicators. The researchers selected VIKOR models and relevant analytical methods in order to rank 30 studied geo-morph site in tourism areas. 12 geo-morph sites were selected based on restrictions that the researchers determined According to these models, the value of Q represented the final ranking of each site from the total 6 main indicators and 41 sub indicators. This value is between zero and one. If the value is near one, it is desirable and if it is near zero, it is undesirable. The findings of the study reveal Lar plain, Mosha plain, and Damavand volcano have the highest value of Q and Shebli tower, Ski result, and Central mosque have the lowest value of Q among sites. According to the highest and the lowest value of Q, the area can be ranked and divided in to 4 groups; poor, fair, good, and great.

Keywords:
Geo-tourism area VIKOR model Geo-morph site Damavand

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 2

References:

[1]  Comanescu, L., & Dobre, R. (2009). Inventorying evaluating and tourism valuating the geomorphosites from the central sector of the Cealhau National park. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 1(3), 86-96.
 
[2]  Fattahi, A. Amiri, N. (2014). Assess and prioritize social stability in rural areas Delfan city with using of VIKOR decision model (Case Study: Rural North Khave), Journal of Regional Planning, third year,No 11.pp65-78.
 
[3]  Heggie, Travis W., 2009. Geotourism and volcanoes: Health hazards facing tourists at volcanic and geothermal destinations Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 7, 257e261.
 
[4]  Kang, K., & Park, Y. (2014). Review-based measurement of customer satisfaction in mobile service: Sentiment analysis and VIKOR approach. Expert Systems with Applications,41(4), 1041-1050.
 
[5]  Nekouie Sadry, B. (2009). “Fundamentals of Geotourism: with a special emphasis on Iran”, Samt Organization publishers, Tehran.220p.
 
[6]  Opricovic, S. (2011). Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning.
 
[7]  Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12983-12990.
 
[8]  Panizza, M., Piacente 1993. Geomorphological assets evaluation. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 87. Stuttgart.
 
[9]  Pralong, J.P. 2005: A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie:relief, processus, environnement 3. Paris.
 
[10]  Reynard, E., Fontana, G., Kozlik, L., Scapozza, C. 2007: A method for assessing »scientific« and »additional values« of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica 62-3. Lausanne.
 
[11]  Yazdani,M, R. Graeml,F.(2014), VIKOR and its Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey, nternational Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, 5(2), 56-83, April-June 2014.Volume 5, Issue 2. Copyright © 2014. 28 pages.