Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics
ISSN (Print): 2373-6690 ISSN (Online): 2373-6704 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/jgg Editor-in-chief: Maria TSAKIRI
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics. 2015, 3(4), 88-95
DOI: 10.12691/jgg-3-4-1
Open AccessArticle

Determination of the best-fit Tropospheric Delay Model on the Nigerian Permanent GNSS Network

Dodo Joseph Danasabe1, , Ojigi Lazarus Mustapha2 and Tsebeje Samuel Yabayanze1

1Space Geodesy and Systems Division, Centre for Geodesy and Geodynamics, Toro, Nigeria

2Mission Planning, IT and Data Management, National Space Research and Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria

Pub. Date: August 09, 2015

Cite this paper:
Dodo Joseph Danasabe, Ojigi Lazarus Mustapha and Tsebeje Samuel Yabayanze. Determination of the best-fit Tropospheric Delay Model on the Nigerian Permanent GNSS Network. Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics. 2015; 3(4):88-95. doi: 10.12691/jgg-3-4-1

Abstract

The Federal Government of Nigeria through the Office of the Surveyor General of the Federation (OSGoF) set up surveying infrastructure throughout the country known as the NIGerian Reference GNSS NETwork (NIGNET). The NIGNET is a network of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) set up at different locations in Nigeria for surveying and mapping. They are satellite tracking stations operating 24 hours a day providing positional solutions. As signals from the satellite pass through the different layers of the atmosphere (ionosphere and troposphere), they are refracted thus, causing delay on the arrival of the signal, which in-turns affect positioning in the horizontal and height component. The most dominant spatially correlated bias is the tropospheric effect on the GNSS satellite signals. Several global tropospheric delay models are in use by different countries to mitigate the biases cause by the troposphere. This study therefore aim to determine the best-fit tropospheric delay model for the NIGerian GNSS Reference NET work (NIGNET) using data collected from the NIGNET stations across Nigeria. Three different global tropospheric models, namely; the Saastamoinen model, Hopfield model and Niell models were used, and results compared. Four processing strategies were adopted. The first strategy was without the application of any of the models, while in the second, third and fourth strategies, the GNSS data were processed with the application of each of the models. The results indicate that, the Niell model has the lowest mean zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) of 2.330m with root mean square error (rmse) of 0.45m, while the Hopfield and Saastamoinen models have ZTD of 2.386m and 2.398m with rmse value of 0.60m and 0.71m respectively. On the overall, the Niell model has better performance in the network. This suggests that, the application of Niell model in the processing of all GNSS data will give a more reliable result in the position domain as well as the height component. The results are very useful to surveyors and geodesist engaged in surveying and mapping, and spatial positioning of infrastructures. It will enhance the effectiveness and reliability of the tropospheric delay resolution process for regional Global Positioning System (GPS) network users.

Keywords:
tropospheric delay Hopfield model Saastamoinen model Niell model NIGNET

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Ahn, Y. W., Lachapelle, G., Skone, S. and Sahm, S. “Analysis of GPS RTK Performance using External NOAA Tropospheric Corrections Integrated with a Multiple Reference Station Approach”, GPS Solution, 10, 171-186. 2006.
 
[2]  Bingley, R, GNSS Principles and Observables, Nottingham, IESSG, University of Nottingham UK, M.Sc. Lecture Monograph. 2004.
 
[3]  Dodo, J. D., and Kamarudin, M. N. “Investigation on the Impact of Tropospheric Models on baseline precision in a local GPS network: Case of the Malaysian RTKnet”, Journal of Geomatics 2 (1) 137-142. 2008.
 
[4]  Don, K., Sunil, B., Langley, R. B., Dare, P. “Performance of Long-Baseline real-Time Kinematic Applications by Improving Tropospheric Delay Modelling”, ION GNSS International Technical Meeting of the satellite Division. Long Beach, California, USA. 2004.
 
[5]  Guochang, X,GPS Theory, Algorithms and Application, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York. 2003.
 
[6]  Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H. and Collins, J,GPS, Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag Wien, New York. 2001.
 
[7]  Hopfield, H. S, “Two Quartic Tropospheric Refractivity Profile for Correcting Satellite Data”. Journal of Geophysical Research 74(18), 4487-4499.1969.
 
[8]  Jatau, B., Fernandes, R.M.S., Adebomehin, A., and Goncalves, N “NIGNET-The New Permanent GNSS Network of Nigeria”, FIG Congress 2010 Facing the Challenges – Building the Capacity Sydney, Australia, 11-16 April 2010.
 
[9]  Leick, A, GPS Satellite Surveying, USA: John Willey & Sons, Inc, 2004.
 
[10]  Niell, A.E, “Global Mapping for the Atmospheric Delay at Radio Wavelenghts”,Journal of Geophysical Research 111 (B2), 3227-3246.1996.
 
[11]  Roberts, C., and Rizos, C, “Mitigating Differential Troposphere for GPS-based Valcano Monitoring”, 5th International Symposium on Satellite Navigation Technology and Applications. Canberra, Australia. 2001.
 
[12]  Rizos, C, “Network RTK Research and Implementation - A Geodetic Perspective”. Journal of Global Positioning System, 1(2), 144-150.2002.
 
[13]  Saastamoinen, J, “Atmospheric Correction for Troposphere and Stratosphere in Radio Ranging of Satellites”,Geophysical Monograph, American Geophysical Union, Washington D.C. 247-252. 1972.
 
[14]  Saastamoinen, J, “Contribution to the theory of Atmosphere Refraction”,Bulletin of Geodesique (105,106,107): 279-298, 383-397, 13-34. 1973.
 
[15]  Satirapod, C., and Chalermwattanachai, P, “Impact of Different Tropospheric Models on GPS Baseline Accuracy: Case Study in Thailand”, Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 4(1-2), 36-40.2005.
 
[16]  Sickel, V., J, GPS for Land Surveyors, Taylor and Francis 3rd, Edition Florida, United State of America, 2008.
 
[17]  Vollath, U., Buecherl, A., Landau, H., Pagels, C. and Wagner, B, “Multi-Base RTK Positioning Using Virtual Reference Stations”,Institute of Navigation, ION GPS-2000, Salt Lake City, 22-19 September, 123-131.2000.
 
[18]  “Ocean Tide Loading” Available: http://www.oso.cha. [AccessedSept. 20, 2009].
 
[19]  “The Earth Orientation Parameters and the Ionosphere models” Available: http://www.bernese.unnibe.ch/ [Accessed: Sept. 21, 2009].
 
[20]  Péter, B. “The evaluation of troposphere models applied in the Hungarian Active GNSS Network” The Council of European Geodetic Surveyors 2012.
 
[21]  Tajul, A. M., Lim, S., Yan, T. and Rizos, C. “Mitigation of Distance-Dependent Errors for GPS Network Positioning”. International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Society IGNSS Symposium, Surfers Paradise, Australia.
 
[22]  Randy Russel, “The Toposphere, Window to the Universe”. [http://www.windows2universe.org/earth/Atmosphere/troposphere.html] , 2010. Last accessed 23/10/2012.