Journal of Finance and Accounting
ISSN (Print): 2333-8849 ISSN (Online): 2333-8857 Website: Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2017, 5(1), 19-30
DOI: 10.12691/jfa-5-1-4
Open AccessArticle

IFRS Adoption and Capital Markets

Elkana K. Kimeli1,

1Department of Business Management, Maasai Mara University, Narok, Kenya

Pub. Date: March 15, 2017

Cite this paper:
Elkana K. Kimeli. IFRS Adoption and Capital Markets. Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2017; 5(1):19-30. doi: 10.12691/jfa-5-1-4


The need to deregulate financial markets has created a unified goal geared towards having uniform standards of accounting in order to help in the smooth flow of capital across economies and across the various global capital markets. Through a review of relevant literature, the study aimed at studying the theories related to financial disclosure, analyze to, by a review of literature, review the various theories related to financial disclosure, critically analyze various empirical studies on the IFRS adoption effects on the functioning and operations of capital markets, identify knowledge gaps and point out areas of further studies on IFRS and capital markets. The review observed significant efforts geared towards the harmonization of the standards of accounting globally as evidenced by the many countries which have since adopted and incorporated IFRS in their regulatory reporting requirements. Further, while IFRS adoption was expected to result in accounting reporting quality improvements and other capital market benefits, the benefits have not been realized uniformly throughout the globe, this is due to factors inherent in firms, cultural, economic and political variations among different nations. From the review it was noted that majority of the studies reviewed were mainly drawn from the developed nations, that is, European Union, United States and other developed countries fewer studies are available for developing countries like Kenya. The studies indicate mixed results as to the benefits of IFRS adoption which can be attributable to the political, economic and legal differences among nations. The review further noted that the studies reviewed did not consider the effects of other variables such as political, institutional, legal, firm specific and macroeconomic factors despite the fact that they are likely to affect IFRS adoption, contributing to varied results across nations. Majority of the studies reviewed used regression analysis, however, the test to ascertain the robustness of the regression models like linearity; multicollinearity; normality and heteroscedasticity were not performed casting doubts on the reliability of the models used. The findings of the review indicate tremendous benefits arising from IFRS adoption to capital markets, this include, enhance liquidity of markets, higher following by analysts, minimized information asymmetry, lower costs of capital, increase of cross listings by firms, improved foreign holdings and higher turnover of capital markets. At formulation of IFRS by IASB there were expectations of enhanced usefulness of accounting reports to capital markets, attainment of this objective however, is dependent on the legal and institutional framework related to financial disclosures which when weak, the achievement of this objective may not be guaranteed. As a result the IASB should have in place measures to ensure nations having weak enforcement of laws are assisted to improve IFRS enforcement so as to reap maximum benefits of IFRS adoption benefits. Further, nations should include IFRS into their laws in order to make it mandatory for firms to adopt IFRS. In conclusion, more country and region specific studies should be conducted in order to analyze the unique variation across countries in relation to IFRS adoption benefits.

