Journal of Finance and Accounting
ISSN (Print): 2333-8849 ISSN (Online): 2333-8857 Website: http://www.sciepub.com/journal/jfa Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2014, 2(4), 100-114
DOI: 10.12691/jfa-2-4-3
Open AccessArticle

Auditing Practices and Organizational Efficiency in Local Government Authorities: A Case Study of Tanzania

Mwamini Madhehebi Tulli1,

1Department of Accounting, The Institute of Finance Management, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, East Africa

Pub. Date: September 10, 2014

Cite this paper:
Mwamini Madhehebi Tulli. Auditing Practices and Organizational Efficiency in Local Government Authorities: A Case Study of Tanzania. Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2014; 2(4):100-114. doi: 10.12691/jfa-2-4-3

Abstract

The study investigated and adds to our understanding of auditing practices and their contributions towards organizational efficiency in the context of Local Government Authorities (LGAs) in emerging and less developed countries. The research explored the manner and extent to which auditing practices interact in a multiple stakeholder scenario. The research was conducted in four local government authorities in Tanzania. The findings of this research revealed that there was a Wrestling for internal efficiency in the LGAs. Wrestling for internal efficiency is a product of the perceived dream of having LGAs which are efficient, effective, transparent and accountable. Despite a persistent decline in the performance of the LGAs, various LGAs’ actors believed that effective LGAs could be attained if the internal actors in LGAs played their parts effectively and efficiently. The study contributes to the existing debate posed by Power (1994) about whether audits can deliver what they promise in the form of greater accountability, efficiency or quality, or whether they, in fact, fuel the problems? In addition, the study provides practical evidence about how auditing can be used as an instrument to foster organizational efficiency. From the substantive theory of wrestling for internal efficiency, it was observed that auditing has a substantial role to play in achieving organizational efficiency. For example, the research uncovered that audit has increased interactions among actors, through participatory audits and the use of audit reports by various stakeholders. It was also revealed that in the LGAs, auditing was found to be a catalyst for a number of reforms and measures introduced by the Central Government, including migrating to the use of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs) and the appointment of an Internal Auditor General in Tanzania. Furthermore, the external overseeing bodies, particularly the Local Authorities Accounting Committee (LAAC) and the External Auditor, emerged as the most useful overseeing bodies to make the LGAs’ actors perform. The close relationship between the LAAC’s and the External Auditor’s functions were found to increase Executives’ accountability in the LGAs.

Keywords:
auditing practices organizational efficiency auditing contributions. local government authorities accountability

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Abdul-Rahman, A. and Goddard, A. (1998) An interpretive inquiry of accounting practices in religious organizations, Financial Accountability and Management, 14 (3): 183-201.
 
[2]  Alam, Q. and Pacher, J. (2000) Impact of compulsory competitive tendering on the structure and performance of local government systems in the state of Victoria, Public Administration and Development, 20: 359-371.
 
[3]  Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W and Weller, P. (2003) Traditions of governance: interpreting the changing role of the public sector, Public Administration, 81 (1): 1-17.
 
[4]  Bowerman, M., Humphrey, C. and Owen, D. (2003) Struggling for supremacy: the case of UK public audit institutions, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14 (1/2): 1-22.
 
[5]  Boyne, G., Gould-Williams, J., Law, J., and Walker, R. (2002) Plans, performance information and accountability: The case of best value, Public Administration, 80 (4): 691-710.
 
[6]  Broadbent, J. and Guthrie, J. (1992) Changes in the public sector: A review of recent alternative, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 5 (2): 3-31.
 
[7]  Charmaz, K. (2006), Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
 
[8]  Common R. (1999) Accounting for Administrative Change in Three Asia-Pacific Statetes: The Utility of Policy Transfer Analysis, Public Management 1(3): 429-438.
 
[9]  Controller and Auditor General (2008) Improving audit and accountability in Tanzania, Conference paper.
 
[10]  Cooper, D. and Robinson, K. (2006) Accounting professions and regulations: locating the sites of professionalization, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4/5):415-444.
 
[11]  English, L. and Guthrie, J. (1991) Public Sector Auditing: A Case of Contested Accountability Regimes, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 50 No. 3, 547-560.
 
[12]  English, L. (2003) Emasculating public accountability in the name of competition: Transformation of state audit in Victoria, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14 (1/2): 51-76.
 
[13]  Everett, J. (2003) The politics of comprehensive auditing in fields of high outcome and cause uncertainty, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14 (1/2): 77-104.
 
[14]  Funnel, W. (2003) Enduring fundamentals: constitutional accountability and auditors-General in the reluctant state, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14 (1/2): 107-132.
 
[15]  Gasper, A.F. (2006) Accounting, Accountability and Governance in Local Government in Tanzania: A Grounded Theory.
 
[16]  Gendron, Y., Cooper, D.J. and Townley, B. (2001) In the name of accountability-state auditing, independence and new public management, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 14 (3): 278-310.
 
