Journal of Finance and Economics
ISSN (Print): 2328-7284 ISSN (Online): 2328-7276 Website: Editor-in-chief: Suman Banerjee
Open Access
Journal Browser
Journal of Finance and Economics. 2018, 6(6), 223-227
DOI: 10.12691/jfe-6-6-3
Open AccessReview Article

Review of Chinese Patent Value Evaluation Methods

Yanli Zhu1, 2, , Wei Xu1 and Jiawen Zhao1

1Business School, Institute of Industrial Economics, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, China

2Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Statistics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China

Pub. Date: December 06, 2018

Cite this paper:
Yanli Zhu, Wei Xu and Jiawen Zhao. Review of Chinese Patent Value Evaluation Methods. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2018; 6(6):223-227. doi: 10.12691/jfe-6-6-3


With the development of era, Chinese government pays increasingly more attention to the improvement of innovation ability. Under the guidance of the government, the number of patents in China has exploded in recent years. However, the increase of the patents number does not necessarily imply the improvement of the value. Many scholars focus on the evaluation of patent value. This paper provides a review of Chinese patent value evaluation methods including the traditional and emerging approaches as well as other modern mainstream methods. Some suggestions are further proposed.

patent value traditional approach emerging approaches patent value model

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Hu Q; Zheng X.Q. (2009). Application of cost method in assessing the value of invisible assets [J]. Finance and accounting communications, 10, 112-113.
[2]  Chen S.Z. (2004). The study of assessment method of invisible asset [J]. Journal of central university of finance and economics, 8, 77-80.
[3]  Liu Q (2014). Study on the value evaluation of the patent assets in China [D]. North China electric power university, 30-46.
[4]  Wan X.L.; Zhu X.Z (2008). The indicator system and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of patent value [J]. Science research management, 2, 185-191.
[5]  Liu Y.H (2016). Review and comment on the research related to the analysis of the economic value of patent right [J]. Science and technology management research, 2, 149-161.
[6]  Xie P; Wang X.H.; Lu Z.P. (2015). Evaluation methods of enterprise patent value and an empirical analysis [J]. Journal of intelligence, 2, 93-98.
[7]  Zheng S.L.; Song M.S (2012). Review on the determinants of patent value: an integrate framework [J]. Studies in science of science, 9, 1316-1323.
[8]  He Y.D.; Fan W; Yu J; Wang Y; Yu X.Z. (2017). Technology innovation information research based on patent life cycle [J]. Journal of intelligence, 7, 73-77.
[9]  Li M; Chen X.D.; Song S (2016). Research on the evolution of China‚Äôs patent quality based on the duration time of patent [J]. Science of science and management of science and technology, 9, 26-36.
[10]  Bessen J (2008). The Value of US Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics [J]. Research Policy, 5, 932-945.
[11]  Zhang G.P.; Chen X.D. (2012). A comparison of patent values between corporations and research institutes based on patent renewal period [J]. China economic quarterly, 4, 1403-1426.
[12]  Zhang G.P.; Chen X.D. (2013). The patent value based on renewal periods: a model reconstruction with the hypothesis of exponentially distributed return [J]. Journal of industrial engineering/Engineering management, 4, 142-148.
[13]  Pan J; Li Y; Chen X.C. (2007). Research on enterprise patent strategy selection methods based on patent value classification model [J]. Enterprise demonstration, 3, 47-50.