IFRS liquidity comparability cross listing integration

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  King’wara, R. A. (2015). Effect of IFRS Adoption on Reporting Quality in Kenya. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 17 (1), 82-84.
[2]  Ames, D. (2013). IFRS adoption and accounting quality: The case of South Africa. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 3(3), 154-165.
[3]  Soderstrom, N. S., & Sun, K. J. (2007). IFRS adoption and accounting quality: a review. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 675-702.
[4]  Qu, W., Fong, M., & Oliver, J. (2012). Does IFRS convergence improve quality of accounting information?–Evidence from the Chinese stock market. Corporate Ownership and Control, 9(4), 187-196.
[5]  IFRS Foundation. (2013, November 29). IFRS Application Around the World Jurisdictional Profile: Kenya. London, United Kingdom. Retrieved April 22, 2016, from
[6]  Pacter, P. (2015). IFRS as Global Standards: A Pocket Guide. London: International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation.
[7]  IASB. (2010, september). Conceptual Framework of Accounting. London, United Kingdom: International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation. Retrieved March 2nd, 2016, from
[8]  Houqe, N., & Easton, S. (2013). Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve Information Quality in Low Investor Protection Countries? Evidence from France, Sweden and Switzerland. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation (Forthcoming). Retrieved from
[9]  Clarkson, P., Hanna, J., Richardson, G., & Thompson, R. (2011). The Impact of IFRS Adoption on Value Relevance of Book Value and Earnings. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 7(1), 1-17.
[10]  Chen, H., Tang, Q., Jiang, Y., & Lin, Z. (2010). The role of international financial reporting standards in accounting quality: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 21(3), 220-278.
[11]  Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467-498.
[12]  Bartov, E., Goldberg, S., and Kim, M. (2005), Comparative value relevance among German, U.S., and international accounting standards: A German stock market perspective, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 20(2), 95-119.
[13]  Brüggemann, U., Hitz, J.-M., & Sellhorn, T. (2013). Intended and unintended consequences of mandatory IFRS adoption: A review of extant evidence and suggestions for future research. European Accounting Review, 22(1), 1-37.
[14]  Brochet, F., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Riedl, E. J. (2013). Mandatory IFRS adoption and financial statement comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1373-1400.
[15]  Bova, F., & Pereira, R. (2012). The determinants and consequences of heterogeneous IFRS compliance levels following mandatory IFRS adoption: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1), 83-111.
[16]  Outa, E. R. (2011). The Impact of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Adoption on The Accounting Quality of Listed Companies In Kenya. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 1(1), 212-241.
[17]  Ahmed, K., Chalmers, K., & Khlif, H. (2013). A Meta-analysis of IFRS Adoption Effects. The International Journal of Accounting, 48(2), 173-217.
[18]  Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, Information Costs and Economic Organisation. American Economic Review, 62, 772-795.
[19]  Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, H. W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
[20]  Clark, T. (2004). Theories of Corporate Governance: The Philosophical Foundations of Corporate Governance. London: Routledge.
[21]  Jensen, M. C., & Smith Jr., C. W. (2000). Stockholder, manager and creditor interests: applications of agency theory. In E. I. Altman, & M. G. Subrahmanyam, Recent advances in corporate finance. Harvard University Press.
[22]  Hooper D.U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J.J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Neem, S., Schimid, B., Setala, H., Symstad, A. J., Vandermeer, J., and Wardle, D.A., (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 7, 3-35.
[23]  Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organisations. New York: Random House.
[24]  Burney, J., & Ouchi, W. (1986). Organizational economics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[25]  Akerlof, G. A. (1970, August). The Market for Lemons: Quarterly Uncertainity and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
[26]  Mwangi, L., Makau, M., & Kosimbei, G. (2014). The Relationship between Capital Structure and Performance of Non-financial Companies listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. Global Journal of Contemporary Research in Accounting, Auditing and Business Ethics, 1(2), 72-90.
[27]  Yu, G. (2010). Accounting standards and international portfolio holdings: Analysis of cross-border holdings following mandatory adoption of IFRS. Unpublished Paper, Harvard University. Retrieved from
[28]  Kaymaz, Ö., & Karaibrahimoglu, Y. Z. (2011). Early Observations on the Quality of IFRS Reports: Evidence from Turkey. Global Journal of Business Research, 5(3), 27-40.
[29]  Horton, J., Serafeim, G., & Serafeim, I. (2013). Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve the Information Environment? Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 388-423.
[30]  Tarca, A. (2012). The case for global accounting standards: Arguments and evidence. Available at SSRN 2204889. Retrieved from
[31]  Okoye, P. V. C., Okoye, J., F. N., & Ezejiofor, R. A. (2014). Impact of the IFRS Adoption on Stock Market Movement in Nigerian Corporate Organization. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(9).
[32]  Beuselinck, C., Joos, P., Khurana, I. K., & Van der Meulen, S. (2009). Mandatory IFRS reporting and stock price informativeness. Available at SSRN 1381242. Retrieved from
[33]  Landsman, W. R., Maydew, E. L., & Thornock, J. R. (2012). The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1), 34-54.
[34]  Alnodel, A. (2014). The effect of the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards on capital markets integration in the Gulf cooperation council countries. Journal of International Accounting Research Conference. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
[35]  Cai, F., & Wong, H. (2010). The effect of IFRS adoption on global market integration. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 9(10). Retrieved from
[36]  Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2013). Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in the Economic Consequences Around IAS/IFRS Adoptions: Adopting a Label. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3), 495-547.
[37]  Drake, M. S., Myers, L. A., & Yao, L. (2010). Are Liquidity Improvements Around the Mandatory Adoption of IFRS Attributable to Comparability Effects or to Quality Effects? AAA. Retrieved from
[38]  Brüggemann, U. (2011). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on cross-border equity investments of individual investors. In Essays on the economic consequences of mandatory IFRS reporting around the world (pp. 45-82).