[17]  Gill, J. and Johnson, P. (1997) Research methods for managers, Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd, London.
 
[18]  Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
 
[19]  Goddard, A and Powell, A. (1994) Accountability and Accounting: Using Naturalistic Methodology to enhance organizational control, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 7 (2): 50-69.
 
[20]  Gregory, R. and Hicks, C. (1999) Promoting public service integrity: A case for responsible accountability, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58 (4): 3-15.
 
[21]  Guthrie, J., Olson, O. and Humphrey, C. (1999) Debating developments in new public financial management: The limits of global theorising and some new ways forward, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 15 (3/4): 209-228.
 
[22]  Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (2004) Diversity and AAAJ: Interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting, auditing and accountability, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 17 (1): 7-16.
 
[23]  Hood, C. (1995) The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme, Accounting, Organization and Society, 20 (2/3): 93-109.
 
[24]  Hoque, M. and Moll, J. (2001) Public sector reform-Implications for accounting accountability and performance of state-owned entities –an Australian perspectives, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14 (4): 304-326.
 
[25]  Humphrey C. (1997), Debating audit expectations, “Debating audit expectations”, in Sherer, M. and Turley, W. S. (Eds), Current Issues in Auditing, 3rd Edition., Paul Chapman Publishing London, pp. 3-30.
 
[26]  Humphrey C. (2007), Auditing research: a review across the disciplinary divide, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21(2): 170-203.
 
[27]  Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA) (1999) Accountability 1000 (AA1000), Framework: Standard, Guidelines and Professional Qualification (London: ISEA).
 
[28]  Kaplan S. E. and Lord A. T. (2001) An examination of the effects of accountability when auditors are uncertain about the views of superior partners, International journal of auditing, 5: 141-155.
 
[29]  Kothari, C. R. (2004), Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, (Second Edition), New Age International Publishers.
 
[30]  Locke, K. (2001), Grounded Theory in Management Research, Sage Publications, London.
 
[31]  Mayston, D.J. (1993) Principals, agents and the economics of accountability in new public sector, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 6 (3): 68-96.
 
[32]  Mulgan, R. (2000) Accountability: an ever-expanding concept, Public Administration, 78 (3): 555-573.
 
[33]  Nelson, M. W. (2005), A review of experimental and archival conflicts-of-interest, in Moore, D. A., Cain, D. M., Ng A. Y. (2002) Public accountability and Performance Auditing in Government, International Journal of Auditing 6: 109-118
 
[34]  Nyman, C., Nilsson, F. and Rapp, B. (2005), Accountability in local government: a principal–agent perspective, Journal of Human Resources, Costing and Accounting, 9(2):123-137.
 
[35]  Pallot, J. (2003) A wider accountability? The audit Office and New Zealand’s bureaucratic revolution, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14 (1/2): 133-155.
 
[36]  Power M. (1997) “The Audit Society” in Hopwood, A. G. and Miller, P. (Eds), Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 299-316.
 
[37]  Power M. (2003) Auditing and the production of legitimacy, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28 No. 4, 279-94.
 
[38]  Roberts, J. and Scapens, R (1985) Accounting systems and systems of accountability-understanding accounting practices in their organizational contexts, Accounting, Organization and Society, 10 (4): 443-456.
 
[39]  Ryan, B., Scapens, R. W. and Theobald, M. (2002) Research method and methodology in Finance and Accounting, Thompson, London.
 
[40]  Salawu, R. O. and Agbeja, O. (2007) Auditing and Accountability Mechanism in Public Sector, The International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, 1(1): 45-54.
 
[41]  Silverman, D. (2001) Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook, Sage Publications.
 
[42]  Solomon, J. and Trotman, K. T., (2003), Experimental judgment and decision research in auditing: the first 25 years of AOS, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4):395-412.
 
[43]  Stewart, J. D. (1984) The role of information in public accountability. Issues in Public Sector Accounting, J.D. Stewart, A. Hopwood and C. Tomkins, Philip Allen, Oxford.
 
[44]  Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory and Techniques, SAGE, Califonia.
 
[45]  Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
 
[46]  Schwartz R. and Sulitzeanu-Kenan R. (2002) The Politics of Accountability: Institutionalising Internal Audititng in Israel, Financial Accounting & Management, 18(3), 211-231.
 
[47]  TerBogt, H. and van Helden, G. (2000), Management control and performance measurement in Dutch local government, Management Accounting Research, 11(2): 263-279.
 
[48]  Tower, G., (1993), A public accountability model of accounting regulation, British Accounting Review, 25: 61-85.
 
[49]  United Republic of Tanzania (1998) Local Government Reform Programme, Policy Paper on Local Government Reform Ministry of Regional Administrative and Local Government.
 
[50]  Watkins, A. L., Hillison, W. and Morecroft, S. E., (2004), Audit quality: asynthesis of theory and empirical evidence, Journal of Accounting Literature, 23: 153-193.
 
[51]  Yandell, D. (1988), Audit information and Incentives for efficiency, American Economist, 32(1): 49-58.