[39]  Chen, L., Ng, J., & Tsang, A. (2015, July). The Effect of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on International Cross-listings. The Accounting Review, 1395-1435.
[40]  Hong, H. A., Hung, M., & Lobo, G. J. (2014). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on IPOs in global capital markets. The Accounting Review, 89(4), 1365-1397.
[41]  Francis, J. R., Huang, S. X., & Khurana, I. K. (2015). The Role of Similar Accounting Standards In Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions. Contemporary Accounting Research.
[42]  Florou, A., & Pope, P. F. (2012). Mandatory IFRS adoption and institutional investment decisions. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1993-2025.
[43]  Lourenço, I. M. E. C., & Branco, M. E. M. de A. D. (2015). Main Consequences of IFRS Adoption: Analysis of Existing Literature and Suggestions for Further Research. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 26(68), 126-139.
[44]  Bae, K., Tan, H., & Welker, M. (2008). International GAAP Differences: The Impact of Foreign Analysts. The Acccounting Review, 83(3), 593-628.
[45]  DeFond, M., Hu, X., Hung, M., & Li, S. (2011). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 240-258.
[46]  Yip, R. W., & Young, D. (2012). Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve information comparability? The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1767-1789.
[47]  Cascino, S., & Gassen, J. (2011, December). Comparability Effects of Mandatory IFRS Adoption. Discussion Paper. Retrieved April 22, 2016.
[48]  Procházka, D., & Pelák, J. (2015). The Development of Capital Markets of New EU Countries in the IFRS Era. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 116-126.
[49]  Guggiola, G. (2010). IFRS adoption in the EU, accounting harmonization and markets efficiency: A review1. The International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(12), 99.
[50]  Li, F., & Shroff, N. (2010). Financial reporting quality and economic growth. Available at SSRN 1265331. Retrieved from
[51]  Berry, A., & Robertson, D. (2006). Overseas bankers in the UK and their use of information for making lending decisions: changes from 1985. The British Accounting Review, 38(2), 175.
[52]  Mardini, G. H. (2012). The Impact of IFRS 8 on segemental reporting by Jordanian listed companies an analysis of disclosure practices and some stakeholders perceptions. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Dundee.
[53]  Edwards, J. R. (1989). A history of Financial Accounting (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
[54]  Glauitier, M., & Underdown, B. (2001). Accounting theory and practice (7th ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.
[55]  Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1997). The materiality of environmental information to users of accrual reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10(4), 562-583.
[56]  Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and Accountability. London: Prentice Hall.
[57]  Sterling, R. R. (1970). On theory construction and verification. The Accounting Review, 45(3), 444-457.
[58]  Kieso, D. E., Waygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2009). Intermediate Accounting (15th ed.). New York: Wiley Publications.
[59]  Al-khouri, R., & Balgasem, M. (2006). The effect of timing of financial statement disclosure on stock prices and trading volumes. An empirical study of Amman Stock Exchange. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 2(2), 163-186.
[60]  Bebbington, J., Gray, R., Hibbit, C., & Kirk, E. (2001). Full cost accounting: An agenda for action. ACCA report. 73, London.
[61]  Deegan, C. (2000). Financial Accouting Theory. Sydney: McGraw Hill.
[62]  Beattie, V. (2005). Moving the accounting research front forward: the UK contribution. Accounting Forum, 205-236.
[63]  Hitz, J. M. (2007). The Decision Usefulness of fair value accounting: a theoretical perspective. European Accounting Review, 2, 323-362.
[64]  Mathews, M. R., & Perera, M. H. (1996). Accounting Theory and Development (3rd ed.). Sydney: Thomas Nelson.
[65]  IASB. (2008). Exposure Draft on an Improved Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: The Objective of Financial Reporting and Qualitative Characteristics of Decision . London.
[66]  Kribat, M. (2009). Financial disclosure practices in developing countries: evidence from Libyan banking sector. Unpublished PhD thesis, school of accounting and finance. University of Dundee.
[67]  Funningham, G. D. (2010). The impact of introduction of IFRS on corporate annual reports and accounts in the UK. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Accounting and Finance. University of Dundee.
[68]  Staubus, G. (2000). The Decision Usefulness Theory of Accounting: A limited history. New York: Garland Publishing.
[69]  Armstrong, M. S. (1977). The Politics of Establishing Accounting Standards. Journal of Accountancy, 143, 2-76.
[70]  Dey, C. (1999). Social Accounting and Accountabillity: Ethnography, book keeping and the critical project. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Accounting and Finance, University of Dundee.
[71]  Freeman, R. (1984). Stretegic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
[72]  Cragg, W. (2002). Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 113-142.
[73]  Smallman, C. (2004). Exploring Theoretical Paradigm in Corporate Governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(1), 78-94.
[74]  Deegan, C. (2004). Financial Accounting Theory. New South Wales: McGraw-Hill Audtralia Pty Ltd.
[75]  Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1978, January). Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review, 53, 112-134.
[76]  Belkaoui, A. (1992) 3th edition, Accounting Theory. London: Dryden Press.
[77]  Deegan, C., & Unerman, J. (2006). Financial Accounting Theory. McGraw-Hill Education.
[78]  Healy, M. P. (1985). Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 85-107.
[79]  Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. The Accounting Review, 66(1), 131-156.
[80]  Sweeney, A. P. (1994). Debt-Covenant Violations and Managers Accounting Responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(3), 281-308.
[81]  Jones, J. (1991). Earnings Management during Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 193-228.
[82]  Qurashi, M. K., & Islam, M. S. (2014). The Adoption of IAS/IFRS in a Developing Country - A Case of Bangladesh. ELK Asia Pacific Journal of Finance and Risk Management, 5(3).
[83]  Tyrall, D., Woodward, D., & Rakhimbekova, A. (2007). The Relevance of International Financial Reporting Standards to a Developing Country: Evidence from Kazakhstan. The International Journal of Accounting, 42, 82-110.
[84]  Lin, S. (2012). Discussion of the Determinants consequences of Heteregenous IFRS Compliance Levels Following Mandatory Adoption: Evidence from a Developing Country. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1), 113-118.